|
|
|
| An investigation on smoke-free environment and smoking status at or below county-level governments |
| LYU Qiao-hong, XU Shui-yang, WU Qing-qing, XU Jing-hang, XU Yue, HAO Gang
|
| The Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310051, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To learn the smoke-free environment and smoking status at or below county-level governments of Zhejiang Province, and to promote a smoke-free government.Methods By multi-stage random sampling method, 4 cities were selected in Zhejiang Province, then 4 counties were selected in 4 cities, finally12 governments were selected in 4 counties. With the methods of field observation,interview and questionnaire survey,smoke-free environment and smoking behavior , tobacco related knowledge of civil servants were investigated.Results A total of 12 governments and 405 civil servants were investigated. The smoke-free environment of 12 governments were relatively well. The total smoking rate of civil servants was 17.78%, and the highest was 26.67% in Jiande City, and the lowest were 9.00% in Zhuji City. For the civil servants ,male(26.62%), aged 50-(40.74%),divorced or widowed(40.00%),graduation of technical secondary school (33.33%),cadre of section rank(57.14%),above 20 years’ work(28.81%),smoking anywhere at home(50.00%), smoking in certain areas at work(22.95%)were significantly higher. The rate of cognition on the hazards of smoking was lower among the smokers than that of non-smokers (P<0.05).The rate of agreement on MPOWER tobacco control strategies and smoking bans in public places were lower among the smokers than that of non-smokers (P＜0.05). Non-conditional logistic regression analysis showed that age of 30-39(OR=9.87,95%CI:1.45-67.29),50-(OR=9.87,95%CI:1.45-67.29), smoking anywhere at home(OR=12.28,95%CI:2.95-51.18),and smoking in certain areas at home(OR=6.57,95%CI:3.07-14.08) may be the risk factors about smoking behavior. Conclusion The situation of smoking control at or below county-level governments in Zhejiang Province was good, and smoking rates has declined. But tobacco related knowledge and behavior of civil servants were relatively insufficient. Aiming at the problems found in the investigation, it is necessary to strengthen education on smoking control among civil servants, and to promote a smoke-free government.
|
|
Published: 21 November 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]Department of Health and Human Services,US. How tobacco smoke causes disease:the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease. A Report of the Surgeon General [R]. Atlanta(GA):Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,US,2010.
[2]World Health Organization. Framework convention on tobacco control[R]. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
[3]World Health Organization. 2008 global tobacco survey: MPOWER policy[M]. Geneva:World Health Organization,2008. [4]徐越,徐水洋,吴青青,等.浙江省2013年成人吸烟及被动吸现状调查[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2014,35(12):24-29.
[5]中国疾病预防控制中心.2015全球成人烟草调查[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2015. [6]赵芳红,刘敏,万国峰,等.北京市4 861名公务员吸烟与被动吸烟现状调查[J].中国健康教育,2011,27(5):339-342.
[7]许兆瑞,翟前前,丁春生.2011年长春市公务员吸烟及戒烟情况调查研究[J].中国健康教育,2013, 29(7): 657-659.
[8]钱运梁,李玉青,刘秀荣.北京市部分区县公务员吸烟行为及其影响因素调查[J].中国健康教育,2014,30(4) :291-293.
[9]雷丽霞,覃萍,陆松仪,等.广西来宾市科级以上公务员吸烟现状调查[J].中国健康教育,2015,31(9):851-854.
[10]徐越,徐水洋,吴青青.公务员吸烟行为及控烟知识调查[J].浙江预防医学,2010,22(4):78-79.
[11]黄敬亨,邢育健,吕姿之.健康教育学[M]. 5版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2011:52-60.
[12]吴金星,陈海婴,范义兵.南昌市办公场所吸烟与二手烟暴露现况调查[J].现代预防医学,2012,39(8):1885-1889.
[13]林竹,洪原浩,陆翔,等.福建省创建无烟医院控烟效果评价[J].中国健康教育,2013,29(1):25-28.
[14]高峰燕,郭欣,刘亨辉,等.中国40个市(县)中小学校创建无烟环境效果评价[J].中国学校卫生,2011,32(2):150-152. |
|
|
|
