Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (5): 421-424    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.013
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
湖州市市售黄酒邻苯二甲酸酯污染健康风险评价
王芳, 杨凤华, 杨中荣, 邵国健, 王晔
湖州市疾病预防控制中心质管科,浙江 湖州 313000
Health risk assessment of phthalic acid esters contamination in market-available yellow rice wine in Huzhou City
WANG Fang, YANG Fenghua, YANG Zhongrong, SHAO Guojian, WANG Ye
Department of Quality Management, Huzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China
全文: PDF(785 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解浙江省湖州市市售黄酒中邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物(PAEs)污染水平并评价健康风险,为保障黄酒食用安全提供依据。方法 于2021—2022年采集湖州市市售黄酒样品,采用磁性固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法检测16种PAEs,采用美国环境保护署健康风险评估模型评价黄酒中PAEs的致癌风险和非致癌风险。结果 采集黄酒样品75份,检出PAEs污染44份,检出率为58.67%。检出邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)、邻苯二甲酸二异丁酯(DIBP)和邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP),DMP、DIBP无限量标准,DBP超标17份,超标率为22.67%。DMP、DIBP和DBP未列入国际癌症研究所分类标准2B类及以上致癌物,无明确致癌风险。在PAEs含量均值水平下,黄酒样品均不存在非致癌风险;在PAEs含量75%分位值水平下,塑料包装饮料酒DBP的非致癌风险值为1.207 5,总非致癌风险值为1.207 5;在PAEs含量最高值水平下,塑料包装料酒、塑料包装饮料酒、玻璃瓶装饮料酒和陶瓷坛装饮料酒总非致癌风险值分别为2.751 0、2.782 0、1.298 2和2.944 0,存在非致癌风险。结论 湖州市市售黄酒存在一定程度的PAEs污染,未发现致癌风险,但长期摄入高PAEs残留的黄酒可能存在非致癌风险。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王芳
杨凤华
杨中荣
邵国健
王晔
关键词 邻苯二甲酸酯黄酒健康风险    
AbstractObjective To investigate the contamination of phthalic acid esters (PAEs) and assess the health risk of PAEs contamination in market-available yellow rice wine in Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, so as to provide the safety safeguard for consuming yellow rice wine. Methods Yellow rice wine samples were collected from markets in Huzhou City from 2021 to 2022, and 16 PAEs were determined in yellow rice wine using magnetic solid-phase extraction coupled with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of PAEs were evaluated using the health risk models proposed by United States Environmental Protection Agency. Results A total of 75 yellow rice wine samples were collected, and 44 samples were detected with PAEs contamination (58.67%). Dimethyl phthalate (DMP), di-isobutyl phthalate (DIBP) and di-butyl phthalate (DBP) were detected, and there were 17 samples (22.67%) detected with DBP overdose (DMP and DIBP had no limit standard). DMP, DBP and DIBP, which were not classified as Class 2B and higher carcinogens by WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer, had no definitive carcinogenic risks. Under mean PAEs, the five types of yellow rice wine all had no carcinogenic risks. Under 75% percentile of PAEs concentrations, the DBP in beverage wine with plastic packaging had a carcinogenic risk score of 1.207 5, with a gross carcinogenic risk score of 1.207 5. Under the maximum PAEs concentration, the ross carcinogenic risk scores of cooking wine with plastic packaging, beverage wine with plastic packaging, beverage wine with glass bottle packaging, and beverage wine with jar packaging were 2.751 0, 2.782 0, 1.298 2 and 2.944 0, presenting non-carcinogenic risks. Conclusion There is PAEs contamination in market-available yellow rice wine in Huzhou City, and no carcinogenic risk is evaluated. Non-carcinogenic health risk requires to be given a high priority.
Key wordsphthalate    yellow rice wine    health risk
收稿日期: 2023-02-27      修回日期: 2023-04-13      出版日期: 2023-05-10
中图分类号:  R181.3  
基金资助:湖州市科学技术局公益性应用研究项目(2020GYB09)
作者简介: 王芳,硕士,主管技师,主要从事理化检验工作
引用本文:   
王芳, 杨凤华, 杨中荣, 邵国健, 王晔. 湖州市市售黄酒邻苯二甲酸酯污染健康风险评价[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 421-424.
WANG Fang, YANG Fenghua, YANG Zhongrong, SHAO Guojian, WANG Ye. Health risk assessment of phthalic acid esters contamination in market-available yellow rice wine in Huzhou City. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(5): 421-424.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.05.013      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I5/421
[1] 王腾,余逸飞,王睿,等.食品中邻苯二甲酸酯类塑化剂检测方法研究进展[J].生物技术进展,2023,13(1):2095-2341.
[2] PARIGORIDI I E,TSOUMANI E,DEMERTZIS P G,et al.Development of a reliable extraction method for the identification and quantification of 7 plasticizers in recycled paperboard materials intended for food contact applications[J/OL].Sustain Chem Pharm,2023,31[2023-04-13] .https:://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100941.
[3] 聂燕敏,齐丽娟,高珊,等.邻苯二甲酸酯对健康影响的危害评估[J].毒理学杂志,2021,35(5):361-366.
[4] 黄河,黄婷,王媚,等.白酒中邻苯二甲酸酯塑化剂问题研究进展[J].酿酒科技,2022,331(1):97-103.
[5] 吕慧威,耿迪,解慧,等.啤酒中邻苯二甲酸酯检测方法优化及迁移量研究[J].中国酿造,2021,40(8):157-162.
[6] DANCHO L D,NATALIYA T D,IVAN A G,et al.Development of GC/MS method for analysis of phthalates in wines[J/OL].J Biotechnol,2018,280[2023-04-13] .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.06.180.
[7] 韩娟,李杰,梁迪,等.黄酒生产工艺及安全问题浅析[J].中国果菜,2021,41(9):70-74.
[8] 王芳,胡明友,杨凤华,等.磁性固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法测定黄酒中16种邻苯二甲酸酯[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2022,32(17):2072-2076.
[9] 王芳,杨凤华,邵国健,等.磁性固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法测定市售酒中16种邻苯二甲酸酯[J].预防医学,2022,34(8):855-860.
[10] 中华人民共和国卫生部办公厅.卫生部办公厅关于通报食品及食品添加剂邻苯二甲酸酯类物质最大残留量的函[EB/OL].[2023-04-13] .http://law.foodmate.net/show-175051.html.
[11] 秦德萍,杨小珊,黄思瑜,等.重庆市售白酒中18种邻苯二甲酸酯类物质的含量调查及健康风险评估[J].现代食品,2021(13):164-168,171.
[12] 张庆,张颖,牛志广.饮用水系统中邻苯二甲酸酯的污染特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2022,42(12):114-121.
[13] U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume 1 human health evaluation manual(part A)[EB/OL].[2023-04-13] .https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part.
[14] 刘靖靖,赵晶,田莹莹,陈明,等.啤酒中邻苯二甲酸酯的GC-MS测定[J].食品与发酵工业,2015,41(3):168-173.
[1] 王芳, 杨凤华, 邵国健, 胡明友, 王晔. 磁性固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法测定市售酒中16种邻苯二甲酸酯[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 855-860.
[2] 谷少华, 陆蓓蓓, 王永, 金永高, 王爱红. 高温健康风险预警的气象指标研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 803-808,815.
[3] 徐秋凉, 曹艺耀, 王鹏, 任鸿, 袁伟明, 李飞, 张美辨. 五种职业健康风险评估模型评估小型露天石料矿场硅尘危害比较[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 873-876,883.
[4] 刘静, 徐沛维, 陈志健, 邵斌, 施长苗, 李胜, 王晓峰. 人群邻苯二甲酸酯暴露水平研究综述[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 906-909,912.
[5] 廖雅芬, 叶坚, 杨业洲. 肇庆市城市饮用水化学物质健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 951-954.
[6] 梁晓军, 周晓明, 仇家荣, 耿政祥, 张宏斌, 孙强, 赵萍, 陈宝英, 戴鸣. 昆山市深井水水质监测结果及健康风险评价[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 830-834.
[7] 袁瑞, 张鹏, 邵国健, 宋臻鹏, 付云. 南太湖水产品微囊藻毒素污染的非致癌健康风险评价[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 835-837,840.
[8] 徐映如, 陈道湧, 沈俊毅, 张颖琦. 虹口区市售蔬菜重金属污染与健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(4): 406-410.
[9] 谢华森, 宋杨, 王晓峰, 陈志健, 徐沛维, 楼晓明. 三氯生的环境浓度、人群暴露及健康风险研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(10): 1013-1016.
[10] 宋韶芳, 陈坤才, 刘于飞, 潘心红, 张维蔚, 李燕, 黄婕, 张玉华, 钟贤武, 曾锦衡, 李美霞. 广州市市售大米镉污染及健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 723-725.
[11] 梁志明, 曾庆民, 邓永愈, 李丽泉, 余建文, 钟秀霞, 苏世标. 四种方法评估电器制造行业化学有害因素风险结果比较[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(3): 310-314.
[12] 黎乾, 王芬, 提高兰, 倪丰颖, 郑寿贵, 包芳芳. 综合指数法和定量风险评估法在反光膜企业的应用比较[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(9): 946-949.
[13] 吕沈聪, 王恒辉, 燕勇, 管健. 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯降解菌L6关键基因扩增及代谢产物分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(7): 748-750,753.
[14] 丁俊, 苏世标, 靳雅丽, 刘明, 谈伟君. 家具生产企业有机溶剂的三种健康风险评估方法比较[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(4): 400-404.
[15] 王祚懿, 陈强, 何晓庆, 盛微, 罗进斌. 金华市农村生活饮用水化学污染健康风险评估[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(10): 1012-1016.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed