|
|
|
| A study on the application of Romania risk assessment method of occupationalaccidents and diseases in a certain fluorescent lamp manufacture enterprise |
| LI Ming, WANG Sha-sha, JIANG Guo-qin, ZHANG Mei-bian
|
| The Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shaoxing City, Shaoxing , Zhejiang, 312071, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To assess the risk of occupational hazards of a certain fluorescent lamp manufacturing enterprise and to provide the basis for strengthening the industry's occupational health management. Methods To carry out risk assessment by Romania risk assessment method of occupational accidents and diseases in a certain fluorescent lamp manufacture enterprise, and to identify a certain fluorescent lamp manufacturing enterprise occupational hazards risk factors. To analyze the maximum foreseeable consequences of severity and likelihood, and to determine the level of risk. To compare the results of the assessment with the classification for occupational hazards at workplaces. Results The most serious consequences of high temperature and mercury risk level reached level 6, which is the highest level.Mercury concentration, temperature WBGT index exceeded the occupational exposure limits,and it is the primary risk factor for prevention.The most serious consequences of noise risk reached level 3,which is moderate, but noise level positions exceeded with the occupational exposure limits, and it is also the risk factor for prevention .Grilled pipe, taut filament unlock filament, sealing and exhaust inject mercury were the most serious consequences with the risk reached level 5, which is the highest level.Conclusion The enterprises should strengthen high-temperature, noise monitoring, and the prevention of occupational hazards of mercury. Grilled pipe, taut filament unlock filament, sealing and exhaust inject mercury are key positions for occupational hazard risk control.
|
|
Received: 11 April 2016
Published: 21 November 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.风险管理术语:GB/T 23694—2009[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[2]全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国职业病防治法[Z].2012.
[3]袁伟明,冷朋波,周莉芳,等.应用国外两种风险模型评估职业危害的对比研究[J].环境与职业医学,2015,32(1):51-55.
[4]王莎莎,张美辩,蒋国钦,等.澳大利亚职业风险评估模型在蓄电池生产企业中的应用[J].浙江预防医学,2013,25(12):8-11.
[5]张美辨,邹华,袁伟明,等.职业健康风险评估方法的研究进展[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2012,30(12):972-974.
[6]陈建华,冯若桥,任茹香,等.某荧光灯企业职业危害治理措施及效果评价[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2013,33(11):1246-1248.
[7]余晓峰.上虞市荧光灯厂职业卫生调查分析与对策[J].职业与健康,2002,18(6):12.
[8]林君英,竹霞君,杨香生. 嵊州市小型荧光灯厂汞污染现状[J].浙江预防医学,2000,12(1):37.
[9]中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气中有害物质监测的采样规范:GBZ 159—2004[S].北京:法律出版社,2007.
[10]中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气有毒物质测定:GBZ/T 160—2007[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.
[11]中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气中粉尘测定 第1 分部:总粉尘浓度:GBZ/T 192.1—2007[S]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.
[12]中华人民共和国卫生部. 工作场所物理因素测量:GBZ/T 189—2007[S]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.
[13]丁钢强,张美辨.国外职业健康风险评估指南[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2014.
[14]中华人民共和国卫生部. 工作场所空气中有害因素职业接触限值第1部分:化学有害因素:GBZ 2.1—2007 [S].北京: 人民卫生出版社,2007.
[15]中华人民共和国卫生部. 工作场所空气中有害因素职业接触限值第2部分:物理因素:GBZ 2.1—2007 [S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.
[16]中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所职业病危害作业分级第1部分:生产性粉尘:GBZ/T 229.1—2010 [S]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
[17]中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ/T 229.2—2010 工作场所职业病危害作业分级第2部分:化学物[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
[18]中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所职业病危害作业分级第3部分:高温:GBZ/T 229.3—2010 [S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
[19]中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所职业病危害作业分级第4部分:噪声:GBZ/T 229.4—2010 [S]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.
[20]中华人民共和国卫生部.职业性接触毒物危害程度分级:GBZ 230—2010 [S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010.
[21]余晓峰,韩丽芳, 谢凯蕾,等. 罗马尼亚职业事故和职业病风险评估方法在某贵金属冶炼厂的应用效果[J].浙江预防医学,2016,28(2):186-191.
[22]丁有生.固汞在荧光灯低汞工艺中的应用[J].中国照明电器,2013,37(4):49-52.
[23]刘喜房,任保印.高温作业的健康监护与中暑预防[J].劳动保护,2010(7):88-89.
[24]朱红心,苏勤.某大型系列液压挖掘机技改项目职业病危害控制效果评价[J].职业卫生与病伤,2015,30(3):142-147.
|
|
|
|
