Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (9): 781-785    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.09.011
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
广州市21种市售蔬菜新烟碱类杀虫剂膳食风险评估
宋韶芳, 张维蔚, 张玉华, 王燕燕, 曾锦衡, 潘心红
广州市疾病预防控制中心食源性疾病与食品安全风险监测部,广东 广州 510440
Dietary risk assessment of neonicotinoid pesticide in 21 kinds of market-sold vegetables in Guangzhou City
SONG Shaofang, ZHANG Weiwei, ZHANG Yuhua, WANG Yanyan, ZENG Jinheng, PAN Xinhong
Department of Foodborne Disease and Food Safety Surveillance, Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510440, China
全文: PDF(840 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评估广州市市售蔬菜新烟碱类杀虫剂膳食风险,为保障居民食品安全提供依据。方法 于2022年6—9月,在广州市超市和农贸市场采集21种45份蔬菜样品,采用液相色谱-质谱联用法检测10种新烟碱类杀虫剂含量;通过广州市居民食物消费与营养素摄入状况资料获取居民蔬菜消费量,计算新烟碱类杀虫剂日暴露量和非致癌风险商值,评估膳食风险。结果 45份蔬菜样品中27份检出新烟碱类杀虫剂,检出率为60.00%。10种新烟碱类杀虫剂检出6种,分别为噻虫胺、噻虫嗪、吡虫啉、啶虫脒、呋虫胺和烯啶虫胺。其中噻虫胺、噻虫嗪、吡虫啉检出率较高且个别样品超标,检出率分别为26.67%、11.11%和6.67%,超标率分别为4.44%、2.22%和2.22%。新烟碱类杀虫剂暴露量IMIRPF为3 053.00 ng/g,吡虫啉在块根块茎类蔬菜中的含量和IMIRPF最高。吡虫啉、啶虫脒、呋虫胺、噻虫胺、噻虫嗪和烯啶虫胺的人群日暴露量分别为34.58、3.85、1.20、6.87、7.19和0.86 ng/(kg·d);非致癌风险商值均<1,分别为5.76×10-4、0.55×10-4、0.06×10-4、0.69×10-4、0.90×10-4和0.02×10-4;非致癌风险商值总和<1,为7.98×10-4结论 本次调查广州市市售21种蔬菜新烟碱类杀虫剂膳食风险较低,但有个别蔬菜样品存在新烟碱类杀虫剂含量超标,应加强蔬菜市场监管。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
宋韶芳
张维蔚
张玉华
王燕燕
曾锦衡
潘心红
关键词 蔬菜新烟碱类杀虫剂风险评估    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the dietary risk of neonicotinoid insecticides in market-sold vegetables in Guangzhou City, so as to provide insights into ensuring food safety for residents. Methods Forty-five samples of 21 kinds of vegetables were collected from supermarkets and farmer's markets in Guangzhou City from June to September in 2022, and 10 kinds of neonicotinoid insecticides were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The vegetable consumption was obtained through the survey of food consumption and nutrients intake of residents in Guangzhou City. The dietary risk was evaluated by calculating daily exposure and non-carcinogenic risk quotients of neonicotinoid insecticides. Results A total of 27 samples of vegetables were detected with neonicotinoid insecticides, and the detection rate was 60.00%. Among 10 kinds of neonicotinoid insecticides, 6 kinds were identified, including clothianidin, thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, dinotefuranand and nitenpyram. The detection rates of clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid were relatively high (26.67%, 11.11% and 6.67%), and some samples exceeded the standard, with the rate of 4.44%, 2.22% and 2.22%, respectively. The total exposure of neonicotinoid pesticides (IMIRPF) was 3 053.00 ng/g, and the contents and IMIRPF of imidacloprid were the highest in roots and tubers. The daily exposure of imidacloprid, acetamiprid, dinotefuran, clothianidin, thiamethoxam and nitenpyram was 34.58, 3.85, 1.20, 6.87, 7.19 and 0.86 ng/(kg·d). Non-carcinogenic risk quotients of imidacloprid, acetamiprid, dinotefuran, clothianidin, thiamethoxam and nitenpyram was 5.76×10-4, 0.55×10-4, 0.06×10-4, 0.69×10-4, 0.90×10-4 and 0.02×10-4, respectively, which was lower than 1; and the sum of non-carcinogenic risk quotients was 7.98×10-4, which was lower than 1. Conclusions The dietary risk of neonicotinoid pesticides is low in 21 kinds of market-sold vegetables in Guangzhou City; however, the contents of neonicotinoid insecticides in some vegetable samples exceed the standard. The supervision of vegetable markets should be strengthened.
Key wordsvegetable    neonicotinoid pesticide    risk assessment
收稿日期: 2023-04-06      修回日期: 2023-08-11      出版日期: 2023-09-10
中图分类号:  R155  
基金资助:广州市科技计划项目(2023A03J0450)
作者简介: 宋韶芳,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事疾病控制工作
引用本文:   
宋韶芳, 张维蔚, 张玉华, 王燕燕, 曾锦衡, 潘心红. 广州市21种市售蔬菜新烟碱类杀虫剂膳食风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 781-785.
SONG Shaofang, ZHANG Weiwei, ZHANG Yuhua, WANG Yanyan, ZENG Jinheng, PAN Xinhong. Dietary risk assessment of neonicotinoid pesticide in 21 kinds of market-sold vegetables in Guangzhou City. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(9): 781-785.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.09.011      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I9/781
[1] 李昌兴,刘东东,高一星,等.新烟碱类杀虫剂的研究与开发进展[J].化学试剂,2023,45(3):29-36.
[2] 崔嵩,李斐,刘志琨.新烟碱类杀虫剂污染特征及其毒性效应[J].中国环境科学,2023,43(1):361-373.
[3] 马跃,毛亚萍,刘芙,等.新烟碱类杀虫剂对人类及哺乳动物的生殖毒性作用[J].沈阳医学院学报,2022,24(2):191-195.
[4] 韩明慧,方虹霁,王园平,等.新烟碱类农药污染和人体暴露及有害效应研究[J].上海预防医学,2021,33(6):534-543.
[5] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会,农业农村部,国家市场监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准食品中农药最大残留限量:GB 2763—2021[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2021:4.
[6] ZHANG Q,LU Z B,CHANG C H,et al.Dietary risk of neonicotinoid insecticides through fruit and vegetable consumption in school-age children[J].Environ Int,2019,126(2):672-681.
[7] 张玉华,李迎月,何洁仪,等.广州市居民食物消费与营养素摄入状况[J].中国公共卫生,2017,33(6):696-700.
[8] 温馨,黎小鹏,谭淑铧,等.2021年中山市种植蔬菜农药残留及膳食风险评估[J].浙江农业科学,2023,64(2):455-462.
[9] CHEN D W,ZHANG Y P,LV B,et al.Dietary exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides and health risks in the Chinese general population through two consecutive total diet studies[J/OL].Environ Int,2020,135[2023-08-11].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105399.
[10] 谭颖,张琪,赵成,等.蔬菜水果中的新烟碱类农药残留量与人群摄食暴露健康风险评价[J].生态毒理学报,2016,11(6):15-20.
[11] 黄钰婷,李敬尧,张琪,等.新烟碱类杀虫剂吡虫啉和啶虫脒对人神经母细胞瘤SK-N-SH细胞的毒性作用[J].生态毒理学报,2021,16(5):59-69.
[12] THOMPSON D A,LEHMLER H J,KOLPIN D W,et al.A critical review on the potential impacts of neonicotinoid insecticide use:current knowledge of environmental fate,toxicity,and implications for human health[J].Environ Sci Process Impacts,2020,22(6):1315-1346.
[13] YANG W,CARMICHAEL S L,ROBERTS E M,et al.Residential agricultural pesticide exposures and risk of neural tube defects and orofacial clefts among offspring in the San Joaquin Valley of California[J].Am J Epidemiol,2018,179(6):740-748.
[14] KEIL A P,DANIELS J L,HERTZ-PICCIOTTO I.Autism spectrum disorder,flea and tick medication,and adjustments for exposure misclassification:the CHARGE(Childhood Autism Risks from Genetics and Environment)case-control study[J].Environ Health,2018,13(1)[2023-08-11].https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-3.
[15] 张蕊,朱琳,李乐乐,等.气相色谱-串联质谱法(GC-MS/MS)测定大米中25种农药及其代谢物残留[J].中国粮油学报,2022,37(3):170-177.
[16] 张倩,郭学斌,刘大晶,等.2017—2019年青海省市售蔬菜,水果和茶叶中农药残留状况分析[J].医学动物防制,2022,38(4):345-353.
[1] 林天祥, 邱银伟, 汪炜, 赵艳荣, 姜学文, 杨清. 基于基本公共卫生服务项目构建中老年人群高血压风险评估模型[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 816-820.
[2] 周少磊, 刘波, 王鹏, 郑旭, 董静. 北京市通州区农村饮用水砷暴露健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 705-709.
[3] 顾永权, 王爱红, 毛荷明, 胡向前, 冷朋波, 苗超. 两家黑色金属铸造企业职业健康风险评估结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 924-927,931.
[4] 张鹏, 刘弢, 张敏, 张传会, 施长苗, 闫福. 四种职业健康风险评估方法在电子元件及组件制造企业的应用比较[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 928-931.
[5] 姚建花, 邵国健, 胡明友, 徐玲珍, 余娟. 改进的QuEChERS结合GC-MS/MS测定叶菜类蔬菜14种有机氯和拟除虫菊酯类农药残留[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 859-862.
[6] 张俊彦, 占利, 张云怡, 陈建才, 陈鸿鹄, 张政. 浙江省市售散装熟肉制品单核细胞增生李斯特菌污染的半定量风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 656-659,664.
[7] 牛勇, 张璘, 刘凯, 俞兵, 章荣平, 韩磊, 谢丽庄, 吴鹏, 叶萌. 水泥生产企业粉尘职业健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(6): 558-562,567.
[8] 刘红丽, 马青青, 卢素格, 翟志雷, 张二鹏, 张榕杰. 河南省蔬菜水果双酚S污染的居民膳食暴露风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 442-445.
[9] 徐映如, 陈道湧, 沈俊毅, 张颖琦. 虹口区市售蔬菜重金属污染与健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(4): 406-410.
[10] 王心怡, 吴晨, 缪梓萍, 孙琬琬, 余昭, 周洋, 朱瑶, 吴昊澄, 丰燕, 陈奕娟, 林君芬. 2021年3月浙江省突发公共卫生事件风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(3): 217-220.
[11] 赵毕, 周标. 中国花生及其制品黄曲霉毒素污染与风险评估研究现状[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(12): 1228-1230.
[12] 秦汝男, 唐慧晶, 李梅莉, 刘保峰, 曾强. 不同风险评估法在纸面石膏板生产企业粉尘危害评估中的应用比较[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(11): 1161-1165.
[13] 吴晓丽, 赵毕, 齐小娟, 周标. 食品中化学污染物风险评估方法研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 682-685.
[14] 宋韶芳, 陈坤才, 刘于飞, 潘心红, 张维蔚, 李燕, 黄婕, 张玉华, 钟贤武, 曾锦衡, 李美霞. 广州市市售大米镉污染及健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 723-725.
[15] 吴昊澄, 丁哲渊, 吴晨, 鲁琴宝, 李傅冬, 林君芬. 浙江省新型冠状病毒肺炎病例境外输入风险分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(6): 541-545.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed