Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2017, Vol. 29 Issue (4): 342-346    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2017.04.005
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
县级及以下政府机关无烟环境建设与吸烟情况调查
吕巧红,徐水洋,吴青青,徐锦杭,徐越,郝刚
浙江省疾病预防控制中心,浙江杭州 310051
An investigation on smoke-free environment and smoking status at or below county-level governments
LYU Qiao-hong, XU Shui-yang, WU Qing-qing, XU Jing-hang, XU Yue, HAO Gang
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310051, China
全文: PDF(521 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解浙江省县级及以下政府机关无烟环境建设情况及公务员吸烟情况,探讨控烟相关策略和措施。方法 通过多阶段分层随机抽样方法,在浙江省抽取4个市,每个市抽1个县(市、区),再分别抽取县政府、乡镇政府、街道办事处各1家,共12家。采用问卷调查、知情人访谈、现场观察相结合的方法进行调查。 结果 共调查12家政府机关405名公务员。12家政府机关办公场所控烟环境整体较好,公务员现在吸烟率为17.78%,不同调查地区的公务员吸烟率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。男性(26.62%)、年龄≥50岁(40.74%)、离婚或丧偶(40.00%)、中专以下文化程度(33.33%)、处级及以上干部(57.14%)、工作年限≥20年(28.81%)、家庭任何地方均能吸烟(50.00%)及单位内某些区域能吸烟(22.95%)者的吸烟率相对较高。吸烟者烟草危害相关知识知晓率、对MPOWER控烟策略和对公共场所(除餐厅外)禁烟规定的赞成率均低于不吸烟者(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,30岁~(OR=9.87,95%CI:1.45~67.29)、50岁~(OR=10.26,95%CI:1.06~99.17)、在家庭任何地方均能吸烟(OR=12.28,95%CI:2.95~51.18)及家庭某些区域能吸烟(OR=6.57,95%CI:3.07~14.08)是公务员吸烟的危险因素。结论 浙江省县级及以下政府机关控烟环境较好,吸烟率有所下降,但调查的公务员烟草相关知识知晓水平相对不足,应加强机关公务员重点人群控烟知识宣传,推进无烟政府创建活动。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吕巧红
徐水洋
吴青青
徐锦杭
徐越
郝刚
关键词 政府机关无烟环境吸烟率相关因素    
AbstractObjective To learn the smoke-free environment and smoking status at or below county-level governments of Zhejiang Province, and to promote a smoke-free government.Methods By multi-stage random sampling method, 4 cities were selected in Zhejiang Province, then 4 counties were selected in 4 cities, finally12 governments were selected in 4 counties. With the methods of field observation,interview and questionnaire survey,smoke-free environment and smoking behavior , tobacco related knowledge of civil servants were investigated.Results A total of 12 governments and 405 civil servants were investigated. The smoke-free environment of 12 governments were relatively well. The total smoking rate of civil servants was 17.78%, and the highest was 26.67% in Jiande City, and the lowest were 9.00% in Zhuji City. For the civil servants ,male(26.62%), aged 50-(40.74%),divorced or widowed(40.00%),graduation of technical secondary school (33.33%),cadre of section rank(57.14%),above 20 years’ work(28.81%),smoking anywhere at home(50.00%), smoking in certain areas at work(22.95%)were significantly higher. The rate of cognition on the hazards of smoking was lower among the smokers than that of non-smokers (P<0.05).The rate of agreement on MPOWER tobacco control strategies and smoking bans in public places were lower among the smokers than that of non-smokers (P<0.05). Non-conditional logistic regression analysis showed that age of 30-39(OR=9.87,95%CI:1.45-67.29),50-(OR=9.87,95%CI:1.45-67.29), smoking anywhere at home(OR=12.28,95%CI:2.95-51.18),and smoking in certain areas at home(OR=6.57,95%CI:3.07-14.08) may be the risk factors about smoking behavior. Conclusion The situation of smoking control at or below county-level governments in Zhejiang Province was good, and smoking rates has declined. But tobacco related knowledge and behavior of civil servants were relatively insufficient. Aiming at the problems found in the investigation, it is necessary to strengthen education on smoking control among civil servants, and to promote a smoke-free government.
Key words:County-level governments    Smoke-free environment    Smoking rate    Related factors
          出版日期: 2017-04-15
中图分类号:  R195  
作者简介: 吕巧红,硕士,主管医师,主要从事健康干预工作
通信作者: 徐水洋,E-mail:xsy1003@163.com   
引用本文:   
吕巧红, 徐水洋, 吴青青, 徐锦杭, 徐越, 郝刚. 县级及以下政府机关无烟环境建设与吸烟情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(4): 342-346.
LYU Qiao-hong, XU Shui-yang, WU Qing-qing, XU Jing-hang, XU Yue, HAO Gang. An investigation on smoke-free environment and smoking status at or below county-level governments. Preventive Medicine, 2017, 29(4): 342-346.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2017.04.005      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2017/V29/I4/342
[1]Department of Health and Human Services,US. How tobacco smoke causes disease:the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease. A Report of the Surgeon General [R]. Atlanta(GA):Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,US,2010.
[2]World Health Organization. Framework convention on tobacco control[R]. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
[3]World Health Organization. 2008 global tobacco survey: MPOWER policy[M]. Geneva:World Health Organization,2008. [4]徐越,徐水洋,吴青青,等.浙江省2013年成人吸烟及被动吸现状调查[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2014,35(12):24-29.
[5]中国疾病预防控制中心.2015全球成人烟草调查[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2015. [6]赵芳红,刘敏,万国峰,等.北京市4 861名公务员吸烟与被动吸烟现状调查[J].中国健康教育,2011,27(5):339-342.
[7]许兆瑞,翟前前,丁春生.2011年长春市公务员吸烟及戒烟情况调查研究[J].中国健康教育,2013, 29(7): 657-659.
[8]钱运梁,李玉青,刘秀荣.北京市部分区县公务员吸烟行为及其影响因素调查[J].中国健康教育,2014,30(4) :291-293.
[9]雷丽霞,覃萍,陆松仪,等.广西来宾市科级以上公务员吸烟现状调查[J].中国健康教育,2015,31(9):851-854.
[10]徐越,徐水洋,吴青青.公务员吸烟行为及控烟知识调查[J].浙江预防医学,2010,22(4):78-79.
[11]黄敬亨,邢育健,吕姿之.健康教育学[M]. 5版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2011:52-60.
[12]吴金星,陈海婴,范义兵.南昌市办公场所吸烟与二手烟暴露现况调查[J].现代预防医学,2012,39(8):1885-1889.
[13]林竹,洪原浩,陆翔,等.福建省创建无烟医院控烟效果评价[J].中国健康教育,2013,29(1):25-28.
[14]高峰燕,郭欣,刘亨辉,等.中国40个市(县)中小学校创建无烟环境效果评价[J].中国学校卫生,2011,32(2):150-152.
[1] 郑子聪, 俞锋, 王子艺, 王勐, 徐越, 吕巧红. 杭州市公共场所无烟环境建设暗访调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 355-358.
[2] 徐倩倩, 朱莹莹, 陶臻博, 丁十戈, 金秋妍, 董莹. 宁波市无烟党政机关公务员控烟态度及行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(1): 87-90.
[3] 吕巧红, 张雪海, 吴青青, 徐水洋, 徐越, 黄玉, 胡秀静. 浙江省医疗卫生机构无烟环境暗访结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(5): 475-478.
[4] 赵艳, 尹丽娟, 汤磊. 儿童致死性百日咳相关因素的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(11): 1104-1110.
[5] 余真君,赵小瑜,江挺,陈华忠,何泽宝,朱坚胜. 肾综合征出血热重型患者相关因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(1): 73-75.
[6] 武小娟, 李旭, 刘红新, 孟舰. 急性一氧化碳中毒发生迟发性脑病的相关因素[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(1): 86-87,90.
[7] 刘晓红, 曾长佑, 胡志勇, 陈晓蕾. 丽水市2型糖尿病患者维生素D水平及相关因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(9): 879-882.
[8] 丁荣楣,王平,马丽君,田奕. 中国女性居民被动吸烟率的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(7): 671-676.
[9] 黄长珍,卢章云,胡引闹,陈宵,陈晓伟,张美君,倪丽萍,洪妙兰. 东阳市居民代谢综合征患病现况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(5): 490-492.
[10] 徐雪云, 李神赐. 126例强制医疗精神病患者特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(11): 1150-1152.
[11] 丁亚萍, 吴正康. 嵊泗列岛学生贫血状况及相关因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(1): 77-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed