Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2020, Vol. 32 Issue (4): 338-341    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.04.004
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
下城区中小学生步行交通安全行为调查
何宝华1, 周晓红1, 席胜军1, 王峥1, 钟节鸣2, 郭丽花2, 赵鸣2
1.杭州市下城区疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 310003;
2.浙江省疾病预防控制中心
Pedestrian traffic safety behaviors among primary and secondary school students in Xiacheng District
HE Baohua*, ZHOU Xiaohong, XI Shengjun, WANG Zheng, ZHONG Jieming, GUO Lihua, ZHAO Ming
*Xiacheng Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310003,China
全文: PDF(438 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解杭州市下城区中小学生步行上下学交通安全相关行为情况,为制定中小学生步行交通安全干预措施提供依据。方法 于2015年10月选择杭州市下城区6所学校9个校区,采用非参与式观测法观察分析中小学生过马路时走人行横道、观察交通状况、跑步和看手机等行为情况。结果 共观测2 585人,有效观测2 580人,有效率为99.81%。过马路时走人行横道1 887人,占73.14%;男生和女生过马路时走人行横道分别占71.89%和74.51%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);上学和放学过马路时走人行横道分别占64.76%和81.32%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。过马路时观察交通状况1 683人,占65.23%;男生和女生过马路时观察交通状况分别占63.61%和67.02%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);上学和放学过马路时观察交通状况分别占64.05%和66.39%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。过马路时跑步362人,占14.03%;男生和女生过马路时跑步分别占15.31%和12.62%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);上学和放学过马路时跑步分别占9.26%和18.68%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。过马路时看手机53人,占2.05%;男生和女生过马路时看手机分别占2.29%和1.79%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);上学和放学过马路时看手机分别占1.41%和2.68%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 中小学生步行过马路时存在危险行为。上学时重点针对过马路时不走人行横道、不观察交通状况等行为进行干预,而放学时应重点针对过马路时看手机进行干预。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
何宝华
周晓红
席胜军
王峥
钟节鸣
郭丽花
赵鸣
关键词 步行交通安全行为中小学生    
AbstractObjective To investigate the pedestrian traffic safety behaviors of primary and secondary school students in Xiacheng District of Hangzhou,and to provide reference for formulating traffic safety strategy. Methods In October 2015,nine campuses of six schools in Xiacheng District were selected to observe the pedestrian traffic safety behaviors of the primary and secondary school students walking to and from school,such as taking the zebra crossing,observing the traffic condition,running and playing with cellphones when walking across the road. Results Totally 2 585 students were investigated,and 2 580 students were valid(99.81%). When walking across the road,1 887 people took the zebra crossing,accounting for 73.14%;71.89% of boys and 74.51% of girls took the zebra crossing,and there was no significant difference(P>0.05);64.76% and 81.32% of the students took the zebra crossing on the way to school and home,with a significant difference(P<0.05). When walking across the road,1 683 students people observed the traffic conditions,accounting for 65.23%;63.61% of boys and 67.02% of girls observed the traffic conditions,and there was no significant difference(P>0.05);64.05% and 66.39% of the students observed the traffic conditions on the way to school and home,with a significant difference(P<0.05).There were 362 students running across the road, accounting for 14.03%;15.31% of boys and 12.62% of girls ran across the road,and there was no significant difference(P>0.05);9.26% and 18.68% of the students ran across the road on the way to school and home,with a significant difference(P<0.05). There were 53 students playing with cellphones when crossing the road,accounting for 2.05%;2.29% of boys and 1.79% of girls played with cellphones,and there was no significant difference(P>0.05);1.41% and 2.68% of the students played with cellphones on the way to school and home,with a significant difference(P<0.05). Conclusions Primary and secondary school students have dangerous behaviors when walking across the road. We should focus on the intervention of not taking the zebra crossing and not observing traffic conditions when crossing the road on the way to school,and playing with cellphones on the way home.
Key wordspedestrian traffic safety    behavior    primary and secondary school students
收稿日期: 2019-12-17      修回日期: 2020-01-08      出版日期: 2020-04-10
中图分类号:  R193  
通信作者: 周晓红,E-mail:26724030@qq.com   
作者简介: 何宝华,本科,主管医师,主要从事慢性病管理工作
引用本文:   
何宝华, 周晓红, 席胜军, 王峥, 钟节鸣, 郭丽花, 赵鸣. 下城区中小学生步行交通安全行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(4): 338-341.
HE Baohua, ZHOU Xiaohong, XI Shengjun, WANG Zheng, ZHONG Jieming, GUO Lihua, ZHAO Ming. Pedestrian traffic safety behaviors among primary and secondary school students in Xiacheng District. Preventive Medicine, 2020, 32(4): 338-341.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.04.004      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2020/V32/I4/338
[1] 楼淑萍,赵若兰,陈辉. 2006—2016年我国0~14岁儿童道路交通伤害发生率的Meta分析[J/CD].伤害医学(电子版),2018, 7(2): 22-28.
[2] 叶鹏鹏,金叶,耳玉亮,等.1990年与2013年中国0~14岁儿童伤害疾病负担分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2017, 38(10):1335-1341.
[3] 钟节鸣,郭丽花,赵鸣,等.2010—2014年浙江省儿童道路交通伤害病例特征分析[J/CD].伤害医学(电子版),2016,5(2):22-26.
[4] 刘爱玲,胡小琪,李艳平,等.我国中小学生上下学交通方式分析[J].中国健康教育,2009,25(1):8-10,32.
[5] 高悦尔,陈小鸿,李佳,等.中小城市义务教育阶段学生上下学出行特征研究[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2016,18(3):108.
[6] 金微瑛,张维溪,李昌崇,等.2005—2014年温州地区重症道路交通伤害住院患儿的流行病学特征及变化趋势[J].中国公共卫生,2012,28(5):569-571.
[7] 林焘宇,肖作鹏.深圳小学生上学交通特征及方式选择影响因素[J].交通与运输(学术版),2017(A2): 90-94.
[8] 邱俊. 中国交通事故和交通伤害成因特点与趋势研究 [D].重庆:第三军医大学,2009.
[9] 周月芳,陆茜,罗春燕.上海社区中小学生步行安全状况分析[J].中国学校卫生,2011,32(12):1461-1464.
[10] 叶周丰,王书梅,陈瑶,等.上海市非中心城区三~五年级小学生步行危险行为调查[J].中国学校卫生,2017,38(10): 1458-1460,1464.
[11] 何宝华,周晓红,席胜军,等.下城区中小学生道路交通安全知信行调查[J].预防医学,2019,31(9): 877-881.
[12] 禚子群,冯向先.长治市小学生道路交通安全问题现况调查[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2015,19(1): 28-30.
[13] 雷若艺,胡晓斌,柳招兄,等.中小学生手机使用现状及其家长态度分析[J].中国校医,2019,33(7): 481-483,499.
[14] 何安明,万娇娇,惠秋平.青少年手机依赖者的心理健康状况及与生活事件、学业倦怠的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2019,27(2):410-413.
[15] 闫铭喆,佟博男,郭少帅,等.医学生手机依赖行为与睡眠质量的相关分析[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2018,38(8):1066-1069.
[16] OJO T,ADETONA C O,AGYEMANG W,et al.Pedestrian risky behavior and safety at zebra crossings in a Ghanaian metropolitan area[J].Traffic Inj Prev,2019,20(2):216-219.
[17] SCHWEBEL D C,STAVRINOS D,BYINGTON K W,et al.Distraction and pedestrian safety: how talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street[J].Accid Anal Prev,2012,45(2):266-271.
[18] JIANG K,LING F,FENG Z,et al.Effects of mobile phone distraction on pedestrians' crossing behavior and visual attention allocation at a signalized intersection: An outdoor experimental study[J].Accid Anal Prev, 2018,115:170-177.
[19] 丘志坚,邱宗耀,苏绮雯,等. 广州市番禺区12 320名小学生步行安全教育干预效果评价[J]. 医学动物防制,2018,34(8):752-755.
[20] 韩云飞,李得溪. 我国道路交通伤害的流行病学研究进展[J].沈阳医学院学报,2014,16(4): 225-226.
[1] 何佳, 徐方忠, 汤路瀚, 余鸽, 韩煜昉. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童优势反应抑制缺陷与注意缺陷、冲动行为的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 766-769.
[2] 王梦琴, 柴荟琳, 郭宇燕, 任敬娟, 梁瑞峰. 山西省农村居民高血压防治知识、态度、行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 563-569.
[3] 卢小敏, 赵继娟, 孙中友, 张学艳, 陈盛兰. 盐城市儿童青少年健康危险行为聚集情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 331-334.
[4] 张红, 胡志明, 潘晓锋, 朱梦胜, 戴伟丽, 谢伊丽, 诸建方. 社区高血压患者Triangle分层分级管理效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 350-354,358.
[5] 景正伟, 宁艳, 常文辉, 周超, 任强, 董丽芳, 贾华, 许诗瑶, 王志锋. 高校MSM人群HIV感染学生生存质量分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 291-294.
[6] 彭佳, 曹友琴, 荣冬芸, 刘玉杰, 吕宝坤, 曹煜. 贵阳市在校大学生电子烟相关知识、态度、行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 253-257.
[7] 罗西, 覃世龙, 明方钊, 余庆, 范传刚. 武汉市MSM人群HIV抗体重复检测的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 831-835.
[8] 王其鹏, 曹龙飞, 张行, 方妍彤, 叶宝娟. 注意缺陷多动障碍不同表现型的反应时低频振幅研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 747-750,755.
[9] 江南, 高静, 吴燕芳, 杨艳娜. 通州区中小学生视力不良的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(6): 616-621.
[10] 由娜, 潘洁滢, 阮慧红. 番禺区中小学生伤害特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(6): 622-625.
[11] 潘松涛, 陈艳, 张永利, 张森, 王安芬, 严剑波. 舟山市中小学生睡眠情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(6): 626-630.
[12] 何海艳, 谢玉先, 何燕, 吴学华. 布拖县中小学生性知识调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(5): 525-529.
[13] 刘媛, 王冰, 徐瑞雪, 喻颖杰, 张炎, 李明颖, 赵耀. 中小学生维生素D水平与血红蛋白、血清铁蛋白的相关性研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(4): 385-388.
[14] 张娆, 陈映, 钱叶红, 胡守玮, 褚庆霞. 基层医疗机构医务人员医院感染防控知识和行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(4): 424-428.
[15] 林静静, 杜雨珊, 梁明斌, 陈向宇, 何青芳, 许辉, 秦家胜, 陆凤, 王立新, 钟节鸣, 方乐. 中老年人衰弱与生活行为因素的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(3): 263-267.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed