Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2017, Vol. 29 Issue (11): 1109-1114,1118    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2017.11.007
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
65岁及以上老年人接种TIV一年内免疫持久性的Meta分析
胡昱, 李倩, 汪颖, 陈雅萍
浙江省疾病预防控制中心免疫规划所,浙江 杭州 310051
A meta-analysis of the year-round vaccine persistency of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine among elderly aged 65 years and above
HU Yu, LI Qian, WANG Ying, CHEN Ya-ping
Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310051,China
全文: PDF(670 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价≥65岁老年人群接种三价流行性感冒病毒灭活疫苗(TIV)一年内的免疫持久性。方法 检索美国国家医学图书馆数据库、Cochrane协作网图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国期刊全文数据库和万方全文数据库,收集2016年12月31日前公开发表的有关≥65岁老年人接种TIV一年内免疫持久性的研究,采用Cochrane协作组织2016年发布的随机对照试验偏倚评价工具和非随机对照试验偏倚评价工具进行文献质量评价。结果 共纳入合格文献17篇。接种一年后,受种者总血凝抑制(HI)抗体几何平均滴度(GMT)与接种前比较,合并后标准化均数差(SMD)为0.10(95%CI:-0.12~0.32);针对A/H1N1、A/H3N2和B疫苗株的HI抗体GMT与接种前比较,合并后SMD分别为0.57(95%CI:0.23~0.91)、0.47(95%CI:-0.20~1.15)和-0.27(95%CI:-0.51~-0.04)。受种者HI总抗体血清保护率(SP)与接种前比较,其率差(RD)为0.06(95%CI:-0.04~0.16);针对A/H1N1、A/H3N2和B疫苗株的HI抗体SP与接种前比较,RD分别为0.09(95%CI:-0.15~0.33)、-0.08(95%CI:-0.28~0.13)和0.00(95%CI:-0.13~0.13)。结论 ≥65岁老年人接种TIV一年后HI抗体GMT和SP迅速衰减,建议开展更多的临床试验和卫生经济学研究评估≥65岁老年人群每年接种多剂次TIV免疫程序的可行性和成本效益。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
胡昱
李倩
汪颖
陈雅萍
关键词 三价流行性感冒病毒灭活疫苗免疫持久性Meta分析    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the year-round vaccine persistency of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) among elderly aged 65 years and above. Methods Searching “National Center for Biotechnology Information”,“ Cochrane Library,CL”,“China Biology Medicine disc”,“China National Knowledge Infrastructure”,“Wanfang Database”,the studies of the year-round vaccine persistency of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine among the elderly aged 65 years and above were included,and meta-analysis were made by Stata 11.0 software. Results A total of 17 studies were included. Compared with the antibody level before immunization,the standard mean differences (SMDs) of geometric mean titer (GMT) was 0.10(95%CI:-0.12-0.32),0.57(95%CI:0.23-0.91),0.47(95%CI:-0.20-1.15) and -0.27(95%CI:-0.51--0.04) for the total haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody,the HI antibody of A/H1N1,the HI antibody of A/H3N2 and the HI antibody of B,respectively,by 360 day. The risk differences (RD) of sero-protection rate (SP) was 0.06(95%CI:-0.04-0.16),0.09(95%CI:-0.15-0.33),-0.08(95%CI:-0.28-0.13) and 0.00(95%CI:-0.13 - -0.13) for the total haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody,the HI antibody of A/H1N1,the HI antibody of A/H3N2 and the HI antibody of B,respectively,by 360 day. Conclusion The HI antibody responses following TIV vaccination do not reliably persist year-round in the elderly aged 65 years and above. Clinic trials and health economic evaluation studies are needed to assess the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of multiple doses schedule of TIV in elderly.
Key wordsTrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine    Vaccine persistency    Meta-analysis
收稿日期: 2017-01-11      修回日期: 2017-03-03     
中图分类号:  R186  
通信作者: 陈雅萍,E-mail:ypchen@cdc.zj.cm   
作者简介: 胡昱,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事免疫规划管理工作
引用本文:   
胡昱, 李倩, 汪颖, 陈雅萍. 65岁及以上老年人接种TIV一年内免疫持久性的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(11): 1109-1114,1118.
HU Yu, LI Qian, WANG Ying, CHEN Ya-ping. A meta-analysis of the year-round vaccine persistency of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine among elderly aged 65 years and above. Preventive Medicine, 2017, 29(11): 1109-1114,1118.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2017.11.007      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2017/V29/I11/1109
[1] BRANDENBURG B,KOUDSTAAL W,GOUDSMIT J,et al. Mechanisms of hemagglutinin targeted influenza virus neutralization[J]. PLoS ONE,2013,8(12):e80034.
[2] ANDREWS N,MCMENAMIN J,DURNALL H,et al. Effectiveness of trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza in primary care in the United Kingdom:2012/13 end of season results[J]. Eurosurveillance,2014,19(27):20851.
[3] CASTILLA J,MART I NEZ-BAZ I,MARTÍNEZ-ARTOLA V,et al. Decline in influenza vaccine effectiveness with time after vaccination,Navarre,Spain,season 2011/12[R]. Surveillance and Outbreak Reports,2013,18(5):17-24.
[4] SKOWRONSKI D M,TWEED S A,DE SERRES G. Rapid decline of influenza vaccine-induced antibody in the elderly:is it real,or is it relevant?[J]. J Infect Dis,2008,197(4):490-502.
[5] GUYATT G H,OXMAN A D,VIST G E,et al. GRADE:an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations[J]. BMJ,2008,336(7650):924-926.
[6] MINUTELLO M,SENATORE F,CECCHINELLI G,et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated subunit influenza virus vaccine combined with MF59 adjuvant emulsion in elderly subjects,immunized for three consecutive influenza seasons[J]. Vaccine,1999,17(2):99-104.
[7] VAN HOECKE C,PRIKAZSKY V,UTÖI,et al. Immunogenicity of an inactivated split influenza vaccine in institutionalized elderly patients[J]. Gerontology,1996,42(4):190-198.
[8] BUXTON J A,SKOWRONSKI D M,NG H,et al. Influenza revaccination of elderly travelers:antibody response to single influenza vaccination and revaccination at 12 weeks[J]. J Infect Dis,2001,184(2):188-191.
[9] IORIO A M,CAMILLONI B,BASILEO M,et al. Effects of repeated annual influenza vaccination on antibody responses against unchanged vaccine antigens in elderly frail institutionalized volunteers[J]. Gerontology,2007,53(6):411-418.
[10] BEN-YEHUDA A,JOSEPH A,BARENHOLZ Y,et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a novel IL-2-supplemented liposomal influenza vaccine (INFLUSOME-VAC) in nursing-home residents[J]. Vaccine,2003,21(23):3169-3178.
[11] SONG J Y,CHEONG H J,HWANG I S,et al. Long-term immunogenicity of influenza vaccine among the elderly:Risk factors for poor immune response and persistence[J]. Vaccine,2010,28(23):3929-3935.
[12] RÜMKE H C,RICHARDUS J H,ROMBO L,et al. Selection of an adjuvant for seasonal influenza vaccine in elderly people:modelling immunogenicity from a randomized trial[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2013,13:348.
[13] COUCH R B,BAYAS J M,CASO C,et al. Superior antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell response with AS03-adjuvantation of a trivalent influenza vaccine in a randomised trial of adults aged 65 and older[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2014,14:425.
[14] MCELHANEY J E,BERAN J,DEVASTER J M,et al. AS03-adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine against seasonal influenza in elderly people:a phase 3 randomised trial[J]. The Lancet Infectious Diseases,2013,13(6):485-496.
[15] SONG J Y,CHEONG H J,NOH JY,SEO YB,CHOI WS,CHO G J,et al. Long-term and cross-reactive immunogenicity of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in the elderly:MF59-adjuvanted vaccine versus unadjuvanted vaccine[J]. J Med Virol, 2013,85:1591-1597.
[16] TINOCO J C,PAVIA-RUZ N,CRUZ-VALDEZ A,et al. Immunogenicity,reactogenicity,and safety of inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine candidate versus inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in healthy adults aged≥18 years:a phase III,randomized trial[J]. Vaccine,2014,32(13):1480-1487.
[17] FREY S E,REYES M R,REYNALES H,et al. Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted with a non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in elderly subjects[J]. Vaccine,2014,32(39):5027-5034.
[18] SCHEIFELE D W,MCNEIL S A,WARD B J,et al. Safety,immunogenicity,and tolerability of three influenza vaccines in older adults[J]. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics,2013,9(11):2460-2473.
[19] SAIKI I,KOIZUMI K,GOTO H,et al. The long-term effects of a kampo medicine,juzentaihoto,on maintenance of antibody titer in elderly people after influenza vaccination[J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med,2013,2013:568074.
[20] SEO Y B,CHOI W S,LEE J,et al. Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of the conventional subunit,MF59-adjuvanted,and intradermal influenza vaccines in the elderly[J]. Clin Vaccine Immunol,2014,21(7):989-996.
[21] NACE D A,LIN C J,ROSS T M,et al. Randomized,controlled trial of high-dose influenza vaccine among frail residents of long-term care facilities[J]. J Infect Dis,2015, 211(12):1915-1924.
[22] CHAN T C,HUNG I F N,CHAN K H,et al. Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal trivalent influenza vaccination in nursing home older adults:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association,2014,15(8):607-605.
[23] DUNNING A J,DIAZGRANADOS C A,VOLOSHEN T,et al. Correlates of protection against influenza in the elderly:results from an influenza vaccine efficacy trial[J]. Clin Vaccine Immunol,2016,23(3):228-235.
[24] COUDEVILLE L,BAILLEUX F,RICHE B,et al. Relationship between haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody titres and clinical protection against influenza:development and application of a bayesian random-effects model[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2010,10:18.
[25] OHMIT S E,PETRIE J G,MALOSH R E,et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in households with children during the 2012-2013 season:assessments of prior vaccination and serologic susceptibility[J]. J Infect Dis,2015,211(10):1519-1528.
[26] BEYER W E,PALACHE A M,SPRENGER M J,et al. Effects of repeated annual influenza vaccination on vaccine sero-response in young and elderly adults[J]. Vaccine,1996,14(14):1331-1339.
[27] NATH K D,BUREL J G,SHANKAR V,et al. Clinical factors associated with the humoral immune response to influenza vaccination in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis,2014,9:51-56.
[28] SHERIDAN P A,PAICH H A,HANDY J,et al. The antibody response to influenza vaccination is not impaired in type 2 diabetics[J]. Vaccine,2015,33(29):3306-3313.
[29] GORONZY J J,WEYAND C M. Understanding immunosenescence to improve responses to vaccines[J]. Nat Immunol,2013,14(5):428-436.
[30] WIJNANS L,VOORDOUW B. A review of the changes to the licensing of influenza vaccines in Europe[J]. Influenza Other Respir Viruses,2016,10(1):2-8.
[1] 贾铭, 彭菊意, 刘星宇, 刘宇丹, 赵华. 心血管代谢性共病危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 790-795.
[2] 刘溦, 宋杰, 陈伟伟, 叶丁, 毛盈颖. 硒水平与慢性肾脏病关联的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 669-676.
[3] 柏旭, 苏洁, 李凤, 徐倩, 沈源, 肖凌凤. 我国成人糖尿病视网膜病变影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 595-601.
[4] 段恬筱, 黄希汇, 刘诗川, 胡薇薇, 刘涛, 李亚, 岑斌. 新型冠状病毒感染流行期间医护人员职业倦怠的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(6): 526-532.
[5] 方子思, 廖辉, 周筱丛, 徐虹. 我国公共场所集中空调通风系统嗜肺军团菌污染的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 425-430.
[6] 张家佳, 陈小玉, 卿雪莲. 我国空巢老人跌倒发生率的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(10): 844-848,855.
[7] 沈强, 张月琴, 江圣洁, 甘露, 尉莹莹. 新冠肺炎疫情期间医务人员焦虑状况的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 720-726.
[8] 杨丹丹, 姚学成, 张昕涵, 唐梦龄, 王建炳, 金明娟, 陈坤. 中国人群胃癌发病影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(6): 561-570.
[9] 郑云枝, 侯灿灿, 曹锦程, 崔总文, 王茂, 崔俊鹏. 心肺适能与心脑血管疾病发病关系的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(3): 282-288,293.
[10] 韩梦蝶, 许明慧, 陈旭, 赵雪, 程明慧, 高静, 李惠菊. 中国HIV/AIDS病例自杀意念发生率的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(11): 1132-1138.
[11] 何佳晋, 居豪, 吴超. 中国MSM人群HIV新发感染率及其影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(1): 70-77.
[12] 朱琳, 高静, 柏丁兮, 陈昕羽. 中国居民肺炎球菌疫苗接种意愿的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(9): 935-939,943.
[13] 黄勤竹, 费安裕, 李高春, 项振扬. 中国在校大学生眼干燥症患病率的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 793-796.
[14] 严波, 周倩意, 郑晓晖, 余昭锋, 鲁影, 刘紫瑜, 陈维清. 中国儿童家长疑似预防接种异常反应知晓率的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(3): 250-254.
[15] 陈轶铭, 全宁斌, 吴茵茵. 维生素D水平与孕产妇抑郁关联性的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(12): 1276-1281.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed