Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2022, Vol. 34 Issue (1): 63-65,69    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.01.013
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
杭州市无偿献血者乙型肝炎病毒感染及其传播残余风险分析
祝宏1,2, 董杰1,2, 凌霞1,2, 励晓涛1,2, 吴丹霄1,2, 朱发明1,2
1.浙江省血液中心,浙江 杭州 310052;
2.浙江省血液安全研究重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310052
Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection and residual transmission risk among volunteer blood donors in Hangzhou City
ZHU Hong1,2, DONG Jie1,2, LING Xia1,2, LI Xiaotao1,2, WU Danxiao1,2, ZHU Faming1,2
1. Blood Center of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310052, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Blood Safety Research of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310052, China
全文: PDF(827 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解杭州市无偿献血者乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染情况,评估输注其血液传播HBV的残余风险。方法 通过献血者信息管理数据库收集2016—2019年杭州市无偿献血者资料,采用酶联免疫吸附法测定乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)和核酸检测技术测定HBV DNA。采用发病率-窗口期模型评估无偿献血者血液传播HBV的残余风险。结果 2016—2019年杭州市共筛查初次献血者320 755人,HBV阳性率为0.56%;重复献血者279 816人,HBV阳性率为0.13%。初次献血者HBV阳性率高于重复献血者(P<0.05)。初次献血者和重复献血者检测HBsAg后,输血传播HBV的残余风险分别为296.38/100万人次[95%CI:(277.57~315.19)/100万人次]和98.79/100万人次[95%CI:(87.15~110.43)/100万人次];检测HBV DNA后,输血传播HBV的残余风险分别为86.79/100万人次[95%CI:(76.60~96.98)/100万人次]和28.93/100万人次[95%CI:(22.63~35.23)/100万人次]。结论 经检验合格的杭州市无偿献血者血液仍然存在输血传播HBV的风险,献血人群中开展核酸检测可明显降低输血传播HBV的残余风险。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
祝宏
董杰
凌霞
励晓涛
吴丹霄
朱发明
关键词 无偿献血者乙型肝炎病毒残余风险核酸检测    
AbstractObjective To investigate the prevalence of hepatitis B virus ( HBV ) infection among volunteer blood donors in Hangzhou City, and to evaluate the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV infections. Methods Data pertaining to volunteer blood donors in Hangzhou City from 2016 to 2019 were retrieved from the blood donor management system. Hepatitis B surface antigen ( HBsAg ) was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ( ELISA ) and HBV DNA was detected using nucleic acid testing. The incidence/window period model was employed to assess the residual risk of HBV transmitted through transfusion from donors. Results The prevalence of HBV infections was 0.56% among the 320 755 first-time donors and 0.13% among the 279 816 repeat donors in Hangzhou City from 2016 to 2019, and a higher prevalence of HBV infection was detected among first-time donors than among repeat donors ( P<0.05 ). The residual risks of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection were 296.38 per million person-times ( 95%CI: 277.57 to 315.19 per million person-times ) and 98.79 per million person-times ( 95%CI: 87.15 to 110.43 per million person-times ) among first-time and repeat donors with positive HBsAg, and were 86.79 per million person-times ( 95%CI: 76.60 to 96.98 per million person-times ) and 28.93 per million person-times ( 95%CI: 22.63 to 35.23 per million person-times ) among first-time and repeat donors tested positive for HBV DNA, respectively. Conclusions There is still a residual risk of HBV infection transmitted through transfusion from blood donors in Hangzhou City. Nucleic acid testing may remarkably reduce the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection in blood donors.
Key wordsvolunteer blood donor    hepatitis B virus    residual risk    nucleic acid testing
收稿日期: 2021-08-13      修回日期: 2021-10-29     
中图分类号:  R512.62  
基金资助:浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LGF20H260008)
通信作者: 董杰,E-mail:dongj@126.com   
作者简介: 祝宏,硕士,主任技师,主要从事血液检测工作
引用本文:   
祝宏, 董杰, 凌霞, 励晓涛, 吴丹霄, 朱发明. 杭州市无偿献血者乙型肝炎病毒感染及其传播残余风险分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(1): 63-65,69.
ZHU Hong, DONG Jie, LING Xia, LI Xiaotao, WU Danxiao, ZHU Faming. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection and residual transmission risk among volunteer blood donors in Hangzhou City. Preventive Medicine, 2022, 34(1): 63-65,69.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.01.013      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2022/V34/I1/63
[1] ROTH W K.History and future of nucleic acid amplification technology blood donor testing[J]. Transfus Med Hemother,2019,46(2):67-75.
[2] JAYAWAYDENA T,HOAD V,STYLES C,et al.Modelling the risk of transfusion-transmitted syphilis:a reconsideration of blood donation testing strategies[J].Vox Sang,2019,114(2):107-116.
[3] LI L,HAN T,ZANG L,et al.The current incidence,prevalence,and residual risk of hepatitis B viral infections among voluntary blood donors in China[J/OL].BMC Infect Dis,2017,17(1)[2021-10-29].https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29212443.DOI:10.1186/s12879-017-2861-3.
[4] LELIE N,VERMEULEN M,VAN DRIMMELEN H,et al.Direct comparison of three residual risk models for hepatitis B virus window period infections using updated input parameters[J].Vox Sang,2020,115(3):133-145.
[5] YAND H,ANDERSON S A,FORSHEE R,et al.Modeling complete removal of risk assessment questions in the USA predicts the risk of HIV exposure in blood recipients could increase despite the use of nucleic acid testing[J].Vox Sang,2016,110(4):324-328.
[6] AINLEY L I,HEWITT P E.Haematology patients and the risk of transfusion transmitted infection[J].Br J Haematol,2018,180(4):473-483.
[7] WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization.WHO technical report series;No 1004[R].Geneva:WHO,2017.
[8] CORRÊA A S M,LAMARÃO L M,VIEIRA P C M,et al.Prevalence,incidence and residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection before and after the implementation of HBV-NAT in northern Brazil[J/OL].PLoS One,2018,13(12)[2021-10-29].https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208414.
[9] BUSCH M P,BLOCH E M,KLEINMAN S.Prevention of transfusion-transmitted infections[J].Blood,2019,133(17):1854-1864.
[10] O'BRIEN S F,YI Q L,FAN W,et al.Residual risk of HIV,HCV and HBV in Canada[J].Transfus Apher Sci,2017,56(3):389-391.
[11] VELATI C,ROMANO L,PATI I,et al.Prevalence,incidence and residual risk of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus infection in Italy from 2009 to 2018[J].Blood Transfus,2019,17(6):409-417.
[12] 谢小琴,王芳.重庆地区无偿献血者HBV筛查结果及其阳性人群特征分析[J].中国输血杂志,2021,34(7):743-746.
XIE X Q,WANG F.Analysis of HBV screening results and positive population characteristics of blood donors in Chongqing[J].Chin J Blood Transfus,2021,34(7):743-746.
[1] 王衡, 李鹏, 贺贤龙, 包君萍, 宋晶, 李浩孺, 王海红. 舟山市固定无偿献血者营养健康知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 440-443.
[2] 周洋, 卢肇骏, 严睿, 邓璇, 唐学雯, 朱瑶, 徐校平, 何寒青. 应用德尔菲法构建乙型肝炎病毒感染孕产妇健康管理优化路径[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(6): 631-636.
[3] 蒋巧香, 刘黎燕, 徐雪梅, 潘凌凌. 无偿献血者献血不良反应的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(1): 42-45.
[4] 陈飞, 徐放, 林殷悦, 周蕴丽, 杨年忠. 椒江区乙型肝炎病毒母婴传播免疫阻断效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(6): 634-635,638.
[5] 陈劲华,骆淑英,韦意娜,骆伟彪,周洋. 义乌市0~59岁人群乙型病毒性肝炎血清流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(10): 1026-1029.
[6] 王浩, 陈玲琍, 谢开婿, 王春梅, 曹元, 沈盾, 张晓怡, 祝水清, 胡如英, 卞铮, 郭彧, 俞敏, 陈铮鸣, 李立明. 慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染与成人糖尿病患病的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(1): 1-5.
[7] 张友春,汪睿 综述,朱永良 审校. 新型冠状病毒实验室检测方法研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(4): 361-365.
[8] 张丹丹, 傅小红, 焦素黎, 顾文珍, 许国章. 宁波市新型冠状病毒肺炎确诊病例SARS-CoV-2 靶标基因水平及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(12): 1213-1216.
[9] 邓敏, 吴云辉, 丁韧烨, 魏大海. 乙型肝炎病毒携带者外周血PD-1、PD-L1、M30、M65与肝脏炎症的相关性研究[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(12): 1242-1245.
[10] 杨洁, 刘栋楠, 许苗苗, 卫成, 武恕星, 武景福. 三门峡市流行性感冒病原学监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(8): 813-815,819.
[11] 王兰, 郑建军, 谢瑜, 王晓璐, 何贤松. 临海市发热伴血小板减少综合征病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(5): 482-483,487.
[12] 王璐璐, 孙海波, 孙佰红, 刘双, 宋亦春, 毛玲玲, 孙英伟, 姚文清. 辽宁省外环境禽流感病毒监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(3): 221-224.
[13] 张超, 付钰淋, 任强, 李华, 邹扬帆, 张梦妍, 常文辉. 陕西省HIV/AIDS 合并感染HBV病例分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(9): 889-892,896.
[14] 李婷,时代强. HBV感染型原发性肝癌肿瘤微环境T淋巴细胞亚群的表达[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(4): 387-388.
[15] 张海峰, 张国彬, 黄永清, 崔睿. 江苏省首例输入性寨卡病毒病病例调查[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(1): 86-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed