Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (2): 187-190    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.02.016
  妇幼保健 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
婚检孕检女性血清抗缪勒管激素水平分析
李薇1, 万惠卿1, 韩海燕1, 俞吉奇1, 黄艺舟2, 王飞雪3, 周坚红2
1.杭州市拱墅区妇幼保健中心,浙江 杭州 310005;
2.浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院,浙江 杭州 310006;
3.浙江省妇幼和生殖保健中心,浙江 杭州 310012
Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels among female undergoing premarital and preconception examinations
LI Wei1, WAN Huiqing1, HAN Haiyan1, YU Jiqi1, HUANG Yizhou2, WANG Feixue3, ZHOU Jianhong2
1. Women and Children's Health Center of Gongshu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310005, China;
2. Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China;
3. Zhejiang Provincial Center for Maternal and Child Health & Reproductive Health Care, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China
全文: PDF(809 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析婚检孕检女性血清抗缪勒管激素(AMH)水平及其影响因素,为优化生殖健康管理措施提供依据。方法 选择2022年1月—2025年4月在杭州市拱墅区妇幼保健中心接受免费婚检孕检并自愿进行血清AMH检测的女性为研究对象,通过问卷调查收集人口学信息、生育史等;采集静脉血,检测促甲状腺激素(TSH)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶、血红蛋白(Hb)和AMH水平等。AMH原值不服从正态分布,经自然对数转换后服从正态分布,记为ln(AMH);采用Pearson相关分析各变量间的相关性,采用多重线性回归模型分析婚检孕检女性ln(AMH)水平的影响因素。结果 调查婚检孕检女性1 073人,年龄为(29.43±3.30)岁。未孕959人,占89.38%;无足月活产史1 042人,占97.11%。AMH水平MQR)为3.85(3.63)ng/mL,ln(AMH)水平为1.27±0.75。未孕和无足月活产史的婚检孕检女性ln(AMH)水平较高(均P<0.05);ln(AMH)水平与年龄(r=-0.260)、TSH(r=-0.093)呈负相关,与Hb(r=0.073)呈正相关(均P<0.05)。多重线性回归分析结果显示,年龄(β′=-0.253)、TSH(β′=-0.103)与婚检孕检女性ln(AMH)水平存在统计学关联(均P<0.05),其他变量与婚检孕检女性ln(AMH)水平的关联无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 年龄与TSH水平是婚检孕检女性AMH水平的影响因素,婚检孕检女性AMH水平随年龄增长、TSH水平升高而下降。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李薇
万惠卿
韩海燕
俞吉奇
黄艺舟
王飞雪
周坚红
关键词 抗缪勒管激素年龄促甲状腺激素影响因素    
AbstractObjective To analyze serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and its influencing factors among female undergoing premarital and preconception examinations, so as to provide the evidence for optimizing reproductive health management measures. Methods Female who received free premarital and preconception examinations and voluntarily underwent serum AMH testing at Women and Children's Health Center of Gongshu District, Hangzhou City from January 2022 to April 2025 were selected as study subjects. Demographic information and reproductive history were collected through questionnaire survey. Venous blood was collected to detect thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), alanine aminotransferase, hemoglobin (Hb), and AMH levels. The original AMH values did not follow a normal distribution, but followed a normal distribution after natural logarithm transformation, recorded as ln (AMH). Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between variables, and multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors for ln (AMH) levels among female undergoing premarital and preconception examinations. Results A total of 1 073 females undergoing premarital and preconception examinations were surveyed, with a mean age of (29.43±3.30) years. There were 959 females without pregnancy (89.38%) and 1 042 females without full-term live birth history (97.11%). The median AMH level was 3.85 (interquartile range, 3.63) ng/mL, and the mean ln (AMH) level was 1.27±0.75. The ln (AMH) levels were higher in females without pregnancy and without full-term live birth history (both P<0.05). The ln (AMH) level was negatively correlated with age (r=-0.260) and TSH (r=-0.093), and positively correlated with Hb (r=-0.260, -0.093, and 0.073, all P<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that age (β′=-0.253) and TSH (β′=-0.103) were statistically associated with ln (AMH) levels among female undergoing premarital and preconception examinations (both P<0.05). The associations of other variables with ln (AMH) levels were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). Conclusions Age and TSH level are influencing factors for AMH levels among female undergoing premarital and preconception examinations. AMH levels among female undergoing premarital and preconception examinations decrease with increasing age and increasing TSH level.
Key wordsanti-Müllerian hormone    age    thyroid-stimulating hormone    influencing factor
收稿日期: 2025-10-09      修回日期: 2026-01-26     
中图分类号:  R711  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(82574100); 杭州市卫生科技计划一般项目(B20263029)
作者简介: 李薇,本科,主治医师,主要从事妇女保健工作
通信作者: 周坚红,E-mail:zhoujh1117@zju.edu.cn   
引用本文:   
李薇, 万惠卿, 韩海燕, 俞吉奇, 黄艺舟, 王飞雪, 周坚红. 婚检孕检女性血清抗缪勒管激素水平分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 187-190.
LI Wei, WAN Huiqing, HAN Haiyan, YU Jiqi, HUANG Yizhou, WANG Feixue, ZHOU Jianhong. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels among female undergoing premarital and preconception examinations. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(2): 187-190.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.02.016      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I2/187
[1] 顾宝昌,侯佳伟,吴楠.中国总和生育率为何如此低?——推延和补偿的博弈[J].人口与经济,2020(1):49-62.
[2] 周灿权,古芳.重视高龄女性生殖健康[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2017,33(1):59-63.
[3] 杨玉清,李旭丽,李伟娥.备孕夫妇生育储备功能现状及影响因素研究[J].宁夏医学杂志,2025,47(7):599-603.
[4] Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve:a committee opinion[J].Fertil Steril,2020,114(6):1151-1157.
[5] CEDARS M I.Evaluation of female fertility-AMH and ovarian reserve testing[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2022,107(6):1510-1519.
[6] MOOLHUIJSEN L M E,VISSER J A.Anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian reserve:update on assessing ovarian function[J].J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2020,105(11):3361-3373.
[7] SONG J W,GAO S K,ZHAO L X,et al.Distribution and related influencing factors of AMH level in family-planning women of childbearing age:a cross-sectional study from Beijing,China[J].Int J Womens Health,2025,17:99-107.
[8] CUI L L,QIN Y Y,GAO X,et al.Antimüllerian hormone:correlation with age and androgenic and metabolic factors in women from birth to postmenopause[J].Fertil Steril,2016,105(2):481-485.
[9] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice and Practice Committee.Female age-related fertility decline.Committee Opinion No.589[J].Fertil Steril,2014,101(3):633-634.
[10] AL RISI E,ZADJALI F,MULA-ABED W S.Reference ranges of serum anti-müllerian hormone in healthy reproductive-aged Omani women[J/OL].Oman Med J,2023,38(3)[2026-01-26].https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2023.79.
[11] HU L L,YANG H Y,LUO H N,et al.Age-specific reference ranges and variation of anti-mülerian hormone in healthy Chinese women of reproductive and perimenopausal age:a nationwide population-based prospective multicenter cross-sectional study[J/OL].Gynecol Endocrinol,2025,41(1)[2026-01-26].https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2024.2431230.
[12] 钱靖,钱东林,朱国祥.不孕症患者血清AMH和E2水平对卵巢储备功能、治疗后卵巢反应及妊娠结局的预测价值[J].中国性科学,2024,33(10):56-60.
[13] 高丽虹,蔡文伟,朱琴,等.抗苗勒管激素与年龄的关系及其预测卵巢衰老的临床研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2015,50(5):352-355.
[14] ZHANG J,WANG X,REN Z,et al.Impact of age and menopausal stage on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels in middle-aged women[J].Climacteric,2021,24(6):618-623.
[15] HIRAOKA T,WADA-HIRAIKE O,HIROTA Y,et al.The impact of elevated thyroid stimulating hormone on female subfertility[J].Reprod Med Biol,2015,15(2):121-126.
[16] LI S Y,ZHANG L N,LI W Q,et al.Adult-onset hypothyroidism induces granulosa cell apoptosis and affects ovarian follicle development in rats[J/OL].Front Cell Dev Biol,2025,13[2026-01-26].https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1610694.
[17] ZHANG H Z,QIU H,LIU Z Q,et al.Subclinical/overt hypothyroidism may be associated with diminished ovarian reserve in infertile women independent of thyroid autoimmunity[J/OL].Front Endocrinol,2024,15[2026-01-26].https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1477665.
[1] 朱珂, 陈高尚, 唐慧玲, 龙智平, 金屡华, 吴佳晖. 金华市HIV/AIDS病例结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 452-455.
[2] 孟祥杰, 唐崟, 寿钧, 孙明希, 张钰. 余杭区中学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 456-459,463.
[3] 卢美, 余霞, 汪德兵, 陶智勇, 王炜, 宋怡晴. 2016—2025年开化县肺结核患者就诊延迟分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 460-463.
[4] 倪俊煜, 杨云娟. 中学生非故意伤害现况及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 464-467,472.
[5] 徐芬, 张丽, 王凌, 汪靖, 张行. 1994—2025年鼓楼区HIV/AIDS病例失访的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 468-472.
[6] 韦艳炼, 农圣, 漆光紫, 江建明. 1990—2023年中国肝癌疾病负担变化趋势及年龄-时期-队列分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 473-477.
[7] 李景琦, 李晨曦, 董立平. 1994—2023年中国脑卒中发病和死亡的年龄-时期-队列分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 488-492,497.
[8] 张红梅, 付照然, 朱婷婷. 怀柔区35~75岁居民心血管疾病高危人群调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 523-527.
[9] 吴静, 万金豹, 吴萃, 刘方华, 陈秋艳, 丁承辉, 吴函. 宝山区慢性阻塞性肺疾病高危人群肺通气功能研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 388-393.
[10] 杨小婷, 索朗央吉, 贡桑扎堆, 王英, 索朗多布杰, 巴桑卓玛. 林芝市35~75岁居民心血管病高危风险筛查结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 394-397.
[11] 游继存, 田磊, 王鑫佳, 张喜琴. 2015—2024年安吉县病原学阳性肺结核患者治疗转归的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 329-333.
[12] 曾真, 赵丽娜, 单志力, 毛景, 林韩特, 毛玲琼, 李君. 温州市企业职工结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 334-337.
[13] 张文, 吴成果, 郑登虎, 罗建奎, 罗杰, 孙建, 张理翌, 雷蓉蓉, 廖文平. 南川区老年人群结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 338-342.
[14] 朱颖, 凌羽晓, 祝惠红. 2014—2023年嘉善县老年肺结核患者就诊延迟和确诊延迟分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 343-347.
[15] 张曦小雪, 王雪纯, 刘良楹, 武文君, 马玉, 何耀, 刘淼. 老年人认知功能变化轨迹的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 352-356.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed