Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2024, Vol. 36 Issue (7): 639-643    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.07.021
  实验技术 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
重组结核杆菌融合蛋白皮肤试验筛查HIV/AIDS病例结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的效果分析
王慧1, 李锦成1, 陆兴2, 王金富2, 竺丽梅3, 刘巧3
1.扬州市疾病预防控制中心慢性传染病防制科,江苏 扬州 225000;
2.扬州市第三人民医院,江苏 扬州 225000;
3.江苏省疾病预防控制中心,江苏 南京 210000
Effectiveness of recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein skin test in screening for latent tuberculosis infection among HIV/AIDS patients
WANG Hui1, LI Jincheng1, LU Xing2, WANG Jinfu2, ZHU Limei3, LIU Qiao3
1. Department of Chronic Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Yangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225000, China;
2. The Third People's Hospital of Yangzhou, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225000, China;
3. Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, China
全文: PDF(853 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 评价重组结核杆菌融合蛋白皮肤试验(EC-ST)筛查艾滋病病毒感染者和艾滋病患者(HIV/AIDS)结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染(LTBI)的效果,为EC-ST筛查HIV/AIDS病例LTBI的适用性提供依据。方法 于2023年4—6月,选择江苏省扬州市在管在治的HIV/AIDS病例为研究对象,通过问卷调查收集基本资料,分别采用EC-ST和γ-干扰素释放试验(IGRA)筛查LTBI。以IGRA结果为诊断标准,分析EC-ST筛查阳性率、灵敏度、特异度和一致率,以及CD4+T淋巴细胞(CD4)计数对EC-ST筛查效果的影响。结果 纳入HIV/AIDS病例523例,其中男性458例,占87.57%;女性65例,占12.43%;年龄MQR)为48.00(21.00)岁。EC-ST阳性率为7.27%,IGRA阳性率为7.46%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两种方法的一致率为94.84%,Kappa值为0.621(95%CI:0.489~0.752,P<0.05);EC-ST的灵敏度为64.10%,特异度为97.31%。CD4计数<500和≥500个/μL组比较,两种方法的一致率分别为95.32%和94.44%,Kappa值分别为0.568和0.650(均P<0.05),EC-ST阳性率、灵敏度和特异度差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);CD4计数<200和≥200个/μL组比较,两种方法的一致率分别为96.55%和94.62%,Kappa值分别为0.648和0.619(均P<0.05),EC-ST阳性率、灵敏度和特异度差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 EC-ST筛查HIV/AIDS病例LTBI的效果与IGRA存在一致性,且不受CD4计数水平的影响。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王慧
李锦成
陆兴
王金富
竺丽梅
刘巧
关键词 重组结核杆菌融合蛋白皮肤试验γ-干扰素释放试验艾滋病结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染CD4+T淋巴细胞    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the effectiveness of recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein skin test (EC-ST) in screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among HIV/AIDS patients, so as to provide insights into the applicability of EC-ST in LTBI screening among HIV/AIDS patients. Methods From April to June 2023, HIV/AIDS patients under management and treatment in Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province, were selected as study subjects. Basic information was collected through questionnaire surveys. LTBI was screened by EC-ST and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). Taking IGRA results as the diagnostic standard, the positive rate, sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate of EC-ST, and the impact of CD4+T lymphocyte (CD4) counts on the screening effect of EC-ST were analyzed. Results A total of 523 HIV/AIDS patients were screened, including 458 males (87.57%) and 65 females (12.43%). The median age was 48.00 (interquartile range, 21.00) years. The positive rate of EC-ST was 7.27% and the positive rate of IGRA was 7.46%, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The consistency rate of the two methods was 94.84%, and the Kappa value of 0.621 (95%CI: 0.489-0.752, P<0.05). The sensitivity of EC-ST was 64.10% and the specificity was 97.31%. Comparing the groups with CD4 counts <500 and ≥500 cells/μL, the consistency rates of the two methods were 95.32% and 94.44%, and the Kappa values were 0.568 and 0.650, respectively (both P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the positive rates, sensitivity, and specificity of EC-ST (all P>0.05). Comparing the groups with CD4 counts <200 and ≥200 cells/μL, the consistency rates of the two methods were 96.55% and 94.62%, and the Kappa values were 0.648 and 0.619, respectively (both P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the positive rates, sensitivity, and specificity of EC-ST (all P>0.05). Conclusion The effectiveness of EC-ST in screening for LTBI among HIV/AIDS patients is consistent with that of IGRA and is not affected by CD4 counts.
Key wordsrecombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein skin test    interferon-gamma release assay    AIDS    latent tuberculosis infection    CD4+T lymphocyte
收稿日期: 2024-03-08      修回日期: 2024-06-13      出版日期: 2024-07-10
中图分类号:  R211  
基金资助:扬州市科技计划软课题研究项目(YZ2023305); 江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(ZDA2020022)
作者简介: 王慧,硕士,主管医师,主要从事结核病防制工作
通信作者: 李锦成,E-mail:yzcdc_ljc@126.com   
引用本文:   
王慧, 李锦成, 陆兴, 王金富, 竺丽梅, 刘巧. 重组结核杆菌融合蛋白皮肤试验筛查HIV/AIDS病例结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的效果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 639-643.
WANG Hui, LI Jincheng, LU Xing, WANG Jinfu, ZHU Limei, LIU Qiao. Effectiveness of recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein skin test in screening for latent tuberculosis infection among HIV/AIDS patients. Preventive Medicine, 2024, 36(7): 639-643.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2024.07.021      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2024/V36/I7/639
[1] World Health Organization.Global tuberculosis report 2023[R].Geneva:WHO,2023.
[2] 沈银忠,卢洪洲,陈耀凯,等.人类免疫缺陷病毒感染/艾滋病合并结核分枝杆菌感染诊治专家共识[J].新发传染病电子杂志,2022,7(1):73-87.
[3] 桑国鑫,陈同,车洋,等.宁波市结核分枝杆菌和艾滋病病毒双重感染筛查结果[J].预防医学,2022,34(11):1121-1124.
[4] OVERTON K,VARMA R,POST J J.Comparison of interferon-γ release assays and the tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus:a systematic review[J].Tuberc Respir Dis(Seoul),2018,81(1):59-72.
[5] BINAY U D,FINCANCI M,FERSAN E,et al.Comparison of tuberculin skin test(TST)and T-SPOT.TB Tests for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection(LTBI)in HIV-infected patients[J].Mikrobiyol Bul,2019,53(4):388-400.
[6] XIA L,XU M,LI F,et al.High accuracy of recombinant fusion protein early secretory antigenic target protein 6-culture filtrate protein 10 skin test for the detection of tuberculosis infection:a phase Ⅲ,multi-centered,double-blind,hospital-based,randomized controlled trial[J].Int J Infect Dis,2023,126:98-103.
[7] 沈银忠,李太生.《中国艾滋病诊疗指南(2021年版)》解读[J].国际流行病学传染病学杂志,2022,49(2):81-85.
[8] 唐锦华,姜申,黄嫄,等.QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus鉴别活动性结核病与潜伏性结核感染的潜在价值探讨[J].中华检验医学杂志,2020,43(9):907-911.
[9] 卢鹏,刘巧,竺丽梅,等.中国东部地区结核菌素试验诊断结核病感染临界值的确定:基于人群的现况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2020,41(3):363-367.
[10] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.艾滋病和艾滋病病毒感染诊断WS 293—2019[S].2019.
[11] MATULYTE E,KANCAUSKIENE Z,KAUSAS A,et al.Latent tuberculosis infection and associated risk factors among people living with HIV and HIV-uninfected individuals in Lithuania[J].Pathogens,2023,12(8):1-13.
[12] KLAUTAU G B,DA MOTA N V F,SALLES M J C,et al.Interferon-γrelease assay as a sensitive diagnostic tool of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with HIV:a cross-sectional study[J].BMC Infect Dis,2018,18(1):1-8.
[13] MAZUREK G H,JEREB J,LOBUE P,et al.Guidelines for using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,United States[J].MMWR Recomm Rep,2005,54(15):49-55.
[14] 马艳,陆伟,高磊,等.终止结核病流行须加强结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染高危人群筛查和预防性治疗的管理[J].中国防痨杂志,2022,44(3):209-214.
[15] LI F,XU M,QIN C,et al.Recombinant fusion ESAT6-CFP10 immunogen as a skin test reagent for tuberculosis diagnosis:an open-label,randomized,two-centre phase 2a clinical trial[J].Clin Microbiol Infect,2016,22(10):9-16.
[16] XU M,LU W,LI T,et al.Sensitivity,specificity,and safety of a novel ESAT6-CFP10 skin test for tuberculosis infection in China:two randomized,self-controlled,parallel-group phase 2b trials[J].Clin Infect Dis,2022,74(4):668-677.
[17] LU P,WU K,ZHOU H,et al.Evaluation of ESAT6-CFP10 skin test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among persons living with HIV in China[J].J Clin Microbiol,2023,61(4):1-10.
[18] SINGH R,FATIMA N,SHUKLA I,et al.Evaluation of role of interferon gamma release assays in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients[J].Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS,2021,42(2):111-117.
[19] 张瑜,卢鹏,陆伟,等.潜伏结核感染三种检测方法比较的研究进展[J].中国热带医学,2022,22(5):477-482.
[20] 苏倩,汪清雅,张婷,等.重组结核分枝杆菌融合蛋白皮肤试验与TST在学校结核潜伏感染筛查中的比较[J].中国感染控制杂志,2023,22(5):547-551.
[1] 何婷婷, 曹栋卿, 林家锋, 蒋卓婧, 张佳峰, 范钦. 绍兴市MSM人群HIV-1分子传播网络特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(7): 571-575,579.
[2] 吴斌, 方琼楼, 朱珂. 金华市抗病毒治疗失败HIV/AIDS病例HIV-1亚型及耐药分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 506-509.
[3] 贾晓锋, 王慧群, 石敏, 汤婕, 任静霞. HIV/AIDS病例HIV相关神经认知障碍的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 461-464.
[4] 夏永玲, 张海芳, 陶桃, 蓝黄琛, 陈晓蕾, 吴振宇. 丽水市MSM人群HIV定期检测及暴露后预防调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 465-469.
[5] 候金余, 柏建芸, 郭燕, 李佳, 李龙, 龚卉, 于茂河. 天津市MSM人群网络HIV抗体自我检测情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(6): 470-473.
[6] 陈梦清, 李娜, 姚英, 胡锦峰, 潘忠廉, 施明明. 2006—2022年上城区新报告15岁及以上HIV/AIDS病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(5): 437-439.
[7] 陈琦, 薛霏, 桂娟娟, 吕鑫, 谢锋. MSM人群HIV/AIDS病例的结婚意愿调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(5): 397-401.
[8] 吴虹, 许珂, 张兴亮, 李西婷, 程伟. HIV/AIDS病例抗病毒治疗后免疫重建的影响因素研究[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(4): 277-282.
[9] 徐一梅, 陈亚妮, 胡锦峰, 陈婉君. 2013—2022年上城区新报告HIV/AIDS病例晚发现及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 243-246.
[10] 褚堃, 石小俊, 姜海波, 裴学丽, 谭诗文, 史宏博, 叶泽豪, 杨建辉, 张丹丹. 一起故意传播艾滋病事件的流行病学调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 232-234.
[11] 郑锦雷, 何林, 王憓, 陈婉君, 姜婷婷, 陈卫永, 陈琳. AHFtest平台HIV抗体自我检测资料分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(2): 156-158.
[12] 俞素芬, 蒋青林, 戴杰. 2012—2021年吴兴区新报告HIV/AIDS病例晚发现及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 796-799.
[13] 郑伟, 张世勇, 杨纶砥, 熊华利. 基于年龄-时期-队列模型的1990—2019年我国艾滋病发病率趋势分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 665-668,681.
[14] 王婷婷, 汪剡灵, 李桂霞, 常玥. 2012—2021年台州市新报告HIV/AIDS病例首次CD4+T淋巴细胞检测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 578-582.
[15] 姜海波, 洪航, 周健, 李继革, 史宏博, 谭诗文, 褚堃, 张丹丹. 宁波市HIV/AIDS病例新型毒品使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(6): 470-474.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed