Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2022, Vol. 34 Issue (5): 507-510    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.05.017
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
绍兴市手足口病病毒型别检测结果分析
蒋卓婧1, 葛小萍2, 陈金堃1, 王吉玲1
1.绍兴市疾病预防控制中心微生物检验科,浙江 绍兴 312071;
2.萧山区疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 311200
Genotype analysis of enteroviruses causing hand, foot and mouthdisease in Shaoxing City
JIANG Zhuojing1, GE Xiaoping2, CHEN Jinkun1, WANG Jiling1
1. Microbiological Laboratory, Shaoxing Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312071, China;
2. Xiaoshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311200, China
全文: PDF(911 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 了解绍兴市手足口病病毒型别分布,为手足口病防治工作提供参考。方法 收集2018—2020年绍兴市手足口病监测哨点医院14岁以下手足口病病例的肛拭子/咽拭子标本,采用实时荧光定量PCR和BLAST序列比对测定肠道病毒型别,描述性分析肠道病毒型别构成及流行时间分布。结果 2018—2020年收集肛拭子/咽拭子标本1 267份,检出阳性661份,阳性率为52.17%。其中肠道病毒71型(EV71)70份,阳性率为5.52%;柯萨奇病毒A组16型(CoxA16)208份,阳性率为16.42%;CoxA6型239份,阳性率为18.86%;CoxA10型23份,阳性率为1.82%;其他型别121份,成功测序84份,检出CoxA2、CoxA4和CoxA5等10种型别。2018—2020年EV71型阳性率分别为14.08%、0.72%和1.84%,2018年4—7月为检出高峰;CoxA16型阳性率分别为10.98%、26.57%和11.98%,2019年4—8月和11—12月为检出高峰;CoxA6型阳性率分别为10.50%、14.73%和30.88%,2020年5—12月为检出高峰。结论 2018—2020年绍兴市手足口病的主要肠道病毒型别为EV71、CoxA16和CoxA6型,且CoxA6型检出有上升趋势。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
蒋卓婧
葛小萍
陈金堃
王吉玲
关键词 手足口病肠道病毒基因型别    
AbstractObjective To investigate the genotypes of enteroviruses causing hand, foot and mouth disease ( HFMD ) in Shaoxing City, so as to provide insights into HFMD control. Methods The anal and pharyngeal swab specimens were collected from HFMD cases under 14 years of age reported by sentinel hospitals of HFMD in Shaoxing City from 2018 to 2020. The enterovirus genotypes were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay and sequenced by BLAST, and the constitution and temporal distribution of enterovirus genotypes were descriptively analyzed. Results A total of 1 267 anal and pharyngeal swab specimens were collected from children with HFMD, and 661 specimens were positive for enteroviruses, with a positive rate of 52.17%. Among the 661 enterovirus-positive specimens, 70 specimens were tested positive for EV71 ( 5.52% ), 208 specimens tested positive for CoxA16 ( 16.42% ), 239 specimens tested positive for CoxA6 ( 18.86% ); 23 specimens tested positive for CoxA10 (1.82%), and 121 specimens tested positive for other 10 genotypes, including CoxA2, CoxA4, and CoxA5. The prevalence rates of EV71 were 14.08%, 0.72% and 1.84% from 2018 to 2020, and the detection of EV71 peaked during the period between April and July, 2018. The prevalence rates of CoxA16 were 10.98%, 26.57% and 11.98 from 2018 to 2020, and the detection of CoxA16 peaked during the period between April and August, and between November and December, 2019. The prevalence rates of CoxA6 were 10.50%, 14.73% and 30.88% from 2018 to 2020, and the detection of CoxA6 peaked during the period between May and December, 2020. Conclusions EV71, CoxA16 and CoxA6 were predominant enterovirus genotypes causing HFMD in Shaoxing City from 2018 to 2020, and the detection of CoxA6 appeared a tendency towards a rise.
Key wordshand    foot and mouth disease    enteroviruses    genotype
收稿日期: 2021-10-18      修回日期: 2022-03-21     
中图分类号:  R725.1  
通信作者: 蒋卓婧,E-mail:526836824@qq.com   
作者简介: 蒋卓婧,硕士,主管技师,主要从事病原微生物分子检测工作
引用本文:   
蒋卓婧, 葛小萍, 陈金堃, 王吉玲. 绍兴市手足口病病毒型别检测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(5): 507-510.
JIANG Zhuojing, GE Xiaoping, CHEN Jinkun, WANG Jiling. Genotype analysis of enteroviruses causing hand, foot and mouthdisease in Shaoxing City. Preventive Medicine, 2022, 34(5): 507-510.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2022.05.017      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2022/V34/I5/507
[1] LI P,WANG N,MA W,et al.Hand,foot,and mouth disease in mainland China[J].Lancet Infect Dis,2014,14(4):308-318.
[2] 庞孟涛,李傅冬,林君芬,等.2016—2019年浙江省手足口病流行特征[J].预防医学,2022,34(3):307-310.
PANG M T,LI F D,LIN J F,et al.Epidemiological characteristics of hand,foot and mouth disease in Zhejiang Province from 2016 to 2019[J].Prev Med,2022,34(3):307-310.
[3] ZHAO Y Y,JIN H,ZHANG X F,et al.Case-fatality of hand,foot and mouth disease associated with EV-A71:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Epidemiol Infect,2015,143(14):3094-3102.
[4] SIMMONDS P,SREENU V B,WARIS M,et al.Genetic characterization of human Coxsackievirus A6 variants associated with atypical hand,foot and mouth disease:a potential role of recombination in emergence and pathogenicity[J].J Gen Virol,2015,96(5):1067-1079.
[5] MIRAND A,LE SAGE F,PEREIRA B,et al.Ambulatory pediatric surveillance of hand,foot and mouth disease as signal of an outbreak of Coxsackievirus A6 infections,France,2014-2015[J].Emerg Infect Dis,2016,22(11):1884-1893.
[6] BLOMQVIST S,KLEMOLA P,KAIJALAINEN S,et al.Co-circulation of Coxsackieviruses A6 and A10 in hand,foot and mouth disease outbreak in Finland[J].J Clin Virol,2010,48(1):49-54.
[7] LI J,SUN Y,DU Y,et al.Characterization of coxsackievirus A6- and enterovirus 71-associated hand foot and mouth disease in Beijing,China,from 2013 to 2015[J/OL].Front Microbiol,2016,7[2022-03-21].https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00391.
[8] 姚相杰,陈龙,王伟琪,等.2012—2015年深圳市重症手足口病患儿柯萨奇病毒A6型VP1~VP4基因特征分析[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2019,39(1):24-29.
YAO X J,CHEN L,WANG W Q,et al.Sequence analysis of VP1-VP4 genes of coxsackievirus A6 strains isolated from children with severe hand,foot,and mouth disease in Shenzhen from 2012 to 2015[J].Chin J Microbiol Immunol,2019,39(1):24-29.
[9] YANG L,BAO H,ZHANG X,et al.Epidemiological and genetic analysis concerning the non-enterovirus 71 and non-coxsackievirus A16 causative agents related to hand,foot and mouth disease in Anyang City,Henan Province,China,from 2011 to 2015[J].J Med Virol,2017,89(10):1749-1758.
[10] 钟家禹,李柏生,朱冰,等.2016年至2017年广州市手足口病流行病学及非肠道病毒A组71型非柯萨奇病毒A组16型肠道病毒型别分析[J].中华传染病杂志,2018,36(12):747-751.
ZHONG J Y,LI B S,ZHU B,et al.Hand,foot,and mouth disease in Guangzhou,2016-2017:an epidemiological study and genotype analysis of non-enterovirus group A 71 non-coxsackievirus group A 16 enterovirus[J].Chin J Infect Dis,2018,36(12):747-751.
[11] 武晶,张建军,杨霄星,等.丰台区手足口病聚集性疫情病原体分析[J].预防医学,2021,33(4):404-405.
WU J,ZHANG J J,YANG X X,et al.Pathogen spectrum of hand-foot-and-mouth disease clusters in Fengtai District[J].Prev Med,2021,33(4):404-405.
[12] 王浩权,马飞飞,龚刚,等.2015—2020年嘉定区手足口病流行特征[J].预防医学,2021,33(10):1065-1067.
WANG H Q,MA F F,GONG G,et al.Epidemiological characteristics of hand-foot-and-mouth disease in Jiading District from 2015
13 to 2020[J].Prev Med,2021,33(10):1065-1067.
[13] CHOU A H,LIU C C,CHANG J Y,et al.Immunological evaluation and comparison of different EV-A71 vaccine candidates[J/OL].Clin Dev Immunol,2012[2022-03-21].https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/831282.
[14] CHEN Y J,CHANG S C,TSAO K C,et al.Comparative genomic analysis of coxsackievirus A6 strains of different clinical disease entities[J/OL].PLoS One,2013[2022-03-21].https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052432.
[1] 王唐, 董兆鹏, 李淑华, 莫平华, 赵艺明, 宋灿磊. 金山区托幼机构和学校手足口病聚集性疫情分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(9): 800-802.
[2] 钱晓萍, 凌健, 刘腾. 吴兴区6岁以下儿童手足口病流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(3): 243-245,249.
[3] 王炸亚, 叶莉霞, 吴锋. 宁波市2018—2021年出生儿童肠道病毒71型疫苗接种情况分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(10): 895-898.
[4] 庞孟涛, 李傅冬, 林君芬, 古雪. 2016—2019年浙江省手足口病流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(3): 307-310.
[5] 吴昊澄, 鲁琴宝, 丁哲渊, 王心怡, 傅天颖, 杨珂, 吴晨, 林君芬. 基于百度指数和手足口病的疱疹性咽峡炎预测模型研究[J]. 预防医学, 2022, 34(3): 217-221.
[6] 孙秀秀, 刘光涛, 刘艳, 沈建勇. ARIMA乘积季节模型预测湖州市手足口病流行趋势[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(8): 801-803,807.
[7] 赵玉秋, 张进, 邓舒, 余芳. 安徽省5岁以下儿童手足口病患病的家庭和行为因素[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 693-696.
[8] 王吉玲, 马岩, 马珊珊, 方益荣. 应用圆形分布法分析2010—2019年绍兴市手足口病季节性流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 729-731.
[9] 袁月荣, 高志杰, 李保军. 海曙区托幼儿童家长手足口病知识及儿童手卫生行为调查[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(7): 742-744,748.
[10] 考庆君, 吴彦, 王兵, 张国忠, 孙昼, 赵俊. 手足口病儿童血清细胞因子分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(5): 497-499.
[11] 武晶, 张建军, 杨霄星, 杨军勇, 武庆锐, 孟艳, 李若曦, 刘璐, 杨洋, 苗凯玲, 倪雪, 信振江. 丰台区手足口病聚集性疫情病原体分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(4): 404-405.
[12] 李宗瑾, 李艳艳, 张俊杰, 郭晏强, 李爱军. 平顶山市3种病原型手足口病的圆形分布法分析[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(3): 299-302.
[13] 王浩权, 马飞飞, 龚刚, 段春梅, 张书志. 2015—2020年嘉定区手足口病流行特征[J]. 预防医学, 2021, 33(10): 1065-1067.
[14] 王凌虹, 叶莉霞, 顾永权, 方挺. 余姚市2012—2018年出生儿童肠道病毒71型疫苗接种分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(9): 911-913.
[15] 李鹏, 唐安, 李科峰, 吴昺, 严剑波. 中国健康人群手足口病病原体隐性感染率的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2020, 32(7): 659-665.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed