|
|
|
| Analysis of birth surveillance results in Baoshan Districtfrom 2013 to 2022 |
| LI Lin1, SHEN Fangli2, MAO Jianying2, YIN Chunli1, ZHU Sanmei2, LIU Shiyou2
|
1. Office of Comprehensive Business Management, Baoshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201901, China;
2. Baoshan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201901, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the fertility level of registered population in Baoshan District, Shanghai Municipality and the incidence of adverse birth outcomes of live births from 2013 to 2022, so as to provide the evidence for improving maternal and child health care strategies. Methods The data pertaining to live births registered in Baoshan District from 2013 to 2022 were collected through the Shanghai Birth Medical Information System, including the basic information of live births and maternal fertility. The indicators such as fertility level, parity, birth age and incidence of adverse birth outcomes of live births were descriptively analyzed. The trend of crude birth rate and total fertility rate was analyzed by annual percent change (APC). Results A total of 56 719 live births were registered in Baoshan District from 2013 to 2022. The crude birth rate was 6.54‰, the total fertility rate was 31.78‰, and the sex ratio at birth was 105.61. The crude birth rate showed a downward trend from 2016 to 2022 (APC=-11.054%, P<0.05), and the total fertility rate showed a downward trend from 2017 to 2022 (APC=-10.377%, P<0.05). The proportion of second parity and above showed an increasing trend from 2013 to 2017 (P<0.05) and a decreasing trend from 2017 to 2022 (P<0.05). The maternal childbearing age showed an increasing trend from 2013 to 2022 (P<0.05), the incidence of premature infants and low birth weight infants showed an increasing trend (both P<0.05). The incidence of premature infants and low birth weight infants increased with the rising childbearing age (both P<0.05). Conclusions The fertility level in Baoshan District was relatively low from 2013 to 2022. The proportion of second parity and above showed an upward trend followed by a downward trend. The incidence of premature infants and low birth weight infants increased with the rising childbearing age.
|
|
Received: 16 October 2023
Revised: 01 December 2023
Published: 12 January 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 叶欣. 中国人口负增长的现状、挑战及对策研究[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,27(5):76-92.
[2] 唐迪,顾斐雯,那立欣,等.上海提高居民生育水平的公共政策研究[J].科学发展,2023(5):95-103.
[3] 杨启帆. 中国生育率变化趋势及其影响因素分析[D].昆明:云南财经大学,2023.
[4] 徐艳华,毛华庆,徐益红,等. 浙江省新生儿疾病筛查工作质量监测与评价[J]. 预防医学, 2022,34(8): 848-851.
[5] 郭广丽,周钦,李晓慧,等.2013—2017年河北省不同年龄段孕产妇不良分娩结局的分析[J].现代预防医学,2020,47(8):1402-1405,1434.
[6] 张妍,金亚清,于宏杰,等.嘉定区出生监测结果分析[J].预防医学,2019,31(12):1269-1272.
[7] 倪静宜,陈林利,陈丽菁,等.生育年龄与不良出生结局的关系及对适宜生育年龄的启示[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(20):3720-3724,3753.
[8] 韩荣荣,方利萍,曹波,等.2012—2020年上海市青浦区户籍人口生育水平变化分析[J].上海预防医学,2022,34(8):761-764.
[9] 吕希霖,唐友池,周玉博,等.2009—2019年北京朝阳区出生人口性别比特征分析[J].中国生育健康杂志,2023,34(2):114-119.
[10] 上海市卫生健康委员会.关于《上海市人口与计划生育条例》(修正案)和单独两孩政策的解读[EB/OL].[2023-12-01].https://wsjkw.sh.gov.cn/zcjd/20180815/0012-58260.html
[11] 王涵,张纯,等.跨越“低生育率陷阱”[J].法治与社会,2023(7):4-12.
[12] 邢致远. 中国“多孩”政策为何难以推行[J].经济研究导刊,2022(35):52-55.
[13] 黄丽,李辉,管晓晔,等.全面二孩政策对上海市杨浦区户籍居民生育水平的影响分析[J].上海预防医学,2021,33(1):42-46.
[14] 边艳霞,李黄福,刘小军,等.太原市阳曲县2011—2020年出生人口及不良妊娠结局变化趋势研究[J].现代预防医学,2023,50(14):2565-2570.
[15] 陈蓉. 从生育意愿与生育行为的转变看我国大城市全面两孩政策的实施效应——以上海为例[J].兰州学刊,2018(4):155-165.
[16] 朱敏,徐峰,朱益民,于伟. 柯桥区育龄人群二孩生育意愿及影响因素[J]. 预防医学,2018,30(7):671-675.
[17] 刘佳,徐阳.女性最佳生育年龄探讨[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2018,29(7):865-868.
[18] 蓝仙梅,罗霞,郑晓红,等. 丽水市单胎活产儿早产的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学,2021,33(3):313-316.
[19] 果丽娜,严慧.2018—2021年北京市海淀社区建册孕妇高危风险因素分析[J].中国初级卫生保健,2023,37(7):65-68.
[20] 吴军华,邱海燕. 宁波市新生儿出生健康状况评估[J]. 预防医学,2017,29(5):521-523.
[21] 张相明,赵鹏,陈思成,等.广西桂平市2016—2020年活产新生儿不良出生结局影响因素[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2022,26(9):1050-1056. |
|
|
|
