|
|
|
| Health risk assessment of phthalic acid esters contamination in market-available yellow rice wine in Huzhou City |
| WANG Fang, YANG Fenghua, YANG Zhongrong, SHAO Guojian, WANG Ye
|
| Department of Quality Management, Huzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the contamination of phthalic acid esters (PAEs) and assess the health risk of PAEs contamination in market-available yellow rice wine in Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, so as to provide the safety safeguard for consuming yellow rice wine. Methods Yellow rice wine samples were collected from markets in Huzhou City from 2021 to 2022, and 16 PAEs were determined in yellow rice wine using magnetic solid-phase extraction coupled with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of PAEs were evaluated using the health risk models proposed by United States Environmental Protection Agency. Results A total of 75 yellow rice wine samples were collected, and 44 samples were detected with PAEs contamination (58.67%). Dimethyl phthalate (DMP), di-isobutyl phthalate (DIBP) and di-butyl phthalate (DBP) were detected, and there were 17 samples (22.67%) detected with DBP overdose (DMP and DIBP had no limit standard). DMP, DBP and DIBP, which were not classified as Class 2B and higher carcinogens by WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer, had no definitive carcinogenic risks. Under mean PAEs, the five types of yellow rice wine all had no carcinogenic risks. Under 75% percentile of PAEs concentrations, the DBP in beverage wine with plastic packaging had a carcinogenic risk score of 1.207 5, with a gross carcinogenic risk score of 1.207 5. Under the maximum PAEs concentration, the ross carcinogenic risk scores of cooking wine with plastic packaging, beverage wine with plastic packaging, beverage wine with glass bottle packaging, and beverage wine with jar packaging were 2.751 0, 2.782 0, 1.298 2 and 2.944 0, presenting non-carcinogenic risks. Conclusion There is PAEs contamination in market-available yellow rice wine in Huzhou City, and no carcinogenic risk is evaluated. Non-carcinogenic health risk requires to be given a high priority.
|
|
Received: 27 February 2023
Revised: 13 April 2023
Published: 15 May 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 王腾,余逸飞,王睿,等.食品中邻苯二甲酸酯类塑化剂检测方法研究进展[J].生物技术进展,2023,13(1):2095-2341.
[2] PARIGORIDI I E,TSOUMANI E,DEMERTZIS P G,et al.Development of a reliable extraction method for the identification and quantification of 7 plasticizers in recycled paperboard materials intended for food contact applications[J/OL].Sustain Chem Pharm,2023,31[2023-04-13] .https:://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100941.
[3] 聂燕敏,齐丽娟,高珊,等.邻苯二甲酸酯对健康影响的危害评估[J].毒理学杂志,2021,35(5):361-366.
[4] 黄河,黄婷,王媚,等.白酒中邻苯二甲酸酯塑化剂问题研究进展[J].酿酒科技,2022,331(1):97-103.
[5] 吕慧威,耿迪,解慧,等.啤酒中邻苯二甲酸酯检测方法优化及迁移量研究[J].中国酿造,2021,40(8):157-162.
[6] DANCHO L D,NATALIYA T D,IVAN A G,et al.Development of GC/MS method for analysis of phthalates in wines[J/OL].J Biotechnol,2018,280[2023-04-13] .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.06.180.
[7] 韩娟,李杰,梁迪,等.黄酒生产工艺及安全问题浅析[J].中国果菜,2021,41(9):70-74.
[8] 王芳,胡明友,杨凤华,等.磁性固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法测定黄酒中16种邻苯二甲酸酯[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2022,32(17):2072-2076.
[9] 王芳,杨凤华,邵国健,等.磁性固相萃取-气相色谱-串联质谱法测定市售酒中16种邻苯二甲酸酯[J].预防医学,2022,34(8):855-860.
[10] 中华人民共和国卫生部办公厅.卫生部办公厅关于通报食品及食品添加剂邻苯二甲酸酯类物质最大残留量的函[EB/OL].[2023-04-13] .http://law.foodmate.net/show-175051.html.
[11] 秦德萍,杨小珊,黄思瑜,等.重庆市售白酒中18种邻苯二甲酸酯类物质的含量调查及健康风险评估[J].现代食品,2021(13):164-168,171.
[12] 张庆,张颖,牛志广.饮用水系统中邻苯二甲酸酯的污染特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2022,42(12):114-121.
[13] U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume 1 human health evaluation manual(part A)[EB/OL].[2023-04-13] .https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part.
[14] 刘靖靖,赵晶,田莹莹,陈明,等.啤酒中邻苯二甲酸酯的GC-MS测定[J].食品与发酵工业,2015,41(3):168-173. |
|
|
|
