Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2025, Vol. 37 Issue (2): 118-122    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.02.003
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中学生非自杀性自伤风险的潜在剖面分析
段文静, 谢煜相, 羊姝, 崔依婷, 彭爱, 黄鹏
南昌大学公共卫生学院循证医学中心,疾病预防与公共卫生江西省重点实验室,江西 南昌 330006
Latent profile analysis of non-suicidal self-injury risk among middle school students
DUAN Wenjing, XIE Yuxiang, YANG Shu, CUI Yiting, PENG Ai, HUANG Peng
Center for Evidence-based Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanchang University, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Disease Prevention and Public Health, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
全文: PDF(928 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解中学生非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的风险分类,为制定中学生NSSI预防和干预策略提供参考。方法 采用分层整群抽样方法抽取江西省3所中学的3 740名学生为调查对象,通过问卷调查收集中学生基本信息,采用自尊量表、青少年心理韧性量表、认知情绪调节量表和青少年生活事件量表分别评估中学生的自尊水平、心理韧性、责难情况和负性生活事件影响,采用渥太华自伤量表调查中学生近1年NSSI行为。建立潜在剖面分析(LPA)模型对NSSI风险进行分类,采用一致性检验、灵敏度和特异度评价分类稳定性和准确性。结果 回收有效问卷3 372份,问卷有效率为90.16%。调查男生1 908人,占56.58%;女生1 464人,占43.42%。初中生1 730人,占51.30%;高中生1 642人,占48.70%。近1年有NSSI行为1 160人,占34.40%。NSSI风险经LPA分为低(63.20%)、高风险(36.80%),或低(46.17%)、中(42.41%)、高风险(11.42%)2种分类方式;Kappa值分别为0.952和0.989(均P<0.05),灵敏度分别为59.66%和76.72%,特异度分别为75.18%和58.18%。结论 经LPA模型分析发现中学生NSSI有低、高风险或低、中、高风险2种分类方式,可尝试用于中学生NSSI高危人群筛查。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
段文静
谢煜相
羊姝
崔依婷
彭爱
黄鹏
关键词 中学生非自杀性自伤潜在剖面分析    
AbstractObjective To classify non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) risk among middle school students, so as to provide the reference for formulating prevention and intervention strategies for NSSI among this population. Methods Totally 3 740 students from three middle schools in Jiangxi Province were selected using the stratified cluster sampling method. Basic information of the students was collected through questionnaire surveys. Self-esteem, resilience, blame attribution and the impact of negative life events were assessed using the Self-Esteem Scale, Resilience Scale for Chinese adolescents, Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Chinese and Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist, respectively. The prevalence of NSSI in the past year was investigated using the Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory. The NSSI risk was classified using a latent profile analysis (LPA) model, and the stability and accuracy of the classification were evaluated using consistency tests, sensitivity and specificity. Results Totally 3 372 valid questionnaires were recovered, with an effective recovery rate of 90.16%. There were 1 908 males (56.58%) and 1 464 females (43.42%). There were 1 730 junior high school students (51.30%) and 1 642 senior high school students (48.70%). A total of 1 160 students (34.40%) reported NSSI behaviors in the past one year. The risk of NSSI could be classified into two categories: low (63.20%) and high risk (36.80%); or three categories: low (46.17%), medium (42.41%) and high risk (11.42%) by LPA. The Kappa values were 0.952 and 0.989 (both P<0.05), the sensitivities were 59.66% and 76.72%, and the specificities were 75.18% and 58.18%, respectively. Conclusion Based on LPA, there are two ways of classification for NSSI risk among middle school students: low and high risk, or low, medium and high risk, which could be used for screening high-risk populations for NSSI among middle school students.
Key wordsmiddle school student    non-suicidal self-injury    latent profile analysis
收稿日期: 2024-11-21      修回日期: 2025-01-10      出版日期: 2025-02-10
中图分类号:  R179  
基金资助:江西省研究生创新专项基金项目(YC2023-s177)
作者简介: 段文静,硕士研究生在读,公共卫生专业
通信作者: 黄鹏,E-mail:huangpengncu@163.com   
引用本文:   
段文静, 谢煜相, 羊姝, 崔依婷, 彭爱, 黄鹏. 中学生非自杀性自伤风险的潜在剖面分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 118-122.
DUAN Wenjing, XIE Yuxiang, YANG Shu, CUI Yiting, PENG Ai, HUANG Peng. Latent profile analysis of non-suicidal self-injury risk among middle school students. Preventive Medicine, 2025, 37(2): 118-122.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.02.003      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V37/I2/118
[1] 苟双玉,杜美杰,刘晓容,等.中国青少年非自杀性自伤检出率的Meta分析[J].现代预防医学,2023,50(2):263-271.
GOU S Y,DU M J,LIU X R,et al.Meta-analysis of the detection rate of non-suicidal self-injury among Chinese adolescents[J].Mod Prev Med,2023,50(2):263-271.(in Chinese)
[2] XIAO Q Q,SONG X Z,HUANG L J,et al.Global prevalence and characteristics of non-suicidal self-injury between 2010 and 2021 among a non-clinical sample of adolescents:a meta-analysis[J].Front Psychiatry,2022,13:1-16.
[3] 温忠麟,谢晋艳,王惠惠.潜在类别模型的原理、步骤及程序[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2023,41(1):1-15.
WEN Z L,XIE J Y,WANG H H.Principles,procedures,and programs of latent class models[J].J East China Norm Univ(Educ Sci),2023,41(1):1-15.(in Chinese)
[4] 于丽霞. 一样自伤两样人:自伤青少年的分类研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2013.
YU L X.“Same”in behaviors,different in kinds:the classification of adolescent non-suicidal self-injurers[D].Wuhan:Central China Normal University,2013.(in Chinese)
[5] 王玉龙,苏慧娟,蔺秀云.青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J].心理发展与教育,2023(5):1-8.
WANG Y L,SU H J,LIN X Y.The classification of self-injury in adolescents:based on latent profile analysis[J]Psychol Dev Educ,2023(5):1-8.(in Chinese)
[6] 张珊珊,张野.农村留守中学生自尊与非自杀性自伤行为的关系[J].中国健康教育,2019,35(12):1099-1103.
ZHANG S S,ZHANG Y.The relationship between self-esteem and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior among left-behind middle school students:mediating effects of bullying and shame[J].Chin J Health Educ,2019,35(12):1099-1103.(in Chinese)
[7] XAVIER A,PINTO GOUVEIA J,CUNHA M.Non-suicidal self-injury in adolescence:the role of shame,self-criticism and fear of self-compassion[J].Child Youth Care Forum,2016,45(4):571-586.
[8] 马明坤,张银玲,阮奎.南宁市壮族青少年家庭亲密度和心理韧性与非自杀性自伤行为的关联[J].现代预防医学,2022,49(10):1792-1796.
MA M K,ZHANG Y L,RUAN K.Associated between family intimacy and psychological resilience and non-suicidal self-injury behavior among Zhuang adolescents in Nanning[J].Mod Prev Med,2022,49(10):1792-1796.(in Chinese)
[9] 刘寒梅,钟年.负性生活事件与大学生非自杀性自伤行为:有调节的中介模型[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2023(3):568-573.
LIU H M,ZHONG N.Negative life events and non-suicidal self-injury in college students:a moderated mediating model[J].Chin J Clin Psychol,2023(3):568-573.(in Chinese)
[10] NIXON M K,LEVESQUE C,PREYDE M,et al.The Ottawa Self-Injury Inventory:evaluation of an assessment measure of nonsuicidal self-injury in an inpatient sample of adolescents[J/OL].Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health,2015,9[2025-01-10].https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-015-0056-5.
[11] ROSENBERG M.Society and the adolescent self-image[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,2015:157-199.
[12] 胡月琴,甘怡群.青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证[J].心理学报,2008,40(8):902-912.
HU Y Q,GAN Y Q.Development and psychometric validity of the Resilience Scale for Chinese adolescents[J].Acta Psychol Sin,2008,40(8):902-912.(in Chinese)
[13] 魏义梅,刘永贤.认知情绪调节量表在大学生中的初步信效度检验[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2008,22(4):281-283.
WEI Y M,LIU Y X.Reliability and validity of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionaire(CERQ)in Chinese college students[J].Chin Ment Health J,2008,22(4):281-283.(in Chinese)
[14] 刘贤臣,刘连启,杨杰,等.青少年生活事件量表的信度效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1997,5(1):34-36.
LIU X C,LIU L Q,YANG J,et al.Reliability and validity of the Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist[J].Chin J Clin Psychol,1997,5(1):34-36.(in Chinese)
[15] POUDEL A,LAMICHHANE A,MAGAR K R,et al.Non suicidal self injury and suicidal behavior among adolescents:co-occurrence and associated risk factors[J].BMC Psychiatry,2022,22(1):1-12.
[16] 葛海艳,刘爱书.累积家庭风险指数与青少年自伤行为分析[J].中国学校卫生,2018,39(5):698-701.
GE H Y,LIU A S.Cumulative familial risk index and adolescent self-harm behaviors[J].Chin J Sch Health,2018,39(5):698-701.(in Chinese)
[17] 黎旭娇,欧阳泽平,罗雨星,等.中小学生心理韧性、情绪调节在家庭累积风险与积极应对方式间的中介效应[J].预防医学,2024,36(11):941-944.
LI X J,OUYANG Z P,LUO Y X,et al.Mediating effects of resilience and emotion regulation on family cumulative risk and positive coping style among primary and middle school students[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(11):941-944.(in Chinese)
[18] LEVIN M E,KRAFFT J,PIERCE B,et al.When is experiential avoidance harmful in the moment?Examining global experiential avoidance as a moderator[J].J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry,2018,61:158-163.
[19] 张媛媛,汪文,唐新龙,等.青少年非自杀性自伤的破窗效应联合叙事护理干预效果评价[J].预防医学,2024,36(7):553-557.
ZHANG Y Y,WANG W,TANG X L,et al.Effects of broken window effect and narrative nursing intervention on adolescent non-suicidal self-injury[J].China Prev Med J,2024,36(7):553-557.(in Chinese)
[1] 见明智, 鲁迪, 蒋婷婷, 陈洁. 中学生电子烟尝试使用的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 208-211,216.
[2] 黄健玲, 曾静, 罗锐, 顾菁. 职业高中学生电子烟使用及尝试意愿调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 201-207.
[3] 王婷婷, 汪剡灵, 杨玉婷, 王静夷, 陈潇潇. 台州市中学生心理健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 821-824.
[4] 张媛媛, 汪文, 唐新龙, 江爱国. 青少年非自杀性自伤的破窗效应联合叙事护理干预效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 553-557.
[5] 孙强, 李小勇, 龚清海, 潘文杰, 黄艳. 中学生健康危险行为潜在类别与抑郁症状的关联分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 474-478.
[6] 钟庆, 熊越华, 梅欣, 黄远霞, 李毅琳, 张志峰. 武汉市高中学生电子烟使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 355-358.
[7] 李娟娟, 章荣华, 孟佳, 高雷, 沈郁, 顾昉, 朱冰. 浙江省中学生脊柱弯曲异常的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(12): 1036-1039,1044.
[8] 许璐璐, 黄文, 黄敏钢, 王柯颖, 陈康康, 陈奇峰. 绍兴市中学生通校道路交通伤害现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(10): 838-841.
[9] 徐倩倩, 朱莹莹, 丁十戈, 金秋妍, 董莹. 宁波市中学生电子烟使用调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 814-819.
[10] 高颖, 孙乐成, 王莉莉, 黄银凤, 吴英锋. 海南省中学生电子烟使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 655-658,664.
[11] 余志涛, 程庆林, 邓媛元, 王柳茜, 黎燕, 李志芳. 中学生解离倾向的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 369-373,379.
[12] 王俊玲, 郭菲, 陈祉妍. 孤独感、抑郁症状在父母冲突与青少年非自杀性自伤间的中介效应研究[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1029-1032.
[13] 陈奕婷, 沈旭娟. 初中学生乙型病毒性肝炎防治知识、态度、行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(12): 1097-1101.
[14] 沈婷, 蔡永环, 张静敏, 胡艺俨, 靳颖, 许俊. 西湖区健康促进学校初中学生电子烟使用调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(8): 776-781.
[15] 徐倩倩, 朱莹莹, 丁十戈, 金秋妍, 董莹. 宁波市中学生烟草使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(10): 1064-1068,1074.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed