|
|
|
| Analysis of Chinese elderly health policies based on policy tools |
| SONG Junqing1,2, ZHAO Yuming1,2, SHI Wenhui1,2
|
1. Department of Non-Communicable Diseases and Ageing Health Management, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China;
2. National Action Office for the Action on a Healthy Lifestyle for All, Beijing 102206, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze Chinese elderly health policy documents from 2018 to 2022 based on policy tools, so as to provide insights into improving elderly health policies and promoting healthy aging. Methods Elderly health policy documents were retrieved from “the magic weapon of Peking University”, the policy document database of the State Council and portal websites of relevant ministries and commissions using keywords “elderly”, “aging” and “elderly health”. The documents were encoded using content analysis and keywords were extracted. A two-dimensional analysis framework was constructed based on Rothwell and Zegveld's classification framework and dimension theory, and the use of policy tools was analyzed. Results Totally 57 Chinese elderly health policy documents were collected from 2018 to 2022, including 44 notices, 7 opinions, one rule, one regulation, one law, one announcement, one letter and one joint declaration. There were 37 documents (64.91%) issued by National Health Commission and its departments and offices. The high-frequency keywords in the documents included “medical and healthcare institutions”, “elderly health”, “rehabilitation/nursing”, “community/grassroots/rural”, “pilot”, “traditional Chinese medicine”, “propaganda” and “standardization”. There were 413 document codes, and the supply-, environment- and demand-side policy tools accounted for 52.54%, 31.72% and 15.74%, respectively. Public health and medical services (19.61%) and science popularization (7.99%) were the most commonly used supply-side policy tools, law/regulations and administration systems (7.99%) was the most commonly used environment-side policy tools, while pilot/demonstration projects (5.33%) was the most commonly used demand-side policy tools. The external and internal indicators of the system dimensions accounted for 48.18% and 51.82%, and political system (17.19%) and technical system (16.46%) were the two most commonly used external indicators, while service system (35.60%) was the most commonly used internal indicator. Conclusions Chinese elderly health policies focused on supply-side policies from 2018 to 2022, such as public health and medical services. The use of demand-side policy tools is recommended to be increased and the internal composition of supply- and environment-side policy tools are recommended to be optimized.
|
|
Received: 08 May 2023
Revised: 09 July 2023
Published: 17 August 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 吴玉韶,伍小兰,沈励.健康老龄化:低成本应对人口老龄化的战略举措[C].北京:中国老年学和老年医学学会,2015.
[2] 刘远立,郑忠伟,饶克勤,等.老年健康蓝皮书:中国老年健康研究报告(2018)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.
[3] 顾建光. 公共政策工具研究的意义基础与层面[J].公共管理学报,2006,3(4):58-61,110.
[4] 袁永旭,吴文婧,尚有为,等.政策工具视角下护理服务政策文本研究[J].护理研究,2022,36(10):1784-1790.
[5] 中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.国家卫生健康委员会职能配置、内设机构和人员编制规定发布[J].中国卫生人才,2018(10):4.
[6] 中国共产党第十九届中央委员会.中国共产党第十九届中央委员会第五次全体会议公报[J].中国人大,2020(21):6-8.
[7] 邱均平,余以胜,邹菲.内容分析法的应用研究[J].情报杂志,2005,24(8):11-13.
[8] ROTHWELL R,ZEGVELD W.Reindusdalization and technology[M].London:Logman Group Limited,1985:83-104.
[9] 郦烨琳,励晓红,孙禾奇,等.我国老年健康管理相关政策的变迁[J].医学与社会,2022,35(11):1-6,12.
[10] 沈慧煌,赵静,傅云翔,等.政策工具视角下我国慢性病防控政策研究[J].中国全科医学,2021,24(13):1637-1643.
[11] 司建平,郭清,王先菊,等.政策工具视角下我国医养结合政策文本研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2020,13(6):49-55.
[12] 何强,陈菲,王映红,等.基于政策工具视角的我国老年健康服务业政策分析[J].医学与社会,2020,33(6):47-52.
[13] 李晓娣,原媛,黄鲁成.政策工具视角下我国养老产业政策量化研究[J].情报杂志,2021,40(4):147-154.
[14] 姚俊,张丽.政策工具视角下中国养老服务政策文本量化研究[J].现代经济探讨,2018(12):33-39.
[15] 钱隆,陈菲,何强,等.基层医疗卫生机构应对突发公共卫生事件政策工具研究[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2023,43(4):248-255.
[16] 范转转,刘园园,姚东明.政策工具视角下的我国全科医生政策研究[J].中国全科医学,2018,21(31):3788-3794.
[17] 裴晨阳,胡琳琳,刘远立.我国老年健康服务政策的发展演变与未来建议[J].中国卫生政策研究,2020,13(11):77-82.
[18] 戴卫东,汪倩格,朱儒城,等.长期护理保险试点政策的特征、问题与路径优化:基于两批29个国家试点城市政策的比较分析[J].中国软科学,2022(10):41-50. |
|
|
|
