Please wait a minute...
文章检索
预防医学  2025, Vol. 37 Issue (1): 59-64    DOI: 10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.01.013
  疾病控制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
闵行区肺结核就诊延误、诊断延误和发现延误的影响因素分析
马琼锦, 严慧琴, 吴蕴华, 郭旭, 杨丽佳, 唐利红, 杨圣元
上海市闵行区疾病预防控制中心,上海 201101
Influencing factors for delay in healthcare-seeking, definitive diagnosis, identification in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Minhang District
MA Qiongjin, YAN Huiqin, WU Yunhua, GUO Xu, YANG Lijia, TANG Lihong, YANG Shengyuan
Minhang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201101, China
全文: PDF(880 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 分析上海市闵行区肺结核就诊延误、诊断延误和发现延误的影响因素,为有效减少肺结核病例延误提供依据。方法 通过中国疾病预防控制信息系统传染病报告信息管理系统收集2017—2022年闵行区肺结核病例资料,描述性分析肺结核就诊延误率、诊断延误率和发现延误率;采用多因素logistic回归模型分析肺结核就诊延误、诊断延误和发现延误的影响因素。结果 2017—2022年闵行区报告肺结核病例4 214例,男性2 802例,女性1 412例,男女比为1.98∶1。年龄以25~<45岁为主,1 664例占39.49%。肺结核就诊延误率为36.81%,诊断延误率为30.21%,发现延误率为38.09%。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,肺结核就诊延误与年份(2018年,OR=0.708;2019年,OR=0.549;2020年,OR=0.670;2021年,OR=0.682)、性别(女,OR=1.199)、职业(工人,OR=1.379;家政/家务/待业,OR=1.481)、病例发现方式(因症就诊,OR=11.159)和首诊医院级别(市级,OR=1.528)有关;诊断延误与年龄(45~<65岁,OR=1.476)、职业(商业服务人员,OR=0.687;家政/家务/待业,OR=0.672)、户籍(非本地,OR=0.820)、病例发现方式(因症就诊,OR=0.616)、病原学结果(阴性/未查,OR=1.903)和首诊医院级别(市级,OR=0.311)有关;发现延误与年份(2018年,OR=0.785;2019年,OR=0.647;2020年,OR=0.790;2021年,OR=0.710)、职业(商业服务人员,OR=0.687)、户籍(非本地,OR=0.848)和首诊医院级别(市级,OR=0.560)有关。结论 年份、性别、职业、病例发现方式和首诊医院级别是闵行区肺结核就诊延误的影响因素;年龄、职业、户籍、病例发现方式、病原学结果和首诊医院级别是诊断延误的影响因素;年份、职业、户籍和首诊医院级别是发现延误的影响因素。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马琼锦
严慧琴
吴蕴华
郭旭
杨丽佳
唐利红
杨圣元
关键词 肺结核就诊延误诊断延误发现延误影响因素    
AbstractObjective To investigate the influencing factors for delay in healthcare-seeking, definitive diagnosis and identification in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in Minhang District, Shanghai Municipality, so as to provide the basis for effectively reducing delay in PTB patients. Methods Data of PTB patients in Minhang District from 2017 to 2022 were collected from the Infectious Disease Reporting Information System of Chinese Disease Prevention and Control Information System. The prevalence rates of delay in healthcare-seeking, definitive diagnosis and identification were analyzed, and factors affecting delay in healthcare-seeking, definitive diagnosis and identification were identified using multivariable logistic regression models. Results A total of 4 214 PTB patients were reported in Minhang District from 2017 to 2022, including 2 802 males and 1 412 females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.98∶1. The majority of patients were aged 25 to <45 years (1 664 cases, 39.49%). The prevalence rates of delay in healthcare-seeking, definitive diagnosis and identification were 36.81%, 30.21% and 38.09%, respectively. Delay in healthcare-seeking was associated with the year (2018, OR=0.708; 2019, OR=0.549; 2020, OR=0.670; 2021, OR=0.682), gender (female, OR=1.199), occupation (worker, OR=1.379; housekeeping service/housework/unemployed, OR=1.481), case identification route (symptom-based consultation, OR=11.159), and level of the first-diagnosed hospital (city-level, OR=1.528). Delay in definitive diagnosis was associated with age (45 to <65 years, OR=1.476), occupation (commercial service, OR=0.687; housekeeping service/housework/unemployed, OR=0.672), household registration (non-local, OR=0.820), case identification route (symptom-based consultation, OR=0.616), pathogen test result (negative/not tested, OR=1.903), and the level of the first-diagnosed hospital (city-level, OR=0.311). Delay in identification was associated with the year (2018, OR=0.785; 2019, OR=0.647; 2020, OR=0.790; 2021, OR=0.710), occupation (commercial service, OR=0.687), household registration (non-local, OR=0.848) and level of the first-diagnosed hospital (city-level, OR=0.560). Conclusions Year, gender, occupation, case identification route and level of the first-diagnosed hospital are influencing factors for delay in healthcare-seeking in PTB patients. Age, occupation, household registration, case identification route, pathogen test result and level of the first-diagnosed hospital are influencing factors for delay in definitive diagnosis. Year, occupation, household registration and level of the first-diagnosed hospital are influencing factors for delay in identification.
Key wordspulmonary tuberculosis    delay in healthcare-seeking    delay in definitive diagnosis    delay in identification    influencing factor
收稿日期: 2024-07-19      修回日期: 2024-11-12      出版日期: 2025-01-10
中图分类号:  R521  
基金资助:闵行区自然科学研究课题(2022MHZ038)
作者简介: 马琼锦,硕士,副主任医师,主要从事结核病防制工作
通信作者: 杨圣元,E-mail:ysy.8@163.com   
引用本文:   
马琼锦, 严慧琴, 吴蕴华, 郭旭, 杨丽佳, 唐利红, 杨圣元. 闵行区肺结核就诊延误、诊断延误和发现延误的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 59-64.
MA Qiongjin, YAN Huiqin, WU Yunhua, GUO Xu, YANG Lijia, TANG Lihong, YANG Shengyuan. Influencing factors for delay in healthcare-seeking, definitive diagnosis, identification in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Minhang District. Preventive Medicine, 2025, 37(1): 59-64.
链接本文:  
http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2025.01.013      或      http://www.zjyfyxzz.com/CN/Y2025/V37/I1/59
[1] World Health Organization.Global tuberculosis report 2023[R].Geneva:WHO,2023.
[2] 王微. 基于结核病的流行趋势与防控[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(70):215-238.
WANG W.Epidemic trend and prevention and control of tuberculosis based on tuberculosis[J].World Latest Med Inf(Electron Version),2019,19(70):215-238.(in Chinese)
[3] 全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查技术指导组,全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查办公室.2010年全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查报告[J].中国防痨杂志,2012,34(8):485-508.
Technical Guidance Group of the Fifth National TB Epidemiological Survey,The Office of the Fifth National TB Epidemiological Survey.The fifth national tuberculosis epidemiological survey in 2010[J].Chin J Antituberc,2012,34(8):485-508.(in Chinese)
[4] 傅丽娟,汪业胜,朱文龙,等.湖州市2008—2018年肺结核患者就诊延迟情况及影响因素[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2021,25(2):235-239.
FU L J,WANG Y S,ZHU W L,et al.Consultation delay and influencing factors among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Huzhou City from 2008 to 2018[J].Chin J Dis Control Prev,2021,25(2):235-239.(in Chinese)
[5] 赵承杰,何雪姣.136例初治肺结核患者就诊延迟的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2017,29(12):1235-1237.
ZHAO C J,HE X J.Influencing factors of patient delay among 136 cases of newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients[J].China Prev Med J,2017,29(12):1235-1237.(in Chinese)
[6] 中华人民共和国卫生部结核病控制项目办公室.世界银行贷款中国结核病控制项目工作手册2版[M].北京:中华人民共和国卫生部结核病控制项目办公室,1995.
Tuberculosis Control Project Office of the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China.Manual for the World Bank Loan China Tuberculosis Control Project(2nd ed)[M].Beijing:Tuberculosis Control Project Office of the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China,1995.(in Chinese)
[7] 宋媛媛,李涛,夏辉,等.1997—2023年全国肺结核报告发病流行病学特征[J].中国防痨杂志,2024,46(10):1198-1208.
SONG Y Y,LI T,XIA H,et al.Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of national reported pulmonary tuberculosis incidence,1997-2023[J].Chin J Antituberc,2024,46(10):1198-1208.(in Chinese)
[8] 杨超,王晶,唐桂林.2012—2021年北京市通州区流动人口肺结核患者就诊延迟的变化趋势及影响因素分析[J].疾病监测,2023,38(9):1033-1038.
YANG C,WANG J,TANG G L.Analysis on trend of medical care seeking delay in pulmonary tuberculosis patients in floating population and influencing factors in Tongzhou District of Beijing,2012-2021[J].Dis Surveill,2023,38(9):1033-1038.(in Chinese)
[9] 刘旷怡,徐巧,葛木村,等.2008—2021年咸宁市肺结核病患者就诊延迟及影响因素分析[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2023,34(3):74-78.
LIU K Y,XU Q,GE M C,et al.Treatment delay and influencing factors of tuberculosis patients in Xianning from 2008 to 2021[J].J Pub Health Prev Med,2023,34(3):74-78.(in Chinese)
[10] 周芳静,冯慧莹,方兰君,等.2016—2020年广东省活动性肺结核患者发现延迟的变化趋势及影响因素分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2023,45(1):85-95.
ZHOU F J,FENG H Y,FANG L J,et al.Analysis on the trend and influencing factors of detection delay in patients with active tuberculosis in Guangdong Province from 2016 to 2020[J].Chin J Antituberc,2023,45(1):85-95.(in Chinese)
[11] 刘健雄,杜雨华,沈鸿程,等.2008—2018年广州市结核病患者诊断延误影响因素分析[J].中国防痨杂志,2021,43(1):80-86.
LIU J X,DU Y H,SHEN H C,et al.Influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis delay in Guangzhou,2008-2018[J].Chin J Antituberc,2021,43(1):80-86.(in Chinese)
[12] 李德洋,苏德奇,张为胜,等.乌鲁木齐市肺结核患者就诊、确诊、发现延迟的影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2020,32(11):1150-1154.
LI D Y,SU D Q,ZHANG W S,et al.Influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis patient,diagnosis,and detection delay in Urumqi City[J].China Prev Med J,2020,32(11):1150-1154.(in Chinese)
[13] CHEN X,DU L,WU R H,et al.Tuberculosis-related stigma and its determinants in Dalian,Northeast China:a cross-sectional study[J/OL].BMC Public Health,2021,21(1)[2024-11-12].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10055-2.
[14] WONDAWEK T M,ALI M M.Delay in treatment seeking and associated factors among suspected pulmonary tuberculosis patients in public health facilities of Adama town,Eastern Ethiopia[J/OL].BMC Public Health,2019,19(1)[2024-11-12].https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7886-7.
[15] ANIMUT Y,GODNO A B,NIGATU S G,et al.Delay in seeking treatment and associated factors among pulmonary tuberculosis patients attending public health facilities in the Metekel Zone,Benishangul Gumuz Region,Western Ethiopia[J/OL].Front Public Health,2024,12[2024-11-12].https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1356770.
[16] BATBAYAR B,KARIYA T,BOLDOO T,et al.Patient delay and health system delay of patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis in Mongolia,2016-2017[J].Nagoya J Med Sci,2022,84(2):339-351.
[1] 朱云娇, 顾昉, 孟佳, 李娟娟, 沈郁, 高雷. 中小学生校园欺凌及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 1-6.
[2] 方子健, 李清春, 谢立, 宋旭, 戴若骐, 吴亦斐, 贾庆军, 程庆林. 肺结核与糖尿病共病患者肺结核不良转归的城乡差异[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 7-11.
[3] 陈博, 王熙慧, 裘凤黔, 喻彦, 高淑娜, 何丽华, 李为翊, 纪云芳, 陈玮华. 0~3岁儿童安全座椅配备及使用情况调查[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 21-25.
[4] 李依窈, 李小菊, 申小颖, 张宪琦, 赵莉, 张玉涵, 汪欣梦. 老年人接种流行性感冒疫苗的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 31-35.
[5] 崔彩岩, 蒋骏, 王斐娴, 傅颖, 张晓龙. 2015—2023年苏州市学生肺结核时空分布特征[J]. 预防医学, 2025, 37(1): 77-81.
[6] 刘宇丹, 张彩云, 郭明媚, 郑宇娟, 贾铭, 杨佳乐, 侯嘉宁, 赵华. 慢性病共病患者服药依从性影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 790-795,800.
[7] 卢巧玲, 徐来潮, 张开漩. 绍兴市老年人群肺结核时空聚集性分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 760-763.
[8] 张文丽, 张丽, 胡在方, 周国伟, 胡洁. 北京市某区制造业工人抑郁、焦虑症状调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 796-800.
[9] 见明智, 鲁迪, 陈洁, 蒋婷婷. 绍兴市居民吸烟调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 817-820,824.
[10] 王婷婷, 汪剡灵, 杨玉婷, 王静夷, 陈潇潇. 台州市中学生心理健康素养调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(9): 821-824.
[11] 王思嘉, 包凯芳, 龚清海, 仲昭浩, 王永, 朱银潮, 应焱燕, 方挺, 陈洁平. 宁波市老年人跌倒的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 654-657,662.
[12] 吕阳, 乐博昕, 胡伟宏, 刘园, 陈昶, 刘效峰. 肺结核密切接触学生结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 658-662.
[13] 陈高尚, 朱凯强, 朱军礼, 李克. 金华市学生结核病病例发现延迟的影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 698-701.
[14] 张琳, 杜昕, 马煜, 刘依妮. 2016—2021年陕西省肺结核流行特征分析[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 706-709.
[15] 夏林, 何建敏, 宁惊鸣, 李毅琳. 东西湖区学龄前儿童家长伤害急救技能调查[J]. 预防医学, 2024, 36(8): 718-722.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed