Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2017, Vol. 29 Issue (7): 675-679    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2017.07.006
  论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
浙江省各级疾病预防控制中心岗位设置现状分析
程苏云, 于迪迪, 黄学敏, 郭妤洁, 庞孟涛, 钟捷楠, 黄建民, 于村
浙江省疾病预防控制中心,浙江 杭州 310051
An analysis on the present situation of post setting in CDCs of Zhejiang Province
CHENG Su-yun, YU Di-di, HUANG Xue-min, GUO Yu-jie, PANG Meng-tao, ZHONG Jie-nan, HUANG Jian-min, YU Cun
Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310051,China
全文: PDF(517 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的分析浙江省各级疾病预防控制中心(疾控中心)岗位设置情况,为完善和规范岗位管理提供依据。方法采用自行设计的《疾控中心岗位设置调查表》对浙江省99家疾控中心进行调查,按照国家和本省有关岗位设置的规范性文件要求,评价岗位设置结构比例的合理性。结果浙江省97家疾控中心已按要求实施了岗位设置工作,省、市、县三级疾控中心岗位类别均以专业技术岗位比例最高,达到80%以上。市、县间核准比例存在一定差异,其中核准比例离散程度相对较大的为工勤岗位(市级:CV=72.3%;县级CV=101.6%)和管理岗位(市级:CV=65.6%;县级:CV=82.1%);专业技术岗位等级结构核准比例,市级离散程度较大的是初级和正高岗位(CV=29.1%、28.5%),县级离散程度较大的是正高级和副高级岗位(CV=58.9%、21.8%),市、县两级高级岗位核准比例也相对偏低,平均核准比例分别为32.2%和17.0%。市、县级在编在岗人员中从事疾病预防与控制、实验室检测岗位居多,分别占47.8%和45.1%。结论浙江省各级疾控中心岗位类别的结构比例基本符合国家和本省的规范性要求,但存在市县两级的工勤和管理岗位核准比例欠规范、专业技术高级岗位比例较低以及县级疾病预防控制和实验室检测岗位人员比例偏低的问题。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
程苏云
于迪迪
黄学敏
郭妤洁
庞孟涛
钟捷楠
黄建民
于村
关键词 疾病预防控制中心岗位设置结构比例    
Abstract:Objective To analyze the present post setting situation of CDCs in Zhejiang Province,and to provide evidence for further improvement and standardization of post setting. Methods The data of post setting were collected by questionnaires from all levels of CDCs in Zhejiang Province. The compliance and rationality of post setting structure were evaluated by national and provincial normative policy documents. Results Ninety seven CDCs had implemented the post setting. Professional technical posts had the highest proportion (above 80%)among three kinds of posts. As the approved proportions of posts classification and professional titles were approved by the local government,there were differences between different levels of CDCs. The approved proportion of ground skilled posts and management posts between municipal and county CDCs had a relatively higher degree of dispersion,and the CVs of ground skilled posts and management posts of municipal CDCs were 72.3% and 65.6%,and the CVs of county CDCs were 101.6% and 82.1%. In terms of the approved professional titles structural proportion,the degree of dispersion appeared to be higher in senior titles and primary titles approved proportion of municipal CDCs(CV=29.1%,28.5%),while the degree of dispersion was higher in senior titles and vice-senior titles of county CDCs(CV=58.9%,21.8%). Meanwhile,the approved proportions of senior titles in municipal and county CDCs were lower with the averages of 32.2% and 17.0%. The posts of infectious disease prevention and control and laboratory detection were accounting for the majority posts in municipal and county CDCs with average percentages of 47.8% and 45.1%. Conclusion The present situation of post structural proportion meets the relevant requirements generally. However,there are some phenomena of non-standard approved proportion of ground skilled posts and management posts and low senior titles approved proportion. Meanwhile,the percentage of infectious disease prevention and control and laboratory detection posts appears to be lower in county CDCs.
Key wordsCDCs    Post setting    Structural proportion
收稿日期: 2017-03-02      出版日期: 2017-11-15
ZTFLH:  R197.2  
通讯作者: 于村,E-mail:cyu@cdc.zj.cn   
作者简介: 程苏云,本科,主任技师,主要从事公共卫生人力资源管理工作
引用本文:   
程苏云, 于迪迪, 黄学敏, 郭妤洁, 庞孟涛, 钟捷楠, 黄建民, 于村. 浙江省各级疾病预防控制中心岗位设置现状分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(7): 675-679.
CHENG Su-yun, YU Di-di, HUANG Xue-min, GUO Yu-jie, PANG Meng-tao, ZHONG Jie-nan, HUANG Jian-min, YU Cun. An analysis on the present situation of post setting in CDCs of Zhejiang Province. Preventive Medicine, 2017, 29(7): 675-679.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn1007-0931.2017.07.006      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2017/V29/I7/675
[1] 刘霞. 某大型综合医院岗位设置和聘任的影响因素评价[D]. 济南:山东大学,2011.
[2] 季又君,武冰松. 人岗匹配对事业单位岗位设置管理的启示 #x02014; #x02014;以河北省为例[J]. 产业与科技论坛,2015,14(4):232-233,234.
[3] 中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部. 事业单位岗位设置管理试行办法[S]. 2006.
[4] 中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部.《事业单位岗位设置管理试行办法》实施意见[S]. 2006.
[5] 李弘. 浅议医院岗位设置与管理[J]. 人力资源管理,2012(1):101.
[6] 王越,刘玲玲. 疾病预防控制机构岗位设置管理工作的实践与探讨[J]. 职业卫生与病伤,2013,28(3):173-175.
[7] 中共浙江省委办公厅. 浙江省事业单位岗位设置管理实施办法(试行)[S]. 2009.
[8] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.关于疾病预防控制中心岗位设置管理的指导意见[S]. 2015.
[9] 程苏云,于迪迪,郑余焕,等. 浙江省县级疾病预防控制中心人员编制标准测算[J]. 中国公共卫生,2015,31(10):1338-1341.
[10] 潘东霞,顾华,林峰,等. 浙江省疾病预防控制中心人力资源现状调查[J]. 实用预防医学,2013,20(3):374-377.
[11] 苏娟. 岗位设置管理中人员绩效考核模式初探[J]. 人力资源管理,2013(6):176.
[12] 刘艳慧,李海麟,许明晖,等. 广州市疾病预防控制机构人力资源现状分析[J]. 中国公共卫生管理,2012,28(4):435-437.
[13] 王红梅,刘民. 北京市某疾控机构卫生人力资源现况调查[J]. 中国公共卫生管理,2009,25(5):462-464.
[14] 苗木,鞠永.公立医院岗位设置管理的思考[J]. 现代医院管理,2011(6):28-31.
[15] 孟毅芳. 做好事业单位岗位设置管理工作[J]. 理论探索,2009(2):109-111.
[16] 钱德凤. 对高校管理岗位设置的分析与探讨[J]. 教育与职业,2011(33):31-32.
[17] 付继娟,张正堂. 人与岗位匹配的国内外研究综述[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2004(7): 15-18.
[1] 李娜, 张人杰, 周颖, 王臻, 张雪海, 戚小华, 韦余东. 浙江省市县疾病预防控制中心应急人员能力评估及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2017, 29(11): 1081-1085.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed