Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (10): 1076-1080    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.10.021
  卫生管理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
嘉兴市预防接种异常反应保险补偿分析
唐娴, 杜哲群, 余鹏飞, 宋逸平, 沈国初, 胡洁
嘉兴市疾病预防控制中心,浙江 嘉兴 314050
Insurance-based compensation for adverse reactions following vaccination in Jiaxing City
TANG Xian, DU Zhequn, YU Pengfei, SONG Yiping, SHEN Guochu, HU Jie
Jiaxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiaxing, Zhejiang 314050, China
全文: PDF(869 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析浙江省嘉兴市预防接种异常反应基础保险和补充保险补偿情况,为完善疫苗保险补偿机制、促进预防接种工作开展提供依据。方法 收集2024—2025年嘉兴市完成预防接种异常反应保险补偿的个案资料,描述性分析保险补偿个案数、补偿金额、损害级别、疫苗类型和临床诊断等特征。结果 嘉兴市预防接种异常反应保险补偿个案479例,补偿总金额为153.89万元。基础保险补偿个案9例,补偿金额为68.36万元,1例三级乙等个案补偿65.60万元,8例四级及其他个案补偿2.76万元;补充保险补偿个案470例,补偿金额为85.53万元,1例死亡个案(发生偶合症)补偿15.00万元,469例四级及其他个案补偿70.53万元。补充保险补偿个案数前3位的疫苗为吸附无细胞百白破脊灰灭活和b型流感嗜血杆菌(结合)联合疫苗(DTaP-IPV-Hib)单独接种、乙型肝炎疫苗(HepB)和卡介苗(BCG)联合接种、13价肺炎球菌多糖结合疫苗(PCV13)单独接种,分别为72、54和39例;补偿金额前3位的疫苗为HepB和BCG联合接种、DTaP-IPV-Hib单独接种、PCV13单独接种,分别为26.37、12.53和4.83万元;补偿个案数前3位的临床诊断为急性上呼吸道感染、肺炎和急性支气管炎,分别为175、81和54例。结论 嘉兴市预防接种异常反应保险补偿机制呈现“基础保重症、补充保轻症”的分层保障特征,需加强DTaP-IPV-Hib单独接种、HepB和BCG联合接种、PCV13单独接种异常反应的监测力度,并注意鉴别偶合症。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
唐娴
杜哲群
余鹏飞
宋逸平
沈国初
胡洁
关键词 : 疫苗,  预防接种异常反应,  保险,  补偿    
Abstract:Objective To analyze the insurance-based compensation provided by basic and supplementary insurance for adverse reactions following vaccination in Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, so as to provide a basis for improving the vaccine insurance compensation mechanism and promoting vaccination services. Methods Individual records of insurance compensation for adverse reactions following vaccination in Jiaxing City from 2024 to 2025 were collected. A descriptive analysis was conducted to characterize the number of insurance-based compensation cases, compensation amounts, severity grades, vaccine types and clinical diagnoses. Results A total of 479 cases of adverse reactions following vaccination received insurance-based compensation in Jiaxing City, with a total compensation amount of 1 538 900 yuan. Basic insurance compensated 9 cases, with a total compensation amount of 683 600 yuan. Among these, one case classified as Grade Ⅲ, Class B received compensation of 656 000 yuan, while eight cases classified as Grade Ⅳ and other cases received compensation totaling 27 600 yuan. Supplementary insurance compensated 470 cases, with a total compensation amount of 855 300 yuan. One death case involving a coincidental illness received compensation of 150 000 yuan, 469 Grade Ⅳ and other cases received compensation totaling 705 300 yuan. The three most frequently compensated vaccine categories under supplementary insurance were diphtheria and tetanus toxoid with acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus vaccine-inactivated, and Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine (DTaP-IPV-Hib), combined vaccination with hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) and bacille calmette-guérin vaccine (BCG), and 13-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PCV13), accounting for 72, 54 and 39 cases, respectively. The three vaccine categories associated with the highest compensation amounts were combined vaccination with HepB and BCG, DTaP-IPV-Hib, and PCV13, with compensation amounts of 263 700, 125 300 and 48 300 yuan, respectively. The three most common clinical diagnoses among compensated cases were acute upper respiratory tract infection, pneumonia and acute bronchitis, accounting for 175, 81 and 54 cases, respectively. Conclusions The insurance-based compensation mechanism for adverse reactions following vaccination in Jiaxing City demonstrates a tiered coverage pattern: basic insurance primarily covers severe cases, while supplementary insurance mainly covers mild cases. Surveillance of adverse reactions following vaccination associated with standalone administration of DTaP-IPV-Hib, combined vaccination with HepB and BCG, and PCV13 should be strengthened, and particular attention should be paid to distinguishing coincidental illness.
Key words: vaccine    adverse reactions following vaccination    insurance    compensation
收稿日期: 2026-07-02      修回日期: 2026-09-01      出版日期: 2026-10-10
中图分类号:  R186  
基金资助:浙江省疾病预防控制科技计划项目(2026JKY261)
作者简介: 唐娴,硕士,副主任护师,主要从事免疫规划工作
通信作者: 胡洁,E-mail:hujie0211039@163.com   
引用本文:   
唐娴, 杜哲群, 余鹏飞, 宋逸平, 沈国初, 胡洁. 嘉兴市预防接种异常反应保险补偿分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(10): 1076-1080.
TANG Xian, DU Zhequn, YU Pengfei, SONG Yiping, SHEN Guochu, HU Jie. Insurance-based compensation for adverse reactions following vaccination in Jiaxing City. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(10): 1076-1080.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.10.021      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I10/1076
[1] 全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国疫苗管理法[EB/OL].[2026-09-01].https://www.samr.gov.cn/zw/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/fgs/art/2023.
[2] 张彩霞,谭妙婵,温菊香.79例疑似预防接种异常反应疫苗纠纷案例分析——以司法裁判文书为视角[J].中国卫生法制,2020,28(1):27-34.
[3] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.国家卫生计生委办公厅关于印发国家免疫规划儿童免疫程序及说明(2016年版)的通知[EB/OL].[2026-09-01].https://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/c100063/201612/0f651acf2863404189dafde304337407.shtml.
[4] 罗美玲,张英,刘浩,等.长沙市儿童家长购买预防接种异常反应补充保险的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2020,32(8):774-777.
[5] 浙江省疾病预防控制中心.浙江省疾病预防控制中心关于印发浙江省免疫规划疫苗预防接种异常反应补偿保险实施方案(试行)的通知[EB/OL].[2026-09-01].https://zjjcmspublic.oss-cn-hangzhou-zwynet-d01-a.internet.cloud.zj.gov.cn/jcms_files/jcms1/web3595/site/attach/0/53b172b217e54e18bffafe1f0369e09e.pdf.
[6] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.医疗事故分级标准(试行)[EB/OL].[2026-09-01].https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2003/content_62085.htm.
[7] 浙江省卫生健康委员会.浙江省预防接种异常反应补偿办法(试行)[EB/OL].[2026-09-01].https://zjyxjl.org.cn/news/detailn_id=192&wn=9&apply=0.
[8] 黄鹏辉.预防接种异常反应的保险补偿机制研究[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2019:11,21,24-25.
[9] 杨旭,王玲玲,王旭雯.2020—2022年江苏省无锡市预防接种异常反应保险补偿分析[J].上海预防医学,2024,36(8):814-822.
[10] 臧秀娟,姜婷,王芳芳.2021—2023年宿迁市宿城区商业保险补偿在预防接种异常反应中的使用情况分析[J].中国校医,2025,39(3):235-240.
[11] 许濒月,邓瑞楠,韩真明,等.2018—2021年重庆市预防接种异常反应保险补偿分析[J].中国疫苗和免疫,2022,28(4):451-457.
[12] Pieren D K J,Boer M C,De Wit J.The adaptive immune system in early life:the shift makes it count[J/OL].Front Immunol,2022,13[2026-09-01].http://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1031924.
[13] 刘建华. 3例儿童预防接种偶合疾病性质分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2015,23(2):223-224.
[1] 黄玉琴, 张琰, 史宏博, 潘兴强. 0~6岁儿童父母疫苗犹豫调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(6): 626-629.
[2] 刘杨, 富小飞, 王远航, 李睿. 嘉兴市老年人流行性感冒疫苗保护效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(5): 508-512.
[3] 杜哲群, 唐娴, 余鹏飞, 甘正凯, 宋逸平, 胡洁. 嘉兴市含脑膜炎球菌成分疫苗疑似预防接种异常反应监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(4): 382-387.
[4] 刘丹, 徐锦杭, 王勐. 男大学生人乳头瘤病毒疫苗认知和接种意愿调查[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 119-123.
[5] 何佳丽, 程晓东, 汪馨, 王斌冰, 苏颖, 程鹏博, 宋菲扬, 柴瑜. 安徽省脊髓灰质炎病毒VP1编码区基因特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 166-170.
[6] 罗美玲, 张英, 李栎. 长沙市2012—2021年出生儿童水痘疫苗接种率和保护效果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(10): 992-995,1001.
[7] 徐艳平, 闫晓彤, 姚丁铭, 徐越, 张雪海, 孙洁, 徐锦杭. 浙江省中老年人肺炎疫苗接种意愿的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 881-885.
[8] 王晓宇, 张志平, 董玉颖, 梁杰, 陈强. 老年人带状疱疹疫苗接种意愿的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 809-813.
[9] 赵志元, 郑俐敏. 我国人用狂犬病疫苗接种不良反应研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 682-686.
[10] 田海艳, 李保军, 陈奕. 宁波市流行性腮腺炎突破病例分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(3): 292-295.
[11] 唐学雯, 白祎然, 苏颖, 龚黎明, 严睿, 朱瑶, 何寒青. 一例急性弛缓性麻痹病例检出疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 178-180,188.
[12] 李依窈, 李小菊, 申小颖, 张宪琦, 赵莉, 张玉涵, 汪欣梦. 老年人接种流行性感冒疫苗的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 31-35.
[13] 杨旭, 王旭雯. 2015—2023年无锡市风疹流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 65-68.
[14] 王苗玲, 童莺歌. 疫苗素养评价工具研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 768-771.
[15] 王颖, 江媚, 华丽, 林玉幸. 海珠区14岁以下儿童水痘突破病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 523-526.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed