|
|
Investigation on smoking status of residents aged 15 years and over in Hangzhou |
PENG Hong, WANG Meng, HE Xiaoyan, ZHANG Qiong, HUANG Yangmei
|
Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310020,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To learn the current situation of smoking among permanent residents aged 15 years and over in Hangzhou,so as to provide evidence for further smoking control. Methods From March to June of 2017,multi-stage random sampling method was used to select residents aged 15 years and over in Hangzhou from district (county),town (street),village (residential committee) and then residential groups. The global Adult Tobacco Survey (part of China) questionnaire was used to investigate smoking,second-hand smoking and smoking cessation status of residents. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors for smoking and quitting behaviors. Results A total of 1 440 questionnaires were sent out and 1 434 valid ones were recovered,with an response rate of 99.58%. There were 359 (25.03%) current smokers and 333 (23.22%) daily smokers. The median number was 15 cigarettes per day in daily smokers,and the median age of starting daily smoking was 21 years old. There were 670 (62.33%) people exposed to second-hand smoking. There were 137 (27.62%) people successfully quitting smoking. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that men (OR=73.459,95%CI:38.970-138.458), 50 years old or above (OR:1.646-2.632,95%CI:1.020-4.710),primary school education (OR=3.267,95%CI: 1.586-6.732),high school or vocational school education (OR=1.902,95%CI: 1.109-3.261),awareness of second-hand smoking hazards (OR=2.485,95%CI:1.735-3.559) were the influencing factors for current smoking;men (OR=64.454,95%CI:29.031-138.691),50-59 years old (OR=0.281,95%CI:0.095-0.827),primary school education (OR=0.211,95%CI:0.053-0.841) were the influencing factors for quitting smoking. Conclusions The rates of current smoking and second-hand smoking of permanent residents aged 15 years and over in Hangzhou were 25.03% and 62.33%,respectively. Gender,age and education level were associated with current smoking and quitting smoking.
|
Received: 23 August 2019
Published: 19 March 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1] GBD 2013 Risk Factors Collaborators,FOROUZANFAR M H,ALEXANDER L,et al. Global,regional,and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural,environmental and occupational,and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries,1990-2013:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013[J]. Lancet,2015,386(10010):2287-2323. [2] 吴蕾,姜斌,何耀. 戒烟干预模式及方法研究的国内外进展[J]. 中华保健医学杂志,2014,16(2):157-159. [3] 杨焱,南奕,屠梦吴. 《2015中国成人烟草调查报告》概要[J]. 中华健康管理学杂志,2016,10(2):85-87. [4] 世界卫生组织. 2013 年世界卫生组织全球烟草流行报告:禁止烟草广告、促销和赞助[R]. 2013. [5] 杨功焕. 2010 全球成人烟草调查中国报告[M]. 北京:中国三峡出版社,2011. [6] 陈德,蒋月英,尉晓霞. 2016年上海市居民烟草暴露和烟草危害的认知情况[J]. 上海预防医学,2018,30(8):689-693. [7] 胡文斌,张婷,张小花. 2016年江苏省昆山市18~69岁居民吸烟现况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国健康教育,2018,34(5):13-17. [8] 谢尉,熊静帆,余卫业. 深圳市15~70岁居民吸烟状况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2017,25(8):582-584. [9] 王磊,徐越,吴青青. 浙江省2013年成人烟草流行现状调查分析[J]. 中华健康管理学杂志,2016,10(2):96-100. [10] 胡如英,展元元,王蒙,等. 浙江省成人吸烟行为趋势研究[J]. 预防医学,2018,30(12):1189-1194. [11] 陈芳,马海燕,汤静,等. 杭州市归因于吸烟的疾病负担研究[J]. 预防医学,2016,28(3):226-230. [12] 沈卓之,丁贤彬,毛德强. 重庆市2014年成年人吸烟、戒烟行为及认知现状调查[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(11):1236-1243. [13] ZHANG X L,LIN S,HU T W.The epidemic of cigarette gifting: a social barrier to tobacco control in China [M]//HU T W. Economics of tobacco control in China:from policy research to practice.Berkeley: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.,2016:129-146. [14] 李忠友,唐振柱,方志峰. 1991—2015年广西6市(县)18岁及以上居民吸烟状况及变化趋势分析[J]. 中国健康教育,2018,34(3):195-199. [15] 罗晓菊,江承荣,徐四卫,等. 昭通市水富县18岁及以上社区居民吸烟现况调查[J]. 卫生职业教育,2016(2):144-146. [16] 何君,陈小芳,邓颖. 四川省慢病监测点18 岁以上居民吸烟状况调查[J]. 职业卫生与病伤,2012,27(5):274-277. [17] 姜愚烽,孔浩南,肖琴. 2016年北京市朝阳区成人烟草现况及其影响因素分析[J]. 实用预防医学,2018,25(10):127-130. [18] 袁利华,杨树民. 烟草对女性的危害及应对措施[J]. 浙江预防医学,2015,27(6):572-576. [19] 朱庆茹,薛慧颖,喻兆阳. 铁杆吸烟者吸烟行为与戒烟意愿的影响因素[J]. 职业与健康,2019,35(14):1952-1955. [20] 郝冉,周剑平,倪磊. 快速戒断法与逐步戒断法戒烟疗效比较及影响因素分析[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2017,40(12):898-902. |
|
|
|