|
|
|
| Evaluation on the quality of syphilis case reporting from hospitals in Hunan Province |
| GAO Shou-zhi, HE Jian-mei, ZHENG Jun, ZHOU Yan-jun, CHEN Xi
|
| Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Changsha,Hunan 410005,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To assess the quality of syphilis case reporting from hospitals in Hunan Province .Methods The syphilis cases reported by 126 middle second-class and above hospitals in the year 2010 and 2017 were retrieved from unified infectious case reporting network and compared with original reporting cards,medical records and laboratory testing records according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Syphilis （WS 273-2018）and the Guidelines for the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. The accuracy of syphilis diagnosis and classification were evaluated between different reporting years,types of hospitals,levels of hospitals and departments .Results There were 8 947 syphilis cases reported in 2010 and 13 552 syphilis cases reported in 2017. The accuracy of syphilis diagnosis and classification were 98.81% and 98.66% in 2017,which were higher than 36.39% and 36.10% in 2010 （P<0.01）. The accuracy of syphilis diagnosis in the provincial,municipal and county-level hospitals in 2017 were 99.07%,99.20% and 98.17%;the accuracy of syphilis classification were 98.91%,99.03% and 97.99%;the accuracy of syphilis diagnosis and classification were significantly different in different levels of hospitals（P<0.01）. The accuracy of syphilis diagnosis in the general hospitals,traditional Chinese medicine hospitals and maternal & child health hospitals in 2017 were 99.25%,96.92% and 97.57%;the accuracy of syphilis classification were 99.13%,96.72% and 97.30%;the accuracy of syphilis diagnosis and classification were significantly different in different types of hospitals（P<0.01）. The accuracy of syphilis diagnosis in the department of dermatology and non- dermatology in 2017 were 99.13% and 98.74%;the accuracy of syphilis classification were 99.02% and 98.58%;the accuracy of syphilis diagnosis and classification were not significantly different in different departments（P>0.05） .Conclusion The accuracy of syphilis diagnosis and classification have been improved in 2017,which varies in different levels and types of hospitals.
|
|
Received: 18 July 2018
Revised: 22 October 2018
Published: 03 January 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 龚向东,岳晓丽,滕非,等. 2000—2013年我国梅毒流行特征与趋势分析[J]. 中华皮肤病杂志,2014,47(5):310-315.
[2] 乔瑞,杨玉荣,武立昕,等. 包头市2016—2017年梅毒流行状况[J]. 中国热带医学,2018,18(10):1021-1024.
[3] 史临爱,王一溪,杜中强. 山西省某市2005—2014年梅毒流行病学调查研究[J]. 中国预防医学杂志,2016,17(2):157-158.
[4] 张琬悦,罗红兵,方清艳,等. 2012—2016年云南省梅毒疫情分析[J]. 中国艾滋病性病,2018,24(9):923-925.
[5] 张万宏,徐业华,石卫东,等. 2010—2015年武汉市梅毒网络报告发病率与人群估计感染率对比分析[J]. 实用预防医学,2018,25(10):1184-1186.
[6] 单杏仁,杨作凯,卢巧玲. 绍兴市性传播疾病流行特征分析[J].预防医学,2017,29(11):1147-1150.
[7] 岳晓丽,龚向东,蒋宁,等. 中国5省医疗机构梅毒报告病例数据核查质量调查结查分析[J]. 中国艾滋病性病,2015,21(4):314-317.
[8] 姜宪尘,方春福,来时明. 衢州市近十年甲乙类传染病疫情分析[J]. 预防医学,2015,27(3):291-293
[9] 王希江,曾光. 网络直报后医疗机构报告法定传染病影响因素的调查[J]. 疾病监测,2006,21(10):551-554.
[10] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 梅毒诊断标准:WS 273—2018[S]. 2018.
[11] 王千秋,刘全忠,徐金华. 性传播疾病临床诊疗与防治指南[M]. 上海:上海科技出版社,2014:72-89.
[12] 中华人民共和国卫生部.关于印发《中国预防与控制梅毒规划(2010—2020年)》的通知[EB/OL].(2010-06-03)[2018- 07-18]. http://www.moh.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/ mohjbyfkzj/s3585/201006/47778.htm.
[13] 胡洋,宇翔,张欢,等. 2013—2015年江西省女性婚检人群及孕产妇艾滋病、梅毒和乙肝检测状况分析[J]. 现代预防医学,2017,44(1):170-173.
[14] 沈鸿程,赵培祯,苏桂华,等. 广东省珠三角地区促进性病门诊就诊者HIV及梅毒检测干预研究[J]. 现代预防医学,2018, 45(13):2456-2459.
[15] 陈详生. 我国梅毒流行现状及防治策略[J]. 国际流行病学传染病杂志,2008,35(2):73-77.
[16] 杨利群,钱一建,赵峥,等. 桐乡市梅毒防治成效分析[J]. 预防医学,2016,28(8):863-864.
[17] 马宁,阎涵,王莉. 辽宁省实施《中国预防与控制梅毒规划(2010—2020年)》中期评估结果[J]. 预防医学,2018,30(7):653-657.
[18] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 性病防治管理办法 [EB/OL].(2012-11-23)[2018-07-18]. http://www.moh.gov.cn/ mohzcfgs/s3576/201212/cba30083e498409f913515da 47cecee7.shtml. |
|
|
|
