Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (4): 283-287    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.04.002
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
双胎妊娠孕妇子痫前期风险预测模型研究
陆艳, 李琼珊, 孟迪云, 梅丽娜, 丁忠英, 李雯雯, 储华, 秦玲
湖州市妇幼保健院产科,浙江 湖州 313000
Prediction of preeclampsia in twin-pregnant women
LU Yan, LI Qiongshan, MENG Diyun, MEI Lina, DING Zhongying, LI Wenwen, CHU Hua, QIN Ling
Department of Obstetrics, Huzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China
全文: PDF(891 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 构建双胎妊娠孕妇子痫前期(PE)风险预测模型,为PE早期筛查和预防提供依据。方法 选择在湖州市妇幼保健院产检并分娩的双胎妊娠孕妇467人,随访期内发生PE 60例纳入病例组,随机选择未发生PE 60人纳入对照组。收集一般资料、血液生化检测指标和子宫动脉阻力指数(UtA-RI);采用logistic回归模型分析预测因子并建立列线图;采用Bootstrap法进行内部验证,采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析法分别检验模型的区分度、校准度和临床实用性。结果 病例组年龄<35岁47例,占78.33%;孕前体质指数(BMI)≥25 kg/m2 21例,占35.00%;受孕方式以试管婴儿为主,33例占55.00%。对照组年龄<35岁57人,占95.00%;孕前BMI≥25 kg/m2 8人,占13.33%;受孕方式以自然妊娠为主,39人占65.00%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、孕前BMI、受孕方式、胎盘生长因子(PLGF)和UtA-RI是双胎妊娠孕妇发生PE的风险预测因子,建立的列线图曲线下面积为0.827(95%CI:0.755~0.899),灵敏度为0.767,特异度为0.733;验证显示模型的区分度、校准度良好,临床净获益较高。结论 本研究建立的列线图对双胎妊娠孕妇PE风险具有较好的预测价值。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陆艳
李琼珊
孟迪云
梅丽娜
丁忠英
李雯雯
储华
秦玲
关键词 双胎妊娠子痫前期列线图    
AbstractObjective To construct a prediction model for preeclampsia (PE) risk in twin-pregnant women, so as to provide the basis for early screening and prevention of PE. Methods A total of 467 twin-pregnant women who underwent prenatal examination and delivered at Huzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital were selected. Sixty cases with preeclampsia (PE) were included in the case group, and 60 women without PE were included in the control group. General information, blood biochemical indicators and uterine artery resistance index (UtA-RI) were collected. A logistic regression model was used to screen predictive factors and establish a nomogram. The Bootstrap method was performed for the internal validation; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis were employed to evaluate the discrimination, calibration and clinical utility of the nomogram, respectively. Results In the case group, there were 47 individuals (78.33%) aged younger than 35 years, 21 individuals (35.00%) with pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 and above, and 33 individuals (55.00%) with in vitro fertilization. In the control group, there were 57 individuals (95.00%) aged younger than 35 years, 8 individuals (13.33%) with pre-pregnancy BMI of 25 kg/m2 and above, and 39 individuals (65.00%) with natural pregnancy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age, pre-pregnancy BMI, method of conception, placental growth factor (PLGF) and UtA-RI as risk prediction factors for PE in twin-pregnant women. The established nomogram had an area under the ROC curve of 0.827 (95%CI: 0.755-0.899), a sensitivity of 0.767, a specificity of 0.733, a good discrimination and calibration, and a relatively high clinical net benefit. Conclusion The nomogram established by age, pre-pregnancy BMI, method of conception, PLGF and UtA-RI has a good predictive value for the risk of PE in twin-pregnant women.
Key wordstwin pregnancy    preeclampsia    nomogram
收稿日期: 2023-11-20      修回日期: 2024-02-10      出版日期: 2024-04-10
中图分类号:  R714.244  
基金资助:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2021KY1084); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2022KY1226); 湖州市科学技术局公益性应用研究项目(2019GYB15)
作者简介: 陆艳,本科,副主任医师,主要从事高危产科研究工作,E-mail:115043225@qq.com
引用本文:   
陆艳, 李琼珊, 孟迪云, 梅丽娜, 丁忠英, 李雯雯, 储华, 秦玲. 双胎妊娠孕妇子痫前期风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 283-287.
LU Yan, LI Qiongshan, MENG Diyun, MEI Lina, DING Zhongying, LI Wenwen, CHU Hua, QIN Ling. Prediction of preeclampsia in twin-pregnant women. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(4): 283-287.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.04.002      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I4/283
[1] CHANTANAHOM N,PHUPONG V.Clinical risk factors for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies[J].PLoS One,2021,16(4):1-8.
[2] POON L C,SHENNAN A,HYETT J A,et al.The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO)initiative on pre-eclampsia:a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2019,145(Suppl.1):1-33.
[3] 张芝银,李秀央,郑国英,等.不良妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2020,32(1):94-97.
[4] ROBERGE S,NICOLAIDES K,DEMERS S,et al.The role of aspirin dose on the prevention of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction:systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2017,216(2):110-120.
[5] National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health(UK).Multiple pregnancy:the management of twin and triplet pregnancies in the antenatal period[M].London:RCOG Press,2011.
[6] 中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2020,55(4):227-238.
[7] U.S.Preventive Services Task Force.Low-dose aspirin use for the prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia:U.S.Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement[J].Ann Intern Med,2014,161(11):819-826.
[8] DE KAT A C,HIRST J,WOODWARD M,et al.Prediction models for preeclampsia:a systematic review[J].Pregnancy Hypertens,2019,16:48-66.
[9] 谢金亮,王筱金,王炳顺.双胎妊娠子痫前期的预测进展[J].中华围产医学杂志,2023,26(7):601-606.
[10] POON L C,KAMETAS N A,CHELEMEN T,et al.Maternal risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy:a multivariate approach[J].J Hum Hypertens,2010,24(2):104-110.
[11] FRANCISCO C,WRIGHT D,BENKŐ Z,et al.Competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy by maternal characteristics and medical history[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2017,50(4):501-506.
[12] HU J,GAO J,LIU J,et al.Prospective evaluation of first-trimester screening strategy for preterm pre-eclampsia and its clinical applicability in China[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2021,58(4):529-539.
[13] 李丽洁,王梁萍,郑艳鹛.抑制素A、激活素A与子宫动脉搏动指数联合预测子痫前期的效果分析[J].预防医学,2017,29(3):251-254,259.
[14] SVIRSKY R,LEVINSOHN-TAVOR O,FELDMAN N,et al.First-and second-trimester maternal serum markers of pre-eclampsia in twin pregnancy[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2016,47(5):560-564.
[15] MAYMON R,TRAHTENHERTS A,SVIRSKY R,et al.Developing a new algorithm for first and second trimester preeclampsia screening in twin pregnancies[J].Hypertens Pregnancy,2017,36(1):108-115.
[16] FOX N S,ROMAN A S,SALTZMAN D H,et al.Risk factors for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies[J].Am J Perinatol,2014,31(2):163-166.
[17] TAGUCHI T,ISHII K,HAYASHI S,et al.Clinical features and prenatal risk factors for hypertensive disorders in twin pregnancies[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2014,40(6):1584-1591.
[18] HAN Q,ZHENG S S,CHEN R X,et al.A new model for the predicting the risk of preeclampsia in twin pregnancy[J].Front Physiol,2022,13:1-9.
[19] CHEN J P,ZHAO D P,LIU Y,et al.Screening for preeclampsia in low-risk twin pregnancies at early gestation[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2020,99(10):1346-1353.
[20] LU Y,DING Z Y,LI W W,et al.Prediction of twin pregnancy preeclampsia based on clinical risk factors,early pregnancy serum markers,and uterine artery pulsatility index[J].Pak J Med Sci,2021,37(7):1727-1733.
[21] 陆艳,丁忠英,李雯雯,等.子宫动脉阻力指数联合临床风险因素预测双胎孕妇子痫前期的应用价值[J].浙江医学,2021,43(20):2185-2189.
[1] 周梓萌, 洪忻. 心血管病高危人群预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 211-214.
[2] 高梦阳, 娄鹏威, 马丽, 李惠, 黄玉婷, 王璐, 王凯. 甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 229-234.
[3] 杨秀琳, 马宗康, 马霞, 马鑫. 东乡族自治县农村居民传染病健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(2): 166-170.
[4] 王晓薇, 许艳岚. 老年2型糖尿病患者认知衰弱风险预测研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1037-1042.
[5] 谢庆堂, 罗健, 陈开, 雷少颖. 应用列线图模型预测噪声作业工人高频听力损失情况[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 715-719.
[6] 施明明, 张晓, 李娜, 胡锦峰. 居民血脂异常影响因素的列线图分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(5): 460-464.
[7] 李丽洁, 王梁萍, 郑艳鹛. 抑制素A、激活素A与子宫动脉搏动指数联合预测子痫前期的效果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(3): 251-254,259.
[8] 崔莹珊, 陈小林, 周航亮, 张瑞光. 术前外周血NLR和d-NLR水平与结直肠癌手术患者预后的相关性研究[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(4): 362-367.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed