Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2022, Vol. 34 Issue (1): 22-26    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.01.005
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于防范行为采纳模型的女大学生HPV疫苗犹豫干预研究
孙秀, 张六仁, 陈涛, 毛升, 周怡, 吴玥, 魏征, 傅传喜
浙江中医药大学公共卫生学院传染病与疫苗研究所,浙江 杭州 310053
Effectiveness of interventions for human papillomavirus vaccine hesitancy among female university students based on the precaution adoption process model
SUN Xiu, ZHANG Liuren, CHEN Tao, MAO Sheng, ZHOU Yi, WU Yue, WEI Zheng, FU Chuanxi
Institute of Infectious Disease and Vaccine, School of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310053, China
全文: PDF(834 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价防范行为采纳模型(PAPM)对女大学生人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗犹豫的干预效果,为提高该人群HPV疫苗覆盖率提供依据。方法 采用整群抽样方法抽取浙江中医药大学HPV疫苗犹豫的女大学生为研究对象,随机分配入PAPM干预组和对照组。PAPM干预组实施基于PAPM模型的HPV疫苗犹豫干预,对照组采用常规干预措施。分别在干预前(T0)、干预后即时(T1)、干预后1个月(T2)、干预后3个月(T3)收集2组研究对象的HPV及其疫苗相关知识和HPV疫苗犹豫测量值,采用重复测量方差分析比较2组干预效果。结果 PAPM干预组147人,对照组141人;医学专业分别占36.73%和39.72%;大一学生分别占48.23%和50.35%。干预后,PAPM干预组HPV及其疫苗知识平均得分(T1为5.29、T2为4.27、T3为4.22)高于对照组(4.91、4.22、4.04),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);PAPM干预组疫苗犹豫平均得分(2.98、3.07、3.08)与对照组(2.95、3.07、2.97)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);其中,信心维度(3.37、3.48、3.38)和受他人影响维度(3.44、3.42、3.46)平均得分均高于对照组(3.23、3.40、3.25;3.33、3.37、3.27),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);自满维度平均得分(1.98、2.06、2.18)低于对照组(2.03、2.20、2.15),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 基于PAPM模型的HPV疫苗犹豫干预能较好地提高女大学生HPV及其疫苗认知水平,改善女大学生HPV疫苗自满犹豫程度及受他人影响的情况。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙秀
张六仁
陈涛
毛升
周怡
吴玥
魏征
傅传喜
关键词 人乳头瘤病毒疫苗疫苗犹豫防范行为采纳模型女大学生    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for human papillomavirus ( HPV ) vaccine hesitancy among female university students based on the precaution adoption process model (PAPM), so as to provide the evidence for improving the coverage of HPV vaccine in this population. Methods HPV vaccine hesitant female students were selected using a cluster sampling method from Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, and randomly assigned to the PAPM group and control group. Students in the PAPM group received PAPM-based interventions for HPV vaccine hesitancy, while students in the control group were given routine interventions. The HPV-related knowledge, HPV vaccine-related knowledge and HPV vaccine hesitancy scores were collected from both groups prior to interventions ( T0 ), 0 ( T1 ), 1 ( T2 ) and 3 months post-interventions ( T3 ), and the effectiveness of interventions was evaluated using analysis of variance for repeated measures. Results There were 147 students in the PAPM group and 141 students in the control group. In the PAPM group, 36.73% of the students majored in medical sciences, and 48.23% were freshmen; in the control group, 39.72% majored in medical sciences, and 50.35% were freshmen. The mean scores of HPV- and HPV vaccine-related knowledge were significantly greater in the PAPM group than in the control group, respectively ( T1, 5.29 vs. 4.91; T2, 4.27 vs. 4.22; T3, 4.22 vs. 4.04; P<0.05 ); however, no significant differences were detected in the HPV vaccine hesitancy scores between the two groups, respectively ( T1, 2.98 vs. 2.95; T2, 3.07 vs. 3.07; T3, 3.08 vs. 2.97; P>0.05 ). The mean scores of the confidence dimension ( T1, 3.37 vs. 3.23; T2, 3.48 vs. 3.40; T3, 3.38 vs. 3.25 ) and the dimension of influence by others ( T1, 3.44 vs. 3.33; T2, 3.42 vs. 3.37; T3, 3.46 vs. 3.27 ) were significantly greater in the PAPM group than in the control group (P<0.05), while the mean scores of the complacency dimension were significantly lower in the PAPM group than in the control group ( T1, 1.98 vs. 2.03; T2, 2.06 vs. 2.20; T3, 2.18 vs. 2.15; P<0.05 ). Conclusions PAPM-based interventions for HPV vaccine hesitancy may effectively improve the awareness of HPV and HPV vaccines, reduce complacency, and enhance the influence by others among female university students.
Key wordshuman papillomavirus vaccine    vaccine hesitancy    precaution adoption process model    female university student
收稿日期: 2021-08-02      修回日期: 2021-10-29     
中图分类号:  R195  
通信作者: 吴玥,E-mail:wuyue@zcmu.edu.cn   
作者简介: 孙秀,硕士在读
引用本文:   
孙秀, 张六仁, 陈涛, 毛升, 周怡, 吴玥, 魏征, 傅传喜. 基于防范行为采纳模型的女大学生HPV疫苗犹豫干预研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(1): 22-26.
SUN Xiu, ZHANG Liuren, CHEN Tao, MAO Sheng, ZHOU Yi, WU Yue, WEI Zheng, FU Chuanxi. Effectiveness of interventions for human papillomavirus vaccine hesitancy among female university students based on the precaution adoption process model. Preventive Medicine, 2022, 34(1): 22-26.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.01.005      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2022/V34/I1/22
[1] 宋晓彬,赵勤俭,周鼒,等.二价HPV疫苗接种策略的卫生经济学评估:基于动态模型[J].中华预防医学杂志,2017,51(9):814-820.
SONG X B,ZHAO Q J,ZHOU Z,et al.Health economic evaluation of bivalent human papilloma virus vaccine in china:based on the a dynamic model[J].Chin J Prev Med,2017,51(9):814-820.
[2] 刘捷宸,吴琳琳,白庆瑞,等.上海市2017—2019年人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率和疑似预防接种异常反应监测[J].中国疫苗和免疫,2020,26(3):322-325,348.
LIU J C,WU L L,BAI Q R,et al.Surveillance for coverage of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and adverse events following immunization with HPV vaccine in Shanghai,2017-2019[J].Chin J Vaccines Immunization,2020,26(3):322-325,348.
[3] 金孔军,周悦,葛学娣.大学生人群HPV疫苗认知及影响因素研究进展[J].预防医学,2019,33(5):470-473.
JIN K J,ZHOU Y,GE X D.Research progress on influencing factors for awareness of HPV vaccines among college students[J].Prev Med,2019,33(5):470-473.
[4] 张洁,张加仪,庞敏慧,等.广州市大学生HPV疫苗的接种意愿及影响因素分析[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2018,22(9):965-967,971.
ZHANG J,ZHANG J Y,PANG M H,et al.Investigation on acceptance of HPV vaccination and its determinants among college students in Guangzhou City[J].Chin J Dis Control Prev,2018,22(9):965-967,971.
[5] SZILAGYI P G,ALBERTIN C S,GURFINKEL D,et al.Prevalence and characteristics of HPV vaccine hesitancy among parents of adolescents across the US[J].Vaccine,2020,38(38):6027-6037.
[6] World Health Organization.Ten threats to global health in 2019[EB /OL].[2021-10-29].https: //www.whoint/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.
[7] 者雅茹. 基于跨理论模型的矿工粉尘防治态度及行为干预研究[D].西安:西安科技大学,2019.
ZHE Y R .Study on mind dust prevention and control attitude and behavior intervention based on transtheoretical model[D].Xi'an:Xi'an University of Science and Technology,2019.
[8] 周莹莹. 基于跨理论模型的冠脉介入术后患者康复运动的护理干预[D].长春:吉林大学,2016.
ZHOU Y Y .The application of rehabilitative exercise intervention based on the trans-theoretical model in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2016.
[9] PAIVA A L,LIPSCHITZ J M,FERNANDEZ A C,et al.Evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility of a computer-tailored intervention to increase human papillomavirus vaccination among young adult women[J].J Am Coll Health,2014,62(1):32-38.
[10] FERNANDEZ A C,AMOYAL N R,PAIVA A L,et al.Motivation for HPV vaccination among young adult men:validation of TTM decisional balance and self-efficacy constructs[J].Am J Health Promot,2015:163-171.
[11] SHAPIRO G K,TATAR O,AMSEL R,et al.Using an integrated conceptual framework to investigate parents'HPV vaccine decision for their daughters and sons[J].Prev Med,2018,116:203-210.
[12] WEINSTEIN N D.The precaution adoption process[J].Health Psychol,1988,7(4):355-386.
[13] BARNARD M,GEORGE P,PERRYMAN M L,et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine knowledge,attitudes,and uptake in college students:implications from the Precaution Adoption Process Model [J/OL]. PLoS One,2017,12(8)[2021-10-29].http://dov.org/10.1016/j.prp.2007.11.001.
[14] MACDONALD N E,the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy.Vaccine hesitancy:definition,scope and determinants[J].Vaccine,2015,32(34):4161-4164.
[15] 李娟. 跨理论模型的健康教育对首发中风患者自我管理行为的影响[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江中医药大学,2016.
LI J .Effect of trans-theoretical model-based health education on self-management behaviors for patients with first stroke[D].Harbin: Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine,2016.
[16] 李夕然,唐桂丹,黄竞男,等.健康教育干预对本科护生HPV疫苗认知和态度的影响[J].家庭生活指南,2019(3):233-235.
LI X R,TANG G D,HUANG J N,et al.Effects of educational intervention on knowledge and attitudes of human papillomavirus vaccine among nursing undergraduates[J].Family Life Guide,2019(3):233-235.
[17] 张希,严诗钰,孙莉颖,等.基于手机应用软件的健康教育对女大学生HPV疫苗的认知和接种意愿的干预效果评价[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(5):888-892,934.
ZHANG X,YAN S Y,SUN L Y,et al.The utility of mobile phone-based intervention in promoting awareness and willingness to uptake human papillomavirus vaccine among female college students[J].Mod Prev Med,2021,48(5):888-892,934.
[18] 张其其. 健康干预下新疆女大学生宫颈癌有关认知及疫苗接种意愿调查[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆医科大学,2021.
ZHANG Q Q .Investigation on cognition and vaccination intention of cervical cancer among female college students in Xinjiang under health intervention[D].Urumqi: Xinjiang Medical University,2021.
[1] 窦倩如, 黄翠敏, 曹霞, 樊利春. 海南省女性HPV疫苗相关知识和接种意愿调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 359-364.
[2] 李改芳, 冯勤梅, 仇丽霞. 基于技术接受与使用统一理论2的妇科门诊就诊患者HPV疫苗接种行为研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 295-297,326.
[3] 江伟, 刘艳, 杜渐, 许玉洋, 车鑫仁, 王婧, 王骏, 张学潮, 顾雯雯, 张小平. 2017—2021年杭州市HPV疫苗疑似预防接种异常反应监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(1): 71-73,77.
[4] 林越东, 李峤, 覃青连, 颜星星, 成曼, 周红霞, 唐咸艳. 广西某医学院校女大学生接种HPV 疫苗知识、信念和行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 955-957.
[5] 朱义雯, 邓桢, 巴观平, 刘勇, 陈玉丰. 基于创新扩散理论的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种行为分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 457-461.
[6] 冀慧方, 张志伟, 李强, 李俭, 杨凤云, 李安乐. 黄渡社区女性居民人乳头瘤病毒认知及疫苗接种意愿调查[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(6): 625-628.
[7] 熊素娟, 江湖大川 综述, 易槐明 审校. 疫苗犹豫影响因素研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(11): 1120-1123,1127.
[8] 胡昱,陈雅萍,梁辉,汪颖. 男性人群对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接受度的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(9): 897-901.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed