Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (11): 957-960,965    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.11.009
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
紧固件制造企业噪声对作业工人听力损失的影响研究
孟盼, 吴益康, 胡赞, 吴大明, 施志豪, 周哲华
嘉兴市疾病预防控制中心环境与健康科(职业健康与辐射防护科),浙江 嘉兴 314050
Effect of noise on hearing loss among workers in a fastener manufacturing enterprise
MENG Pan, WU Yikang, HU Zan, WU Daming, SHI Zhihao, ZHOU Zhehua
Department of Environment and Health (Department of Occupational Health and Radiation Protection), Jiaxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314050, China
全文: PDF(823 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解紧固件制造企业噪声对作业工人听力损失的影响,为噪声相关职业病防治提供依据。方法 通过中国疾病预防控制信息系统职业病与健康危害因素检测信息系统收集浙江省嘉兴市某紧固件制造企业2022年工人职业健康检查资料和工作场所职业病危害因素调查资料,分析高频听力损失和语频听力损失的影响因素。结果 调查的625名工人年龄MQR)为44.00(13.00)岁,工龄MQR)为8.00(9.00)年。男性519人,占83.04%;女性106人,占16.96%。单独噪声暴露309人,占49.44%;联合暴露316人,占50.56%。接触的LEX,40 h超标518人,占82.88%。高频听力损失和语频听力损失分别检出307和219人,检出率为49.12%和35.04%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,男性(OR=10.528,95%CI:5.271~21.025)、工龄≥10年(OR=2.451,95%CI:1.599~3.759)、接触LEX,40 h超标(OR=2.227,95%CI:1.318~3.764)、联合暴露(OR=3.002,95%CI:2.080~4.334)工人发生高频听力损失的风险较高;男性(OR=9.400,95%CI:4.211~20.985)、接触LEX,40 h超标(OR=2.305,95%CI:1.345~3.951)、联合暴露(OR=3.880,95%CI:2.677~5.623)工人发生语频听力损失的风险较高。结论 性别、工龄、接触LEX,40 h超标和暴露方式是紧固件制造企业工人高频听力损失的影响因素,性别、接触LEX,40 h超标和暴露方式是语频听力损失的影响因素。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孟盼
吴益康
胡赞
吴大明
施志豪
周哲华
关键词 噪声高频听力损失语频听力损失紧固件制造    
AbstractObjective To investigate the current status of hearing loss in a fastener manufacturing enterprise, and to analyze its influencing factors, so as to provide insights into occupational disease prevention and control. Methods The occupational health examination data of noise exposed workers and the workplace occupational disease hazard factors detection data in a fastener manufacturing enterprise in Jiaxing City in 2022 were collected through the Occupational Disease and Occupational Health Hazard Factors Detection System of China Disease Prevention and Control Information System, and factors affecting the development of high-frequency noise-induced hearing loss (HFNIHL) and speech-frequency noise-induced hearing loss (SFNIHL) were analyzed. Results Totally 625 workers were investigated, with a median age of 44.00 (interquartile range, 13.00) years and a median length of service of 8.00 (interquartile range, 9.00) years, and including 519 men (83.04%) and 106 women (16.96%). There were 309 workers with single noise exposure (49.44%) and 316 workers with joint noise exposure (50.56%), and 518 workers exposed to noise with the normalized continuous A-weighted sound pressure level equivalent to a 40 h working week (LEX,40 h) that exceeded the national standard (82.88%). The detection rates of HFNIHL and SFNIHL were 49.12% and 35.04%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that males (OR=10.528, 95%CI: 5.271-21.025), length of service of 10 years and longer (OR=2.451, 95%CI: 1.599-3.759), LEX,40 h of >85 dB (A) (OR=2.227, 95%CI: 1.318-3.764) and joint noise exposure (OR=3.002, 95%CI: 2.080-4.334) were associated with an increased risk of HFNIHL, and male (OR=9.400, 95%CI: 4.211-20.985), LEX,40 h of >85 dB (A) (OR=2.305, 95%CI: 1.345-3.951), and joint noise exposure (OR=3.880, 95%CI: 2.677-5.623) were associated with an increased risk of SFNIHL. Conclusion Gender, length of service, noise intensity and exposure mode are factors affecting the risk of HFNIHL, while gender, noise intensity and exposure mode are factors affecting the risk of SFNIHL.
Key wordsnoise    high-frequency noise-induced hearing loss    speech-frequency noise-induced hearing loss    fastener manufacturing
收稿日期: 2023-07-12      修回日期: 2023-10-02      出版日期: 2023-11-10
中图分类号:  R135.8  
基金资助:嘉兴市科技局基金项目(2021AY30011)
通信作者: 周哲华,E-mail:907253206@qq.com   
作者简介: 孟盼,硕士,主管医师,主要从事职业卫生工作
引用本文:   
孟盼, 吴益康, 胡赞, 吴大明, 施志豪, 周哲华. 紧固件制造企业噪声对作业工人听力损失的影响研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(11): 957-960,965.
MENG Pan, WU Yikang, HU Zan, WU Daming, SHI Zhihao, ZHOU Zhehua. Effect of noise on hearing loss among workers in a fastener manufacturing enterprise. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(11): 957-960,965.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.11.009      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I11/957
[1] World Health Organization.World report on hearing[R/OL]. [2023-10-02]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-hearing.
[2] 李欣欣,柳安琪,王丹,等.2020年中国工业企业接触噪声劳动者听力损失流行病学特征分析[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志,2022,26(8):882-887.
[3] 王旭波,施志豪,辛佳芮,等.浙江省五家汽车制造企业接噪工人听力损失的流行病学特征[J]. 环境与职业医学,2022,39(12):1386-1390,1397.
[4] 王文朋,黄云彪,李钢,等. 造船企业噪声所致作业工人高频听力损失回顾性队列研究[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援,2023,41(2):127-132.
[5] 赵学彬,姚国兴,胡磊.新吴区噪声作业人员健康体检听力异常结果分析[J]. 预防医学,2020,32(1):83-84.
[6] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. 声学测听方法第1部分:纯音气导和骨导测听法:GB/T 16296.1—2018[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
[7] 中华人民共和国卫生和计划生育委员会. 职业性噪声聋的诊断:GBZ 49—2014[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
[8] 邬堂春. 职业卫生与职业医学(第8版)[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2017.
[9] CHEN K H, SU S B,CHEN K T. An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers:epidemiology,pathogenesis,and preventive measures[J/OL]. Environ Health Prev Med,2020,25(1)[2023-10-02]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-020-00906-0.
[10] ZHOU J,SHI Z,ZHOU L,et al. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss in China:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. BMJ Open,2020,10(9)[2023-10-02]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039576.
[11] 王鑫,边洪英,董一文,等. 3家铁路运输设备制造企业噪声致劳动者听力损失的风险评估[J]. 卫生研究,2022,51(6):904-910.
[12] 林燕,郑双来,张宝津. 杭州市某区9 895例噪声作业工人职业健康检查结果及相关因素分析[J]. 工业卫生与职业病,2022,48(5):377-379.
[13] 高美伶,张永利,易井萍. 舟山市噪声作业工人高频听力损失的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学,2020,32(8):834-838.
[14] 白瑞. 职业性噪声聋成因及防护对策[J]. 现代职业安全,2011(10):98-99.
[15] 秦汝男,张明,唐慧晶,等. 某钢管制造企业高温与噪声联合暴露对工人健康影响的调查分析[J]. 工业卫生与职业病,2022,48(1):10-13,17.
[16] 刘丹. 耳毒性有机溶剂与噪声联合暴露对劳动者听力影响研究[D]. 北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2021.
[1] 倪蕾, 殷文军, 刘艳茹, 李群燕, 易桂林, 陈振龙. 职业性噪声暴露和动脉硬化对血糖水平的交互影响研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(2): 108-111.
[2] 王剑飞, 靳明英, 朱烨, 冯玲芳, 夏海玲, 李涛, 陈俊斐, 方圆, 施理, 楼建林, 蒋兆强. 某化纤材料生产企业一线工人职业紧张状况的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(1): 6-10.
[3] 高美伶, 张永利, 易井萍. 舟山市噪声作业工人高频听力损失的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(8): 834-838.
[4] 谢庆堂, 罗健, 陈开, 雷少颖. 应用列线图模型预测噪声作业工人高频听力损失情况[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 715-719.
[5] 梁志明, 曾庆民, 余建文, 邓永愈, 周艺枝, 李丽泉, 苏世标. 机械加工行业手持打磨工具作业工人手传振动和噪声危害调查[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(6): 621-624.
[6] 赵学彬, 姚国兴, 胡磊. 新吴区噪声作业人员健康体检听力异常结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(1): 83-84.
[7] 王莎莎, 李明, 蒋兴祥. 绍兴市噪声作业职业病危害特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(4): 405-408.
[8] 彭艳, 徐慧, 边阳甫, 张磊. 杭州市某区企业噪声作业工人听力下降影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(2): 196-198.
[9] 李向文, 王永斌, 刘启玲, 孙娜, 张荣强, 李星慧, 袁聚祥. 噪声和高温职业暴露与高血压的关系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(12): 1189-1192,1199.
[10] 周伟, 丘海丽, 田东超, 杨光涛, 王雪毓, 左弘. 深圳市职业病防治机构声级计性能实验室间比对结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(12): 1217-1221.
[11] 张婷婷,沈洁,杨盛谊,谌容 综述;杨磊 审校. 噪声性耳聋动物模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(10): 1013-1016.
[12] 周彩玲, 贾月芝, 胡应祖, 李静. 噪声作业工人听力损失调查[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(1): 91-92,95.
[13] 陈辉 综述, 蒋健敏, 张美辨, 杨磊 审校. 工业噪声测量指标研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(4): 376-379.
[14] 戴泽礼, 陆燕娜, 徐雯. 噪声暴露对作业工人高血压患病率的影响[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(2): 183-185.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed