Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (6): 465-469    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.06.002
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
丽水市MSM人群HIV定期检测及暴露后预防调查
夏永玲1, 张海芳2, 陶桃2, 蓝黄琛2, 陈晓蕾2, 吴振宇1
1.丽水市疾病预防控制中心综合办公室,浙江 丽水 323000;
2.丽水市疾病预防控制中心,浙江 丽水 323000
Regular HIV testing and post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Lishui City
XIA Yongling1, ZHANG Haifang2, TAO Tao2, LAN Huangchen2, CHEN Xiaolei2, WU Zhenyu1
1. Comprehensive Office, Lishui Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, China;
2. Lishui Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lishui, Zhejiang 323000, China
全文: PDF(773 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解浙江省丽水市男男性行为人群(MSM)HIV定期检测和暴露后预防(PEP)行为,为制定针对性干预策略提供参考。方法 于2022年4—8月,采用方便抽样方法抽取丽水市MSM 389人进行调查,通过问卷调查收集社会人口学信息、性行为、HIV检测和PEP行为等资料;采用二阶聚类分析比较不同聚类MSM的HIV定期检测和PEP接受情况。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析HIV定期检测和接受PEP的影响因素。结果 调查对象年龄MQR)为31.00(16.00)岁。HIV定期检测146人,占37.53%;接受过PEP 47人,占12.08%。二阶聚类分析将MSM聚成两类,第一类HIV定期检测占28.05%,低于第二类的44.44%;接受过PEP占22.56%,高于第二类的4.44%(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄(OR=1.030,95%CI:1.011~1.050)、性行为角色(两者皆有,OR=2.999,95%CI:1.732~5.194)和近6个月男男性行为情况(有且每次使用安全套,OR=4.567,95%CI:2.593~8.044)是MSM人群HIV定期检测的影响因素;年龄(OR=0.970,95%CI:0.942~0.999)、性取向(OR=0.292,95%CI:0.139~0.612)和近6个月男男性行为情况(有且不使用安全套,OR=0.135,95%CI:0.040~0.460;有且每次使用安全套,OR=0.076,95%CI:0.018~0.326)是MSM人群接受PEP的影响因素。结论 不同性行为特征的MSM人群对HIV定期检测和PEP的接受程度不同,近6个月男男性行为情况、性行为角色和性取向是主要的影响因素。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
夏永玲
张海芳
陶桃
蓝黄琛
陈晓蕾
吴振宇
关键词 艾滋病病毒男男性行为人群定期检测暴露后预防    
AbstractObjective To investigate the status of regular HIV testing and post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, so as to provide the reference for developing targeted intervention strategies. Methods A total of 389 MSM were selected from Lishui City by convenient sampling method from April to August 2022, and demographic information, sexual behaviors, HIV testing and PEP behaviors were collected through questionnaire surveys. MSM were clustered using two step clustering analysis, and regular HIV testing and PEP behaviors among different groups of MSM were compared. Factors affecting regular HIV testing and PEP behaviors were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results The MSM surveyed had a median age of 31.00 (interquartile range, 16.00) years. There were 146 MSM undergoing regular HIV testing, accounting for 37.53%, and 47 MSM receiving PEP, accounting for 12.08%. MSM were divided into two groups. There were 28.05% of MSM with regular HIV testing in group 1, which was lower than the 44.44% in group 2; and 22.56% receiving PEP, which was higher than the 4.44% in group 2 (both P<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age (OR=1.030, 95%CI: 1.011-1.050), sexual roles (both receptive and insertive, OR=2.999, 95%CI: 1.732-5.194) and homosexual behaviors in the past 6 months (use condoms every time, OR=4.567, 95%CI: 2.593-8.044) as factors affecting regular HIV testing among MSM; age (OR=0.970, 95%CI: 0.942-0.999), sexual orientation (OR=0.292, 95%CI: 0.139-0.612) and homosexual behaviors in the past 6 months (not use condoms, OR=0.135, 95%CI: 0.040-0.460; use condoms every time, OR=0.076, 95%CI: 0.018-0.326) as factors affecting PEP behaviors among MSM. Conclusion MSM with different characteristics of sexual behaviors have different preferences for HIV regular testing and PEP, with homosexual behaviors in the past 6 months, sexual roles and sexual orientation being the main influencing factors.
Key wordsHIV    men who have sex with men    regular testing    post exposure prophylaxis
收稿日期: 2023-12-15      修回日期: 2024-03-21      出版日期: 2024-06-10
中图分类号:  R512.91  
基金资助:丽水市科学技术局公益技术应用研究计划项目(2023GYX17)
作者简介: 夏永玲,本科,医师,主要从事疾病监测工作
通信作者: 张海芳,E-mail:hfz525@163.com   
引用本文:   
夏永玲, 张海芳, 陶桃, 蓝黄琛, 陈晓蕾, 吴振宇. 丽水市MSM人群HIV定期检测及暴露后预防调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 465-469.
XIA Yongling, ZHANG Haifang, TAO Tao, LAN Huangchen, CHEN Xiaolei, WU Zhenyu. Regular HIV testing and post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Lishui City. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(6): 465-469.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.06.002      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I6/465
[1] HOU Y S,JIN Y C,CAI C,et al.Comparative analysis of epidemiological features of HIV/AIDS cases aged over and under 50 years old-China,2010-2022[J].China CDC Wkly,2023,5(48):1079-1083.
[2] ZHAO Y F,BROMBERG D J,KHOSHNOOD K,et al.Factors associated with regular HIV testing behavior of MSM in China:a cross-sectional survey informed by theory of triadic influence[J].Int J STD AIDS,2020,31(14):1340-1351.
[3] RODGER A J,CAMBIANO V,BRUUN T,et al.Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy(PARTNER):final results of a multicentre,prospective,observational study[J].Lancet,2019,393(10189):2428-2438.
[4] 中国疾病预防控制中心性病艾滋病预防控制中心.艾滋病病毒暴露后预防技术指南(试用)[EB/OL].[2024-03-21].http://ncaids.chinacdc.cn/tzgggd/202011/W020201116802422550750.pdf.
[5] 张倩,罗德威,周乐,等.扬州市居民艾滋病非职业暴露后预防知晓情况调查[J].预防医学,2023,35(12):1093-1096.
[6] 赵亚芳,王夏,绳宇.男男性行为者HIV定期检测行为的三元影响因素分析[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2020,24(12):1433-1440.
[7] 韦娜香,张贺礼,辛辛,等.上海市浦东新区男男性行为者HIV定期检测状况调查[J].中国艾滋病性病,2021,27(8):874-876.
[8] WANG Y,LIU S C,ZHANG Y,et al.Use of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in Shenzhen,China:a serial cross-sectional study[J].AIDS Behav,2022,26(10):3231-3241.
[9] 魏然. 男男性行为人群对HIV暴露后预防服务的接受程度及影响因素研究[D].济南:山东大学,2019.
[10] 任仙龙,刘国武,夏冬艳,等.HIV非职业暴露后预防药物使用的影响因素研究进展[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(9):1709-1712.
[11] 武松. SPSS实战与统计思维[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2019.
[12] 陈吟,刘诗洋,孙静,等.基于二阶聚类分析的住院患者满意度研究[J].中华医院管理杂志,2018,34(2):104-109.
[13] POLANCO-GARCÍA M,GRANERO R,GALLART L,et al.Finding the vulnerable postoperative population:a two-step cluster analysis of the PAIN-OUT registry[J].Eur J Pain,2022,26(8):1732-1745.
[14] 陈文丽,陈剑惠,张宏,等.福州市男同性恋者/男双性恋者行为特征及HIV感染相关因素分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2022,28(8):910-914.
[15] 吴雨霏. 广西南宁、柳州市MSM人群艾滋病非职业暴露后预防的实施效果评价[D].南宁:广西医科大学,2023.
[16] 罗西,覃世龙,明方钊,等.武汉市MSM人群HIV抗体重复检测的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2022,34(8):831-835.
[17] 郑亦慧,谢言,魏巍.上海市男男性行为者艾滋病非职业暴露后预防的接受意愿和使用情况[J].上海预防医学,2022,34(2):134-138.
[1] 何婷婷, 曹栋卿, 林家锋, 蒋卓婧, 张佳峰, 范钦. 绍兴市MSM人群HIV-1分子传播网络特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 571-575,579.
[2] 贾晓锋, 王慧群, 石敏, 汤婕, 任静霞. HIV/AIDS病例HIV相关神经认知障碍的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 461-464.
[3] 候金余, 柏建芸, 郭燕, 李佳, 李龙, 龚卉, 于茂河. 天津市MSM人群网络HIV抗体自我检测情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 470-473.
[4] 陈琦, 薛霏, 桂娟娟, 吕鑫, 谢锋. MSM人群HIV/AIDS病例的结婚意愿调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(5): 397-401.
[5] 景正伟, 宁艳, 常文辉, 周超, 任强, 董丽芳, 贾华, 许诗瑶, 王志锋. 高校MSM人群HIV感染学生生存质量分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 291-294.
[6] 陈银炜, 周洋, 刘珍, 张晓辉. 流动人口HIV感染孕产妇健康综合评价指标体系研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 210-214.
[7] 徐冰钰, 阿力亚·阿迪力努尔, 何倩, 李月飞, 倪明健. 不同性角色MSM的HIV感染风险研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1018-1023.
[8] 张倩, 罗德威, 周乐, 杨惠民, 杨文彬, 刘艳, 李锦成. 扬州市居民艾滋病非职业暴露后预防知晓情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1093-1096.
[9] 罗西, 覃世龙, 明方钊, 余庆, 范传刚. 武汉市MSM人群HIV抗体重复检测的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 831-835.
[10] 许珂, 陈珺芳, 张兴亮, 罗文杰, 吴嗣圣, 黄思超. 杭州市新确证在校学生HIV/AIDS分子传播网络分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1096-1100,1104.
[11] 姜婷婷, 马瞧勤, 陈琳, 何林, 陈婉君, 陈卫永, 王憓, 郑锦雷. 16~24岁男男性行为人群多性伴的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1091-1095.
[12] 刘迎男, 杨景元, 李慧, 杨虹, 杲柏呈, 高雅. 内蒙古自治区吸毒人群丙型肝炎和梅毒感染分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1125-1131.
[13] 何佳晋, 居豪, 吴超. 中国MSM人群HIV新发感染率及其影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(1): 70-77.
[14] 辛若雷, 李佳, 孙丽君, 刘安, 张琴, 孙伟东, 李洁, 卢红艳, 白立石. 5例HIV-1感染者pol基因进化和感染时间推断研究[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(6): 545-550.
[15] 张丽, 姚英, 胡锦峰, 潘忠廉, 宋姝娟, 黄春萍. 上城区VCT门诊求询者梅毒与HIV感染的关联分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(6): 583-585.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed