Abstract:Objective To develop an evaluation index system on health information on the internet using Delphi method. Methods The index system on health information on the internet was drown up and then two rounds of 11 experts' questionnaire consultation were conducted using Delphi method to determine the index system. Results Of 11 experts,the mean age was 48.55±6.79,and 91.67% of experts had high professional titles and had been working for average(23.64±10.10)years. The altive coefficient for the first and the second hound consultation was 91.67% and 100.00% respectively. The average coefficient of specialists authority was 0.75. After two round consultations,Kendalf's concordance coefficients were 0.39(P<0.01) and 0.51(P<0.01),respectively. After two rounds of Delphi,the index system includes 3 from first-level indicators and 15 from secondary-level indicators. Conclusion Experts' representativeness, enthusiasm and professionalism brought to a consensus in developing an evaluation index system to be used in monitoring health information on the internet.
赵玉遂, 许燕, 吴青青, 徐水洋, 徐锦杭. 应用德尔菲法构建网络健康信息质量评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(2): 121-124.
ZHAO Yu-sui, XU Yan, WU Qing-qing, XU Shui-yang, XU Jin-hang. The development of an evaluation index system on health information on the internet using Delphi method. Preventive Medicine, 2018, 30(2): 121-124.
[1] 沈金萍. 第39次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》发布我国网民达7.3亿[J]. 传媒,2017(3):30. [2] 魏萌萌,马敬东,夏晨曦. 国内外网络健康信息质量评估工作研究综述[J]. 中国卫生事业管理,2012,29(7):551-553. [3] 王俏,赵毅,刘伟,等. 应用德尔菲法研制功能性消化不良患者健康行为自我效能量表[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2012,28(32):66-68. [4] 侯筱蓉,陈俊羽,赵文龙. 面向公众的网络医疗健康信息质量分析[J]. 中国卫生信息管理杂志,2014,11(1):38-42. [5] EYSENBACH G,POWELL J,KUSS O,et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web:a systematic review[J]. JAMA,2002,287(20):2691-2700. [6] GIMÉNEZ-PÉREZ G,CAIXÀS A,GIMÉNEZ-PALOP O,et al. Dissemination of 'patient-oriented evidence that matters' on the internet:the case of type 2 diabetes treatment[J]. Diabet Med,2005,22(6):688-692. [7] WILSON P. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly:a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet * commentary:on the way to quality[J]. BMJ ,2002,324(7337):598-602. [8] 李培,刘淑华. 论网上信息资源的评价标准[J]. 图书情报工作,2000,44(9):28-30. [9] 戴维民. "网络为王"时代的媒体公信力认定——网络媒体评价指标与方法[J]. 图书情报工作,2004,48(1):33-38. [10] 邵波. 用户接受:网络信息资源开发与利用的重要因素[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2004,30(1):51-54. [11] 刘祥,朱军,代礼,等. 特尔菲法建立唐氏综合征产前筛查核心信息[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究,2010,21(2):143-146. [12] 韦余东,张人杰,张新卫,等. 应用德尔菲法构建疾控机构应急能力评价指标体系[J]. 浙江预防医学,2016,28(1):32-36. [13] 曾光.现在流行病学方法与应用 [M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994:250-270. [14] 夏萍,吴大嵘,卢传坚,等. 德尔菲法在医疗质量评价指标体系中的可靠性分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2012,39(14):3488- 3490.