|
|
|
| An analysis on the present situation of post setting in CDCs of Zhejiang Province |
| CHENG Su-yun, YU Di-di, HUANG Xue-min, GUO Yu-jie, PANG Meng-tao, ZHONG Jie-nan, HUANG Jian-min, YU Cun
|
| Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310051,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the present post setting situation of CDCs in Zhejiang Province,and to provide evidence for further improvement and standardization of post setting. Methods The data of post setting were collected by questionnaires from all levels of CDCs in Zhejiang Province. The compliance and rationality of post setting structure were evaluated by national and provincial normative policy documents. Results Ninety seven CDCs had implemented the post setting. Professional technical posts had the highest proportion （above 80%）among three kinds of posts. As the approved proportions of posts classification and professional titles were approved by the local government,there were differences between different levels of CDCs. The approved proportion of ground skilled posts and management posts between municipal and county CDCs had a relatively higher degree of dispersion,and the CVs of ground skilled posts and management posts of municipal CDCs were 72.3% and 65.6%,and the CVs of county CDCs were 101.6% and 82.1%. In terms of the approved professional titles structural proportion,the degree of dispersion appeared to be higher in senior titles and primary titles approved proportion of municipal CDCs（CV=29.1%,28.5%）,while the degree of dispersion was higher in senior titles and vice-senior titles of county CDCs（CV=58.9%,21.8%）. Meanwhile,the approved proportions of senior titles in municipal and county CDCs were lower with the averages of 32.2% and 17.0%. The posts of infectious disease prevention and control and laboratory detection were accounting for the majority posts in municipal and county CDCs with average percentages of 47.8% and 45.1%. Conclusion The present situation of post structural proportion meets the relevant requirements generally. However,there are some phenomena of non-standard approved proportion of ground skilled posts and management posts and low senior titles approved proportion. Meanwhile,the percentage of infectious disease prevention and control and laboratory detection posts appears to be lower in county CDCs.
|
|
Received: 02 March 2017
Revised: 14 April 2017
Published: 15 November 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘霞. 某大型综合医院岗位设置和聘任的影响因素评价[D]. 济南：山东大学,2011.
[2] 季又君,武冰松. 人岗匹配对事业单位岗位设置管理的启示 #x02014; #x02014;以河北省为例[J]. 产业与科技论坛,2015,14（4）：232-233,234.
[3] 中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部. 事业单位岗位设置管理试行办法[S]. 2006.
[4] 中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部.《事业单位岗位设置管理试行办法》实施意见[S]. 2006.
[5] 李弘. 浅议医院岗位设置与管理[J]. 人力资源管理,2012（1）：101.
[6] 王越,刘玲玲. 疾病预防控制机构岗位设置管理工作的实践与探讨[J]. 职业卫生与病伤,2013,28（3）：173-175.
[7] 中共浙江省委办公厅. 浙江省事业单位岗位设置管理实施办法（试行）[S]. 2009.
[8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.关于疾病预防控制中心岗位设置管理的指导意见[S]. 2015.
[9] 程苏云,于迪迪,郑余焕,等. 浙江省县级疾病预防控制中心人员编制标准测算[J]. 中国公共卫生,2015,31（10）：1338-1341.
[10] 潘东霞,顾华,林峰,等. 浙江省疾病预防控制中心人力资源现状调查[J]. 实用预防医学,2013,20（3）：374-377.
[11] 苏娟. 岗位设置管理中人员绩效考核模式初探[J]. 人力资源管理,2013（6）：176.
[12] 刘艳慧,李海麟,许明晖,等. 广州市疾病预防控制机构人力资源现状分析[J]. 中国公共卫生管理,2012,28（4）：435-437.
[13] 王红梅,刘民. 北京市某疾控机构卫生人力资源现况调查[J]. 中国公共卫生管理,2009,25（5）：462-464.
[14] 苗木,鞠永.公立医院岗位设置管理的思考[J]. 现代医院管理,2011（6）：28-31.
[15] 孟毅芳. 做好事业单位岗位设置管理工作[J]. 理论探索,2009（2）：109-111.
[16] 钱德凤. 对高校管理岗位设置的分析与探讨[J]. 教育与职业,2011（33）：31-32.
[17] 付继娟,张正堂. 人与岗位匹配的国内外研究综述[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2004（7）： 15-18. |
|
|
|
