|
|
|
| Chinese version of the Menopause Perception Scale and its reliability and validity test |
| JI Yongzhi1,2, CHEN Tingzhi2, ZHANG Bingjie2, HAN Lingyu1, JIANG Enshe1,2
|
1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475001, China;
2. School of Nursing and Health, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To translate the Menopause Perception Scale (MPS) into Chinese, and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the MPS. Methods The MPS was translated back-translated, culturally adapted and pre-tested according to the Brislin translation model to develop the Chinese version of MPS. The menopausal women from five communities were selected using simple random sampling to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of MPS. Content validity was evaluated based on expert ratings, criterion-related validity was evaluated using the Chinese version of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) as the criterion. Structural validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's α, and split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were calculated. Results Totally 430 questionnaires were allocated, and 414 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 96.28%. The Chinese version of the MPS consisted of 18 items across four dimensions: acceptance, sexual perception, normalization, and support perception. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.833 to 1.000, and the scale-level content validity index average was 0.924. The correlation coefficients between the scores of each dimension and the total scores of the Chinese version of the MPS and the Chinese version of the MRS ranged from 0.529 to 0.790 (all P<0.05). Exploratory factor analysis extracted four common factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 64.502%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit, with a root mean square error of approximation of 0.052, root mean square residual of 0.053, comparative fit index of 0.958, Tucker-Lewis index of 0.950, goodness of fit index of 0.908, incremental fit index of 0.958, and relative fit index of 0.884. The Cronbach's α of the Chinese version of the MPS was 0.916, the split-half reliability coefficient was 0.845, and the test-retest reliability was 0.906. Conclusion The Chinese version of the MPS demonstrates good reliability and validity, and can be used to assess the perceptions and attitudes of menopausal women in China toward menopause.
|
|
Received: 26 December 2024
Revised: 13 March 2025
Published: 23 July 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 《围绝经期综合征(更年期综合征)重点人群治未病干预指南》编写组,中国医学科学院北京协和医院.围绝经期综合征(更年期综合征)重点人群治未病干预指南[J].北京中医药大学学报,2023,46(8):1048-1062.
Editing Group of Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Perimenopausal Syndrome(Climacteric Syndrome):Disease Prevention in Key Population,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of perimenopausal syndrome(climacteric syndrome):disease prevention in key population[J].J Beijing Univ Tradit Chin Med,2023,46(8):1048-1062.(in Chinese)
[2] HART D A.Sex differences in biological systems and the conundrum of menopause:potential commonalities in post-menopausal disease mechanisms[J].Int J Mol Sci,2022,23(8):1-24.
[3] JONES E K,JURGENSON J R,KATZENELLENBOGEN J M,et al.Menopause and the influence of culture:another gap for Indigenous Australian women?[J].BMC Womens Health,2012,12:43-52.
[4] ABAY H,ALTUN E,KAPLAN S.Development of the Menopause Perception Scale[J].Menopause,2024,31(9):818-827.
[5] GAGNIER J J,LAI J,MOKKINK L B,et al.COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures[J].Qual Life Res,2021,30(8):2197-2218.
[6] 王晓娇,夏海鸥.基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(7):61-63.
WANG X J,XIA H O.Construction and application of a new translation model based on Brislin's classic back-translation model[J].J Nurs Sci,2016,31(7):61-63.(in Chinese)
[7] 黄琳,刘琴,刘月.围绝经期评定量表Menopause Rating Scale(MRS)中文版信度及效度分析[J].护理研究,2018,32(21):3435-3437.
HUANG L,LIU Q,LIU Y.Reliability and validity analysis of the Menopause Rating Scale(MRS)Chinese version of the perimenopausal rating scale[J].Chin Nurs Res,2018,32(21):3435-3437.(in Chinese)
[8] 张晨,周云仙.我国护理测量工具文献中内容效度指数应用误区分析[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(4):86-88,92.
ZHANG C,ZHOU Y X.Analysis on errors regarding content validity index used in evaluation of measurement tools in Chinese nursing literature[J].J Nurs Sci,2020,35(4):86-88,92.(in Chinese)
[9] 蒋艳,沈宁,邹树芳.护理研究中量表研制及测量学特征的评定方法[J].中华护理教育,2005,2(4):174-176.
JIANG Y,SHEN N,ZOU S F.Assessment methods for scale development and metrological characteristics in nursing research[J].Chin J Nurs Educ,2005,2(4):174-176.(in Chinese)
[10] 王炜,李智慧,孔燕,等.产后忧郁量表的汉化及信度、效度检验[J].预防医学,2024,36(12):1086-1091.
WANG W,LI Z H,KONG Y,et al.Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Maternal Blue Scale[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(12):1086-1091.(in Chinese)
[11] 姚琳,张笑倩,段晓旭,等.肥胖患者饮食行为评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(20):2509-2514.
YAO L,ZHANG X Q,DUAN X X,et al.Translation and psychometric properties test of the Eating Behaviors Assessment for Obesity[J].Chin J Nurs,2024,59(20):2509-2514.(in Chinese)
[12] 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2):49-52.
SHI J C,MO X K,SUN Z Q.Content validity index in scale development[J].J Cent South Univ(Med Sci),2012,37(2):49-52.(in Chinese)
[13] 胡雁,王志稳.护理研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2017.
HU Y,WANG Z W.Nursing research[M].Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House,2017.(in Chinese)
[14] 刘明东,丁珊妮,杨志超,等.信息安全态度量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学杂志,2024,39(17):15-19.
LIU M D,DING S N,YANG Z C,et al.Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Information Security Attitude Questionnaire[J].J Nurs Sci,2024,39(17):15-19.(in Chinese) |
|
|
|
