Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2020, Vol. 32 Issue (7): 674-677    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.07.006
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
南宁市新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性疫情流行特征分析
刘昊晖, 覃健敏, 农皓, 蒋作祎
南宁市疾病预防控制中心应急办,广西 南宁 530023
Epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 clusters in Nanning
LIU Haohui, QIN Jianmin, NONG Hao, JIANG Zuoyi
Emergency Office of Nanning Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Nanning,Guangxi 530023,China
全文: PDF(516 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析广西壮族自治区南宁市新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)聚集性疫情流行特征,为防控COVID-19疫情提供依据。方法 通过中国疾病预防控制信息系统突发公共卫生事件报告管理信息系统收集2020年1—2月南宁市COVID-19聚集性疫情资料,采用描述流行病学方法分析疫情时间分布、地区分布、人群分布、感染来源、代际传播情况、疫情发现方式和规模等。结果 2020年1—2月南宁市共报告COVID-19聚集性疫情11起,报告确诊病例36例,涉及暴露人数293人,平均罹患率为12.29%,其中家庭聚集性疫情10起。疫情规模均较小,平均每起疫情报告病例3.27例。聚集性疫情病例发病时间在1月23日达高峰,报告时间主要集中在2月10日—18日;病例分布在2个城区和1个县,其中青秀区和西乡塘区罹患率为16.95%,高于马山县的5.17%(p<0.05)。家庭密切接触者续发率为25.42%,高于其他密切接触方式(p<0.05)。11起聚集性疫情中,输入疫情和输入关联性疫情9起;发生二代及以上病例5起,首代病例与二代病例发病间隔时间中位数为3 d。结论 南宁市COVID-19聚集性疫情多由输入病例引起,以家庭聚集性疫情为主,疫情规模较小,报告集中在2月中旬,城区居民罹患率高于农村居民。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘昊晖
覃健敏
农皓
蒋作祎
关键词 新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性疫情流行特征    
AbstractObjective To learn the epidemiological characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)clusters in Nanning,Guangxi Province,so as to provide reference for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Methods The data of COVID-19 clusters from January to February,2020 in Nanning were collected through the Public Emergency Response System of National CDC. Descriptive epidemiological analysis were conducted to analyze the time,space and population distribution, source of infection,transmission chain, ways of detection and the scale of clusters. Results Eleven clusters were reported,with 36 confirmed cases and 293 exposed persons. The average attack rate was 12.29%. There were ten family clusters. The epidemic scale was small,with an average of 3.27 cases. The onset of cases peaked on January 23,while the reporting time was mainly from February 10 to February 18. The cases were distributed in two cities and one county. The attack rate of Qingxiu District and Xixiangtang District was 16.95%,which was higher than 5.17% of Mashan County(p<0.05). The recurrence rate of family contacts was 25.42%,which was higher than that of other ways of contacts(p<0.05). Of eleven clusters,nine were caused by imported cases or related cases;five developed secondary cases or above,and the median interval between the first and secondary cases was three days. Conclusions The COVID-19 clusters in Nanning occurred mainly in families with small scales and most were caused by imported cases. The majority of the cases were reported during mid February. The attack rate in urban areas was higher than that in rural areas.
Key wordscoronavirus disease 2019    cluster    epidemiological characteristics
收稿日期: 2020-04-08      修回日期: 2020-05-14      出版日期: 2020-07-10
中图分类号:  R181.3  
基金资助:广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研基金(Z20191014,Z20191016)
通信作者: 覃健敏,E-mail:qjmin2005@163.com   
作者简介: 刘昊晖,本科,主管医师,主要从事卫生应急管理工作
引用本文:   
刘昊晖, 覃健敏, 农皓, 蒋作祎. 南宁市新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性疫情流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 674-677.
LIU Haohui, QIN Jianmin, NONG Hao, JIANG Zuoyi. Epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 clusters in Nanning. Preventive Medicine, 2020, 32(7): 674-677.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.07.006      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2020/V32/I7/674
[1] WANG C,HORBY P W, HAYDEN F G, et al.A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern[J]. Lancet,2020,395(10223):470-473.
[2] HUANG C, WANG Y, LI X, et al.Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China[J]. Lancet, 2020,395(10223):497-506.
[3] PAULES C I,MARSTON H D,FAUCI A S.Coronavirus infections-more than just the common cold[J]. JAMA, 2020,323(8):707-708.
[4] World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease2019 (COVID-19)situation report-116[R/OL]. [2020-05-14]. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports.
[5] 中华预防医学会新型冠状病毒肺炎防控专家组. 新型冠状病毒肺炎流行病学特征的最新认识[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2020,41(2):139-144.
[6] 崔亮亮,耿兴义,赵小冬,等. 济南市现阶段新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行特征与思考[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2020,58(3):52-57.
[7] 叶莹,范威,王海峰,等.河南省新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性疫情流行病学特征分析[J/OL].中国公共卫生[2020-05-14].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1234.r.20200430.1231.006.html.
[8] 刘莉,井丽,礼彦侠,等.辽宁省新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性病例流行病学分析[J/OL].中国公共卫生[2020-05-14].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/21.1234.r.20200430.1314.012.html.
[9] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会办公厅.新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第六版)[EB/OL]. [2020-05-14]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/zhengcwj/202002/8334a8326dd94d329df351d7da8aefc2.shtml.
[10] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会办公厅.新型冠状病毒肺炎防控方案(第五版)[EB/OL]. [2020-05-14]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-02/22/content_5482010.htm.
[11] 赵善露,高立冬,罗垲炜,等.湖南省新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性疫情流行特征分析[J/OL].实用预防医学[2020-05-14].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/43.1223.r.20200306.0825.002.html.
[12] 李新蕊,耿兴义,王蔚茹,等. 37例新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性思考[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版),2020,58(4):32-35.
[13] 陈衍芳,李文豪,陆敏,等.中山市新型冠状病毒肺炎流行病学特征及防控效果评价[J/OL].华南预防医学[2020-05-14].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1550.R.20200403.1442.002.html.
[14] 白尧,刘昆,陈志军,等. 陕西省新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情的早期传播动力学研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2020,30(6):834-838.
[15] NISHIURA H,LINTON N M, AKHMETZHANOV A R.Serial interval of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections[J]. Int J Infect Dis,2020,93:284-286.
[16] 王婉薇,周思韩,应俊强,等.内江市新型冠状病毒肺炎聚集性疫情流行特征分析[J/OL].华南预防医学[2020-05-14].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1550.r.20200331.1735.002.html.
[17] 唐安,仝振东,李科峰,等. 舟山市新型冠状病毒肺炎病例流行病学特征分析[J]. 预防医学,2020,32(2):113-116.
[18] KAMPF G, TODT D, PFAENDER S, et al. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents[J]. J Hosp Infect, 2020,104(3)246-251.
[1] 富小飞, 刘砚清, 胡洁, 亓云鹏, 郭飞飞, 查亦薇. 2005—2021年嘉兴市甲型病毒性肝炎和戊型病毒性肝炎流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 737-740.
[2] 刘艳, 沈建勇, 张超, 孙秀秀, 王雨达, 郑佳仪, 张子喆. 2012—2022年湖州市百日咳流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 811-813.
[3] 朱思懿, 洪航, 边学燕, 许国章. 慢性肾脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 770-773.
[4] 明小力, 杨晓庆, 周瑜, 任天广. 我国夏季型恙虫病流行病学研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 778-780.
[5] 王唐, 董兆鹏, 李淑华, 莫平华, 赵艺明, 宋灿磊. 金山区托幼机构和学校手足口病聚集性疫情分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 800-802.
[6] 郑家乐, 冯太聪, 向伦辉, 张月娟, 唐小德, 沈隽卿, 刘效峰. 宝山区45起诺如病毒聚集性疫情分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 803-806.
[7] 周星缘, 洪航, 方挺, 许国章. 肺炎流行病学研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 682-686.
[8] 王璇, 刘社兰, 曹艳丽, 孙琬琬, 丰燕, 凌锋. 2013—2022年浙江省流行性感冒暴发疫情流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 645-648.
[9] 黎燕, 雷梦婷, 王燧, 殷淑娇, 章存瑞, 李清春. 一起涉及多所学校的肺结核聚集性疫情调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 607-610.
[10] 邢超, 王琦梅, 任蒋磊, 陈吉铭, 何琴芬, 蒋卓婧. 2012—2022年绍兴市食源性疾病暴发事件流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(6): 506-508,513.
[11] 赵棋锋, 刘明奇, 马珊珊, 李杰, 陈海苗, 马岩, 王吉玲, 方益荣. 2006—2022年绍兴市肾综合征出血热流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(6): 514-516,521.
[12] 向泽林, 富小飞, 亓云鹏, 朱国英, 顾伟玲, 胡洁, 李傅冬, 周晚玲, 侯志刚, 刘杨, 刘砚清, 郭飞飞, 陆先权, 郭林杰, 陈中文. 羽毛球场馆一起新型冠状病毒感染聚集性疫情的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 316-319.
[13] 许太彬, 程春荣, 段江洋, 兰培利, 段欣洋. 郑州市50岁及以上HIV/AIDS病例流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 323-326.
[14] 钱晓萍, 凌健, 刘腾. 吴兴区6岁以下儿童手足口病流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 243-245,249.
[15] 李鹏, 吴文杰, 唐安, 李科峰, 严剑波. 2004—2021年舟山市突发公共卫生事件流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(2): 144-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed