Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2026, Vol. 38 Issue (3): 296-301    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.03.016
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
重症手足口病风险预测模型研究
徐晶1, 张俊红1, 冯慧芬2
1.苏州大学附属第二医院,江苏 苏州 215026;
2.郑州大学第五附属医院,河南 郑州 450052
Prediction models for severe hand-foot-mouth disease risk
XU Jing1, ZHANG Junhong1, FENG Huifen2
1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215026, China;
2. The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China
全文: PDF(807 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 构建并比较重症手足口病(HFMD)风险预测模型,分析重症HFMD的影响因素,为早期识别与干预重症HFMD提供参考。方法 选择2018年11月—2021年12月在郑州市某医院住院治疗的HFMD患者为研究对象,收集人口学信息、临床症状和实验室检测指标等资料,按7∶3比例随机分为训练集和验证集。参照《手足口病诊疗指南(2018年版)》分为轻症HFMD组和重症HFMD组,两组差异有统计学意义的变量为预测变量,构建随机森林模型、线性支持向量机(LSVM)模型和logistic回归模型;采用准确率、灵敏度、特异度和受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估3种模型的预测性能。结果 纳入HFMD患者1 650例,其中男性1 094例,占66.30%;女性556例,占33.70%。年龄为(1.97±1.17)岁。轻症HFMD组1 293例,占78.36%;重症HFMD组357例,占21.64%。随机森林模型、LSVM模型和logistic回归模型预测重症HFMD的准确率分别为95.76%、88.28%和88.08%,灵敏度为94.55%、59.09%和58.18%,特异度为96.10%、96.66%和96.66%,AUC值分别为0.981、0.895和0.899。随机森林模型模型结果显示,重症HFMD预测因素重要性排序前3位依次为中性粒细胞比率、丙氨酸氨基转移酶和血小板计数。结论 构建的随机森林模型预测性能较好,可用于重症HFMD的预测研究,建议重视HFMD患者中性粒细胞比率、丙氨酸氨基转移酶和血小板计数的变化,可辅助早期识别和干预重症HFMD。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐晶
张俊红
冯慧芬
关键词 手足口病重症随机森林模型线性支持向量机模型logistic回归模型预测    
AbstractObjective To construct and compare risk prediction models for severe hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD), analyze the influencing factors of severe HFMD, so as to provide a reference for early identification and intervention of severe HFMD. Methods HFMD patients who were hospitalized in a hospital in Zhengzhou City from November 2018 to December 2021 were selected as study subjects. Demographic information, clinical symptoms, and laboratory test indicators were collected. The subjects were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a 7∶3 ratio. According to the Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease (2018 Edition), the patients were divided into a mild HFMD group and a severe HFMD group. Variables with statistically significant differences between the two groups were identified as predictive variables. Random forest model, linear support vector machine (LSVM) model, and logistic regression model were constructed. The predictive performance of the three models was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results A total of 1 650 HFMD patients were included, including 1 094 males (66.30%) and 556 females (33.70%). The mean age was (1.97±1.17) years. There were 1 293 cases in the mild HFMD group (78.36%) and 357 cases in the severe HFMD group (21.64%). The accuracy of random forest model, LSVM model, and logistic regression model in predicting severe HFMD were 95.76%, 88.28%, and 88.08%, respectively. The sensitivity were 94.55%, 59.09%, and 58.18%, respectively. The specificity were 96.10%, 96.66%, and 96.66%, respectively. The AUC values were 0.981, 0.895, and 0.899, respectively. The random forest model results showed that the top three important predictors for severe HFMD were neutrophil ratio, alanine aminotransferase, and platelet count. Conclusions The constructed random forest model demonstrates good predictive performance and can be applied in predicting severe HFMD. It is recommended to pay attention to changes in neutrophil ratio, alanine aminotransferase, and platelet count in HFMD patients, which can assist in early identification and intervention of severe HFMD.
Key wordshand-foot-mouth disease    severe    random forest model    linear support vector machine model    logistic regression model    prediction
收稿日期: 2025-06-20      修回日期: 2026-02-03      出版日期: 2026-03-10
中图分类号:  R512.5  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(81473030); 河南省医学科技攻关计划(联合共建)项目(LHGJ20190426); 河南省重点研发与推广专项(192102310376)
作者简介: 徐晶,硕士,医师,主要从事感染性疾病控制工作
通信作者: 冯慧芬,E-mail:huifen.feng@163.com   
引用本文:   
徐晶, 张俊红, 冯慧芬. 重症手足口病风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(3): 296-301.
XU Jing, ZHANG Junhong, FENG Huifen. Prediction models for severe hand-foot-mouth disease risk. Preventive Medicine, 2026, 38(3): 296-301.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2026.03.016      或      https://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2026/V38/I3/296
[1] YAN R,HE J H,LIU G,et al.Drug repositioning for hand,foot,and mouth disease[J/OL].Viruses,2022,15(1)[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.3390/v1501007.
[2] LEUNG A K C,LAM J M,BARANKIN B,et al.Hand,foot,and mouth disease:a narrative review[J].Recent Adv Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov,2022,16(2):77-95.
[3] FONG S Y,MORI D,RUNDI C,et al.A five-year retrospective study on the epidemiology of hand,foot and mouth disease in Sabah,Malaysia[J/OL].Sci Rep,2021,11[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96083-3.
[4] MIAO L,LIU Y J,LUO P L,et al.Association between platelet count and the risk and progression of hand,foot,and mouth disease among children[J/OL].Clinics(Sao Paulo),2020,75[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1619.
[5] SARKAR S,MALI K.Breast cancer subtypes classification with hybrid machine learning model[J].Methods Inf Med,2022,61(3/4):68-83.
[6] ZHANG H W,WANG Y R,HU B,et al.Using machine learning to develop a stacking ensemble learning model for the CT radiomics classification of brain metastases[J/OL].Sci Rep,2024,14(1)[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80210-x.
[7] 《手足口病诊疗指南(2018版)》编写专家委员会.手足口病诊疗指南(2018年版)[J].中华临床感染病杂志,2018,36(5):257-263.
[8] 杨溪,寸建萍,曹亿会,等.2009—2019年云南省手足口病重症病例流行病学特征及危险因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2022,49(15):2689-2693.
[9] XU S S,LI H J,QIAO P,et al.Neonatal hand,foot,and mouth disease due to coxsackievirus A6 in Shanghai[J/OL].BMC Pediatr,2020,20(1)[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02262-y.
[10] 杨青青. 精氨酸代谢对重症HFMD小鼠模型中由巨噬细胞介导的细胞因子风暴作用机制研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2024.
[11] LI P Q,HUANG Y G,ZHU D P,et al.Risk factors for severe hand-foot-mouth disease in China:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL].Front Pediatr,2021[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.716039.
[12] YI Z J,PEI S J,SUO W S,et al.Epidemiological characteristics,routine laboratory diagnosis,clinical signs and risk factors for hand-foot-and-mouth disease:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL].PLoS One,2022,17(4)[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267716.
[13] 董琦. 重症和危重症手足口病风险因子的寻找和预测模型的建立[D].南昌:南昌大学,2022.
[14] ZHANG Y,CHEN S Y,SUN T T,et al.Abundant neutrophil-initiated acute myocardial injury following coxsackievirus A6 infection[J].J Infect Dis,2024,229(5):1440-1450.
[15] XIE Y Q,HU Q M,DUAN G C,et al.NLRP3 inflammasome activation contributes to acute liver injury caused by CVA6 infection in mice[J/OL].BMC Infect Dis,2024,24(1)[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10136-2.
[16] JIN Y F,LI D,SUN T T,et al.Pathological features of enterovirus 71-associated brain and lung damage in mice based on quantitative proteomic analysis[J/OL].Front Microbiol,2021,12[2026-02-03].https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.663019.
[17] FANG L,YU S C,TIAN X X,et al.Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus replicates in platelets and enhances platelet activation[J].J Thromb Haemost,2023,21(5):1336-1351.
[18] LI Q W,WANG Y M,XUE W Y,et al.Immunomodulatory effects of platelets on the severity of hand,foot,and mouth disease infected with enterovirus 71[J].Pediatr Res,2021,89(4):814-822.
[19] 嵇红,陈庆会,张雪峰,等.儿童重症手足口病的临床特征和预后以及预警指标分析[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,2021,35(1):89-95.
[20] 郑珊,冯慧芬,徐晶,等.郑州市2015年至2019年手足口病患者外周血炎症细胞和电解质水平变化与预后关联的巢式病例对照研究[J].重庆医科大学学报,2023,48(3):304-309.
[1] 马宗康, 刘星郎, 李惠惠, 何国威, 颜萍, 张传荣, 马萱, 车雅洁, 于珊, 陈凤辉. 老年人轻度认知功能障碍风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 124-129.
[2] 徐欣颖, 颜伟, 石兴龙, 吕婧, 岳芳, 乔颖异, 刘冠翔, 李秀君. 基于贝叶斯时空模型的滨州市手足口病影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 161-165.
[3] 仲玮, 李伟伟, 相璐, 柴莉莉, 董建梅, 马昭君, 秦绪成, 张伟伟. 2011—2029年连云港市慢性呼吸系统疾病死亡趋势及预测研究[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(2): 181-186.
[4] 卢文海, 孔校杰, 宋丽霞, 卢春如, 于碧鲲, 谢延. SARIMA、Prophet与BSTS模型预测手足口病发病率的效果比较[J]. 预防医学, 2026, 38(1): 79-84.
[5] 刘艳, 张子喆, 王雨达, 刘光涛, 沈建勇. 2013—2023年湖州市手足口病流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(7): 718-721.
[6] 龚亮亮, 戎志东. 10~13岁儿童非自杀性自伤行为风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 546-550.
[7] 白瑞盈, 生海燕. 肺炎住院患者多重耐药菌感染的预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(5): 465-470.
[8] 王英杰 综述, 孙高峰, 审校. 2型糖尿病预测模型研究进展[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 369-372,377.
[9] 杨亚, 费洁, 杨怡玮, 张冰, 张倩, 陆一涵. 手足口病发病与气象因素的关联研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(4): 346-349,355.
[10] 张小乔, 张筱碟, 赵振希, 谢鹏留, 代敏. LSTM、SARIMA和SARIMAX模型预测手足口病发病率的效果比较[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(3): 280-284,287.
[11] 潘祥, 童莺歌, 李怡萱, 倪珂, 程雯倩, 辛蒙雨, 胡钰滢. 机器学习方法构建健康素养预测模型的范围综述[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(2): 148-153.
[12] 李欣格, 王丽娟, 宋亮, 丁海峰, 高彦杰. 男男性行为人群暴露前预防使用的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(12): 1201-1205.
[13] 孙秀秀, 沈建勇, 杨中荣, 罗小福, 张子喆. 气温对手足口病发病的影响研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(11): 1160-1164.
[14] 曾勇, 李亦麟, 吴耀坚. 2013—2023年萍乡市手足口病流行特征和空间聚集性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(11): 1175-1178,1183.
[15] 龚海英, 薛凤玉, 刘晓芬, 邢瑞婷, 苗雨阳, 赵耀. 18~79岁居民高血压风险预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(10): 1075-1080.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed