|
|
|
| Influencing factors for latent tuberculosis infection among student close contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis |
| LÜ Yang1, LE Boxin1, HU Weihong1, LIU Yuan1, CHEN Chang1, LIU Xiaofeng2
|
1. Department of Chronic Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Baoshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201901, China;
2. Baoshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201901, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the prevalence and influencing factors of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among students close contacts diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis in Baoshan District, Shanghai, so as to provide the basis for the prevention and control of pulmonary tuberculosis among students. Methods Pulmonary tuberculosis cases identified among students or teaching staff were selected as index cases through the Surveillance System of Chinese Disease Prevention and Control Information System, school reports, notification of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from April 2021 to November 2023, and student close contacts in their schools were selected as research subjects. Demographic information, lifestyle and Mycobacterium tuberculosis test results were collected through questionnaires surveys and pulmonary tuberculosis screening. LTBI was defined as a positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis test result with the exclusion of active pulmonary tuberculosis. The influencing factors for LTBI among student close contacts were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 1 212 student close contacts were included, with 651 males and 561 females, resulting in a gender ratio of 1.16︰1. The mean age was (18.48±4.33) years. Among them, 32 cases were detected with LTBI, yielding a detection rate of 2.64%. Higher LTBI detection rates were observed among students who shared the same dormitory with pulmonary tuberculosis cases (9.26%), attended private schools (5.54%), lived on campus (3.54%), and obtained meals through take-out services (6.52%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that sharing the same dormitory with pulmonary tuberculosis cases (OR=3.604, 95%CI: 1.256-10.338), attending a private school (OR=2.327, 95%CI: 1.083-5.003), and three meals a day through canteens (OR=9.561, 95%CI: 2.029-45.057) or through take-out services (OR=19.222, 95%CI: 3.528-104.732) were associated with a higher risk of LTBI. Conclusion The close contacts of students with pulmonary tuberculosis in Baoshan District are at risk of LTBI, which is mainly affected by the degree of contact with tuberculosis cases, the strength of school epidemic prevention and control, and students' eating habits.
|
|
Received: 06 February 2024
Revised: 24 June 2024
Published: 22 August 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] HOUBEN R M,DODD P.The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection:a re-estimation using mathematical modelling[J].PLoS Med,2016,13(10):1-13.
[2] World Health Organization.WHO Consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 1:prevention-tuberculosis preventive treatment[Z].Geneva:WHO,2020.
[3] ABUBAKAR I,DROBNIEWSKI F,SOUTHERN J,et al.Prognostic value of interferon-γrelease assays and tuberculin skin test in predicting the development of active tuberculosis(UK PREDICT TB):a prospective cohort study[J].Lancet Infect Dis,2018,18(10):1077-1087.
[4] 国家卫生健康委员会办公厅.关于印发中国结核病预防控制工作技术规范(2020年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2024-06-24].http://wsjkw.gxzf.gov.cn/xxgk_49493/fdzdgk/ggws/jbkz/P020200420356691296321.pdf.
[5] 邱曼玲,江毅,李梦映,等.在校学生结核潜伏感染及预防性治疗研究进展[J].预防医学,2024,36(1):30-33.
[6] 廖龙,陈慧娟,李进岚,等.贵州省2022年学校肺结核接触者筛查结果分析[J].现代预防医学,2023,50(24):4463-4468.
[7] 刘双,李婷,王丹霞,等.2020—2022年四川省学校肺结核患者密切接触者筛查情况分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2024,40(4):355-361.
[8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.关于印发中国学校结核病防控指南(2020年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2024-06-24].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7923/202012/5f40b53827ae41c5ab7827507d584cab.shtml.
[9] 上海市卫生健康委员会,上海市教育委员会.关于印发上海市学校结核病防控指南(2022年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2024-06-24].https://wsjkw.sh.gov.cn/jbfk2/20220819/5d0dacc15f5a4a9d8b66dea1f5ede66e.html.
[10] 张旭. 健康信息对睡眠行为的影响[D].厦门:厦门大学,2021.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.肺结核诊断:WS 288—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[12] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.结核病分类:WS 196—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
[13] 杜永成,林淑芳,戴志松,等.福建省学校结核病疫情后学生接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染状况及其影响因素分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2023,45(3):260-264.
[14] 高磊,权竹声,成君,等.结核分枝杆菌感染检测两步法在学校结核病控制工作中的营养探讨[J].中华预防医学杂志,2020,54(4):385-391.
[15] 周林,初乃惠,陆伟.高危人群结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染检测及预防性治疗专家共识[J].中国防痨杂志,2021,43(9):874-878.
[16] DU J L,SU Y,DONG E J,et al.LTBI-negative close contacts of tuberculosis are more likely to develop the disease:enlightenment and lessons from a cluster outbreak[J/OL].Front Public Health,2023[2024-06-24].https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1136355.
[17] 张胜康,童照威,唐寒梅,等.必须重视结核病患者的营养治疗[J].中国防痨杂志,2020,42(12):1272-1275.
[18] 雷蓉蓉,张婷,吴成果,等.南川区居民结核潜伏感染调查[J].预防医学,2022,34(4):371-374.
[19] 陈静,肖筱,吴哲渊,等.上海市徐汇区和长宁区老年2型糖尿病患者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查情况及影响因素分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2022,44(2):181-186.
[20] 腾子豪,蒋远东,王玥,等.新疆某职业院校新生结核潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2022,34(11):1156-1160.
[21] JIN Y,WANG H Q,ZHANG J F,et al.Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among coal workers' pneumoconiosis patients in China:a cross-sectional study[J/OL].BMC Public Health,2018,18[2024-06-24].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5373-1.
[22] 钟涛,詹广兴,范玉铮,等.深圳市南山区高危人群结核菌潜伏感染情况及影响因素[J].中国热带医学,2020,20(8):702-709,716. |
|
|
|
