|
|
|
| Investigation of occupational health examination institutions in Zhejiang Province |
| YUAN Weiming, XUE Panqi, ZHOU Lifang, ZOU Hua, FANG Xinglin, WEI Fang, GAO Xiangjing
|
| Department of Occupational Health and Radiological Protection, Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the status of occupational health examination institutions in Zhejiang Province, so as to provide suggestions for quality control of occupational health examination institutions. Methods The 312 occupational health examination institutions in Zhejiang Province that have completed filing before September 30, 2023 were selected. The comprehensive capability, service quality, technical capability, and information reporting status were surveyed and evaluated through on-site inspection and skill assessment. Results There were 161 public hospitals (51.60%), 147 private organizations (47.12%), and 4 centers for disease control and prevention (CDCs)/ occupational disease prevention and control institutes (1.28%). The pass rates of comprehensive capability, service quality, technical capability and information reporting were 90.02%, 69.89%, 84.07% and 86.78%, respectively. Among the indicators of comprehensive capability, the compliance rate for staffing was the highest at 95.06%, while the qualification rate of quality control in occupational health examinations was the lowest at 84.83%. Among the indicators of service quality, the compliance rate of the physical examination report format was the highest at 95.83%, while the accuracy rate of the audiometry examination was the lowest at 76.60%. In terms of technical capabilities, the qualification rates for blood lead testing, pneumoconiosis reading, and audiogram diagnostic ability were 87.92%, 89.42% and 75.34%, respectively. In terms of information reporting, the qualification rates for reporting completeness, reporting timeliness, suspected occupational disease reporting timeliness, and reporting accuracy were 89.10%, 81.09%, 96.47% and 80.45%, respectively. Among the three types of institutions, private institutions had the lowest average qualification rates for comprehensive capability, service quality, and technical capability, which were 89.83%, 69.06% and 80.00%, respectively. Conclusions Public hospitals and private organizations were the main types of occupational health examination institutions in Zhejiang Province. However, there were deficiencies in quality control, audiogram examination and diagnosis, and the accuracy of information reporting among occupational health examination institutions.
|
|
Received: 27 May 2024
Revised: 01 August 2024
Published: 15 October 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.职业健康监护技术规范:GBZ 188—2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
[2] 赵静,王杰,张红兵,等.江苏省职业健康检查机构现状调查[J].预防医学,2019,31(2):199-201.
[3] 中国疾病预防控制中心职业卫生与中毒控制所.2020年全国职业病危害现状调查报告[R].北京:中国疾病预防控制中心职业卫生与中毒控制所,2021.
[4] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.职业健康检查管理办法[Z].北京:中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会,2019.
[5] 蒋联. 职业健康检查质量的制约因素与对策[J].安全、健康和环境,2018,18(5):31-34.
[6] 中国疾病预防控制中心.中国疾病预防控制中心关于印发职业健康检查质量控制规范(试行)的通知[Z].北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2019.
[7] 浙江省职业健康技术服务质量控制中心.2023年浙江省职业健康检查机构质量控制考核工作方案[Z].杭州:浙江省职业健康技术服务质量控制中心,2023.
[8] 邹华,方兴林,周莉芳,等.2006—2020年浙江省职业性噪声聋报告病例特征分析[J].环境与职业医学,2022,39(4):357-361.
[9] 吕一星,杜兵,李姗珊,等.关于非公立体检机构诚信评价体系建设的思考[J].中华健康管理学杂志,2020,14(2):191-193.
[10] 姜冬,李晔,张恒东.江苏省职业健康检查机构现状调查[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2022,40(2):208-211,221.
[11] 李晓艺,王姝,黄浪,等.广东省职业健康检查机构现状与发展风险分析[J].中国职业医学,2023,50(1):46-52. |
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|
