|
|
|
| Association of deficits in prepotent response inhibition with attention deficit and impulsive behavior among children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder |
| HE Jia1, XU Fangzhong1,2, TANG Luhan2, YU Ge2, HAN Yufang1
|
1. Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China;
2. Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the associations of deficits in prepotent response inhibition with attention deficit and impulsive behavior in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), so as to provide insights into response inhibition training in ADHD to relieve clinical symptoms. Methods From March to December 2022, 57 children with ADHD were selected from the clinical psychology department of a tertiary hospital in Hangzhou City as the ADHD group, and 55 normal children matched by age and gender were selected from a primary school as the control group. Prepotent response inhibition, attention deficit and impulsive behavior were assessed by inhibition conflict task, visual continuous performance test (CPT) and matching familiar figures test (MFFT), respectively. The associations of deficits in prepotent response inhibition with attention deficit and impulsive behavior were analyzed using multiple linear regression model, and the predictive value of deficits in prepotent response inhibition on ADHD was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results The children included in the ADHD group had a mean age of (8.77±1.60) years and 44 males (77.19%), and the children included in the control group had a mean age of (9.20±1.77) years and 42 males (76.36%). The error rate of inhibition conflict task, missing report rate of visual CPT and the number of MFFT errors were higher in the ADHD group than in the control group [22.50% (12.50%) vs. 8.75% (7.00%), 24.00% (30.00%) vs. 7.50% (7.00%), 8.67±3.32 vs. 4.47±3.16; all P<0.05]. Multiple linear regression model showed that the error rate of inhibition conflict task was positively associated with the missing report rate of visual CPT (R2=0.135, β=0.091, P<0.001) and the number of MFFT errors (R2=0.092, β=0.009, P<0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.891, the sensitivity was 93.00%, the specificity was 80.00%, and the cut-off was 13.13%. Conclusions The deficits in prepotent response inhibition are positively associated with attention deficit and impulsive behavior.
|
|
Received: 06 March 2023
Revised: 01 July 2023
Published: 06 September 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 李世明,冯为,方芳,等.中国儿童注意缺陷多动障碍患病率Meta分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(7):993-998.
[2] FERNÁNDEZ-ANDRÉS M I,TEJERO P,VÉLEZ-CALVO X.Visual attention,orthographic word recognition,and executive functioning in children with ADHD,dyslexia,or ADHD+dyslexia[J].J Atten Disord,2021,25(7):942-953.
[3] FERNANDEZ-RUIZ J,HAKVOORT SCHWERDTFEGER R M,ALAHYANE N,et al.Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex hyperactivity during inhibitory control in children with ADHD in the antisaccade task[J].Brain Imaging Behav,2020,14(6):2450-2463.
[4] GILBERT S J,BURGESS P W.Executive function[J].Curr Biol,2008,18(3):110-114.
[5] BARKLEY R A.Behavioral inhibition,sustained attention,and executive functions:constructing a unifying theory of ADHD[J].Psychol Bull,1997,121(1):65-94.
[6] 韩煜昉. ADHD儿童认知功能损害与临床症状严重程度的相关性研究[D].杭州:浙江理工大学,2019.
[7] BUENO V F,DA SILVA M A,ALVES T M,et al.Fractionating executive functions of adults with ADHD[J].J Atten Disord,2017,21(11):944-955.
[8] American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders:DSM-5[M].Washington D.C.:American Psychiatric Association,2013.
[9] 汤路瀚,徐方忠.儿童多动症行为家长评定量表结构效度初步分析[J].中国现代医生,2015,53(32):22-26.
[10] 周晋波,郭兰婷,陈颖.中文版注意缺陷多动障碍SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表-父母版的信效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2013,27(6):424-428.
[11] SLAATS-WILLEMSE D,SWAAB-BARNEVELD H,DE SONNEVILLE L,et al.Deficient response inhibition as a cognitive endophenotype of ADHD[J].J Am Acad Child Psy,2003,42(10):1242-1248.
[12] KLEE S H,GARFINKEL B D.The computerized continuous performance task,a new measure of inattention[J].J Abnorm Psychol,1983,11(4):487-495.
[13] BUELA-CASAL G,CARRETERO-DIOS H,LOS SANTOS-ROIG D,et al.Psychometric properties of a Spanish adaptation of the matching familiar figures test(MFFT-20)[J].Eur J Psychol Assess,2003,19(2):151-159.
[14] BROCKI K C,RANDALL K D,BOHLIN G,et al.Working memory in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder combined type:are deficits modality specific and are they independent of impaired inhibitory control?[J].J Clin Exp Neuropsyc,2008,30(7):749-759.
[15] 李建英,邹小兵,静进,等.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童执行功能特征[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(3):162-165.
[16] JIMÉNEZ-FIGUEROA G,ARDILA-DUARTE C,PINEDA D A,et al.Prepotent response inhibition and reaction times in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder from a Caribbean community[J].Atten Defic Hyperact Disord,2017,9(4):199-211.
[17] SOLTANINEJAD Z,NEJATI V,EKHTIARI H.Effect of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on DLPFC on modulation of inhibitory control in ADHD[J].J Atten Disord,2019,23(4):325-332.
[18] KOLODNY T,MEVORACH C,STERN P,et al.Fronto-parietal engagement in response inhibition is inversely scaled with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom severity[J].Neuroimage Clin,2020,25:102-119.
[19] KIBBY M Y,DYER S M,LEE S E,et al.Frontal volume as a potential source of the comorbidity between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disorders[J].Behav Brain Res,2020,381:112-382.
[20] ARON A R.The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control[J].Neuroscientist,2007,13(3):214-228.
[21] HAMPSHIRE A,CHAMBERLAIN S R,MONTI M M,et al.The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus:inhibition and attentional control[J].Neuroimage,2010,50(3):1313-1319. |
|
|
|
