Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (5): 401-405    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.008
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养指标体系研究
王智帆1, 郭玲伶2, 简伟研1
1.北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系,北京 100191;
2.北京大学研究生院医学部分院,北京 100191
Construction of a core competency training indicator system for high-level public health talents
WANG Zhifan1, GUO Lingling2, JIAN Weiyan1
1. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China;
2. Graduate School of Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
全文: PDF(794 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 应用德尔菲法构建高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养指标体系,为高层次公共卫生人才培养实践提供依据。方法 复习高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养相关文献,并结合我国公共卫生工作重点与发展需求,初步构建指标框架,邀请20位公共卫生领域专家进行2轮德尔菲咨询。根据专家评分的满分频率、平均值、变异系数(CV)筛选指标,采用熵权法确定指标权重;以专家的积极程度、权威程度和意见协调程度评价咨询效果。结果 20位专家参与咨询,其中男性12人;30~<40岁6人,40~<50岁8人,≥50岁6人;硕士及以上学历17人;副高级及以上专业技术职称19人;从业年限均≥10年。2轮咨询的专家积极程度分别为95.24%和100.00%;权威系数为0.87;第二轮咨询后,CV均降至0.25以下,协调系数(W)均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且均大于第一轮。构建的高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养指标体系包括健康保护、卫生服务改进、健康促进和基本素质4项一级指标,权重分别为0.388、0.310、0.122和0.180;11项二级指标,其中,保护人群健康免受威胁、监测与评估卫生服务利用情况和促进卫生服务质量与可及性的权重较高,分别为0.178、0.157和0.112;70项三级指标,其中,中文写作、卫生政策建议能力和全球观的权重较高,分别为0.038、0.034和0.030。结论 构建的高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养指标体系可为高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养实践提供依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王智帆
郭玲伶
简伟研
关键词 高层次公共卫生人才核心能力德尔菲法    
AbstractObjective To construct a core competency training indicator system for high-level public health talents using the Delphi method, so as to provide insights into optimization of high-level public health talents training. Methods Based on review of publications pertaining to core competency training for high-level public health talents, in combination with public health priorities and development needs in China, a preliminary indicator system was constructed. Twenty public health experts were invited for two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. Indicators were screened based on the frequency of full marks, mean score and coefficient of variation (CV), and the weight of indicators was determined using the Entropy weight method. The effectiveness of the Delphi expert consultation was evaluated using the active degree, authority coefficient and the consistency degree. Results Twenty experts participated in the consultation, including 12 men, and there were 6 experts at ages of 30 to 39 years, 8 at ages of 40 to 49 years, and 6 at ages of 50 years and older. There were 17 experts with an educational level of master and above, 19 with senior professional titles and all experts had working experiences for 10 years and longer. The active degrees were 95.24% and 100.00% for two rounds of consultations, and the overall authority coefficient was 0.87. Following two rounds of consultations, all CVs were reduced to below 0.25, and the coordination coefficients were all statistically significant (P<0.05), with a higher coordination coefficient in the second round of consultation than in the first round. The constructed core competency training indicator system for high-level public health talents included four primary indicators, including health protection, health service improvement, health promotion, and essential quality, with weights of 0.388, 0.310, 0.122 and 0.180, 11 secondary indicators, with high weights seen for protection of human health from threats (0.178), monitoring and assessment of health service utilization (0.157) and promotion of health service quality and access (0.112), and 70 tertiary indicators, with high weights seen for Chinese writing (0.038), capability for health policy suggestions (0.034) and global perspective (0.030). Conclusion The core competency training indicator system for high-level public health talents constructed in this study may provide insights into training of high-level public health talents.
Key wordshigh-level public health talents    core competency    Delphi method
收稿日期: 2023-02-10      修回日期: 2023-04-04      出版日期: 2023-05-10
中图分类号:  R197  
通信作者: 简伟研,E-mail:jianweiyan@bjmu.edu.cn   
作者简介: 王智帆,硕士研究生在读,主要从事医学教育管理相关研究
引用本文:   
王智帆, 郭玲伶, 简伟研. 高层次公共卫生人才核心能力培养指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 401-405.
WANG Zhifan, GUO Lingling, JIAN Weiyan. Construction of a core competency training indicator system for high-level public health talents. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(5): 401-405.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.008      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I5/401
[1] 李立明. 公共卫生在健康中国建设中的地位和作用[J].中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(7):867-872.
[2] 孟佳. 基于能力培养的公共卫生硕士课程教学体系构建[J].中国继续医学教育,2022,14(9):159-163.
[3] 聂晓璐,卓琳,王胜锋,等.国外MD-MPH双学位项目对中国高层次应用型公共卫生人才培养的启示[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(8):1498-1503.
[4] 任涛,吕筠,余灿清,等.疫情后时代我国公共卫生教育和人才队伍建设的思考[J].中华预防医学杂志,2020,54(5):457-464.
[5] Pan American Health Organization.Core competencies for public health:a regional framework for the Americas[R].Washington, D.C.:Pan American Health Organization,2013.
[6] 刘秀颖,赵欣宇,薛恩慈,等.疾病预防控制中心专业人员岗位胜任力模型构建[J].中华预防医学杂志,2021,55(7):916-920.
[7] 樊立华,陈振康,石磊,等.中国公共卫生执业医师岗位胜任力模型构建与应用探讨[J].中国公共卫生管理,2019,35(1):1-4,9.
[8] 梁胜翔. 我国西部地区基层医疗卫生机构基本公共卫生服务人员核心能力建设研究[D].重庆:中国人民解放军陆军军医大学,2020.
[9] 于德娥,王基鸿,王倩,等.用人单位对预防医学专业人才岗位胜任力要素重要性的评价[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2017,16(9):957-961.
[10] 牛媛娜. 公共卫生硕士核心能力指标体系构建[D].郑州:郑州大学,2018.
[11] Council on Linkages between Academia and Public Health Practice.Core competencies for public health professionals[R].Washington D.C.:the Council on Linkages,2021.
[12] Association of Schools of Public Health in the European Region.ASPHER's European list of core competences for the public health professional[R].[S.I.]:ASPHER,2018.
[13] Council of Academic Public Health Institutions in Australia.Foundation Competencies for Public Health Graduates in Australia.Second Edition[R].ACT:CAPHIA,2016.
[14] 王秀萍,尚晓鹏,陈定湾,等.县域医共体公共卫生工作绩效评价指标体系构建[J].预防医学,2020,32(9):869-872.
[15] 方婷. 《预防医学本科生岗位胜任力评定量表》的构建及其应用研究[D].合肥:安徽医科大学,2019.
[16] World Health Organization.21st century health challenges:can the essential public health functions make a difference?[R].Geneva:WHO,2021.
[17] 吴添舒,孔璐.新冠疫情下公共卫生实践教育的思考与建议[J].教育教学论坛,2022(1):50-53.
[18] 程新奎,张瑾.美国能力本位教育的新发展及其对我国远程开放教育的启示[J].中国远程教育,2021,41(12):28-37.
[1] 高丽娟, 井淇, 郑文贵, 吴芳, 段明雪, 马安宁. 县级疾病预防控制中心突发公共卫生事件应急准备能力评价指标体系构建[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 659-664.
[2] 陈银炜, 周洋, 刘珍, 张晓辉. 流动人口HIV感染孕产妇健康综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 210-214.
[3] 周洋, 卢肇骏, 严睿, 邓璇, 唐学雯, 朱瑶, 徐校平, 何寒青. 应用德尔菲法构建乙型肝炎病毒感染孕产妇健康管理优化路径[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(6): 631-636.
[4] 胡秋月, 韩文娟, 周丽, 吴一平, 蒋烨琛, 李殷芳, 王翠娥. 应用德尔菲法构建无偿献血者重复献血意向的评估指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 841-843.
[5] 张婷, 刘珊珊, 汪清雅, 张娅, 李建琼, 陈健. 重庆市疾控机构耐药肺结核治疗管理评价指标体系构建[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(6): 592-594,598.
[6] 吴晓丽, 方乐, 张晓辉, 徐双飞, 陈向宇, 周标, 胡如英, 胡崇高. 应用德尔菲法优化浙江省出生缺陷一级预防策略[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 865-868.
[7] 王秀萍, 尚晓鹏, 陈定湾, 邱银伟, 何凡, 俞敏. 县域医共体公共卫生工作绩效评价指标体系构建[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 869-872.
[8] 王子云, 杨婷婷, 蒋芝月, 范丽丽, 马欣茹, 李兴艳, 杨敬源. 应用德尔菲法建立贵阳市健康细胞建设评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(6): 591-594.
[9] 韩宗梅, 庞志峰, 章光明, 朱浩. 金华市输入性传染病公共卫生风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(11): 1115-1120.
[10] 苏琳, 张佳, 朱文华, 戴红蕾. 应用德尔菲法构建全科适宜技术目录[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(3): 255-259.
[11] 沈益妹, 丁昱, 俞梅华, 莫小春, 沈红伟. 应用德尔菲法建立幼托儿童手足口病健康教育评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(12): 1228-1232.
[12] 赵玉遂, 许燕, 吴青青, 徐水洋, 徐锦杭. 应用德尔菲法构建网络健康信息质量评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(2): 121-124.
[13] 许燕, 郭俊香, 夏时畅, 胡伟, 陈士华, 叶真. 国家卫生城市综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(3): 247-251.
[14] 韦余东, 张人杰, 张新卫, 王臻, 刘碧瑶, 李娜, 张双凤. 应用德尔菲法构建疾控机构应急能力评价指标体系[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(1): 32-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed