|
|
|
| Application of two health risk assessment models in the occupational health risk assessment of chemicals in different industries |
| ZHOU Li-fang,ZHANG Mei-bian,ZOU Hua,YUAN Wei-ming,QUAN Chang-jian
|
| Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310051,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the applicability of Singapore semi-quantitative risk assessment mode and Romania risk assessment model in occupational health risk assessment. Methods We employed two risk assessment models to evaluate the risk of key positions in papermaking factories,electroplating factories,and chemical factories. Then we compared the results with occupational exposure limits,classification of occupational hazards and literature reports. Results The results of Singapore model showed that the total risk ratio was 0.40±0.16. The risk levels of papermaking factories,electroplating factories,and chemical factories were low-medium,negligible-low and low-very high,respectively. The risk ratio of three industries were 0.42±0.04,0.31±0.10 and 0.62±0.15. The results of Romania model showed that the total risk ratio was 0.43±0.11. The risk levels of papermaking factories,electroplating factories,and chemical factories were respectively low-high,minimal-low and low-very high. The risk ratio of three industries was 0.46±0.13,0.38±0.08 and 0.52±0.11,respectively. The risk levels of electroplating factories were higher than papermaking factories and chemical factories （P<0.05）. There was no significant difference between risk levels of papermaking factories and chemical factories（P>0.05）. There was significant difference between the occupational health risk levels assessed by the two models（P>0.05）. Conclusion These findings suggest that Singapore semi-quantitative risk assessment model and Romania risk assessment model both can be applied for the occupational health risk assessment of different workplaces,such as papermaking factories,electroplating factories,and chemical factories. The risk assessment results of the two Methods are basically identical.
|
|
Published: 07 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]USEPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual （Part A,EPA/540/1-89/002 December 1989）[Z]. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,Washington D C,1989.
[2] USEPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I:Human Health Evaluation Manual（Part F,Supplemental Guidance for Inhalation Risk Assessment,EPA-540-R-070- 002OSWER 9285.7-82 January 2009）[Z]. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation Environmental Protection Agency,Washington D C,2009.
[3] University of Queensland （Australia）. Occupational Health and Safety Risk Assessment and Management Guideline[R]. Occupational Health and Safety Unit,2011.
[4] Romania. Risk Assessment Method for Occupational Accidents and Diseases[EB/OL]. [2017-02-28]. http://www.protectiamuncii.ro/pdfs/risk_assessment_method.pdf.
[5] Ministry of Occupational Manpower Safety and Heahh Division. A Semi-quantitative Method to Assess Occupational Exposure to Harmful Chemicals[EB/OL].[2017-02-28].https://www.wshc.sg/files/wshc/upload/cms/file/2014/A%20Semiquantitative%20Method%20to%20Assess%20Occupational%20Exposure%20to%20Harmful%20Che.pdf
[6] International Counci1 on Mining and Metals. Good practice guidance on occupational health risk assessment[EB/OL].[2017-02-28]. https://www.icmm.com/document/629.
[7] 张美辨,唐仕川. 职业健康风险评估方法学实践应用[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社,2016:1-29.
[8] 杨进,许敏凤,顾慧珍. 一起酒厂急性硫化氢混合气体中毒死亡事件[J]. 浙江预防医学,2012,24（9）:53-54.
[9] LANCIA M,PANATA L,TONDI V,et al. A fatal work-related poisoning by hydrogen sulfide:report on a case[J]. Am J Forensic Med Pathol,2013,34（4）:315-317.
[10]肖晓琴,王致,张海,等. 造纸行业职业病危害识别与关键控制点分析[J]. 中国卫生工程学,2010,9（3）:191-193, 196.
[11]靳雅丽,李雪谦,苏世标,等. 粉尘职业危害风险评估指标体系建立与应用研究[J]. 中国职业医学,2016,43（6）:703-706,710.
[12]陈捷敏. 甲醇中毒视网膜功能结构和蛋白质组学研究[D]. 上海:复旦大学,2012.
[13]魏海龙,李利琼,陈丹,等. 硫酸气雾吸入中毒性肺水肿四例报告并文献复习[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2015,14（1）:88-90.
[14]王晓彤,李艳萍,刘秀玲,等. 急性氯化氢吸入247例临床分析[J]. 中国工业医学杂志,2017,30（1）:26-27.
[15]李敏,张丽华,黄丽蓉,等. 职业接触酸雾工人健康状况调查[J]. 中国职业医学,2012,39（2）:175-176.
[16]张峻,韩磊,赵圆. 一起急性氯甲烷中毒事故的调查与处理[J]. 中国工业医学杂志,2012,25（6）:475-476.
[17]郭美琼,何坚,郭翔,等. 一例急性二甲苯中毒病例报告[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援,2015,33（2）:113-114.
[18]王晓彤,张明,迟宁. 急性重度氨中毒1例报告[J]. 中国工业医学杂志,2016,29（5）:347-349.
[19]窦建瑞,钱晓勤,毛一扬,等. 草甘膦对人体的毒性研究进展[J]. 江苏预防医学,2013,24（6）:43-45.
[20]YANG Y,LIU H,XIANG X H,et al. Outline of occupational chromium poisoning in China[J]. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol,2013,90（6）:742-749.
[21]左晨艳,杨波波,吴婷,等. 氰化物中毒及解毒的研究进展[J]. 毒理学杂志,2016,30（4）:311-316. |
|
|
|
