Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (10): 838-841    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.10.003
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
绍兴市中学生通校道路交通伤害现况调查
许璐璐, 黄文, 黄敏钢, 王柯颖, 陈康康, 陈奇峰
绍兴市疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制所,浙江 绍兴 312000
Road traffic injuries among middle school students commuting to school in Shaoxing City
XU Lulu, HUANG Wen, HUANG Mingang, WANG Keying, CHEN Kangkang, CHEN Qifeng
Department of Non-communicable Diseases Control and Prevention, Shaoxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
全文: PDF(759 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解浙江省绍兴市中学生通校道路交通伤害情况,为实施学生道路交通伤害干预提供依据。方法 于2021—2023年,采用多阶段分层整群抽样方法抽取绍兴市82个初中班级和89个高中班级学生为调查对象,通过问卷调查收集基本信息、通校出行情况、道路安全行为和道路安全知识等资料;分析近1年道路交通伤害情况。结果 调查中学生6 287人,报告道路交通伤害971例,交通伤害报告率为15.44%。男生道路交通伤害报告率为17.68%,高于女生的13.34%(P<0.05);高中学生道路交通伤害报告率为17.70%,高于初中学生的12.66%(P<0.05)。通校以步行为主、每周步行5 d和同学结伴出行的道路交通伤害报告率较高,分别为18.00%、17.82%和17.58%;步行时长≥20 min的男生道路交通伤害报告率高于女生(P<0.05)。不同道路安全行为中,使用电子设备的男生道路交通伤害报告率高于女生(P<0.05);玩耍时长≥10 min、上学迟到时过红绿灯直接穿行和直接跨越交通隔离设施的中学生道路交通伤害报告率较高,分别为32.92%、41.54%和30.67%。中学生道路交通伤害报告率随道路安全知识得分升高呈下降趋势(P<0.05)。结论 男生、高中学生、有道路危险行为和道路安全知识水平较低的中学生道路交通伤害报告率较高,应加强学生道路安全知识教育。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
许璐璐
黄文
黄敏钢
王柯颖
陈康康
陈奇峰
关键词 中学生道路交通伤害道路安全行为道路安全知识    
AbstractObjective To investigate the situation of road traffic injuries (RTIs) among middle school students in Shaoxing City, Zhejiang Province, so as to provide the basis for implementation of interventions against RTIs among students. Methods From 2021 to 2023, a multi-stage stratified cluster sampling method was used to select 82 junior high school classes and 89 senior high school classes in Shaoxing City as the survey population. Data on basic information, commuting travel, road safety behaviors and road safety knowledge awareness were collected through questionnaires, and the prevalence of RTIs in the past year was analyzed. Results A total of 6 287 middle school students were surveyed, and 971 cases of RTIs were reported, with a reporting rate of 15.44%. The reporting rate of RTIs was higher in males than in females (17.68% vs. 13.34%, P<0.05). The reporting rate of RTIs was higher in high school students than in junior high school students (17.70% vs. 12.66%, P<0.05). The students who mainly walked to school (18.00%), walked 5 days a week (17.82%) and traveled with classmates (17.58%) had higher reporting rates of RTIs. Among those who walked for ≥20 minutes, the reporting rate of RTIs was higher in males than in females (P<0.05). Among different road safety behaviors, the reporting rate of RTIs was higher in males than in females who used electronic devices (P<0.05). The reporting rates of RTIs were relatively high among students who played for ≥10 minutes on the way (32.92%), crossed traffic lights directly when being late for school (41.54%) and crossed traffic barriers directly (30.67%). The reporting rate of RTIs among middle school students decreased with the increase of road safety knowledge scores (P<0.05). Conclusions Male students, high school students, students with road risky behaviors and with low awareness of road safety knowledge have higher reporting rates of RTIs. It is necessary to strengthen road safety knowledge education for students.
Key wordsmiddle school student    road traffic injury    road safety behavior    road safety knowledge
收稿日期: 2024-06-17      修回日期: 2024-09-05      出版日期: 2024-10-10
中图分类号:  R179  
作者简介: 许璐璐,硕士,医师,主要从事慢性病防治相关工作
通信作者: 陈奇峰,E-mail:cqf5899@163.com   
引用本文:   
许璐璐, 黄文, 黄敏钢, 王柯颖, 陈康康, 陈奇峰. 绍兴市中学生通校道路交通伤害现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(10): 838-841.
XU Lulu, HUANG Wen, HUANG Mingang, WANG Keying, CHEN Kangkang, CHEN Qifeng. Road traffic injuries among middle school students commuting to school in Shaoxing City. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(10): 838-841.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.10.003      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I10/838
[1] VOS T,LIM S S,ABBAFATI C,et al.Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories,1990-2019:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J].Lancet,2020,396(10258):1204-1222.
[2] 国家卫生健康委员会疾病预防控制局.中国儿童伤害报告2019[R].北京:人民卫生出版社,2019.
[3] 纪翠蓉,邓晓,叶鹏鹏,等.2018年云南省红河州蒙自市中小学生通学道路交通伤害发生状况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2019,40(11):1381-1385.
[4] 纪翠蓉,金叶,叶鹏鹏,等.2017年我国6个省份28个县(区)儿童道路交通伤害流行状况[J].中华流行病学杂志,2021,42(8):1407-1412.
[5] 何宝华,周晓红,席胜军,等.下城区中小学生步行交通安全行为调查[J].预防医学,2020,32(4):338-341.
[6] 周欣怡,周月芳,孙力菁,等.上海市中学生道路交通伤害及相关危险行为分析[J].中国学校卫生,2023,44(12):1867-1872.
[7] 谌丁艳,熊华威,王赟,等.深圳市中小学生道路交通伤害及其影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生,2016,37(7):1075-1078.
[8] 中华人民共和国卫生部疾病预防控制局.伤害干预系列技术指南[S/OL].[2024-09-05].https://www.unicef.cn/media/7316/file.
[9] 陈建东. 汕头市初中生道路交通伤害流行病学特征分析[J].中国学校卫生,2015,36(8):1255-1258.
[10] SOLTANI A,EDWARD H J,RYDER C,et al.Police and hospital data linkage for traffic injury surveillance:a systematic review[J/OL].Accid Anal Prev,2024,197[2024-09-05].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107426.
[11] 马岩,祝彩琴,陶建华,等.2013年浙江省新昌县伤害监测首诊病例流行特征分析[J].疾病监测,2014,29(6):485-487.
[12] 赵思远,徐焱,张秋.2013—2023年姑苏区居民伤害死亡特征[J].预防医学,2024,36(6):532-535.
[13] 叶鹏鹏,邓晓,高欣,等.2006—2013年全国伤害监测系统中儿童道路交通伤害病例变化趋势及现况特征分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,3(1):7-11.
[14] STEVENS E,PLUMERT J M,CREMER J F,et al.Preadolescent temperament and risky behavior:bicycling across traffic-filled intersections in a virtual environment[J].J Pediatr Psychol,2013,38(3):285-295.
[15] World Health Organization.Ten strategies for keeping children safe on the road[R].Geneva:WHO,2015.
[16] 张诗晨,杨蓉,李丹琳,等.中学生健康素养和手机依赖行为的交互作用与意外伤害的关联[J].中华流行病学杂志,2018,39(12):1549-1554.
[17] 侯清波,雷若倩,江鸿,等.荆州市沙市区儿童道路交通伤害现况及影响因素分析[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2020,31(6):121-124.
[18] 王圣贤,姜宪尘,焦仕林,等.柯城区中学生步行交通伤害影响因素多重对应分析[J].预防医学,2019,31(8):798-801.
[1] 王婷婷, 汪剡灵, 杨玉婷, 王静夷, 陈潇潇. 台州市中学生心理健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 821-824.
[2] 孙强, 李小勇, 龚清海, 潘文杰, 黄艳. 中学生健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关联分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 474-478.
[3] 钟庆, 熊越华, 梅欣, 黄远霞, 李毅琳, 张志峰. 武汉市高中学生电子烟使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 355-358.
[4] 乔柏杨, 刘薇, 王琪, 刘铮然. 网约配送人员道路交通伤害调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 123-126,130.
[5] 徐倩倩, 朱莹莹, 丁十戈, 金秋妍, 董莹. 宁波市中学生电子烟使用调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 814-819.
[6] 高颖, 孙乐成, 王莉莉, 黄银凤, 吴英锋. 海南省中学生电子烟使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 655-658,664.
[7] 余志涛, 程庆林, 邓媛元, 王柳茜, 黎燕, 李志芳. 中学生解离倾向的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 369-373,379.
[8] 陈奕婷, 沈旭娟. 初中学生乙型病毒性肝炎防治知识、态度、行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1097-1101.
[9] 沈婷, 蔡永环, 张静敏, 胡艺俨, 靳颖, 许俊. 西湖区健康促进学校初中学生电子烟使用调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 776-781.
[10] 徐倩倩, 朱莹莹, 丁十戈, 金秋妍, 董莹. 宁波市中学生烟草使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(10): 1064-1068,1074.
[11] 陈雷, 陆元英, 张晓. 电动自行车道路交通伤害危险因素的病例对照研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(10): 990-995.
[12] 雷兰英, 雷娜, 曹日芳. 高中学生情绪和应对方式积极心理干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 961-962,967.
[13] 杨桂丽, 陈镭, 韦巧慧, 陈红丹, 郑小莲. 温州市中学生卷烟和电子烟使用意向调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 844-847.
[14] 周娓, 吴锋, 元国平. 江北区中学生用眼行为现状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 689-693.
[15] 陈红丹, 李万仓, 陈镭, 陈贤, 倪建晓, 杨桂丽. 瓯海区中学生伤害的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 490-492,496.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed