|
|
|
| Molecular typing and drug resistance of Salmonella in market-sold raw livestock meats in Shaoxing City |
| HE Qinfen, JIANG Zhuojing, TANG Shijie, ZHOU Liangkang, ZHANG Qinchao
|
| Department of Microbiological Inspection, Shaoxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312071, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the molecular typing and drug resistance of Salmonella in market-sold raw livestock meats in Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, so as to provide the basis for the prevention and control of drug-resistant Salmonella. Methods Salmonella isolates were detected and serotyped from raw livestock meat samples collected from supermarkets, agricultural markets and restaurants in Shaoxing City between March and November 2023. Molecular typing was performed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Antibiotic resistance phenotypes and resistance gene analyses were conducted using broth microdilution method and whole genome sequencing. Results A total of 34 Salmonella isolates were detected from 329 samples and the positive rate was 10.33%. There were 14 serotypes, with S. Rissen (9 isolates, 26.47%) and S. London (8 isolates, 23.53%) being dominant. PFGE typing revealed 31 band patterns and 23 banding pattern clusters of Salmonella, and the similarity ranged from 30.80% to 100.00%, without dominant band patterns. MLST identified 15 sequence typing (ST) types, and S. Rissen were all ST469 and S. London were all ST155. Salmonella strains exhibited high levels of resistance to tetracycline (44.12%) and ampicillin (35.29%). Thirteen resistance patterns were identified, with 8 multidrug resistant patterns (29.41%). There were 8 classes of 14 resistance genes, with aminoglycoside resistance gene aac(6' )-Iaa found in 100.00% of the strains. The highest concordance rate between the resistance phenotype and gene was observed for phenicol antibiotics (97.06%), while there was no concordance between the quinolone resistance phenotype and genes. Conclusions S. Rissen and S. London are the predominant serotypes in market-sold raw livestock meats in Shaoxing City. The PFGE band types of the Salmonella isolates show polymorphism distribution, and MLST are mainly ST469 and ST155. The isolates have high levels of resistance to tetracycline and ampicillin, manifesting multidrug resistance.
|
|
Received: 03 July 2024
Revised: 12 September 2024
Published: 15 October 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李红秋,郭云昌,宋壮志,等.2019年中国大陆食源性疾病暴发监测资料分析[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2021,33(6):913-917.
[2] 李红秋,贾华云,赵帅,等.2021年中国大陆食源性疾病暴发监测资料分析[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2022,34(4):816-821.
[3] 邢超,王琦梅,任蒋磊,等.2012—2022年绍兴市食源性疾病暴发事件流行特征分析[J].预防医学,2023,35(6):506-508,513.
[4] 刘玥,顾其芳,刘诚,等.2016年上海市市售肉制品中沙门菌耐药谱与分型研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2018,30(2):132-138.
[5] WANG Y N,LIU Y,LYU N,et al.The temporal dynamics of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella enterica and predominant serovars in China[J/OL].Natl Sci Rev,2022,10(3)[2024-09-12].https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac269.
[6] 施春雷. 食源性致病微生物研究的新动态[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2019,10(18):5981-5982.
[7] 吴云凤,袁宝君,乔昕,等.肉鸡胴体中沙门氏菌的分离鉴定及多重耐药谱研究[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2012,32(1):125-128.
[8] 李春辉. MDR、XDR、PDR多重耐药菌暂行标准定义——国际专家建议[J].中国感染控制杂志,2014,13(1):62-64.
[9] 姚雪婷,蒋玉艳,谭冬梅,等.2012—2017年广西壮族自治区市售食品中沙门菌监测数据分析[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2019,31(5):449-455.
[10] 陈莉萍,严伟,吴晓芳,等.2015—2021年湖州市食品中沙门菌污染与分子分型研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2023,35(2):218-223.
[11] 张金金,梁静,莫浩联,等.2012—2017年福田区食品中沙门菌污染状况监测及分子特征研究[J].热带医学杂志,2019,19(7):816-821.
[12] 黄邵军,袁珊珊,诸佳辉,等.浙江省余姚市猪肉和鸡肉中沙门菌的多样性及耐药性分析[J].疾病监测,2022,37(3):396-400.
[13] 赵雪蕾,周鹏,安戈,等.郑州市儿童感染性腹泻病原菌监测结果[J].预防医学,2022,34(4):389-394.
[14] TENOVER F C,ARBEIT R D,GOERING R V,et al.Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed field gel electrophoresis:criteria for bacterial strain typing[J].J Clin Microbiol,1995,33(9):2233-2239.
[15] 彭思露,周厚德,游兴勇,等.2014—2018年江西省食源性疾病患者沙门菌分离株MLST分型及流行特征研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2023,35(10):1538-1544.
[16] 胡玉琴,章乐怡,李毅,等.温州市沙门菌血清型、耐药性和PFGE指纹图谱研究[J].预防医学,2019,31(6):640-642.
[17] 刘军,吴莹,张杰,等.淄博市342份市售生肉中食源性沙门菌的型别特点及耐药性[J].现代预防医学,2018,45(8):1508-1527.
[18] 吴植,郝福星,刘莉,等.禽源沙门菌氨基糖苷类耐药表型及耐药基因研究[J].中国家禽,2016,38(17):56-58. |
|
|
|
