Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (5): 369-373,379    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.001
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中学生解离倾向的影响因素分析
余志涛1, 程庆林2, 邓媛元3, 王柳茜3, 黎燕4, 李志芳5
1.杭州市钱塘区疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 311222;
2.杭州市疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 310021;
3.杭州师范大学,浙江 杭州 310018;
4.杭州市富阳区疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 310022;
5.桐庐县疾病预防控制中心,浙江 桐庐 310025
Factors affecting dissociative tendency among middle school students
YU Zhitao1, CHENG Qinglin2, DENG Yuanyuan3, WANG Liuxi3, LI Yan4, LI Zhifang5
1. Qiantang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311222, China;
2. Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310021, China;
3. Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310028, China;
4. Fuyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, China;
5. Tonglu County Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Tonglu, Zhejiang 310025, China
全文: PDF(887 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解中学生解离倾向发生情况及其影响因素,为预防和早期干预青少年解离倾向提供依据。方法 于2021年1月—2022年3月,采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法抽取杭州市3个县(市、区)9所中学的13~18岁在校学生为调查对象。采用自制问卷和标准化量表调查学生的社会人口学资料、社会环境、学校环境、家庭环境和心理因素等资料;采用青少年解离经验量表(A-DES)初步筛查解离倾向,再由3名精神科医生按《精神障碍诊断和统计手册第5版》进行诊断;采用多因素logistic回归模型分析中学生解离倾向的影响因素。结果 调查3 240人,有效应答2 841人,应答率为87.69%。男生1 389人,占48.89%;女生1 452人,占51.11%;年龄为(15.69±1.58)岁。检出解离倾向683例,检出率为24.04%;男生解离倾向检出率为29.23%,高于女生的19.08%(χ2=24.529,P<0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示:负向师生关系(OR=1.055,95%CI:1.010~1.103)、家庭情感表达(OR=0.872,95%CI:0.777~0.978)、家庭冲突性(OR=1.152,95%CI:1.045~1.271)、家庭组织性(OR=0.880,95%CI:0.780~0.992)和家庭亲密度(OR=0.871,95%CI:0.766~0.987)是男生解离倾向的影响因素;躯体化(OR=1.041,95%CI:1.002~1.082)、偏执(OR=1.094,95%CI:1.006~1.190)是女生解离倾向的影响因素。结论 调查的中学生解离倾向检出率为24.04%;负向师生关系以及情感表达、冲突性、组织性和亲密度等家庭环境因素可能影响男生解离倾向;躯体化、偏执可能影响女生解离倾向。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
余志涛
程庆林
邓媛元
王柳茜
黎燕
李志芳
关键词 中学生解离倾向解离障碍心理健康性别差异    
AbstractObjective To investigate the prevalence of dissociative tendency and its influencing factors among middle school students, so as to provide insights into prevention and early interventions of adolescent dissociative tendency. Methods Students at ages of 13 to 18 years that studied in 9 high schools were sampled using a multistage, stratified, cluster sampling method from 3 counties (districts) of Hangzhou City from January, 2021 and March, 2022. Participants' demographics and social, school, family environment and psychological factors were collected using self-designed questionnaires and standardized scales. The dissociative tendency was initially screened using the Adolescent Dissociative Experience Scale (A-DES), and the diagnosed by three psychiatrists according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Edition). Factors affecting ADT were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results Totally 3 240 students were recruited, and 2 841 students were qualified, with a response rate of 87.69%. The respondents included 1 389 men (48.89%) and 1 452 women (51.11%), and had a mean age of (15.69±1.58) years. The prevalence of dissociative tendency was 24.04%, and the detection of dissociative tendency was higher among men than among women (29.23% vs. 19.08%; χ2=24.529, P<0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified negative teacher-student relationship (OR=1.055, 95%CI: 1.010-1.103), family emotional expressiveness (OR=0.872, 95%CI: 0.777-0.978), family conflict (OR=1.152, 95%CI: 1.045-1.271), family organization (OR=0.880, 95%CI: 0.780-0.992) and family cohesion (OR=0.871, 95%CI: 0.766-0.987) as factors affecting dissociative tendency among men, and somatization (OR=1.041, 95%CI: 1.002-1.082) and paranoid ideation (OR=1.094, 95%CI: 1.006-1.190) as factors affecting dissociative tendency among women. Conclusions The prevalence of dissociative tendency was 24.04% among middle school students. Negative teacher-student relationship, family emotional expressiveness, family conflict, family organization, and family cohesion may affect dissociative tendency among men, while somatization and paranoid ideation may affect dissociative tendency among women.
Key wordsmiddle school student    dissociative tendency    dissociative barrier    psychological health    gender variation
收稿日期: 2022-12-16      修回日期: 2023-03-31      出版日期: 2023-05-10
中图分类号:  R749.3  
基金资助:浙江省基础公益计划项目(LGF21H260007); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2021PY065,2020PY064); 杭州市卫生科技计划项目(0020190783)
通信作者: 程庆林,E-mail:chengqinglin888@163.com   
作者简介: 余志涛,本科,副主任医师,主要从事慢性非传染性疾病控制、学校卫生工作
引用本文:   
余志涛, 程庆林, 邓媛元, 王柳茜, 黎燕, 李志芳. 中学生解离倾向的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 369-373,379.
YU Zhitao, CHENG Qinglin, DENG Yuanyuan, WANG Liuxi, LI Yan, LI Zhifang. Factors affecting dissociative tendency among middle school students. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(5): 369-373,379.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.001      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I5/369
[1] SAR V,ONDER C,KILINCASLAN A,et al.Dissociative identity disorder among adolescents:prevalence in a university psychiatric outpatient unit[J].J Trauma Dissociatio,2014,15(4):402-419.
[2] REINHARDT M,HORVÁTH Z,URBÁN R,et al. Dissociative tendencies aggregate the impact of negative life events on non-suicidal self-Injury among male juvenile delinquents[J]. Arch Suicide Res,2022,26(1):226-244.
[3] GOFFIINET S J L,BEINE A. Prevalence of dissociative symptoms in adolescent psychiatric inpatients[J]. Eur J Trauma Dissoc,2018,2(1):39-45.
[4] SAPKOTA R P,BRUNET A,KIRMARER L J.Predictors of dissociative experiences among adolescents in Nepal: a path analysis[J]. J Nerv Ment Dis,2019,207(11):958-968.
[5] LUONI C, AGOSTI M, CRUGNOLA S, et al.Psychopathology,dissociation and somatic symptoms in adolescents who were exposed to traumatic experiences [J/OL].Front Psychol,2018,9[2023-03-31] .https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02390.
[6] LOEWENSTEIN R J.Dissociation debates:everything you know is wrong[J]. Dialogues Clin Neuro,2018,20(3):229-242.
[7] PAETZOLD R L,RHOLES W S,ANDRUS J L.A Bayesian analysis of the link between adult disorganized attachment and dissociative symptoms[J].Pers Indiv Differ,2017,107:17-22.
[8] ABU-RUS A,THOMPSON K J,NAISH B L,et al.Development of a validity scale for the dissociative experience scale-revised:atypicality,structure,and inconsistency[J].Psychol Inj Law,2020,13(2):167-177.
[9] KURODA N,FUJIMOTO A,OKANISHI T,et al.Low body mass index and low intelligence quotient are infection risk factors in vagus nerve stimulation[J].World Neurosurg,2019,130(9):839-845.
[10] CHENG Q,XIE L,HU Y,et al.Gender differences in the prevalence and impact factors of hysterical tendencies in adolescents from three eastern Chinese provinces[J].Environ Health Prev,2018,23(1):1-14.
[11] OGELMANA H G,SEVEN S.The reliability-validity studies for the student-teacher relationship scale(STRS)[J].Eur J Res Educ Learn,2014,2(2):179-185.
[12] 程庆林. 青少年群体性癔症与癔症倾向的流行特征及影响因素研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2016.
[13] PHILLIPS M R,WEST C L,SHEN Q,et al.Comparison of schizophrenic patients'families and normal families in China,using Chinese versions of FACES-II and the family environment scales[J].Fam Process,1998,37(1):95-106.
[14] ZHOU J,ZHOU Y,QIU J.Study of item text in the Chinese symptom checklist-90[J/OL].Medicine,2021,100(11)[2023-03-31] .https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/Fulltext/2021/03190/Study_of_item_text_in_the_Chinese_Symptom.36.aspx.DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000024841.
[15] CHENG Q,XU Y,XIE L,et al.Prevalence and environmental impact factors of somatization tendencies in eastern Chinese adolescents:a multicenter observational study[J/OL].Cad Saude Publica,2019,35(1)[2023-03-31] .https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00008418.
[16] 程庆林,谢立,王乐,等.青少年抑郁倾向影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生,2022,38(6):680-685.
[17] 李娟娟,章荣华,邹艳,等.浙江省青少年抑郁症状的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2021,33(2):139-142.
[18] MAGKLARA K,LAZARATOU H,BARBOUNI A,et al.The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on children's and adolescents' mental health in Greece[J].Child Soc,2023,37(2):469-484.
[19] CROCETTI E,MOSCATELLI S,KANIUŠONYTĖ G,et al.Developing morality,competence,and sociability in adolescence:a longitudinal study of gender differences[J].J Youth Adolesc,2019,48(5):1009-1021.
[20] CLEMENS V,DESCHAMPS P,FEGERT J M,et al.Potential effects of “social” distancing measures and school lockdown on child and adolescent mental health[J].Eur Child Adoles Psy,2020,29(6):739-742.
[21] RAUFELDER D,KULAKOW S.The role of social belonging and exclusion at school and the teacher-student relationship for the development of learned helplessness in adolescents[J].Br J Educ Psychol,2022,92(1):59-81.
[22] BURNS E C,VAN BERGEN P,LEONARD A,et al.Positive,complicated,distant,and negative:how different teacher-student relationship profiles relate to students' science motivation[J].J Adolesc,2022,94(8):1150-1162.
[23] MODESTIN J,LÖTSCHER K,ERNI T.Dissociative experiences and their correlates in young non-patients[J].Psychol Psychother-T,2002,75(1):53-64.
[24] ETHIER K A,KERSHAW T S,LEWIS J B,et al.Self-esteem,emotional distress and sexual behavior among adolescent females:inter-relationships and temporal effects[J].J Adolescent Health,2006,38(3):268-274.
[1] 徐倩倩, 朱莹莹, 丁十戈, 金秋妍, 董莹. 宁波市中学生电子烟使用调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 814-819.
[2] 高颖, 孙乐成, 王莉莉, 黄银凤, 吴英锋. 海南省中学生电子烟使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 655-658,664.
[3] 周嘉昱, 施剑飞. 新型冠状病毒感染疫情期间医护人员心理问题及干预研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 307-310.
[4] 施秀珍, 凌洁, 徐漪, 张敬敏, 赵玲慧. 嘉兴市居民心理健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(10): 911-915.
[5] 沈婷, 蔡永环, 张静敏, 胡艺俨, 靳颖, 许俊. 西湖区健康促进学校初中学生电子烟使用调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 776-781.
[6] 王玉成, 李金成, 杨红英, 宋平, 王云锋, 边国林. 宁波市居民心理健康素养水平调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(2): 198-202.
[7] 李俊, 江雁, 陈婧怡, 王文静. 严重精神障碍患者监护人心理健康状况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(12): 1267-1272.
[8] 徐倩倩, 朱莹莹, 丁十戈, 金秋妍, 董莹. 宁波市中学生烟草使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(10): 1064-1068,1074.
[9] 雷兰英, 雷娜, 曹日芳. 高中学生情绪和应对方式积极心理干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 961-962,967.
[10] 杨桂丽, 陈镭, 韦巧慧, 陈红丹, 郑小莲. 温州市中学生卷烟和电子烟使用意向调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 844-847.
[11] 周娓, 吴锋, 元国平. 江北区中学生用眼行为现状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 689-693.
[12] 陈红丹, 李万仓, 陈镭, 陈贤, 倪建晓, 杨桂丽. 瓯海区中学生伤害的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 490-492,496.
[13] 黄滟, 高锦凤, 杜涛, 朱彦锋, 余小平. 天全县高中学生视频显示终端综合征的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 514-518.
[14] 高华, 易波, 张琰, 蒋丹捷, 史碧君, 周绍英, 郭延波. 宁波市初中学生近视流行现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 522-525,528.
[15] 陈红丹, 陈镭, 陈贤, 夏微, 李万仓, 高洁. 瓯海区中学生突发自然灾害防灾素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(2): 207-211.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed