Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2025, Vol. 37 Issue (12): 1277-1281    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.12.018
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
阿坝藏族羌族自治州工作场所重点职业病危害因素监测结果
余朝彦1, 洪斌1, 吴小军1, 王年伟1, 高燕2, 王杨凤3
1.阿坝藏族羌族自治州疾病预防控制中心,四川 马尔康 624000;
2.德阳市疾病预防控制中心,四川 德阳 618000;
3.四川省疾病预防控制中心,四川 成都 610041
Monitoring results of key occupational hazard factors in workplaces in Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture
YU Chaoyan1, HONG Bin1, WU Xiaojun1, WANG Nianwei1, GAO Yan2, WANG Yangfeng3
1. Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Barkam, Sichuan 624000, China;
2. Deyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Deyang, Sichuan 618000, China;
3. Sichuan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
全文: PDF(791 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析四川省阿坝藏族羌族自治州(简称阿坝州)不同行业工作场所重点职业病危害因素监测结果,为优化职业病防控措施提供依据。方法 通过工作场所职业病危害因素监测系统收集2022—2024年阿坝州工作场所重点职业病危害因素监测资料,描述性分析职业病危害因素超标率、职业健康检查完成率和职业卫生培训参加率。结果 2022—2024年监测阿坝州企业165家次,超标112家次,企业超标率为67.88%;监测岗位1 005个,超标302个,岗位超标率为30.05%;2022—2024年企业超标率和岗位超标率呈上升趋势(均P<0.05)。黑色金属矿采选业、有色金属矿采选业企业超标率均为100%;非金属矿采选业、黑色金属矿采选业和有色金属矿采选业岗位超标率居前三位,分别为62.50%、56.00%和53.13%;接触硅尘、噪声和煤尘的岗位超标率较高,分别为17.00%、10.04%和7.27%。粉尘、化学因素和物理因素岗位劳动者实际职业健康检查分别为9 398、2 469和10 928人次,完成率分别为95.78%、81.03%和100.00%;实际复查分别为428、129和1 121人次,复查率分别为64.26%、27.27%和81.53%。监测企业参加负责人培训102家次,参加率为61.82%;参加职业卫生管理人员培训108家次,参加率为65.45%;接害劳动者参加劳动者职业卫生培训10 489人次,参加率为86.24%。结论 阿坝州工作场所重点职业病危害因素超标率较高,职业健康检查完成率良好,但复查率较低。建议重点加强矿采选业的职业病危害因素防控,推进职业健康检查和职业卫生培训的有效开展。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
余朝彦
洪斌
吴小军
王年伟
高燕
王杨凤
关键词 工作场所职业病危害因素监测    
AbstractObjective To analyze the monitoring results of key occupational hazard factors in workplaces across different industries in Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture (Aba Prefecture), Sichuan Province, so as to provide the basis for optimizing occupational disease prevention and control measures. Methods Data of key occupational hazard factors in workplaces in Aba Prefecture from 2022 to 2024 were collected through the Workplace Occupational Hazard Monitoring System. Descriptive analyses were conducted on the over-standard rates of occupational hazard factors, completion rates of occupational health examinations, and participation rates in occupational health training. Results From 2022 to 2024, 165 enterprise-times in Aba Prefecture were monitored, with 112 enterprise-times exceeding the standards, the over-standard rate of enterprises was 67.88%. A total of 1 005 worksite positions were monitored, with 302 exceeding the standards, the over-standard rate of worksite positions was 30.05%. The over-standard rates of enterprises and worksite positions showed upward trends from 2022 to 2024 (both P<0.05). The over-standard rates of enterprises in the ferrous metal mining and dressing industry and non-ferrous metal mining and dressing industry were both 100%. The top three over-standard rates of worksite positions were in the non-metallic mining and dressing industry, ferrous metal mining and dressing industry, and non-ferrous metal mining and dressing industry, at 62.50%, 56.00%, and 53.13%, respectively. Worksite positions exposed to silica dust, noise, and coal dust had relatively high over-standard rates, at 17.00%, 10.04%, and 7.27%, respectively. The actual numbers of physical examinations for personnel at worksite positions with dust, chemical factors, and physical factors were 9 398, 2 469, and 10 928 person-times, respectively, with completion rates of 95.78%, 81.03%, and 100.00%, respectively. The actual number of re-examinations were 428, 129, and 1 121 person-times, respectively, with re-examination rates of 64.26%, 27.27%, and 81.53%, respectively. Among the monitored enterprises, 102 enterprise-times participated in training for persons in charge, with a participation rate of 61.82%; 108 enterprise-times participated in training for occupational health management personnel, with a participation rate of 65.45%; and 10 489 person-times of workers exposed to hazards participated in occupational health training for workers, with a participation rate of 86.24%. Conclusions The over-standard rate of key occupational hazards factors in workplaces in Aba Prefecture was relatively high. The completion rate of occupational health examinations was good, but the re-examination rate was low. It is recommended to focus on strengthening the prevention and control of occupational hazard factors in the mining and dressing industry and promoting the effective implementation of occupational health examinations and occupational health training.
Key wordsworkplace    occupational hazard factor    monitor
收稿日期: 2025-07-08      修回日期: 2025-11-23      出版日期: 2025-12-10
中图分类号:  R135  
作者简介: 余朝彦,本科,副主任医师,主要从事职业卫生与职业病防治工作
通信作者: 王杨凤,E-mail:wyfviolet@163.com   
引用本文:   
余朝彦, 洪斌, 吴小军, 王年伟, 高燕, 王杨凤. 阿坝藏族羌族自治州工作场所重点职业病危害因素监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(12): 1277-1281.
YU Chaoyan, HONG Bin, WU Xiaojun, WANG Nianwei, GAO Yan, WANG Yangfeng. Monitoring results of key occupational hazard factors in workplaces in Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture. Preventive Medicine, 2025, 37(12): 1277-1281.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.12.018      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V37/I12/1277
[1] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会.“十四五”国民健康规划[EB/OL].[2025-11-23] .https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fggz/fzzlgh/gjjzxgh/202206/t20220601_1326725.html.
[2] 《中国职业医学》编辑部.国家开展职业病危害因素的监测和专项调查取得新进展[J].中国职业医学,2022,49(5):552.
Editorial office of China Occupational Medicine.The state has made new progress in monitoring and special investigation of occupational hazard factors[J].China Occup Med,2022,49(5):552.(in Chinese)
[3] 李霞,高尚,杜秋霞.2022—2023年四川省市县两级疾病预防控制机构职业病监测评估能力调查[J].职业卫生与病伤,2024,39(2):65-71,76.
LI X,GAO S,DU Q X.Investigation on occupational disease monitoring and assessment capabilities of disease prevention and control institutions at the city and county levels in Sichuan Province from 2022 to 2023[J].Occup Health Damage,2024,39(2):65-71,76.(in Chinese)
[4] 严易程. 工业逐绿七十载向新向上向未来——写在阿坝藏族羌族自治州成立70周年之际[EB/OL].[2025-11-23] .https://www.scjjrb.com/2023/09/15/99377001.html.
YAN Y C.Seventy years of industrial development - towards the new, the upward, and the future:on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the establishment of Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture[EB/OL].[2025-11-23] .https://www.scjjrb.com/2023/09/15/99377001.html.(in Chinese)
[5] 余朝彦,阿依沙吾列·努尔旦,麦麦提艾力·库尔班江,等.2020—2023年阿坝州工作场所职业病危害因素监测结果分析[J].职业卫生与病伤,2024,39(5):291-297.
YU C Y,MUERDAN A Y S W L,KUERBANJIANG M M T A L,et al.Analysis of the monitoring results of occupational-disease-inductive factors in Aba Prefecture from 2020 to 2023[J].Occup Health Damage,2024,39(5):291-297.(in Chinese)
[6] 四川省卫生健康委员会办公室.关于印发2022年职业病防治项目工作方案的通知[Z].2022.
[7] 四川省卫生健康委员会办公室.关于印发2023年职业病防治项目工作方案的通知[Z].2023.
[8] 四川省卫生健康委员会办公室.关于印发2024年四川省职业病防治项目实施方案的通知[Z].2024.
[9] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.国民经济行业分类:GB/T 4754—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,China National Standardization Administration Committee.Industrial classification for national economic activities:GB/T 4754—2017[S].Beijing:China Standards Press,2017.
[10] 朱雯,冯明,廖春华,等.2021—2023年吉安市重点行业工作场所职业病危害现状分析[J].现代预防医学,2024,51(22):4070-4075.
ZHU W,FENG M,LIAO C H,et al.Investigation on current status of occupational hazards in workplaces of key industries,Ji'an City,2021-2023[J].Mod Prev Med,2024,51(22):4070-4075.(in Chinese)
[11] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第1部分:化学有害因素:GBZ 2.1—2019[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China.Occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace,part 1:chemical hazardous agents:GBZ 2.1—2019[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2019.(in Chinese)
[12] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第2部分:物理因素:GBZ 2.2—2007[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007.
Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China.Occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace,part 2:physical agents:GBZ 2.2—2007[S].Beijing:People's Medical Publishing House,2007.(in Chinese)
[13] 梅丽敏,廖婵,王琳.2019—2021年成都市郫都区重点职业病危害因素监测分析[J].河南预防医学杂志,2023,34(2):159-162.
MEI L M,LIAO C,WANG L.Analysis of monitoring results of key occupational hazard factors in Pidu district of Chengdu from 2019-2021[J].Mod Dis Control Prev,2023,34(2):159-162.(in Chinese)
[14] 平飞飞,王彩云,牛敏瑶.2022年长治市工作场所职业病危害因素监测分析[J].环境与健康杂志,2024,41(6):535-538.
PING F F,WANG C Y,NIU M Y.Monitoring and analysis of occupational hazards in workplaces in Changzhi City in 2022[J].J Environ Health,2024,41(6):535-538.(in Chinese)
[15] 陈小霞,赵俊君,朱文刚.2019—2021年濮阳市工作场所职业病危害因素监测分析[J].实用预防医学,2024,31(3):324-329.
CHEN X X,ZHAO J J,ZHU W G.Monitoring on hazard factors for occupational diseases in workplaces of Puyang City,2019-2021[J].Pract Prev Med,2024,31(3):324-329.(in Chinese)
[16] 高尚,余朝彦,邱乐平.2023年四川省采矿业职业病危害因素监测结果分析[J].职业与健康,2025,41(8):1009-1013.
GAO S,YU C Y,QIU L P.Analysis of monitoring results of occupational hazards in mining industry in Sichuan Province in 2023[J].Occup Health,2025,41(8):1009-1013.(in Chinese)
[17] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.职业健康监护技术规范:GBZ 188—2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China.Technical specifications for occupational health surveillance:GBZ 188—2014[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2014.(in Chinese)
[18] 徐昭英,刘科,陈德超.2020—2022年自贡市大安区工作场所职业病危害因素监测结果分析[J].职业与健康,2024,40(14):1990-1993.
XU Z Y,LIU K,CHEN D C.Analysis on results of occupational hazard monitoring in workplace in Da'an District of Zigong City from 2020 to 2022[J].Occup Health,2024,40(14):1990-1993.(in Chinese)
[19] 蒋恩霏,王辉,杜利利,等.四川省制造业中小微企业职业病危害现状调查[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(18):3295-3299.
JIANG E F,WANG H,DU L L,et al.Investigation on occupational hazards in small and micro manufacturing enterprises in Sichuan Province[J].Mod Prev Med,2021,48(18):3295-3299.(in Chinese)
[1] 顾伟玲, 彭晗琪, 吕大兵, 富小飞, 亓云鹏, 谢亮, 向泽林. 2001—2024年嘉兴市血吸虫病和螺情监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 897-902.
[2] 陈绍云, 曹思静, 霍泳琦, 谷超男, 严新凤, 于传宁. 龙华区伤害病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(9): 950-954,958.
[3] 孙强, 黄颖, 李小勇, 杨晨迎, 王思嘉. 2014—2023年宁波市老年伤害病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(8): 822-826,831.
[4] 孙玲, 刘元青, 刘新光, 张楠, 温婵, 郝建宗, 李梅. 河北省某儿童医院住院患儿多重耐药菌耐药性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 616-621.
[5] 黄阳梅, 沈旭娟, 谢董颖, 张琦, 郑子聪, 王勐. 小学生体重监测信息反馈干预的效果评价[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(6): 541-545.
[6] 许荣全, 杜哲群, 余鹏飞, 沈国初, 胡洁, 张阳春. 嘉兴市13价肺炎球菌多糖结合疫苗疑似预防接种异常反应监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(5): 420-422,427.
[7] 陆飞越, 姚凤燕, 沈智健, 郭林杰. 平湖市非细菌性呼吸道感染病原学监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(3): 239-242.
[8] 冯小丽, 罗诗丽, 李衡, 李志浩, 黄泓轩, 陈汉青. 盐田区3~18岁学生校园伤害特征[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(12): 1073-1077.
[9] 蒋卓婧, 黄泽民, 王吉玲, 陈金堃. 呼吸道感染肠道病毒D68型病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 44-46.
[10] 李琳, 沈方力, 茅俭英, 尹纯礼, 朱三妹, 刘世友. 2013—2022年宝山区出生监测结果分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(1): 13-16.
[11] 张超, 罗小福, 刘艳, 沈建勇, 徐秦儿, 韩利萍, 马力. 湖州市老年人接种流感灭活疫苗疑似预防接种异常反应监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(8): 701-704.
[12] 马艳艳, 陈小劲, 赵月. 朝阳区3~6岁儿童体质健康调查[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 615-619.
[13] 徐杰, 陈棕棕, 骆水娟, 李欢龙. 富阳区市售食品食源性致病菌监测结果[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(7): 624-627.
[14] 潘晓东, 韩见龙, 陈苘. 鸡肉中多种抗生素超高效液相-静电场轨道阱高分辨质谱检测方法[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(5): 456-459.
[15] 赵冲, 施文文. 富阳区监测哨点医院急诊就诊伤害病例特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2023, 35(2): 155-157,161.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed