Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2016, Vol. 28 Issue (5): 437-440    
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
食品中放射性核素137Cs基于不同检测条件的方法选择研究
曹艺耀, 宣志强, 俞顺飞, 赵尧贤, 李新星
浙江省疾病预防控制中心,浙江杭州 310051
AselectivitystudyoftheexaminationofradionuclidesCesium-137 for foodsbasedondifferentdetectionconditions
CAO Yi-yao, XUAN Zhi-qiang, YU Shun-fei, ZHAO Yao-xian, LI Xin-xing
TheCenterforDiseaseControlandPreventionofZhejiangProvince,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310051,China
全文: PDF(758 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的探讨食品中放射性核素137Cs(Cesium-137)在不同条件下检测方法的选择。方法选取秦山核电站和三门核电站周边地区及对照区域(杭州和舟山)共48份食品样品,分别采用γ能谱法和磷酸钼铵法检测137Cs,对两种方法的检测结果、探测限、检验周期、样品用量、灵敏度以及干扰因素等进行分析。结果两种方法检测样品137Cs结果值的差值均数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);γ能谱法探测限低于磷酸钼铵法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);γ能谱法一次可检测多种核素,但需用样品量大,检测周期较长;磷酸钼铵法探测限高,但化学处理步骤繁琐,容易被134Cs干扰。结论应根据检测目的和食品种类选择137Cs检测方法,在实际工作中大部分食品检测建议采用γ能谱法,而样品较难采集、出灰量较少或低含量的食品建议采用磷酸钼铵法检测。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
曹艺耀
宣志强
俞顺飞
赵尧贤
李新星
关键词 食品137Csγ能谱法;磷酸钼铵法    
Abstract:ObjectiveA selectivity study was conducted through the examination of radionuclides 137Cs (Cesium-137) for food based on different detection conditions.MethodsA total of 48 food samples were selected from three areas including Qinshan nuclear power plant, Sanmen nuclear power plant and Hangzhou and Zhoushan respectively.137Cs of these samples were determined by γ spectrometry and Phosphoric acid ammonium molybdate method. The level of 48 foods were statistically analyzed, and then the time consuming, sample size requirements, influence factors were comprehensively discussed, thus the selection reference proposal of the examination method could be provided.ResultsThere were no significant difference for the data of two examination method (P>0.05). The limit of detection of the γ spectrometry was lower (P<0.05). Compared with Phosphoric acid ammonium molybdate method, γ spectrometry had lower limit of detection, and could detect a variety of radionuclides at a time, but need more sample and time-consuming when multi-sample were detected. The limit of detection of the Phosphoric acid ammonium molybdate method was high, and the chemical processing steps were cumbersome and was easy to be interfered by 134Cs.ConclusionThe limit of detection of the γ spectrometry is low, and the sensitivity of the Phosphoric acid ammonium molybdate method is high. Most food are recommended to be detected by γ spectrometry in the practical work, and the food which were difficult collected, less ash or low content,are recommended to be detected by Phosphoric acid ammonium molybdate method.
Key wordsFood    Cs-137    γ spectrometry;    Phosphoric acid ammonium molybdate method
收稿日期: 2015-12-11      修回日期: 2016-01-22      出版日期: 2016-05-10
中图分类号:  R144  
基金资助:浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金项目(2013KYA040)
通信作者: 宣志强,E-mail:zhqxuan@cdc.zj.cn   
作者简介: 曹艺耀,硕士,医师,主要从事食品安全与风险评估(放射性检验方向)工作
引用本文:   
曹艺耀, 宣志强, 俞顺飞, 赵尧贤, 李新星. 食品中放射性核素137Cs基于不同检测条件的方法选择研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(5): 437-440.
CAO Yi-yao, XUAN Zhi-qiang, YU Shun-fei, ZHAO Yao-xian, LI Xin-xing. AselectivitystudyoftheexaminationofradionuclidesCesium-137 for foodsbasedondifferentdetectionconditions. Preventive Medicine, 2016, 28(5): 437-440.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2016/V28/I5/437
[1] IAEA.Cytogenetic Analysis for Radiation Dose Assessment[R].Vienna:IAEA,2001:127.
[2] 白玉书,黄绮龙,关树荣,等.哈尔滨1-28 60 Co源放射事故受照者的生物剂量估算[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,1999,19(6):392-393.
[3] RAMALHO A T, NASCIMENTO A C. The fate of chromosomal aberrations in 137Cs-exposed individuals in the Goiania radiation accident[J]. Health Phys,1991,60(1):67-70.
[4] 杨占山,涂彧.放射医学教程[M].北京:原子能出版社,2008:110.
[5] 国家技术监督局,中华人民共和国卫生部.GB/T 16145—1995生物样品中放射性核素的γ能谱分析方法[S].1996.
[6] 中华人民共和国卫生部.GB 14883.1-94食品中放射性物质检验[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1994.
[7] 中华人民共和国卫生部. GB 14883.10-94食品中放射性物质检验铯-137的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1994.
[8] 徐翠华,范瑶华,周强,等.核辐射突发事件中食品和水的γ能谱检测与评价方法[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2009,29(6):634-638.
[9] 吕魁,黄福琴,黄淑琳.生物样品中铯-137活度浓度的两种分析方法比较[J].中国辐射卫生,2007,16(1):98-99.
[1] 徐杰, 陈棕棕, 骆水娟, 李欢龙. 富阳区市售食品食源性致病菌监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 624-627.
[2] 宋蕴奇, 刁文丽. 辽宁省疾控机构食品安全事故流行病学调查人力资源分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 848-850.
[3] 王奕雯, 梁志强, 顾时平, 叶炜, 张政. 安吉县食品食源性致病菌检测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 732-734,737.
[4] 董玉婷, 彭慧, 程仁杰, 季莹, 袁红. 嘉定区市售食品致病性微生物监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 532-535.
[5] 何华丽, 樊继彩, 王小芳, 任韧. 食品包装纸中11种DSD-FWAs的迁移试验[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(3): 246-249,254.
[6] 李杉, 付鹏钰, 马青青, 杨丽, 周昇昇, 张书芳. 河南省市售畜肉兽药和违禁药物残留暴露风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(1): 81-83,86.
[7] 吴晓丽, 赵毕, 齐小娟, 周标. 食品中化学污染物风险评估方法研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 682-685.
[8] 杨丽, 张利锋, 袁鹏, 张榕杰, 崔良艳, 李和平. 萃取除脂联合液相色谱-串联质谱法检测肉类食品中β-受体激动剂[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(12): 1293-1296.
[9] 黄希汇, 刘少颖, 金铨, 薛鸣. 杭州城区动物性食品中四环素类抗生素残留调查[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(7): 735-736,739.
[10] 张玉, 时丕森, 朱雪雪, 刘宏宇, 刘劲枫, 尹汉明, 杜亮, 周令. 大连市居民食品安全知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(4): 412-415.
[11] 周煜, 沈毅, 王姝婷, 赵栋. 杭州市居民谷物和烧烤油炸类食品多环芳烃暴露风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(3): 260-264,270.
[12] 胡争艳,吴平谷,王立媛,王天娇,王军淋,汤. SPE-UPLC-MS/MS法同时测定火锅食品中5种生物碱[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(7): 750-753.
[13] 曹艺耀,俞顺飞,宣志强,赵尧贤,李新星,吴寿明,赵三虎,刘萍. 动物性食品中盐酸克仑特罗残留检测色谱条件优化[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(6): 570-573.
[14] 石晓波, 赵锦丽, 陈桂仙, 杨柳桦, 王方俊, 吕疏雨, 蒋贤根. 永康市6类市售餐饮具卫生质量检测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(5): 475-478.
[15] 王春红, 黄丽燕, 兰陈花. 松阳县养殖水产品副溶血性弧菌监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(5): 522-523.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed