Abstract：ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese revised version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11th (BIS-11) in Chinese college student with a web-based survey. MethodsA total of 2 295 college students were enrolled in the survey,and were divided into two groups.The first group was used for item and factor analysis, and the second group was used for confirmatory factors analysis. ResultsItem analysis indicated that BIS-11 had satisfactory item discrimination, except the item 29. Three-factor model of BIS-11 was well documented with exploratory factor analysis (explained 45.526% of total variance) and confirmatory factor analysis (GFI, AGFI, TLI, CFI, RMSEA was 0.872, 0.851, 0.853, 0.864, 0.064, respectively). The internal consistency of the total scale and the three subscales using coefficient alpha was in the range of 0.833-0.913. The split-half reliability of the total scale and the three subscales using Spearman-Brown Coefficient was in the range of 0.827-0.907. Furthermore, the female college students in the present study had higher scores on the total scale, cognitive (attention) impulsiveness factor, and motor impulsiveness factor than the male college student (P<0.01). The individuals with GHQ-12 (the twelve-item General Health Questionnaire) screen-positive had higher scores on the total scale and the three factors than the subjects with GHQ-12 screen-negative (P<0.01). ConclusionThe results of present study suggested that the Chinese revised version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11th could be used as a tool of impulsiveness assessment in web-based survey.
沈志华, 汪永光, 王义强. Barratt冲动性量表在大学生心理健康网络调查中的信效度检验[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(4): 368-370,375.
Clinical Institute of mental health in Hangzhou of Anhui Medical University. SHEN Zhi-hua, WANG Yong-guang, WANG Yi-qiang. Preventive Medicine, 2016, 28(4): 368-370,375.
[1] STANFORD M S, MATHIAS C W, DOUGHERTY D M, et al. Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review [J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, 47(5):385-395. [2] JOLLANT F, BELLIVIER F, LEBOYER M, et al. Impaired decision making in suicide attempters[J]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2005, 162(2):304-310. [3] LISTER J J, LEDGERWOOD D M, LUNDAHL L H, et al. Causal pathways between impulsiveness, cocaine use consequences, and depression[J].Addictive Behaviors, 2015(41):1-6. [4] BLACK D W, CORYELL W H, CROWE R R, et al. Personality disorders, impulsiveness, and novelty seeking in persons with DSM-IV pathological gambling and their first-degree relatives[J]. Journal of Gambling studies, 2014, doi:10.1007/s10899-014-9505-y.[5] 李献云, 费立鹏, 徐东, 等. Barratt冲动性量表中文修订版在社区和大学人群中应用的信效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25(8): 610-615. [6] LU C F, JIA C X, XU A Q, et al. Psychometric Characteristics of Chinese Version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 in Suicides and Living Controls of Rural China[J]. Omega, 2012—2013,66(3): 215-229. [7] CHEN S, ZHAO G, LI L, et al. Caine Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Self Reporting Questionnaire 20 (SRQ-20) in community settings[J]. Int J Soc Psychiatry, 2009(55):538-547. [8] MOELLER F G, BARRATT E S, DOUGHERTY D M, et al.Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity[J]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2001, 158(11):1783-1793.[JP] [9] VAN GELDER M M, BRETVELD R W, ROELEVELD N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology?[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2010, 172(11):1292-1298. [10] TOUVIER M, MÉJEAN C, KESSE-GUYOT E, et al.Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire[J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2010, 25(5):287-296. [11] 王俊, 况利, 王我, 等. 大学生心理健康筛查问卷网络版与纸质版信效度比较研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2012(19):2209-2212. [12] PATTON J H, STANFORD M S, BARRATT E S, et al. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1995, 51(6):768-774. [13] CROSS C P, COPPING L T, CAMPBELL A. Sex differences in impulsivity: a meta-analysis[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, 137(1):97-130.
