Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (4): 355-358    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.04.020
  健康教育 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
杭州市公共场所无烟环境建设暗访调查
郑子聪1, 俞锋1, 王子艺1, 王勐1, 徐越2, 吕巧红2
1.杭州市疾病预防控制中心健康教育所,浙江 杭州 310051;
2.浙江省疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 310051
Undercover investigation on the creation of smoke-free environments in public places in Hangzhou City
ZHENG Zicong1, YU Feng1, WANG Ziyi1, WANG Meng1, XU Yue2, LÜ Qiaohong2
1. Department of Health Education, Hangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China;
2. Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China
全文: PDF(837 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解杭州市公共场所无烟环境建设情况,为推进控烟政策的有效实施提供依据。方法 选择杭州市各级党政机关、医疗机构、教育场所、餐饮娱乐场所和开放型公共场所为调查对象,于2022年11—12月委托第三方专业调查公司通过实地观察和隐蔽拍摄对上述场所的无烟环境建设情况进行暗访调查,根据《杭州市无烟单位评分标准》评估无烟环境设置(满分60分)和室内禁烟情况(满分40分)。结果 共调查场所909家,无烟环境建设综合评分为(82.83±14.13)分;其中党政机关285家,综合评分为(84.19±12.85)分;医疗机构65家,综合评分为(90.35±6.95)分;教育场所65家,综合评分为(83.43±16.81)分;餐饮娱乐场所403家,综合评分为(80.68±14.75)分;开放型公共场所91家,综合评分为(82.34±14.77)分。规范设置入口控烟提示397家,占43.67%;按要求张贴禁烟标识308家,占33.88%;正确设置室外吸烟区或明确全面禁烟707家,占77.78%;设置(变相)烟具68家,占7.48%;销售烟草28家,占3.08%。室内区域未发现吸烟痕迹732家,占80.53%;未发现室内有人吸烟850家,占93.51%;未劝阻吸烟者24家,占2.64%。结论 杭州市公共场所室内禁烟情况整体较好,但在规范入口禁烟提示、规范张贴禁烟标识和控烟宣传资料布设方面尚待提升。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 控烟公共场所无烟环境暗访    
AbstractObjective To investigate the creation of smoke-free environments in public places in Hangzhou City, so as to provide insights into effective implementation of the tobacco control policy. Methods The party and government administrations at each level, medical institutions, educational places, restaurants and entertainment places, and open public places were enrolled. The creation of smoke-free environments was investigated in these places through undercover investigation with field observations and concealed photography by a third-party professional investigation company from November to December, 2022. The building of smoke-free environments (totally 60 scores) and no smoking indoors (totally 40 scores) were evaluated according to the Criteria for Scoring of Smoke-free Organizations in Hangzhou City. Results Totally 909 places were investigated, and the comprehensive score of smoke-free environment building was (82.83±14.13) points. There were 285 party and government administrations with a comprehensive score of (84.19±12.85) points, 65 medical institutions with a comprehensive score of (90.35±6.95) points, 65 educational places with a comprehensive score of (83.43±16.81) points, 403 dining and entertainment places with a comprehensive score of (80.68±14.75) points, and 91 open public places, with a comprehensive score of (82.34±14.77) points. There were 397 places with standardized tobacco control tips at entrances (43.67%), 308 places with tobacco control signs posted as required (33.88%), 707 places that set outdoor smoking areas correctly (77.78%), 68 places with smoking paraphernalia (7.48%), 28 places with tobacco sales (3.08%). There were 732 places without signs of indoor smoking (80.53%), 850 places without indoor smoking (93.51%) and 24 places without dissuading from smoking (2.64%). Conclusion The indoor no-smoking is overall satisfactory in public places in Hangzhou City; however, standardizing no-smoking tips at entrances, standardizing the posting of no-smoking signs and assignment of tobacco control materials remain to be improved.
Key wordstobacco control    public place    smoke-free environment    undercover investigation
收稿日期: 2023-01-13      修回日期: 2023-02-16      出版日期: 2023-04-10
中图分类号:  R197  
基金资助:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2021KY626)
通信作者: 俞锋,E-mail:nosmokinghz@126.com   
作者简介: 郑子聪,硕士,主要从事控烟和健康传播工作
引用本文:   
郑子聪, 俞锋, 王子艺, 王勐, 徐越, 吕巧红. 杭州市公共场所无烟环境建设暗访调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 355-358.
ZHENG Zicong, YU Feng, WANG Ziyi, WANG Meng, XU Yue, LÜ Qiaohong. Undercover investigation on the creation of smoke-free environments in public places in Hangzhou City. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(4): 355-358.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.04.020      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I4/355
[1] GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators.Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories,1990-2019:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019BD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators.Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories,1990-2019:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J].Lancet,2020,396(10258):1223-1249.
[2] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.国家卫生健康委发布《中国吸烟危害健康报告2020》[EB/OL].[2023-02-16].http://www.gov.cn/fuwu/2021-05/30/content_5613994.htm.
[3] 中国政府网.中共中央国务院印发《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》[EB/OL].[2023-02-16].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-10/25/content_5124174.html.
[4] 杭州市卫生健康委.杭州市公共场所控制吸烟条例[EB/OL].[2023-02-16].http://wsjkw.hangzhou.gov.cn/art/2020/9/3/art_1229129328_57612897.html.
[5] 中国政府网.关于进一步加强无烟医疗卫生机构建设工作的通知[EB/OL].[2023-02-16].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/s7788/202008/94d6b2c63a0c45eda54c33d7091e71fc.shtml.
[6] 中国疾病预防控制中心.无烟党政机关宣传工具包[EB/OL].[2023-02-16].https://www.chinacdc.cn/jkzt/sthd_3844/slhd_12886/202105/t20210514_230572.html.
[7] 浙江省卫生健康委.浙江省卫生健康委浙江省教育厅浙江省妇联关于进一步加强医疗卫生机构等3类无烟场所建设工作的通知[EB/OL].[2023-02-16].https://wsjkw.zj.gov.cn/art/2021/4/2/art_1229560650_2320338.html.
[8] 万丽萍,王宇红,井光壮,等.《兰州市公共场所控制吸烟条例》实施效果分析[J].首都公共卫生,2019,13(5):237-239.
[9] 罗安斐,莫淳淇,陈招弟,等.深圳市龙华区公共场所控烟立法效果评价研究[J].华南预防医学,2022,48(5):617-619.
[10] 孙颖,苏健婷,崔小波,等.2020年北京市以街道和乡镇为基础的公共场所室内控烟情况分析[J].首都公共卫生,2021,15(4):216-219.
[11] 陆瑛,朱燕红,林军,等.2019年上海市黄浦区公共场所控烟环境监测结果分析[J].中国健康教育,2020,36(4):28-31,40.
[12] RAVARA S B,CASTELO-BRANCO M,AGUIAR P,et al.Compliance and enforcement of a partial smoking ban in Lisbon taxis:an exploratory cross-sectional study[J/OL].BMC Public Health,2013,13[2023-02-16].https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-134.
[13] 吕巧红,张雪海,吴青青,等.浙江省医疗卫生机构无烟环境暗访结果分析[J].预防医学,2022,34(5):475-478.
[14] MCMILLEN R C,GOTTLIEB M A,SHAEFER R M,et al.Trends in electronic cigarette use among U.S. adults:use is increasing in both smokers and nonsmokers[J/OL].Nicotine Tob Res,2014,17(10)[2023-02-16].https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu213.
[15] 徐越,胡秀静,陈赫妮,等.浙江省成人卷烟和电子烟使用现况调查[J].预防医学,2022,34(5):439-444.
[1] 方子思, 廖辉, 周筱丛, 徐虹. 我国公共场所集中空调通风系统嗜肺军团菌污染的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 425-430.
[2] 徐倩倩, 朱莹莹, 陶臻博, 丁十戈, 金秋妍, 董莹. 宁波市无烟党政机关公务员控烟态度及行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(1): 87-90.
[3] 徐珊珊, 徐虹, 吕烨, 刘卫艳, 陈树昶. 杭州市公共场所毛巾pH值调查结果[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(7): 743-746.
[4] 吕巧红, 张雪海, 吴青青, 徐水洋, 徐越, 黄玉, 胡秀静. 浙江省医疗卫生机构无烟环境暗访结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(5): 475-478.
[5] 翟和亮, 陈栋, 罗慧敏, 李玉. 六安市宾馆健康危害因素评估[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 940-943.
[6] 李建彬, 高莉, 郭向娇, 武恩平, 王艳红, 祁辉, 刘建勋. 郑州市居民二手烟暴露及危害认知情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(5): 455-459.
[7] 王志颖, 秦京宁, 高仙, 赵芳, 李鑫. 西城区中小学生吸烟及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(5): 526-529,533.
[8] 陈卫中, 陈志健, 何升良, 徐沛维, 陈媛, 伍立志. 浙江省公共场所集中空调通风系统卫生状况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(10): 1048-1050.
[9] 陈卫中,陈志健,何升良,徐沛维,陈媛,伍立志. 浙江省公共场所集中空调通风系统污染监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(4): 402-404.
[10] 郝秀奇, 高晓彤, 代涛. 中国社区控烟干预效果评价的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(12): 1203-1207.
[11] 吕巧红,徐水洋,吴青青,徐锦杭,徐越,郝刚. 县级及以下政府机关无烟环境建设与吸烟情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(4): 342-346.
[12] 林楚君, 徐武秀, 徐武敏, 张凤飞. 不同家庭控烟方式对婴幼儿可替宁水平和急性呼吸道感染的影响[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(9): 896-898,902.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed