Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (7): 553-557    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.07.001
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
青少年非自杀性自伤的破窗效应联合叙事护理干预效果评价
张媛媛1, 汪文2, 唐新龙1, 江爱国1
1.皖西卫生职业学院附属医院精神卫生中心心理科,安徽 六安 237000;
2.安徽医科大学附属心理医院,安徽省精神卫生中心,合肥市第四人民医院,安徽 合肥 230000
Effects of broken window effect and narrative nursing intervention on adolescent non-suicidal self-injury
ZHANG Yuanyuan1, WANG Wen2, TANG Xinlong1, JIANG Aiguo1
1. Department of Psychology, Mental Health Center, Affiliated Hospital of Anhui West Health Vocational College, Lu'an, Anhui 237000, China;
2. Anhui Medical University Affiliated Psychological Hospital, Anhui Provincial Mental Health Center, Hefei Fourth People's Hospital, Hefei, Anhui 230000, China
全文: PDF(838 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价青少年非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的破窗效应联合叙事护理干预效果,为预防青少年NSSI提供依据。方法 选择皖西卫生职业学院附属医院精神卫生中心2022—2023年收治的134例青少年NSSI病例为研究对象,随机纳入对照组和干预组;对照组实施叙事护理和常规护理,干预组采用叙事护理联合破窗效应方法。采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、自杀意念自评量表(SIOSS)、渥太华自伤功能量表、护理满意度量表分别评估抑郁症状、自杀意念、自伤行为发生率和护理满意度。比较两组干预前后差异,评价干预效果。结果 干预组和对照组各67例,年龄MQR)分别为14.12(2.01)和14.10(1.52)岁;女生分别占71.64%和68.66%;初中学生分别占79.10%和74.63%。两组病例性别、年龄、学段差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。重复测量资料的方差分析结果显示,SDS、HAMD、SIOSS得分的时间与组间交互效应均有统计学意义(P<0.05),干预组病例干预前后SDS、HAMD、SIOSS得分下降幅度均大于对照组。干预后,干预组病例SDS、HAMD、SIOSS得分和自伤行为发生率[(32.54±1.27)分、(10.54±1.83)分、(10.37±2.20)分和14.93%]低于对照组[(44.25±2.23)分、(18.73±1.89)分、(15.76±1.62)分和32.84%];护理满意率(98.51%)高于对照组(88.06%)(均P<0.05)。结论 破窗效应联合叙事护理可改善青少年NSSI病例的抑郁症状,降低自杀意念和自伤行为发生。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张媛媛
汪文
唐新龙
江爱国
关键词 破窗效应叙事护理非自杀性自伤抑郁症状青少年    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the intervention effectiveness of broken window effect combined with narrative nursing on non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents, so as to provide the basis for NSSI prevention in adolescents. Methods Totally 134 adolescents with NSSI admitted to Mental Health Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Anhui West Health Vocational College from January 2022 to December 2023 were enrolled and randomly assigned into the control and treatment group. All were given narrative nursing and routine care, and the adolescents in the treatment group were given additional intervention based on broken window effect. The effects were evaluated using Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), Self-Rating Idea of Suicide Scale (SIOSS), Ottawa Self-injury Inventory-Functions (OSI-F) and Nursing Satisfaction Scale, and the two groups were compared before and after intervention. Results The treatment and control groups comprised 67 cases each, had a median age of 14.12 (interquartile range, 2.01) years and 14.10 (interquartile range, 1.52) years, included 71.64% and 68.66% girls, and 79.10% and 74.63% junior high school students, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups in terms of gender, age or educational level (all P>0.05). The results of analysis of variance for repeated measures showed that there were interactions between time and group for SDS, HAMD and SIOSS scores (all P<0.05), and the decrease in scores before and after intervention was greater in the treatment group than in the control group. After intervention, the SDS, HAMD, SIOSS score and incidence of suicidal behaviors in the treatment group were all lower than the control group [SDS: (32.54±1.27) vs. (44.25±2.23); HAMD: (10.54±1.83) vs. (18.73±1.89); SIOSS: (10.37±2.20) vs. (15.76±1.62); incidence of suicidal behavior: 14.93% vs. 32.84%; all P<0.05]. The nursing satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group (98.51% vs. 88.06%, P<0.05). Conclusion The broken window effect combined with narrative nursing would improve the depressive symptoms in adolescents with NSSI, and reduce the suicidal ideation and self injury.
Key wordsbroken window effect    narrative nursing    non-suicidal self-injury    depressive symptoms    adolescent
收稿日期: 2024-05-13      修回日期: 2024-06-14      出版日期: 2024-07-10
中图分类号:  R179  
基金资助:安徽省自然科学研究项目(KJ2020B006)
作者简介: 张媛媛,本科,主管护师,主要从事精神心理工作
通信作者: 江爱国,E-mail:2577279970@qq.com   
引用本文:   
张媛媛, 汪文, 唐新龙, 江爱国. 青少年非自杀性自伤的破窗效应联合叙事护理干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 553-557.
ZHANG Yuanyuan, WANG Wen, TANG Xinlong, JIANG Aiguo. Effects of broken window effect and narrative nursing intervention on adolescent non-suicidal self-injury. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(7): 553-557.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.07.001      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I7/553
[1] 阮卓尔,管丽丽,于欣.非自杀性自伤行为青少年患者自杀意念的相关因素[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2022,36(8):691-695.
[2] 蒋家丽,李立言,李子颖,等.青少年非自杀性自伤行为持续和停止的预测性因素[J].心理科学进展,2022,30(7):1536-1545.
[3] 李冠男,黄烨楷,李丹,等.音乐疗法联合舍曲林治疗抑郁障碍的效果及对患者认知功能的影响[J].中国医学创新,2020,17(22):108-111.
[4] 王俊玲,郭菲,陈祉妍.孤独感、抑郁症状在父母冲突与青少年非自杀性自伤间的中介效应研究[J].预防医学,2023,35(12):1029-1032.
[5] 韦臻,王若彤,胡燕,等.新冠疫情期间学生心理应激反应与非自杀性自伤行为:有调节的中介模型[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,53(3):122-128.
[6] 张静,蒋茜,孙琳琳.破窗效应联合一体化护理模式在晚期肺癌患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2023,29(6):130-133.
[7] 曾秀玲,万雯雯.破窗理论融入手术室护理安全管理的临床价值[J].临床医学工程,2022,29(6):843-844.
[8] 忻丽云,侯春兰,王润梅,等.抑郁症抑郁自评量表的因子结构分析及影响因素[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2012,20(10):1521-1523.
[9] HAMILTON M.A rating scale for depression[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1960,23(1):56-62.
[10] 何燕玲,张明园.现代精神医学丛书精神科评定量表手册[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2015.
[11] 夏朝云,王东波,吴素琴,等.自杀意念自评量表的初步制定[J].临床精神医学杂志,2002,12(2):100-102.
[12] 何尧苇,姜红燕,何慧萍,等.渥太华自伤功能量表在青少年情感障碍患者中的信效度检验[J].国际精神病学杂志,2023,50(2):241-243,247.
[13] 牛洪艳,倪静玉,张玲,等.护理满意度量表在临床住院病人中应用的信效度研究[J].护理研究,2016,30(1):287-290.
[14] 梁惠玲,梁惠琼,吴秀琪.叙事护理对脑卒中病人焦虑、抑郁状态的影响[J].循证护理,2023,9(19):3563-3565.
[15] 尚超娜,王剑英,宋涛,等.伴非自杀性自伤行为心境障碍青少年患者心理体验的质性研究[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(7):827-834.
[16] SMITHBATTLE L,LORENZ R,LEANDER S.Listening with care:using narrative methods to cultivate nurses' responsive relationships in a home visiting intervention with teen mothers[J].Nurs Inq,2013,20(3):188-198.
[17] SEO M,KANG H S,LEE Y J,et al.Narrative therapy with an emotional approach for people with depression:improved symptom and cognitive-emotional outcomes[J].J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs,2015,22(6):379-389.
[18] LLOYD-WILLIAMS M,SHIELS C,ELLIS J,et al.Pilot randomised controlled trial of focused narrative intervention for moderate to severe depression in palliative care patients:DISCERN trial[J].Palliat Med,2018,32(1):206-215.
[19] 邹雪霞,蒋旭.破窗理论结合预见性护理用于腹腔镜前列腺癌根治切除术效果观察[J].国际医药卫生导报,2019,25(14):2384-2386.
[20] COPELAND W E,ALAIE I,JONSSON U,et al.Associations of childhood and adolescent depression with adult psychiatric and functional outcomes[J].J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2021,60(5):604-611.
[21] KRUZANKP,WHITLOCK J,HASKING P.Supplemental material for development and initial validation of scales to assess decisional balance(NSSI-DB),processes of change(NSST-POC),and self-efficacy(NSSI-SE)in a population of young adult engaging in nonsuicidal self-injury[J].Psychol Assess,2020,32(7):635-648.
[22] 陈艳,徐敬,陈凯明.人文关怀下叙事护理联合时效激励对精神分裂症患者的自尊感、危险行为及认知功能的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2024,30(7):84-87.
[23] 杜松洁,韩英丽,崔衣芹.叙事护理联合正念减压疗法对精神分裂症患者暴力冲动行为的影响[J].心理月刊,2023,24(18):85-87.
[24] 郑麟,廖衰英,张小珍,等.破窗效应理论结合预见性护理在预防孕妇产后深静脉血栓形成中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2024,30(1):155-157.
[25] 陈远珍.破窗理论对提高普外科手术患者手术室护理安全性及患者满意度的影响[J/CD].实用临床护理学杂志(电子版),2018,3(30):59,67.
[1] 王凝雨, 张忠敏, 陈婷. 青少年抑郁症状的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 562-566,570.
[2] 孙强, 李小勇, 龚清海, 潘文杰, 黄艳. 中学生健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关联分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 474-478.
[3] 张栗, 周睿, 王蓓佳, 王红妹. 中老年抑郁症状人群平衡能力的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 115-118.
[4] 郑锦雷, 何林, 王憓, 陈婉君, 姜婷婷, 陈卫永, 陈琳. AHFtest平台HIV抗体自我检测资料分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 156-158.
[5] 段芮, 王红. 2011—2018年我国中老年人抑郁症状流行趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 649-654.
[6] 卢小敏, 赵继娟, 孙中友, 张学艳, 陈盛兰. 盐城市儿童青少年健康危险行为聚集情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 331-334.
[7] 张丛笑, 郑琳, 沈利明, 黄闽燕, 陈晖, 牛星凯, 宋凯. 某区中小学生抑郁症状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 196-199,204.
[8] 王俊玲, 郭菲, 陈祉妍. 孤独感、抑郁症状在父母冲突与青少年非自杀性自伤间的中介效应研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1029-1032.
[9] 葛锐, 田敏, 侯志刚, 潘维浙, 朱国英, 冯豪. 2013—2022年嘉兴市儿童青少年肺结核发现延迟分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1089-1092.
[10] 张曼, 吴鉴伦, 程心蓓, 马源, 郑卫军. 老年人家庭代际接触、抑郁症状与自评健康状况的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(10): 840-843.
[11] 罗珂梦, 李胜, 吕梦莲, 林君芬. 浙江省基层医务人员抑郁症状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(10): 881-884,889.
[12] 贾娟娟, 林云, 朱国英, 洪霞, 孙炀明, 何海涛, 陈丽艳, 李赟. 嘉兴市中小学生脊柱侧弯调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 782-787.
[13] 熊依杰, 许丽娜, 白丽霞, 周文娟, 刘佳, 吴艳玲. 海淀区青少年电子烟使用现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(5): 471-474.
[14] 邹艳, 林云, 何海涛, 孟佳, 李娟娟, 顾昉, 章荣华. 儿童青少年脊柱侧弯的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(4): 395-399.
[15] 倪卫桂, 余勇, 谢悦, 汪敬轩, 陈婷婷, 杨春霞. 成都市结直肠癌患者抑郁症状的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(2): 147-150.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed