Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (8): 659-664    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.08.004
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
县级疾病预防控制中心突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力评价指标体系构建
高丽娟1,2, 井淇2,3, 郑文贵1,2, 吴芳1,2, 段明雪1,2, 马安宁1,2
1.潍坊医学院公共卫生学院,山东 潍坊 261053;
2.“健康山东”重大社会风险预测与治理协同创新中心,山东 潍坊 261053;
3.潍坊医学院,山东 潍坊 261053
Construction of an evaluation index system of public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level centers for disease control and prevention
GAO Lijuan1,2, JING Qi2,3, ZHENG Wengui1,2, WU Fang1,2, DUAN Mingxue1,2, MA Anning1,2
1. School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Major Social Risk Prediction and Governance of Shandong Health, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China;
3. Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261053, China
全文: PDF(775 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 构建县级疾病预防控制中心(疾控中心)突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力评价指标体系,为提高县级疾控中心突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力提供依据。方法 复习我国2003—2023年卫生应急政策法规建立指标体系框架;通过2轮德尔菲专家咨询,对指标的重要性、敏感性和可获得性进行评分和筛选,采用优序图法计算指标权重。采用专家积极系数、权威系数和意见协调程度评价咨询效果。结果 18名专家参与德尔菲咨询,其中男性9名;硕士及以上学历15名;预防医学或公共卫生专业12名;副高级及以上职称12名。2轮咨询专家积极系数分别为100.00%和94.44%,权威系数分别为0.83和0.84,第二轮咨询二级指标和三级指标的协调系数分别为0.341和0.241,均大于第一轮咨询(P<0.05)。最终建立的指标体系包含8个一级指标、21个二级指标和58个三级指标,一级指标中卫生应急组织管理(0.203 1)和卫生应急队伍建设(0.203 1)、卫生应急资金保障(0.203 1)权重最高;二级指标中卫生应急管理制度完善程度(初始权重/全局权重:0.750 0/0.152 3)、卫生应急队伍组建情况(0.750 0/0.152 3)和应急资金保障情况(0.750 0/0.152 3)权重最高;三级指标中明确卫生应急管理科室职责(0.750 0/0.114 2)权重最高。结论 本研究建立的评价指标体系可用于县级疾控中心突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力工作评价。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
高丽娟
井淇
郑文贵
吴芳
段明雪
马安宁
关键词 县级疾控中心突发公共卫生事件应急准备指标体系德尔菲法    
AbstractObjective To construct an evaluation index system of public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level centers for disease control and prevention (CDC), so as to provide the evidence for improving the public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level CDC. Methods An index system framework was created based on review of health emergency policies, laws and regulations released in China from 2003 to 2023. The importance, sensitivity and accessibility of indicators were scored and screened through two rounds of Delphi expert consultations, and the weights of indicators were calculated using precedence charts. The efficiency of Delphi expert consultations was evaluated using the active coefficient, authority coefficient and coordination coefficient. Results Eighteen experts participated in consultations, including 9 men, 15 with educational levels of master degree and higher, 12 with preventive medicine or public health as the specialty, and 12 with deputy senior professional titles and higher. The active coefficients of two rounds of consultations were 100.00% and 94.44%, and the authority coefficients were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. The coordination coefficients of secondary and tertiary indicators during the second round consultation were 0.341 and 0.241, which were both higher than those during the first round (both P<0.05). The final evaluation index system included 8 primary indicators, 21 secondary indicators and 58 tertiary indicators. Among primary indicators, health emergency organization and management (0.203 1), health emergency team building (0.203 1) and financial support for health emergency (0.203 1) had the highest weights, and of secondary indicators, completion degree of health emergency administration regulations (initial weight/global weight: 0.750 0/0.152 3), health emergency team building (0.750 0/0.152 3) and financial support for emergency (0.750 0/0.152 3) had the highest weights, while among tertiary indicators, defining the duty of health emergency administration sectors had the highest weight (0.750 0/0.114 2). Conclusion The created evaluation index system is feasible for evaluation of the public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level CDC.
Key wordscounty-level center for disease control and prevention    public health emergency preparedness    index system    Delphi method
收稿日期: 2023-05-15      修回日期: 2023-06-19      出版日期: 2023-08-10
中图分类号:  R197.2  
基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(22YJAZH081)
通信作者: 郑文贵,E-mail:wgzheng@wmfc.edu.cn   
作者简介: 高丽娟,硕士,主管护师,主要从事卫生应急管理工作
引用本文:   
高丽娟, 井淇, 郑文贵, 吴芳, 段明雪, 马安宁. 县级疾病预防控制中心突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 659-664.
GAO Lijuan, JING Qi, ZHENG Wengui, WU Fang, DUAN Mingxue, MA Anning. Construction of an evaluation index system of public health emergency preparedness capacity in county-level centers for disease control and prevention. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(8): 659-664.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.08.004      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I8/659
[1] 吴群红,杨维中.卫生应急管理[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:197.
[2] 王心怡,吴晨,缪梓萍,等.2021年3月浙江省突发公共卫生事件风险评估[J].预防医学,2021,33(3):217-220.
[3] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.突发公共卫生事件应急条例[EB/OL].[2023-06-19].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-12/26/content_5574586.htm.
[4] 刘铁民. 构建新时代国家应急管理体系[J].中国党政干部论坛,2019,368(7):6-11.
[5] 闪淳昌. 关于做好应急准备的再认识[J].中国应急管理,2020,13(2):14-15.
[6] LI Z J,CHEN Q L,FENG L Z,et al.Active case finding with case managemet the key to tackling the covid-19 pandemic[J] Lancet,2020,396(10243):63-70.
[7] 焦敏,秘玉清,王镇德,等.中国疾控机构卫生应急能力评估现状分析[J].中国公共卫生,2023,39(1):62-67.
[8] 闫东,刘冠纯,任兴宇,等.利用层次分析法和德尔菲法构建疾控中心鼠疫应急能力评价指标体系[J].中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2022,33(4):568-572.
[9] 刘磊,范艳存.基于德尔菲法的基层应对突发公共卫生事件能力研究[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2022,44(2):123-126,138.
[10] 梁艺. 湖北省疾控机构公共卫生应急准备能力评估体系研究[D].武汉:武汉科技大学,2018.
[11] 张婷,刘珊珊,汪清雅,等.重庆市疾控机构耐药肺结核治疗管理评价指标体系构建[J].预防医学,2021,33(6):592-594,598.
[12] 卢璐. 基于优序图法的高校图书馆微信公众平台评价研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2018.
[13] 李慧珍. 基于改良德尔菲法与优序图法的中医药团体标准评价指标体系构建[D].北京:中国中医科学院,2022.
[14] U.S.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Department of Health and Human Services.Public health emergency preparedness and response capabilities: national standards for state, local, tribal,and territorial public health[S/OL].[2023-06-19].https://www.cdc.gov/orr/readiness/00_docs/cdc_preparednesresponsecapabilities_october2018_final_508.pdf.
[15] 宋晓波. 日本突发公共卫生事件应急管理体系借鉴及对我国新冠肺炎疫情应对的启示[J].中国应急救援,2020(3):20-26.
[16] 魏吉利,白文辉,卢颖,等.突发公共卫生事件中社区应急准备能力评价研究进展[J].中国全科医学,2022,25(31):3960-3964.
[17] 美合日阿依·艾力.边疆地区基层政府突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2022.
[18] 姚建义. 全国卫生部门卫生应急基本情况调查(2010年)[D].北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2012.
[19] 王超男,廖凯举,李冰,等.中国卫生应急管理体系建设调查分析[J].中国公共卫生,2018,34(2):260-264.
[20] 卫生应急办公室.全国疾病预防控制机构卫生应急工作规范(试行)[EB/OL].[2023-06-19].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yjb/s7859/201511/8b520f79cba04976bd563ab22bd0fc69.shtml.
[1] 王智帆, 郭玲伶, 简伟研. 高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 401-405.
[2] 陈银炜, 周洋, 刘珍, 张晓辉. 流动人口HIV感染孕产妇健康综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 210-214.
[3] 周洋, 卢肇骏, 严睿, 邓璇, 唐学雯, 朱瑶, 徐校平, 何寒青. 应用德尔菲法构建乙型肝炎病毒感染孕产妇健康管理优化路径[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(6): 631-636.
[4] 胡秋月, 韩文娟, 周丽, 吴一平, 蒋烨琛, 李殷芳, 王翠娥. 应用德尔菲法构建无偿献血者重复献血意向的评估指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 841-843.
[5] 张婷, 刘珊珊, 汪清雅, 张娅, 李建琼, 陈健. 重庆市疾控机构耐药肺结核治疗管理评价指标体系构建[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(6): 592-594,598.
[6] 吴晓丽, 方乐, 张晓辉, 徐双飞, 陈向宇, 周标, 胡如英, 胡崇高. 应用德尔菲法优化浙江省出生缺陷一级预防策略[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 865-868.
[7] 王秀萍, 尚晓鹏, 陈定湾, 邱银伟, 何凡, 俞敏. 县域医共体公共卫生工作绩效评价指标体系构建[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 869-872.
[8] 王子云, 杨婷婷, 蒋芝月, 范丽丽, 马欣茹, 李兴艳, 杨敬源. 应用德尔菲法建立贵阳市健康细胞建设评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(6): 591-594.
[9] 韩宗梅, 庞志峰, 章光明, 朱浩. 金华市输入性传染病公共卫生风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(11): 1115-1120.
[10] 苏琳, 张佳, 朱文华, 戴红蕾. 应用德尔菲法构建全科适宜技术目录[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(3): 255-259.
[11] 沈益妹, 丁昱, 俞梅华, 莫小春, 沈红伟. 应用德尔菲法建立幼托儿童手足口病健康教育评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(12): 1228-1232.
[12] 赵玉遂, 许燕, 吴青青, 徐水洋, 徐锦杭. 应用德尔菲法构建网络健康信息质量评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(2): 121-124.
[13] 张东红, 沈毅, 张行钦, 周勤, 顾晓婉, 杨青. 户外大型活动食品安全监管指标研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(5): 465-468.
[14] 许燕, 郭俊香, 夏时畅, 胡伟, 陈士华, 叶真. 国家卫生城市综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(3): 247-251.
[15] 韦余东, 张人杰, 张新卫, 王臻, 刘碧瑶, 李娜, 张双凤. 应用德尔菲法构建疾控机构应急能力评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(1): 32-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed