Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (8): 710-713    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.08.015
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
2014—2023年温州市狂犬病暴露人群特征分析
王坚1, 谢华森1, 池海潮2, 李晓伟1, 乐思羽1, 倪朝荣1
1.温州市疾病预防控制中心(温州市卫生监督所)传染病防制所,浙江 温州 325000;
2.温州市鹿城区疾病预防控制中心,浙江 温州 325000
Characteristics of rabies-exposed population in Wenzhou City from 2014 to 2023
WANG Jian1, XIE Huasen1, CHI Haichao2, LI Xiaowei1, LE Siyu1, NI Chaorong1
1. Department of Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Wenzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Wenzhou Public Health Inspection Institute), Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China;
2. Lucheng District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
全文: PDF(826 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解2014—2023年浙江省温州市狂犬病暴露人群特征,为狂犬病的预防和控制提供依据。方法 通过温州市犬伤门诊上报的《温州市狂犬病暴露人群情况汇总表》收集2014—2023年温州市狂犬病暴露人群资料,描述性分析致伤动物类型、暴露时间、暴露等级、暴露部位和暴露后处置情况。结果 2014—2023年温州市狂犬病暴露病例709 900例,暴露率呈上升趋势(Z=7.238,P<0.001),年均暴露率为750.75/10万。暴露高峰为7—8月,分别为79 230和78 570例,占11.16%和11.07%。致伤动物以犬为主,448 900例占63.23%,暴露率呈下降趋势(Z=-5.921,P<0.001);其次为猫,175 142例占24.67%,暴露率呈上升趋势(Z=23.314,P<0.001)。暴露部位以上肢和下肢为主,分别379 695和287 521例,占53.49%和40.50%。头面部暴露21 034例,占2.96%,暴露率呈上升趋势(Z=3.549,P<0.001)。暴露等级以Ⅱ级为主,403 881例占56.89%,暴露率呈上升趋势(Z=8.769,P<0.001)。Ⅲ级暴露人群狂犬病被动免疫制剂使用率为23.13%,呈下降趋势(Z=-12.848,P<0.001)。结论 2014—2023年温州市狂犬病暴露率呈上升趋势,7—8月为暴露高峰;以犬致伤为主,猫致伤暴露率呈上升趋势;狂犬病被动免疫制剂使用率有待提高。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王坚
谢华森
池海潮
李晓伟
乐思羽
倪朝荣
关键词 狂犬病犬伤门诊暴露人群    
AbstractObjective To investigate the characteristics of rabies-exposed population in Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province from 2014 to 2023, so as to provide insights into the prevention and control of rabies. Methods Data of rabies-exposed population in Wenzhou City from 2014 to 2023 were collected through Wenzhou Rabies-Exposed Population Summary Sheet reported by dog injury clinics. The species of animals causing injuries, exposure time, exposure grade, exposure site, and post-exposure treatment were descriptively analyzed. Results Totally 709 900 patients were admitted to dog injury clinics in Wenzhou City from 2014 to 2023, and the exposure rate showed an increasing trend (Z=7.238, P<0.001), with an average annual exposure rate of 750.75/105. The number of cases with exposure to rabies peaked in July (79 230 cases, 11.16%) and August (78 570 cases, 11.07%). Dogs were predominant animals causing injuries (448 900 cases, 63.23%), and the exposure rate showed a downward trend (Z=-5.921, P<0.001); cats were the second (175 142 cases, 24.67%), and the exposure rate showed an upward trend (Z=23.314, P<0.001). The upper (379 695 cases, 53.49%) and lower limbs (287 521 cases, 40.50%) were the main exposure sites. There were 21 034 cases (2.96%) exposed to head and face, and the exposure rate of head and face showed an upward trend (Z=3.549, P<0.001). Grade II exposure was the most common (403 881 cases, 56.89%), and the exposure rate showed an upward trend (Z=8.769, P<0.001). The proportion of using human rabies immune globulin was 23.13% in Grade III exposed population, showing a downward trend (Z=-12.848, P<0.001). Conclusions The exposure rate of rabies in Wenzhou City showed an upward trend from 2014 to 2023, with July and August as the peak months of exposure. Injuries mainly caused by dogs, while the exposure rate of cat bites showed an upward trend. The proportion of using human rabies immune globulin needs to be improved.
Key wordsrabies    dog injury clinic    exposed population
收稿日期: 2024-03-28      修回日期: 2024-05-30      出版日期: 2024-08-10
中图分类号:  R181.3  
作者简介: 王坚,本科,主管医师,主要从事传染病监测工作
通信作者: 倪朝荣,E-mail:474011337@qq.com   
引用本文:   
王坚, 谢华森, 池海潮, 李晓伟, 乐思羽, 倪朝荣. 2014—2023年温州市狂犬病暴露人群特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 710-713.
WANG Jian, XIE Huasen, CHI Haichao, LI Xiaowei, LE Siyu, NI Chaorong. Characteristics of rabies-exposed population in Wenzhou City from 2014 to 2023. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(8): 710-713.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.08.015      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I8/710
[1] World Health Organization.Rabies vaccines:WHO position paper,April 2018-Recommendations[J].Vaccine,2018,36(37):5500-5503.
[2] 任江萍,陈直平,孙继民,等.2005年至2017年浙江省狂犬病疫情时空特征分析[J].中华传染病杂志,2018,36(4):240-242.
[3] 中国疾病预防控制中心.狂犬病预防控制技术指南(2016版)[EB/OL].[2024-05-30].https://www.chinacdc.cn/zxdt/201602/W020160421413390729268.pdf.
[4] 王庆昌,李欣.圆形分布分析的EXCEL实现[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(5):448-449.
[5] 王哲,朱雷,孙昼,等.杭州市狂犬病暴露人群流行病学特征分析[J].预防医学,2019,31(11):1150-1152.
[6] 闻栋. 湖州市狂犬病暴露人群流行特征与暴露预防处置现状分析[J].中国高等医学教育,2015(5):129-139.
[7] 吴雪,郑立浩,阚绪伟,等.安吉县狂犬病暴露人群特征分析[J].预防医学,2023,35(4):327-330.
[8] 茅蓉,曹家穗,金安宝.2009—2014年浙江省嘉兴市疾病预防控制中心犬伤门诊狂犬病暴露人群监测分析[J].疾病监测,2015,30(10):851-854.
[9] 李国伟,陈巧格,邵玉普,等.郑州市2015—2020年狂犬病暴露人群流行病学特征及暴露后处置分析[J].江苏预防医学,2022,33(1):91-93.
[10] ZHOU H,VONG S,LIU K,et al.Human rabies in China,1960-2014:a descriptive epidemiological study[J].PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2016,10(8):1-12.
[11] 任江萍,陈直平,孙继民,等.全国人间狂犬病疫情的时间序列分析[J].中国人兽共患病学报,2018,34(3):239-242.
[12] 李培德,白宇,金俊杰,等.温州市犬狂犬病免疫情况调查[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2017,38(7):108-110.
[13] 宋承乾,张娜,陶晓燕,等.2021年中国狂犬病流行特征分析[J].疾病监测,2024,39(1):59-62.
[14] 宋开发,王四全,骆金俊,等.2015—2021年湖北省狂犬病流行特征及暴露后免疫失败病例分析[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2023,34(4):35-38.
[15] 杨浩,胡世雄,罗垲炜,等.湖南省68例狂犬病暴露处置失败病例分析[J].热带病与寄生虫学,2019,17(3):149-152.
[16] 曹明华,宋丹丹.安徽省70例狂犬病暴露后免疫失败流行病学分析[J].中国人兽共患病学报,2018,34(4):382-384.
[17] 郑东方,施达,郭凤芝.金华市狂犬病暴露者流行病学特征分析[J].预防医学,2017,29(12):1243-1244.
[18] 慕欣,吴安忠,贺金,等.2019—2022年贵州省疾病预防控制中心犬伤门诊狂犬病暴露人群流行病学特征分析[J].中国病毒病杂志,2024,14(1):77-81.
[1] 吴雪, 郑立浩, 阚绪伟, 孙继民. 安吉县狂犬病暴露人群特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 327-330.
[2] 包玉泉, 方益荣, 陈敏嫣. 越城区动物致伤病例特征[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(1): 67-68,71.
[3] 戴珍娟, 安小力, 李瑞兰, 刘鸿翔. 犬伤患者科普微视频健康教育效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(2): 204-207.
[4] 舒莎, 高岚. 贵阳市一犬伤多人事件分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(5): 488-489,492.
[5] 王哲, 朱雷, 孙昼, 黄仁杰. 杭州市狂犬病暴露人群流行病学特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(11): 1150-1152,1155.
[6] 姚亚萍, 付国华, 顾丽华, 耿卫勇, 徐旭卿. 犬伤门诊疫苗全程冷链温度监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(11): 1169-1171.
[7] 肖月, 周建刚, 张华君, 蒋晨, 王笑辰, 朱武洋, 吴未辰, 闫江泓, 陶晓燕. 宜兴市一犬伤多人事件调查[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(1): 78-80.
[8] 王涛, 苑新海, 范肖肖, 易文娟, 朱宗龙, 王海红. 昌平区狂犬病和动物致伤流行特征及暴露后处置情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(9): 930-932.
[9] 来时明, 尹志英, 李俊姬, 焦仕林, 周庆荣, 应国成. 狂犬病疫苗两种不同免疫程序接种依从性及经济成本比较[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(8): 857-860.
[10] 陈静, 杨万里, 俞凌, 王英姿, 王卿. 杭州市动物致伤患者流行病学特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(6): 586-588.
[11] 华炜,张丽娟,叶建荣,钮月红. 接种狂犬病疫苗后发生腹型过敏性紫癜1例报告[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(2): 180-181.
[12] 郑东方, 施达, 郭凤芝. 金华市狂犬病暴露者流行病学特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(12): 1243-1244,1247.
[13] 李科峰,李鹏,戴亚欣,耿晓东,仝振东. 舟山市首例狂犬病病例调查报告[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(10): 1033-1035.
[14] 任江萍, 凌峰, 龚震宇, 孙继民, 施旭光, 张蓉, 陈恩富. 浙江省犬伤门诊服务现状分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(1): 53-55,59.
[15] 陈建兰, 冯燕, 何艳燕. 拓东街道居民狂犬病暴露风险及处置情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(12): 1265-1267.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed