|
|
Tuberculin skin test results among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis |
SUN Jiamei, LU Qiaoling, GAO Huaqiang, YANG Zuokai, XU Laichao
|
Shaoxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312075, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the status of tuberculin skin test (TST) results and the influencing factors among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis, so as to provide the evidence for developing prevention and control strategies for pulmonary tuberculosis among students. Methods The students aged 15 years and above who had close contact with pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Yuecheng District, Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, from October 2016 to December 2023 were recruited and investigated using questionnaires and TST to collect demographic information, contact history, and TST results. The influencing factors for TST positivity among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results A total of 5 507 student close contacts were investigated, including 2 982 males and 2 525 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.18∶1. The mean age was (19.10±1.71) years. Among them, 397 (7.21%) were technical secondary school students, 766 (13.91%) were senior high school students, 2 556 (46.41%) were junior college students, and 1 788 (32.47%) were college students or above. A total of 958 students tested positive for TST, with a positivity rate of 17.40%. The rates of general positivity, moderate positivity, and strong positivity were 10.53%, 4.98% and 1.89%, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that senior high school students (OR=1.473, 95%CI: 1.009-2.152) and junior college students (OR=1.467, 95%CI: 1.074-2.005), as well as those with an exposure-to-screening interval of ≥46 days (46-<61 days, OR=2.043, 95%CI: 1.478-2.826; ≥61 days, OR=1.291, 95%CI: 1.018-1.637) had a higher risk of TST positivity. Female student close contacts had a lower risk of TST positivity (OR=0.753, 95%CI: 0.649-0.873). Conclusion The TST positivity rate was relatively high, and gender, school type, and exposure-to-screening interval were influencing factors for TST positivity among student close contacts with pulmonary tuberculosis.
|
Received: 11 December 2024
Revised: 11 February 2025
Published: 17 March 2025
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 雷蓉蓉,隆红霞,罗翠红,等.重庆市病原学阳性肺结核患者密切接触者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染现状及影响因素[J].中国感染控制杂志,2024,23(3):265-270. LEI R R,LONG H X,LUO C H,et al.Latent tuberculosis infection among close contacts of positive etiology pulmonary tuberculosis in Chongqing[J].Chin J Infect Control,2024,23(3):265-270.(in Chinese) [2] 刘明,黄志琴,方芳,等.安徽某高校2012—2022年肺结核报告发病情况分析[J].安徽预防医学杂志,2023,29(4):328-331. LIU M,HUANG Z Q,FANG F,et al.Analysis of the reported incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis in a university in Anhui Province from 2012 to 2022[J].Anhui J Prev Med,2023,29(4):328-331.(in Chinese) [3] 龚德华,唐益,谭文倩,等.2011—2020年湖南省学生结核病时空特征分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2022,44(5):478-483. GONG D H,TANG Y,TAN W Q,et al.Spatial-temporal analysis of tuberculosis among students in Hu'nan Province, during 2011-2020[J].Chin J Antituberc,2022,44(5):478-483.(in Chinese) [4] 周建伟,张松桃,李占辉,等.学校肺结核疫情密切接触者基线筛查及随访队列研究[J].结核与肺部疾病杂志,2023,4(2):120-127. ZHOU J W,ZHANG S T,LI Z H,et al.Baseline screening and follow-up cohort study of close contacts of school tuberculosis epidemic[J].J Tuberc Lung Dis,2023,4(2):120-127.(in Chinese) [5] 林相,贺天锋,龚德光,等.宁波市学校肺结核聚集性疫情影响因素分析[J].中国预防医学杂志,2023,24(12):1376-1379. LIN X,HE T F,GONG D G,et al.Influencing factors for the cluster outbreak of pulmonary tuberculosis in schools in Ningbo City[J].Chin Prev Med,2023,24(12):1376-1379.(in Chinese) [6] 张晓龙,崔彩岩,傅颖,等.学校肺结核密切接触者感染暴露对疫情风险预测的影响[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2025,29(1):108-110,116. ZHANG X L,CUI C Y,FU Y,et al.The impact of infection exposure among close contacts of tuberculosis cases in school on epidemic risk prediction[J].Chin J Dis Control Prev,2025,29(1):108-110,116.(in Chinese) [7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.关于印发中国学校结核病防控指南(2020年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2025-02-11].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/s7923/202012/5f40b53827ae41c5ab7827 [8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.肺结核诊断标准:WS 288—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China.Diagnostic criteria for tuberculosis:WS 288—2017[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2017.(in Chinese) [9] 李芬,许英顺,曹申梅,等.山东省某高校2018—2022年肺结核病发病情况及密切接触者筛查结果分析[J].中国校医,2024,38(9):680-684. LI F,XU Y S,CAO S M,et al.Incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis and screening results among patients' close contacts at a university in Shandong Province from 2018 to 2022[J].Chin J School Doctor,2024,38(9):680-684.(in Chinese) [10] 李小媛,杨绍湖,黄鸿玉,等.南宁市高校结核病密切接触者不同剂型结核菌素试验结果比较[J].中国学校卫生,2021,42(5):768-771,775. LI X Y,YANG S H,HUANG H Y,et al.Comparison of tuberculin test results of different dosage forms among close contacts of tuberculosis in colleges and universities in Nanning[J].Chin J Sch Health,2021,42(5):768-771,775.(in Chinese) [11] 刘文,高术,华邵帅.青岛市某高校肺结核病密切接触者筛查结果分析[J].中国校医,2024,38(7):515-517. LIU W,GAO S,HUA S S.Screening results of close contacts of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis at a university in Qingdao[J].Chin J School Doctor,2024,38(7):515-517.(in Chinese) [12] 卢巧玲,方益荣,高华强,等.绍兴市学校肺结核流行特征[J].预防医学,2018,30(5):516-518. LU Q L,FANG Y R,GAO H Q,et al.Epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis in schools in Shaoxing City[J].China Prev Med J,2018,30(5):516-518.(in Chinese) [13] 赵鑫,张亚楠,闫银锁,等.2020—2022年北京市大学和高中学段新生结核菌素皮肤试验反应特征分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2024,46(1):40-44. ZHAO X,ZHANG Y N,YAN Y S,et al.Analysis of the characteristics of tuberculin skin test reactions among college and high school freshmen in Beijing from 2020 to 2022[J].Chin J Antituberc,2024,46(1):40-44.(in Chinese) [14] 赵小双,谭健霞,刘靖元,等.深圳市龙岗区寄宿制中学新生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染现状[J].中国学校卫生,2024,45(3):419-422. ZHAO X S,TAN J X,LIU J Y,et al.Status of Mycobacterium tuberculosis latent infection among freshmen in boarding middle schools in Longgang district,Shenzhen[J].Chin J Sch Health,2024,45(3):419-422.(in Chinese) [15] ANIBARRO L,TRIGO M,VILLAVERDE C,et al.Interferon-γ release assays in tuberculosis contacts:is there a window period?[J].Eur Respir J,2011,37(1):215-217. [16] 陈高尚,朱凯强,朱军礼,等.金华市学生结核病病例发现延迟的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2024,36(8):698-701. CHEN G S,ZHU K Q,ZHU J L,et al.Influencing factors for delay in identification of tuberculosis among students in Jinhua City[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(8):698-701.(in Chinese) [17] EWE R K,MILLINGTON K A,DECKS J J,et al.Dynamic antigen-specific T-cell responses after point-source exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis[J].Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2006,174(7):831-839. [18] 沈洪波,陈维政.结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的免疫机制及免疫干预研究进展[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2016,39(1):47-51. SHEN H B,CHEN W Z.Immunologic mechanism and immune intervention therapy of latent tuberculosis infection[J].Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis,2016,39(1):47-51.(in Chinese) [19] 邱曼玲,江毅,李梦映,等.在校学生结核潜伏感染及预防性治疗研究进展[J].预防医学,2024,36(1):30-33. QIU M L,JIANG Y,LI M Y,et al.Latent tuberculosis infection and preventive treatment among in-school students:a review[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(1):30-33.(in Chinese) |
|
|
|