Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2020, Vol. 32 Issue (4): 334-338    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.04.003
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
登革病毒载量与患者临床特征的关系
费云霞1, 张祥波2, 高岭3, 高依丹3, 李鸽3, 朱旭平4, 邵俊斌4, 汪浩秋5, 潘劲草5, 陈公英3
1.浙江中医药大学,浙江 杭州 310053;
2.杭州师范大学;
3.杭州师范大学附属医院;
4.上海之江生物有限公司;
5.杭州市疾病预防控制中心
Relationship between dengue viral load and clinical characteristics
FEI Yunxia*, ZHANG Xiangbo, GAO Ling, GAO Yidan, LI Ge, ZHU Xuping, SHAO Junbin, WANG Haoqiu, PAN Jingcao, CHEN Gongying
*Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310053,China
全文: PDF(504 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析登革病毒载量与患者临床特征的关系,为登革热防治提供依据。方法 收集2017年6—11月杭州市拱墅区确诊的120例登革热患者临床资料,采用实时荧光定量RT-PCR法检测登革病毒核酸量和分型,分析病毒载量与患者各项临床指标的相关性。结果 120例登革热患者登革病毒核酸均为阳性,均为登革热Ⅱ型,登革病毒载量中位数为3.91×104 copies/mL。患者均有发热,体温峰值平均为(38.96±0.69)℃;乏力102例,占85.00%;白细胞计数<4×109/L 116例,占96.67%;血小板计数<100×109/L 119例,占99.17%;谷草转氨酶>40 U/L 114例,占95.00%;谷丙转氨酶>52 U/L 81例,占67.50%;肌酸激酶>210 U/L 58例,占48.33%。登革病毒载量与患者住院时间、体温峰值、发热持续时间、白细胞计数、血小板计数、谷丙转氨酶、谷草转氨酶和肌酸激酶相关性均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。重症患者75例,占62.50%;登革病毒载量中位数为 9.29×104 copies/mL,高于非重症患者的5.33×103 copies/mL(P<0.05)。结论 未发现登革病毒载量与患者住院时间、体温峰值、发热持续时间、白细胞计数、血小板计数、谷丙转氨酶和谷草转氨酶、肌酸激酶等临床指标存在相关性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
费云霞
张祥波
高岭
高依丹
李鸽
朱旭平
邵俊斌
汪浩秋
潘劲草
陈公英
关键词 登革热病毒载量临床特征相关性    
AbstractObjective To determine the relationship between dengue virus load and clinical characteristics, so as to provide basis for dengue fever prevention and treatment. Methods The dengue viral load and typing of 120 patients in Gongshu District of Hangzhou from June to November 2017 were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR;the clinical indicators of these dengue patients were collected and their correlation with the viral load was analyzed. Results The DNA detection of dengue virus in 120 patients showed that they were all typeⅡ. The median dengue virus load was 3.91×104 copies/mL. All the patients had fever, the average peak temperature was(38.96 ± 0.69)℃. There were 102(85.00%)cases with asthenia;116(96.67%)cases with white blood cell count(WBC)less than 4× 109/L;119(99.17%)cases with platelet count(PLT)less than 100×109/L;114(95.00%)cases with glutamic oxaloacetate transaminase(GOT)more than 40 U/L;81(67.50%)cases with glutamic pyruvate transaminase(GPT)more than 52 U/L;58(48.33%)cases with creatine kinase(CK)more than 210 U/L. There was no significant correlation of dengue virus load with length of hospitalization, peak temperature,duration of fever, WBC,PLT, GOT, GPT and CK(P>0.05). There were 75(62.50%)severe patients, and their median viral load was 9.29×104copies/mL, which was higher than 5.33×103copies/mL in non-severe patients(P<0.05). Conclusion The dengue virus load is not related with length of hospitalization,peak temperature,WBC,PLT,GOT,GPT and CK,but with the severity of the disease.
Key wordsdengue fever    viral load    clinical characteristics    correlation
收稿日期: 2019-11-15      修回日期: 2019-12-26      出版日期: 2020-04-10
中图分类号:  R373.33  
基金资助:浙江省基础公益研究计划(LGC19H200001); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划(2019KY146)
通信作者: 陈公英,E-mail:liuxingli0329@163.com   
作者简介: 费云霞,硕士在读
引用本文:   
费云霞, 张祥波, 高岭, 高依丹, 李鸽, 朱旭平, 邵俊斌, 汪浩秋, 潘劲草, 陈公英. 登革病毒载量与患者临床特征的关系[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(4): 334-338.
FEI Yunxia, ZHANG Xiangbo, GAO Ling, GAO Yidan, LI Ge, ZHU Xuping, SHAO Junbin, WANG Haoqiu, PAN Jingcao, CHEN Gongying. Relationship between dengue viral load and clinical characteristics. Preventive Medicine, 2020, 32(4): 334-338.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.04.003      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2020/V32/I4/334
[1] KAN F K,TAN C C,VON BAHR GREENWOOD T,et al. Dengue infection complicated by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: experiences from 180 severe dengue patients[J/OL]. Clin Infect Dis(2019-06-12)[2019-12-26]. https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciz499/5514267.
[2] YU H,KONG Q X,WANG J,et al. Multiple lineages of dengue virus serotype 2 cosmopolitan genotype caused a local dengue outbreak in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China, in2017[J/OL]. Sci Rep,2019,9:7345[2019-12-26]. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-43560-5#citeas.
[3] 陈芳, 王哲, 孙昼, 等. 杭州市登革热核心区蚊媒应急处置效果分析[J].预防医学, 2019, 31(10): 1078-1080.
[4] SOE H J, KHAN A M, MANIKAM R, et al.High dengue virus load differentially modulates human microvascular endothelial barrier function during early infection[J]. J Gen Virol, 2017, 98(12): 2993-3007.
[5] NUNES P C G, NOGUEIRA R M R, HERINGER M, et al. NS1 antigenemia and viraemia load: potential markers of progression to dengue fatal outcome?[J].Viruses, 2018, 10(6):e326.
[6] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.登革热诊疗指南(2014年第2版)[J]. 传染病信息, 2014, 27(5):262-265.
[7] 廖宝林, 张复春, 唐漾波, 等. 重症登革热临床和实验室特征及其细胞因子的动态变化[J/CD ].中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版),2011,5(2):142-147.
[8] 中华医学会感染病学分会,中华医学会热带病与寄生虫学分会.中国登革热临床诊断和治疗指南[J].传染病信息, 2018, 31(5):385-392.
[9] 赵令斋. 登革病毒基因变异、病毒载量及机体固有免疫与登革热严重程度的相关性研究[D].广州:广州医科大学, 2017.
[10] 张栋梁,王蓉,易波,等. 一起登革热暴发疫情调查[J].预防医学,2019,31(8):844-847.
[11] 陈英安,景钦隆, 杨勤华,等.血小板计数、白细胞总数与登革热临床类型的相关性[J].热带医学杂志, 2016, 16(4):523-526.
[12] VOGT M B, LAHON A, ARYA R P, et al.Dengue viruses infect human megakaryocytes, with probable clinical consequences[J].PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2019, 13(11):e0007837.
[13] SUNG J M, LEE C K, WU-HSIEH B A. Intrahepatic infiltrating NK and CD8+T cells cause liver cell death in different phases of dengue virus infection[J].PLoS One, 2012,7(9): e46292.
[14] DISSANAKE H A, SENEVIRATNE S L.Liver involvement indengue viral infections[J].Rev Med Virol, 2018,28(2): e1971.
[15] 洪文昕, 张复春. 重症登革热临床特征、预警指征及危险因素的研究进展[J].传染病信息, 2019, 32(1):69-72.
[16] LIBRATY D H, ENDY T P, HOUNG H S, et al.Differing influences of virus burden and immune activation on disease severity in secondary dengue-3 virus infections[J]. J Infect Dis, 2002, 185:1213-1221.
[17] BEN-SHACHAR R, KOELLE K.Minimal within-host dengue models highlight the specific roles of the immune response in primary secondary dengue infections[J]. J R Soc Interface, 2015,12(103): 20140886.
[18] WIJERATNE D T, FERNANDO S, GOMES L, et al.Quantification of dengue virus specific T cell responses and correlation with viral load and clinical disease severity in acute dengue infection.[J] .PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2018,12(10): e0006540.
[19] 赵令斋,高秀洁,庾蕾,等.登革病毒载量和IgM抗体水平与疾病严重程度的关系[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志, 2016, 36(4):252-255.
[20] 杨永红,宋璋瑶,郑学礼.登革热的研究进展[J].中国病原生物学杂志,2017,12(8):803-807.
[1] 张荣兵, 洪劲, 田荣, 陈志辉, 杨倩, 叶青, 李建荣, 马宏琳, 陈莉华, 彭霞. 2015—2021年云南省境外输入登革热和疟疾病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(2): 141-143.
[2] 胡丹标, 任丛汉, 王斌. 农村登革热暴发疫情的网格化管理[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(4): 385-387.
[3] 崔朋伟, 包林, 董泽丰, 陈立凌, 张钧. 2011—2019年苏州市登革热流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(3): 274-276.
[4] 王海滨, 李保军, 马敏, 杨双喜. 海曙区登革热疫点白纹伊蚊越冬蚊监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(1): 78-80.
[5] 程芳, 刘赛朵, 叶新春, 郑世林, 吴特, 张强, 施伎蝉. 新型冠状病毒肺炎普通型和重症病例临床特征比较[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 886-890.
[6] 李保军, 杨双喜, 王海滨. 一起城市点源登革热本地疫情的时空特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 937-939.
[7] 袁月荣, 王海滨, 李保军, 易波, 杨双喜. 海曙区登革热暴发疫情与蚊媒密度分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(8): 817-819.
[8] 周瑞芬, 杜秋菊, 姚国萍, 束龙, 郑培奋. 杭州市45~69岁人群非酒精性脂肪性肝病与2型糖尿病相关性研究[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(8): 809-812.
[9] 何向阳, 刘峥, 徐英, 彭绩, 赵仁成. 肥胖与四种常见慢性病的相关性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 692-697.
[10] 唐安, 李鹏, 李科峰, 仝振东, 严剑波. 舟山市居民登革热防控知信行调查[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 749-752.
[11] 汤路瀚, 任丽, 徐方忠. 学龄前儿童睡眠与行为问题研究[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(6): 569-572.
[12] 吴一峰, 赵凤敏, 李萍萍, 金彦利, 张栋梁. 江北区登革热疫情及本地病例出现对居民登革热认知的影响[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(2): 178-181.
[13] 洪雅青, 黄雅丽, 陈琼姜, 陶核, 陈炜, 张芳芳, 徐娟, 朱勇, 黎关龙, 来伟旗, 金锋, 顾刘金. SD大鼠鼠龄和体重与胸腺质量、胸腺系数的相关分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(1): 105-107.
[14] 张栋梁, 王蓉, 易波, 陈奕, 李永东, 倪红霞, 董红军, 许国章. 一起登革热暴发疫情调查[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(8): 844-847.
[15] 易井萍, 冯昶, 葛琪, 张永利. 舟山市空气污染物与医院门诊量的相关性研究[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(6): 573-577.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed