|
|
|
| The reliability and validity evaluation of a personality scoring system for house-tree-person test |
| TANG Lu-han*, ZHOU Wan-ning, YU Ge, ZHANG Yuan-yuan, XU Fang-zhong
|
| *Clinical Psychology Department,Tong De Hosptial of Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310013,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To evaluate the reliablity and validity of a quantitative personality scoring system of house-tree-person test（HTP）. Methods Based on the identified 36 drawing characteristics relating to personality,we recruited 257 individual cases of asymptomatic to assess its psychometric attributes. They were instructed to draw HTP pictures,and were then asked to complete Y-G personality test. Statistical methods were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the personality scoring system we built. Results The occurrence rate of the 36 items ranged from 7.78% to 64.20%. There was correlation between the score of each item and the total score（P < 0.05）,so all the items were retained. This personality scoring system contains six factors,namely“instability”,“activity”,“social orientation”,“randomness”,“inferiority”and“dominance”,and the accumulated variance was 74.93%. The criterion validity was -0.28-0.47（P < 0.01）. The internal consistency reliability of the system was 0.88（P < 0.01）;the raters’ Kappa coefficients for each item are all above 0.70（P < 0.01）. Conclusion The personality scoring system has 36 items which are categorized into six factors. This study demonstrates our proposed HTP personality scoring system has eminently acceptable reliability and validity.
|
|
Received: 18 September 2017
Revised: 04 December 2017
Published: 22 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] BUCK J N.The H-T-P technique; a qualitative and quantitative scoring manual[J]. J Clin Psychol,1948,4(4):317.
[2] 张凤华,吴倩. 房树人测验在国内的应用研究[J]. 临床心身疾病杂志,2015,21(5):111-113.
[3] ANDERSON F E.Needed:a major collaborative effort[J]. Art Therapy,2001,18(2):74-78.
[4] KATO D,SUZUKI M.Developing a scale to measure total impression of synthetic house-tree-person drawings[J]. Social Behavior and Personality:an International Journal,2016,44(1):19-28.
[5] LI C Y,CHUNG Y,HSIUNG P C,et al.A psychometric study of the Kinetic-House-Tree-Person Scoring System for people with psychiatric disorders in Taiwan[J]. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy,2014,24(1):20-27.
[6] 汤路瀚,徐方忠,周婉宁. 房树人测验抑郁评估计分系统信效度研究[J]. 浙江预防医学,2016,28(1):1-4.
[7] 巩凯旋,高柏慧,刘浩,等.动力房树人测验在大学生应用的计分研究[J]. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2015,24(1):80-83.
[8] 王斐. 大学生房树人投射测验编码系统的建立与信效度初探[J]. 科教文汇,2015(12):137-140.
[9] 孔克勤,叶奕乾,杨秀君.个性心理学[M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006:245-249.
[10] 杨晓斌,张雨青,张涵诗,等. HTP投射测验与EPQ问卷测验的相关性研究[J]. 中国卫生统计,2015,32(3):443-445.
[11] 陈涛,裴欢昌,王鹏,等.青少年依赖型人格障碍倾向的绘画评估诊断[J]. 中国特殊教育,2015(2):59-64.
[12] LANGE-KÜTTNER C,KERZMANN A,HECKHAUSEN J. The emergence of visually realistic contour in the drawing of the human figure[J]. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,2002,20(3):439-463.
[13] ISAKSSON C,NORLÉN A K,ENGLUND B,et al. Changes in self-image as seen in tree paintings[J]. The Arts in Psychotherapy,2009,36(5):304-312.
[14] ZALSMAN G,NETANEL R,FISCHEL T,et al.Human figure drawings in the evaluation of severe adolescent suicidal behavior[J]. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2000,39(8):1024-1031.
[15] KATO D,SUZUKI M.Personality traits and the expression area of synthetic house-tree-person drawings in early adolescent Japanese[J]. Psychological Thought,2016,9(1):67-74.
[16] 邱鸿钟,吴东梅.抑郁症患者明尼苏达多项人格测验与房树人绘画特征的相关性研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2010,18(11):1341-1344.
[17] HAMMER E F.Negro and white children's personality adjustment as revealed by a comparison of their drawings (H-T-P)[J]. J Clin Psychol,1953,9(1):7-10.
[18] GROTH-MARNAT G,ROBERTS L.Human figure drawings and house tree person drawings as indicators of self-esteem:a quantitative approach[J]. J Clin Psychol,1998,54(2):219-222. |
| [1] |
WANG Shenyu, GAN Zhengkai, HU Xiaosong, SHAO Yanzhi, CHEN Yingping, LIANG Zhenzhen, XING Bo, CHEN Zhiping, LÜ Huakun. Reliability and validity of Chinese Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory in influenza cases[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2020, 32(5): 471-474. |
|
|
|
|
