阳性血培养标本菌种快速鉴定及药敏试验方法研究

doi:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.08.019

Preventive Medicine

2023, Vol. 35

Issue (8): 732-736 DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.08.019

Laboratory Research

Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search

Rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing assay in positive blood cultures

FAN Fanghua¹, WANG Xuan¹, ZHANG Yapei¹, XIAO Zhen¹, ZHOU Ying², DONG Shilei¹

1. Department of Microbiology Laboratory, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310013, China;
2. Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310013, China

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (787 KB) HTML (0 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To establish a rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing assay in positive blood cultures, so as to provide insights into timely diagnosis and treatment of bloodstream infections. Methods A total of 1 154 blood culture samples were collected from inpatients in Zhejiang Hospital from February to May, 2022. The bacterial isolates were enriched and purified using improved separation gel method, and bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using VITEK2 mass spectrometry system and VITEK2 Compact automated microbiology system. The accuracy of the new assay for bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests was evaluated with the conventional VITEK 2 compact system as the standard. Results Of 1 154 blood culture specimens, the conventional VITEK 2 compact system detected 174 positives and 980 negatives. The new assay and the conventional VITEK 2 compact system identified consistent bacterial isolates in 165 out of 174 positive blood culture samples, and the accuracy of bacterial identification was 94.83% for the new assay, with a 99.21% accuracy for identifying Gram-negative bacteria and 82.22% for Gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed in 158 bacterial isolates, and the new assay presented a 90.17% accuracy, with a 90.27% accuracy for Gram-negative bacteria and 89.74% for Gram-positive bacteria. The conventional VITEK 2 compact system required 30 hours and longer to complete bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests, and the new assay required 9 to 18 hours. Conclusions The new rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing assay shortens the time of bacterial culture, achieves rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in blood culture specimens and has a high accuracy that meets clinical needs, which facilitates rapid diagnosis and treatment of bloodstream infections.

Key words： blood culture bacterial identification antimicrobial susceptibility test VITEK mass spectrometry system VITEK2 Compact automated microbiology system

Received: 23 February 2023 Revised: 20 May 2023 Published: 17 August 2023

ZTFLH:

R372

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	FAN Fanghua
	WANG Xuan
	ZHANG Yapei
	XIAO Zhen
	ZHOU Ying
	DONG Shilei

Cite this article:

FAN Fanghua,WANG Xuan,ZHANG Yapei, et al. Rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing assay in positive blood cultures[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(8): 732-736.

URL:

http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/EN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.08.019 OR http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/EN/Y2023/V35/I8/732

[1] CECCONI M,EVANS L,LEVY M,et al.Sepsis and septic shock[J].Lancet,2018,392(10141):75-87.
[2] RUDD K E,JOHNSON S C,AGESA K M,et al.Global,regional,and national sepsis incidence and mortality,1990-2017:analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study[J].Lancet,2020,395(10219):200-211.
[3] KUMAR A,ROBERTS D,WOOD K E,et al.Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock[J].Crit Care Med,2006,34(6):1589-1596.
[4] 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会临床微生物与感染分会,中华医学会检验医学分会临床微生物学组,中华医学会微生物学和免疫学分会临床微生物学组.血液培养技术用于血流感染诊断临床实践专家共识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2022,45(2):105-121.
[5] PERI A M,HARRIS P,PATERSON D L.Culture-independent detection systems for bloodstream infection[J].Clin Microbiol Infect,2022,28(2):195-201.
[6] ZENGIN C H,BAYRAKTAR B.Direct rapid identification from positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS:specific focus on turnaround times[J/OL].Microbiol Spectr,2021,9(3)[2023-05-20].https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01103-21.
[7] 潘宏伟,孙恩华.MALDI-TOF MS直接鉴定阳性血培养病原菌的前处理方法选择[J].中华检验医学杂志,2018,41(8):563-566.
[8] 胡继红,马筱玲,王辉,等.MALDI-TOF MS在临床微生物鉴定中的标准化操作专家共识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2019,42(4):241-249.
[9] 谢小芳,周惠琴,郑毅,等.基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱技术直接鉴定血流感染病原菌的效果评价[J].中华临床感染病杂志,2016,4(9):152-155.
[10] 上海医学会检验医学专科委员会临床微生物学组,上海市微生物学会临床微生物专业委员会.上海地区阳性血培养直接质谱快速检测规范[J].中华检验医学杂志,2017,40(3):165-168.
[11] TANG H,LI R,XU H,et al.Direct-on-target microdroplet growth assay for detection of bacterial resistance in positive blood cultures[J].Infect Drug Resist,2021,14:4611-4617.
[12] TSAI Y W,LIN T C,CHOU H Y,et al.Shortening the time of the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures with MALDI-TOF MS[J/OL].Diagnostics(Basel),2021,11(8)[2023-05-20].https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081514.