Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (7): 615-619    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.07.014
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
朝阳区3~6岁儿童体质健康调查
马艳艳, 陈小劲, 赵月
北京市朝阳区妇幼保健院儿童保健科,北京 朝阳 100021
Physical fitness among children at ages of 3 to 6 years in Chaoyang District
MA Yanyan, CHEN Xiaojin, ZHAO Yue
Department of Child Healthcare, the Maternal and Child Health hospital of Chaoyang District, Beijing 100021, China
全文: PDF(787 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解北京市朝阳区3~6岁儿童体质健康状况,为促进儿童体质健康提供参考。方法 基于第五次国民体质监测项目收集朝阳区3~6岁儿童体质健康测试资料,包括基本情况、身体形态、身体机能和身体素质,比较不同性别和年龄儿童体质健康测试结果;采用多重线性回归模型分析3~6岁儿童体质健康的影响因素。结果 纳入3~6岁儿童988人,其中男童490人,占49.60%;女童498人,占50.40%。3岁300人,占30.36%;4岁329人,占33.30%;5岁297人,占30.06%;6岁62人,占6.28%。身高为(109.46±7.31)cm;体重为(18.98±3.82)kg;坐高为(61.99±3.39)cm;胸围为(52.87±4.04)cm;静态心率为(98.04±9.61)次/分;握力为(4.78±2.22)kg;立定跳远为(75.01±21.89)cm,坐位体前屈为(10.07±4.51)cm;双脚连续跳为(7.54±3.84)s;15 m绕障碍跑为(8.73±1.66)s;走平衡木为(8.54±4.72)s。男童坐高、胸围、握力和15 m绕障碍跑的测试结果优于女童,静态心率低于女童;女童坐位体前屈测试结果优于男童(均P<0.05)。不同年龄儿童各项测试结果差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多重线性回归分析结果显示,非独生子女(β'=0.064)、非超重/肥胖(β'=0.192)、每日室内活动时间≥2 h(β'=0.156)、运动量(充足,β'=0.218;一般,β'=0.151)、父亲身高≤170 cm(β'=-0.075)、母亲身高≤160 cm(β'=-0.081)和父母文化程度(本科,β'=0.017;研究生,β'=0.084)是儿童体质健康的影响因素。结论 朝阳区3~6岁儿童身体形态发育水平较好,身体素质需进一步提高。独生子女、超重/肥胖、室内活动时间、运动量、父母身高和父母文化程度影响儿童体质健康状况。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马艳艳
陈小劲
赵月
关键词 体质健康儿童体质监测    
AbstractObjective To investigate the status of physical fitness among children at ages of 3 to 6 years in Chaoyang District, Beijing Municipality, so as to provide insights into improvements in children's physical fitness. Methods Physical fitness test data were collected from children at ages of 3 to 6 years in Chaoyang District based on the Fifth National Physical Fitness Monitoring Program, including basic characteristics, body shape, physical function and quality. The physical fitness test results were compared among children with different genders and ages, and factors affecting the physical fitness were identified among children at ages of 3 to 6 years using a multiple linear regression model. Results Totally 988 children at ages of 3 to 6 years were enrolled, including 490 boys (49.60%) and 498 girls (50.40%), and 300 children at an age of 3 years (30.36%), 329 children at an age of 4 years (33.30%), 297 children at an age of 5 years (30.06%) and 62 children at an age of 6 years (6.28%). The participants had a mean height of (109.46±7.31) cm, body weight (18.98±3.82) kg, sitting height of (61.99±3.39) cm, chest circumference of (52.87±4.04) cm, static heart rate of (98.04±9.61) beats per minute, grip strength of (4.78±2.22) kg, standing long jump of (75.01±21.89) cm, seated forward bend of (10.07±4.51)cm, double-foot continuous jump of (7.54±3.84) s, 15-meter obstacle run of (8.73±1.66) s and balance beam walking of (8.54±4.72) s. Boys had greater sitting height, chest circumference and grip strength and lower 15-meter obstacle run and static heart rate than girls (P<0.05), while girls had higher seated forward bend than boys (P<0.05). There were significant differences in all test items among children at different ages (P<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis identified non-only child (β'=0.064), non-overweight/obesity (β'=0.192), 2 hours and longer daily indoor physical activity (β'=0.156), exercise intensitby (adequate, β'=0.218; generally, β'=0.151), father's height of 170 cm and shorter (β'=-0.075), mother's height of 160 cm and shorter (β'=-0.081), and parents' educational level (undergraduate, β'=0.017; postgraduate, β'=0.084) as factors affecting physical fitness among children at ages of 3 to 6 years in Chaoyang District. Conclusions The body shape development is relatively good among children at ages of 3 to 6 years in Chaoyang District; however, the physical quality remains to be improved. The only child, overweight/obesity, duration of indoor physical activity, exercise intensity, parental height and parental educational level are factors affecting physical fitness among children.
Key wordsphysical fitness    child    physical fitness monitoring
收稿日期: 2023-03-17      修回日期: 2023-05-03      出版日期: 2023-07-10
中图分类号:  R179  
通信作者: 陈小劲,E-mail:chenxiaojin26@163.com   
作者简介: 马艳艳,硕士,主管医师,主要从事儿童保健工作
引用本文:   
马艳艳, 陈小劲, 赵月. 朝阳区3~6岁儿童体质健康调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 615-619.
MA Yanyan, CHEN Xiaojin, ZHAO Yue. Physical fitness among children at ages of 3 to 6 years in Chaoyang District. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(7): 615-619.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.07.014      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I7/615
[1] 中华人民共和国国民体质监测中心.2014年国民体质监测工作手册[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2014.
[2] 朱宗涵,徐海青.儿童早期发展系列教材之一:儿童早期发展总论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014.
[3] 中华人民共和国国务院.国务院关于印发中国妇女发展纲要和中国儿童发展纲要的通知[EB/OL].[2023-05-03].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-09/27/content_5639412.htm.
[4] WHO Multicentre Growth Refrence Study Group.WHO child growth standards based on length/height,weight and age[J].Acta Paediatr Suppl,2006,450:76-85.
[5] 江崇民,于道中,季成叶,等.《国民体质测定标准》的研制[J].体育科学,2004(3):33-36.
[6] 中华人民共和国国家体育总局.国家国民体质监测中心发布《第五次国民体质监测公报》[EB/OL].[2023-05-03].https://www.sport.gov.cn/n315/n329/c24335066/content.html.
[7] 李一辰,陈笑征,尚晓瑞,等.北京市学龄前儿童体质状况分析[J].首都公共卫生,2021,15(6):351-355.
[8] 陈星,宋媛,叶侃.苏州市3~6岁儿童体质健康现状调查[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2018,26(9):1017-1020.
[9] 李国波,钱沁芳,王艳霞,等.福州市学龄前儿童体质状况及影响因素分析[J].慢性病学杂志,2019,20(12):1778-1781.
[10] 谢洁妍,严学勤,曾洁,等.中山市学龄前儿童体质状况分析[J].中国学校卫生,2020,41(4):604-607.
[11] KROMBHOLZ H.Physical performance in relation to age,sex,birth order,social class,and sports activities of preschool children[J].Percept Mot Skills,2006,102(2):477-484.
[12] 中华人民共和国教育部体育卫生与艺术教育司.第八次全国学生体质与健康调研结果发布[J].中国学校卫生,2021,42(9):1281-1282.
[13] 康晓玉,李鹏,张妍,等.2009—2014年左家庄社区学龄前儿童体质状况调查[J].中国妇幼保健,2017,32(10):2180-2183.
[14] 刘峥,王海俊.促进儿童肥胖的预防性干预研究[J].中国学校卫生,2022,43(11):1601-1604.
[15] 贾文慧. 家庭运动环境对3~5岁幼儿体质健康的影响研究[D].济南:山东师范大学,2022.
[16] 许雯,占叶俊.丽水市3~6岁城乡学龄前儿童体质现状对比分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2017,25(1):70-73.
[17] 张敬豪. 2014年与2019年湘西州3~6岁城镇幼儿体质对比研究[D].吉首:吉首大学,2021.
[18] 吴惠宇,唐璐,蔺海旗.广州市学龄前儿童体质状况及生命早期影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生,2022,43(3):421-424.
[19] XIONG X,CUI Y,ZHANG W,et al.Association between sleep duration and physical fitness in children aged 3-6 years:a cross-sectional study from China[J/OL].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2022,19(11)[2023-05-03].https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116902.
[1] 何佳, 徐方忠, 汤路瀚, 余鸽, 韩煜昉. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童优势反应抑制缺陷与注意缺陷、冲动行为的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 766-769.
[2] 安静, 李辉, 盛红斌, 蒋琦. 2012—2021年湖州市5岁以下儿童死亡监测资料分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 628-631.
[3] 闫孜晴, 苏畅, 白玉, 曾亦斌, 包希哲, 赵醒村. 大学生身体自我效能对身体活动及体质健康的影响研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(6): 480-484.
[4] 卢小敏, 赵继娟, 孙中友, 张学艳, 陈盛兰. 盐城市儿童青少年健康危险行为聚集情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 331-334.
[5] 周洁, 谭自明, 茹凉. 1990年与2019年中国0~14岁儿童肿瘤疾病负担分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 205-209.
[6] 关新朋, 徐洪兵, 方嘉堃, 朱雨桐, 刘凌燕, 赵茜, 宋晓明, 徐保平, 黄薇. 大气NOX和NO2急性暴露与儿童呼吸系统疾病门诊量的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 185-189,195.
[7] 钱晓萍, 凌健, 刘腾. 吴兴区6岁以下儿童手足口病流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 243-245,249.
[8] 吴伟丽, 丁军, 张晓强. 气管支气管结核患儿并发肺不张的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(10): 907-910.
[9] 毛光明, 莫哲, 顾思萌, 黄学敏, 王鸳鸯, 李雪青, 陈志健, 王晓峰. 浙江省8~10岁儿童碘营养水平与甲状腺肿调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(9): 914-918.
[10] 邹艳, 林云, 何海涛, 孟佳, 李娟娟, 顾昉, 章荣华. 儿童青少年脊柱侧弯的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(4): 395-399.
[11] 王媛原, 郭菲, 陈祉妍. 亲子冲突在父亲低头行为与儿童外化行为问题间的中介效应[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(10): 984-989.
[12] 陈小惠, 赵枫, 付有娟, 纪文武, 关素珍. 农村学龄期留守儿童社会交往焦虑调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 776-779.
[13] 王琛琛, 王巍巍, 周海茸, 洪忻. 南京市小学三年级学生含糖饮料摄入与龋齿患病调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 711-714.
[14] 赵玉秋, 张进, 邓舒, 余芳. 安徽省5岁以下儿童手足口病患病的家庭和行为因素[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 693-696.
[15] 袁月荣, 高志杰, 李保军. 海曙区托幼儿童家长手足口病知识及儿童手卫生行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 742-744,748.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed