Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2023, Vol. 35 Issue (4): 327-330    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.04.013
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
安吉县狂犬病暴露人群特征分析
吴雪1, 郑立浩1, 阚绪伟1, 孙继民2
1.安吉县疾病预防控制中心,浙江 安吉 313300;
2.浙江省疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 310051
Characteristics of populations exposed to rabies in Anji County
WU Xue1, ZHENG Lihao1, KAN Xuwei1, SUN Jimin2
1. Anji Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Anji, Zhejiang 313300, China;
2. Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310051, China
全文: PDF(884 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解2017—2021年浙江省安吉县狂犬病暴露人群特征,为安吉县狂犬病防控提供依据。方法 收集2017—2021年安吉县犬伤门诊上报的《湖州市狂犬病暴露人群月报表》和《一犬伤多人事件调查表》,描述性分析狂犬病暴露人群的致伤动物类型、暴露时间、暴露等级、暴露部位和暴露后处置情况。结果 2017—2021年安吉县犬伤门诊报告狂犬病暴露就诊者46 186例,暴露率呈下降趋势(Z=-23.249,P<0.001),年均暴露率为1 739.59/10万。7—8月为暴露高峰,10 066例占21.79%。以犬致伤为主,31 732例占68.70%,暴露率呈下降趋势(Z=-35.541,P<0.001);猫致伤11 350例,占24.57%,暴露率呈上升趋势(Z=14.834,P<0.001)。主要暴露部位为下肢,22 364例占48.42%。Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级暴露分别占72.85%和25.23%,Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级暴露率均呈下降趋势(Z=-14.522、-21.820,均P<0.001)。Ⅲ级暴露人群狂犬病免疫球蛋白使用率为25.72%,呈上升趋势(Z=6.636,P<0.001)。结论 2017—2021年安吉县狂犬病暴露率呈下降趋势,以犬致伤为主,猫致伤暴露率呈上升趋势。Ⅲ级暴露人群狂犬病免疫球蛋白使用率尚需提高。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴雪
郑立浩
阚绪伟
孙继民
关键词 狂犬病犬伤门诊暴露人群狂犬病免疫球蛋白    
AbstractObjective To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of rabies-exposed populations in Anji County, Zhejiang Province from 2017 to 2021, so as to provide insights into rabies control in the county. Methods All data pertaining to rabies were captured from Monthly Report of Rabies-exposed Populations in Huzhou City and Investigation Form of Multiple Dog Injuries reported by dog injury clinics in Anji County from 2017 to 2021, and the species of animals causing dog injuries, duration, degree and site of exposure, and post-exposure treatment of rabies-exposed populations were descriptively analyzed. Results Totally 46 186 cases with rabies exposure were reported in dog injury clinics in Anji County from 2017 to 2021, and the rate of exposure appeared a tendency towards a decline year by year (Z=-23.249, P<0.001), with an annual mean exposure rate of 1 739.59/105. The number of cases with exposure to rabies peaked in July and August (10 066 cases, 21.79%). Dogs were predominant animals causing injuries (31 732 cases, 68.70%), and the rate of exposure to dog bites appeared a tendency towards a decline year by year (Z=-35.541, P<0.001). There were 11 350 cases with cat-causing injuries (24.57%), and the rate of exposure to cat bites appeared a tendency towards a rise (Z=14.834, P<0.001). Lower extremity was the main site of exposure (22 364 cases, 48.42%), and the proportions of grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ exposure to rabies were 72.85% and 25.23%, the rates of exposure both appeared a tendency towards a decline (Z=-14.522, P<0.001; Z=-21.820, P<0.001). The proportion of using human rabies immune globulin was 25.72% among populations with grade Ⅲ exposure, which appeared a tendency towards a rise (Z=6.636, P<0.001). Conclusions The rate of exposure to rabies appeared a tendency towards a decline in Anji County from 2017 to 2021. Dogs were predominant animals causing injuries, and the rate of cat bites appeared a tendency towards a rise from 2017 to 2021; however, the proportion of using human rabies immune globulin remains to be improved among populations with grade Ⅲ exposure.
Key wordsrabies    dog injury clinic    exposed population    human rabies immune globulin
收稿日期: 2023-01-30      修回日期: 2023-03-09      出版日期: 2023-04-10
中图分类号:  R373.9  
通信作者: 孙继民,E-mail:jmsun@cdc.zj.cn   
作者简介: 吴雪,本科,副主任医师,主要从事传染性疾病监测工作
引用本文:   
吴雪, 郑立浩, 阚绪伟, 孙继民. 安吉县狂犬病暴露人群特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(4): 327-330.
WU Xue, ZHENG Lihao, KAN Xuwei, SUN Jimin. Characteristics of populations exposed to rabies in Anji County. Preventive Medicine, 2023, 35(4): 327-330.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2023.04.013      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2023/V35/I4/327
[1] 牟笛,陶忠发,李中杰,等.2007—2018年中国狂犬病流行病学特征分析[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,2021,35(2):168-171.
[2] World Health Organization.Global elimination of dog-mediated human rabies report of the Rabies Global Conference[R/OL].[2023-03-09].https://www.who.int/rabies/resources/who_htm_ntd_nzd_2016.02/en.
[3] 任江萍,陈直平,孙继民,等.2005年至2017年浙江省狂犬病疫情时空特征分析[J].中华传染病杂志,2018,36(4):240-242.
[4] 中国疾病预防控制中心.狂犬病预防控制技术指南(2016版)[J].中国病毒学杂志,2016,6(3):161-188.
[5] 郑东方,施达,郭凤芝.金华市狂犬病暴露者流行病学特征分析[J].预防医学,2017,29(12):1243-1247.
[6] 闻栋.湖州市狂犬病暴露人群流行特征与暴露预防处置现状分析[J].中国高等医学教育,2015(5):129,139.
[7] 陈静,杨万里,俞凌,等.杭州市动物致伤患者流行病学特征分析[J].预防医学,2017,29(6):586-588.
[8] 李芳,付美华,陈水芳,等.2014—2017年浙江省常山县狂犬病暴露病例流行病学特征与伤情分析[J].现代实用医学,2019,31(4):498-499.
[9] 王哲,朱雷,孙昼,等.杭州市狂犬病暴露人群流行病学特征分析[J].预防医学,2019,31(11):1150-1152,1155.
[10] 方雪江. 狂犬病暴露病人狂犬病防治知识认知现状及其影响因素调查[J].医药前沿,2018,8(21):33-34.
[11] 李国伟,陈巧格,邵玉普,等.郑州市2015—2020年狂犬病暴露人群流行病学特征及暴露后处置分析[J].江苏预防医学,2022,33(1):91-93.
[12] 任江萍,王玮,王欣莹,等.浙江省2011—2013年一犬伤多人事件调查分析[J].中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2015,26(2):168-171.
[1] 包玉泉, 方益荣, 陈敏嫣. 越城区动物致伤病例特征[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(1): 67-68,71.
[2] 戴珍娟, 安小力, 李瑞兰, 刘鸿翔. 犬伤患者科普微视频健康教育效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(2): 204-207.
[3] 舒莎, 高岚. 贵阳市一犬伤多人事件分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(5): 488-489,492.
[4] 王哲, 朱雷, 孙昼, 黄仁杰. 杭州市狂犬病暴露人群流行病学特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2019, 31(11): 1150-1152,1155.
[5] 姚亚萍, 付国华, 顾丽华, 耿卫勇, 徐旭卿. 犬伤门诊疫苗全程冷链温度监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(11): 1169-1171.
[6] 肖月, 周建刚, 张华君, 蒋晨, 王笑辰, 朱武洋, 吴未辰, 闫江泓, 陶晓燕. 宜兴市一犬伤多人事件调查[J]. 预防医学, 2018, 30(1): 78-80.
[7] 王涛, 苑新海, 范肖肖, 易文娟, 朱宗龙, 王海红. 昌平区狂犬病和动物致伤流行特征及暴露后处置情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(9): 930-932.
[8] 来时明, 尹志英, 李俊姬, 焦仕林, 周庆荣, 应国成. 狂犬病疫苗两种不同免疫程序接种依从性及经济成本比较[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(8): 857-860.
[9] 陈静, 杨万里, 俞凌, 王英姿, 王卿. 杭州市动物致伤患者流行病学特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(6): 586-588.
[10] 华炜,张丽娟,叶建荣,钮月红. 接种狂犬病疫苗后发生腹型过敏性紫癜1例报告[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(2): 180-181.
[11] 郑东方, 施达, 郭凤芝. 金华市狂犬病暴露者流行病学特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(12): 1243-1244,1247.
[12] 李科峰,李鹏,戴亚欣,耿晓东,仝振东. 舟山市首例狂犬病病例调查报告[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(10): 1033-1035.
[13] 任江萍, 凌峰, 龚震宇, 孙继民, 施旭光, 张蓉, 陈恩富. 浙江省犬伤门诊服务现状分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(1): 53-55,59.
[14] 陈建兰, 冯燕, 何艳燕. 拓东街道居民狂犬病暴露风险及处置情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(12): 1265-1267.
[15] 王辉, 阴秀峰. 兰溪市21起一犬伤多人事件的调查[J]. 预防医学, 2016, 28(1): 65-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed